Entries For: July 2007
2007-07-27
The Wage Dilemma
The emotional task of deciding how much to pay local staff in underdeveloped, war-torn economies
“I think we’re blurring the line between being a strong organization that’s creating long-term impact and acting like a bunch of bleeding heart altruists.”
The conversation around the campfire in FORGE’s compound at Meheba Refugee Settlement,
We at FORGE maintain a standardized wage policy in each of our camps in order to ensure that our refugee staff is paid at a rate that is not only economically-fair but also consistent with the local economy and the rates paid by other NGOs. In doing so, we constantly walk the line between paying the high rates that are commensurate with what we believe that our staff deserve, but not paying such high rates that we disrupt the local economy, create tensions between the staff of other NGOs, and/or limit our ability to afford successful projects in the future.
Not surprisingly, we want to err on the side of paying too much. Our 100+ refugee staff are our greatest resource and, quite often, also among our greatest friends. Even the ‘richest’ ones make so little as it is – a salary of $75 a month is almost unheard of in the camps. Why shouldn’t we be paying them as much as we possibly can?
The problem arises when we move to define “how much we possibly can.” All of our projects have different budgets. Some can afford to pay much higher salaries than others, some cannot. Paying too high of salaries now could deter future projects from being financially feasible, and decrease remaining budgets available to go towards the project’s goals. And of course, there is always the trade-off between paying more to your existing employees and providing more employment opportunities by hiring new staff at the existing salary rate.
How does one determine a fair wage rate in a vastly undeveloped economy, where people are willing to work for salaries that do not allow them to support their family? Already we pay more than the other NGOs in Meheba, and that fact is visible in the way our staff have become, for better or for worse, somewhat of the ‘upper crust’ of the community – a fact that is visible in the quality of their diets, their clothes, and their children’s educations. But even still, very few of our staff would ever be able to afford university on their salaries, and many would not be able to cover the costs of a major illness in their family. So while we’re very generous, circumstances are very limiting.
In the end, FORGE does not exist to be an employment agency. We exist to create results for the greater refugee community – in both the short term and long term. We are fortunate enough to be able to change the lives of our individual employees at the same time – by empowering them both financially and psychologically. But when we make decisions about how we are going to spend our limited funds, we have to make them based on the greatest impact we can create through our projects and programs. This of course means treating and compensating our staff as the invaluable partners that they are, while retaining our focus on the project’s impact.
There is no question that many of us are naturally bleeding hearts. What makes FORGE strong is our ability to harness the energy of this blood, transform it into sweat, and then to structure our efforts in such a way that our personal attachments and relationships are motivators but not distractors from long-impact of the greater movement.
2007-07-17
Healing Wounds with Cans of Paint
My first taste of "The Aftermath" - war, welcome, and staring out the window
2007-07-08
Journey to DR Congo
What happens when refugees go home?
"And what happens when the war ends and they return to their home country?"
People often ask me this question when I discuss the lives of refugees. Whether they’re probing for results or compassionately wondering, people want to know exactly what happens when refugees' time in a refugee camp ends.
This year, FORGE will experience many of the answers to that question full-scale. A year after the successful, democratic election of DR Congo’s President Joseph Kabila, fighting has died down, the nation has begun to stabilize, and 40,000 Congolese refugees in Zambia are expected to return home.
The first convoys to leave have blended strong sentiments of excitement and fear. Wide smiles have been met by equally-wide frightened stares.
“They tell us we’re returning home, but we don’t know where home is.”
The Congolese refugees of Kala and Mwange camps have been in Zambia for about eight years. Their general strong will and enterprising spirit have helped develop bustling communities where there were previously none. In relationship to FORGE, the communities of Kala and Mwange have taken a hold of, utilized, and stretched every resource and opportunity we’ve worked to provide. They’re as much or more to credit for FORGE’s immense success as any western staff.
This is why we take it very seriously when the refugees implore us to join them in DR Congo, setting up FORGE operations in their permanent communities.
“The educational opportunities you bring us are worth more than any amount of money,” said Antoine Ngeleka, who I profiled in one of my previous blogs.
In that spirit, I’m about to embark on an exploratory mission into Congo. With fifty bottles of water and three hundred liters of diesel strapped to our Landcruiser, we’ll follow the same route taken by repatriating refugees: Kawambwa to Pweto, Pweto to Moba.
I doubt it matches theirs, but I have similar feelings of anticipation and trepidation, as do the refugees. How is the road? Is there food and clean water? Where can we stay? Will we be safe? Can we work in DR Congo? Will the communities want us?
You’ll hear from me soon.
2007-07-05
Reflection Point
(Due to lack of internet preventing timely blog posting, this entry is from June 30th, 2007)
The Risktakers
(Due to lack of internet which prevented timely blog posting, this entry is from June 25th, 2007)
In my first post, I wrote about how the first people to sign on to FORGE’s mission and to support its creation were ultimately the people most critical to its success.
These founding members are a special breed – they must have a unique ability to conceptualize a better world and an incredible zeal to pursue it. They can taste the flavors of the world they want to live in, and they will work tirelessly to gather the ingredients and write the recipe necessary to create it. They are visionaries, yes, but more importantly they are risk-takers, ready to sacrifice and take chances for the sake of what they believe life should be.
Last week, the world lost one of these special people. Eric Tang was 25 years old when he lost his life jumping off a waterfall in Mexico, 2 months into a long-awaited year-long trek around Latin America.
Eric was special to FORGE because he was amongst the first few to commit to the vision, not only as a founding member but also as the force behind our first major initiative, the Meheba Friendly Library, which continues to serve thousands of refugees and Zambians each year.
But Eric was special to everything he touched because he was of that rare breed that consistently combine clarity of vision with swiftness of action, injecting new life into existing movements and sparking new movements along the way. Eric’s work with the Clean Money Campaign, Micro-finance initiatives, and African refugees will not soon be forgotten, nor will the thousands of other ways in which he touched people’s lives through infectious energy and zest for life.
In Eric’s spirit, I’d like to honor here the people who, like him, played a grand and critical role in the founding year of FORGE. So, to Taylor Ahlgreen, Naomi Gleit, Brandon Cohen, Christian Baxter, Eugenio Lopez, Karen & Joel Erickson, and other – THANK YOU. Like Eric’s, your spirit and work will remain indelible.







