Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Blogs Dr. O on New Money A hybrid strategy for tough times

Dr. O (a.k.a. Patrick O'Heffernan)
 

A hybrid strategy for tough times

Social entrepreneurs are exploring hybrids because begging is not a great business plan, especially now. Here are some ideas and resources for finding hybrid money.

 This ais not a great time to start a new organization, but if you approach it as a hybrid with an eventual sustainable revenue stream, you might be able to leverage hybrid's advantages and convince investors of your idea: The advantages are:

         Better financial stability – control your destiny

         Freedom from funding constraints  - no tied grants

         Ability to plow profits back into the mission

         Ability to pay real salaries and benefits

         Ability to access private capital – much more plentiful than grants

         Never have to beg for money (well, almost never)

 

Of course there are drawbacks to trying to start a social hybrid:

         Competition is not in most NPO leaders' blood and it may not be in yours

         Skill sets and mindsets are very different - you must think like a business leader, not a Executive Director

         You have to pay taxes on for-profit income and investors cannot take a tax deduction

          Your mission can push aside your business and eventually you can go out of business

         Non-hybrids can enter the same business and underprice and outcompete you because they don't have a mission to support

That being said, there are models you can use, such as the LLC, the  B-Corp and the new L3C legal model.  However, since hybrids often cannot offer ROI (return on investment)  sufficient for most investors in these models, you may need grant money to get started. The L3c model allows for some private capital, some grants and some patient capital from social investors who can take a lower profit margin or PRI funds from foundations.

Once you make the decision on which model to use, here are some actions to take to get started:

         Do due diligence.  Undertake careful research to determine:

        What business will you be in (very, very important!)

        Who is your market

        Where will your capital come from

        How will you operate

        Why is a hybrid better than a socially responsible company or an NPO

         Talk to your potential donors and investors to see if they agree and will support you

         Pick the best legal and understand the law governing the model you choose

       •         Work out the operationnal details and write a business plan

         Raise money

 

Since the last step is easier said than done, here are some resourses:

         Social Investment Forum http://www.socialinvest.org/

         Good money Directory http://www.goodmoney.com/directry.htm

         Community Re-investment Fund

http://www.crfusa.com/socialinvestors/Pages/ListofSocialInvestors.aspx

Innovation Exchange   http://innovation-exchange.org/about/social-investors/

         SVN – Social Venture Network

        Investors Circle

         Calvert Foundation  

         Skoll Foundation (yes, that's us)

         friends and family funds

         corporations that may have aninterest in your proudct or service - you cn ask for start-up money or exit money

 

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

comment on L3C's from an NPO attorney

Posted by Patrick O'Heffernan at May 07, 2009 11:12 PM

The big issues (with L3C's) are whether new federal laws or IRS guidance will be created that will ultimately determine the impact of the L3C. Otherwise, we have the quasi-equivalent of an LLC with self-imposed restrictions. IRS is seeing first returns this year. Foundations don’t seem to be increasing PRIs because of the new form (but declines due to the economy may hide any gains). Still, it’s a major step

P-CED model

Posted by Jeff Mowatt at Sep 04, 2009 12:20 PM
Patrick, one model missed from the above list is that which was described in the white paper for People-Centered Economic Developmemt. This is a for profit entity which invests at least 50% of surplus to provide social ROI and was presented to the Committee to re-elect the President in September 1996.

Over and above a social ROI, P-CED is based on the fundamental predicate that no person is disposable.

It was first applied in 1999 to source the Tomsk Regional Intiative in Russia and in 2004 was deployed as a software business in the UK, funding continued humanitarian engagement in Ukraine.

http://www.p-ced.com/about/history/