Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Blogs Kiva Chronicles Moral Hazard with Ducks

Moral Hazard with Ducks

MFIs around the globe are being asked to provide "more than credit" to their clients.  Funders and industry skeptics, more than ever, question the value in just providing banking services to the poor.  I'm not writing here to weigh in on the veracity of that critique.  However, today I got some insight into the difficulty MFIs face in mixing mentoring with credit. 

I sat down with the General Manager of an amazing MFI here in Phnom Penh.  I posed the question in the form of a challenge. 

"Do you provide mentoring to the poor, or *just* banking services?"  I asked. 

He looked slightly troubled in replying that they do not discriminate between business activities and do not advise about the success or failure of a particular business venture.  

A few years ago, they used to encourage borrowers to pursue certain business niches when there was a perceived opportunity.  In one village, a credit officer advised a woman to get into the duck raising business, a particularly profitable one at the time.  Duck is quite a specialty in Cambodia.  The woman used her entire loan to purchase ducklings.  A few months later, the ducks got sick and quickly died.  Out of luck, the woman had little chance to repay.  At the advice of the credit officer, she gambled away one of her only chances to lift herself out of poverty.  

The credit officer was devastated, the woman protested, and the MFI forgave her loan repayment.  Since that time, they have stayed out of the mentoring business and leave that to a separate NGO in the region.  The story illustrates one of the dangers in providing both advice and credit tied to that advice.  Not to say that MFIs shouldn't be mentors, but I thought the story illustrated a tension I hadn't pondered before. 

Grameen bank

Posted by Bhalchander Vishwanath at May 11, 2009 09:01 AM

Hi Matt...Greetings !! .. A very interesting post. I recollect reading something similar in Banker to the poor. At Grameen bank their credit officers are trained to handle requests from entrepreneurs who ask for business ideas. The credit officer's reply goes somewhat like this: Grameen bank does not have any business ideas. If Grameen bank had business ideas, we would have ourselves started the business. We have money to lend and if you have a business idea, we can lend you money.

Partnership is the way forward.

Posted by Daniel Mayhugh at May 11, 2009 09:01 AM

I'm definitely not an expert, but from my limited knowledge I would agree that MFI's shouldn't provide investment counseling for the following reasons. 1. When you become emotionally involved with a client, it's very difficult to stick to rigid policies. And if MFI's don't follow their policies they get into problems. 2. Generally, NGO's (community based...especially religious based) and MFI's have 2 types of culture/perspective. MFI's wants the loan repaid so that they can continue to help more people out of poverty. NGO's want to help an individual get out of poverty. Even if a loan or 2 can't be repaid. (I'm not trying to make a judgment call on who cares more, I'm just reflecting on my observation of 2 distinct organizational cultures. I'm sure there could be exceptions.)

I have seen one MFI in the Philippines that is striving to provide business/wealth education classes to it's members. I can easily see that model working for many larger more established MFI's. Whether an MFI chooses to include education as part of it's service, or not, MFI's would be smart in forming close partnerships with NGO's that are actively involved in their areas. However, this is easier said than done. I work for an NGO that would love to partner with an MFI, because we've realized as an organization that we can't do livelihood development very well. We've tried to form partnerships with MFI's but have so far been unsuccessful. The reason? I'm not sure. Time, money? I'm still hopeful though. Sorry for the long post. :)

Why Not an Equity Model?

Posted by Tony Wang at May 11, 2009 09:01 AM

Hi Matt,

I think the moral hazard problem is an interesting and important one, especially since MFIs give out loans. If you expect someone to repay a loan and you gave bad advice, there is definitely some bitterness of "Why should I have to repay this loan since you gave me bad advice?"

But I think an equity model might offer something different and addresses the moral hazard issue. If the MFI and the person who takes the loan are both invested in the enterprise, both the MFI and the person have an incentive for the business doing really well. Thus, it solves the problem that the MFI may give bad advice, since it has an incentive not to, and the person who asks for equity is not asked to take upon the entire risk of the enterprise.

Cheers, Tony

Risk

Posted by John Kantor at May 11, 2009 09:01 AM

It wasn't bad advice. It was a normal risk of doing business.

If you run microfinance operations as a normal moneymaking business, then success or failure are the responsibility of the client. If you want to be a social entrepreneur, then you have to run it like a micro venture capitalist and accept the risk yourself.