Document Actions
Funding
Feb 26, 2009
Open Source Giving
Hosted by Tom Watson, consultant and author of CauseWired (March 2009)
Online social activism - what I call the CauseWired sector - is rapidly coming of age. Innovative web tools, online story-telling, and social media are more often than not at the center of the modern social enterprise, and not on the edges. The reason is simple and compelling: gathering people online is easier, less costly, and in many cases more effective in building support and creating real movements.
The growth of wired social causes is also generational. The group of young activists who grew up in the wired developed world is naturally adept in using social/digital platforms to pursue societal change on the global commons - whether it's through NGOs, social ventures, advocacy movements, corporate networks, or democratic politics. One of the most fascinating aspects of this trend is the rapid growth of new social ventures - online startups (both non-profit and for-profit) that build networks to change the world. Organizations like Kiva, DonorsChoose, GlobalGiving, Change.org, MyC4, Zazengo, Razoo and dozens of others tackle the world's challenges in education, poverty, intolerance, climate change and almost every issue in society.
So how does this movement, this explosion in wired social ventures, change the web?
I ask this question specifically because of a contest organized by Social Actions, itself a social venture/startup and the clearinghouse for tens of thousands of opportunities to give, organize, volunteer and get involved in wired causes. Social Actions's Change the Web contest challenges developers and entrepreneurs to use its database of more than 70,000 actions across more than 40 'CauseWired' platforms in interesting and innovative ways - to build widgets, to distribute the data to key audiences, to parse searches in ways that encourage open source giving.
But an important part of the Change the Web effort is the dialogue around just how the web is changing, and how socially-wired it will be in the future. So this conversation aims to advance that conversation.
At the Skoll World Forum, I'll be moderating a panel with three experts in online social activism: Premal Shah of Kiva, Mari Kuraishi of GlobalGiving, and Mads Kjaer of MyC4. Rather than the standard pre-forum conference call, we'd like to do our panel planning in public - in this forum, and centered around the theme of changing the web.
Here are four questions to start off the conversation - but feel free to ask your own:
• How open source philanthropy can support social entrepreneurs?
• Does linking thousands of people directly to, say, microfinance and other social ventures help those efforts - and how does it change them?
• What kinds of online tools or techniques or databases still need to be developed to make open source giving more effective?
• Does grassroots organizing and fundraising lend more credence to the causes these activities support?
My book CauseWired: Plugging In, Getting Involved, Changing the World (Wiley, 2008) asked this question in the final chapter: "Will online social activism unleash a golden age for causes - for philanthropy, for activism, for citizen engagement?" I don't know the answer - but I'm hoping that the Social Edge community can talk it over, suggest some great resources, and have a conversation right here that adds to our knowledge and understanding.
Feb 10, 2009
Issue Fatigue – Fighting for Attention and Funds in an Aware World
Hosted by Jill Finlayson and Hildy Gottlieb (February 2009)
Are you changing your lightbulbs? Driving less? Exercising more? Are you voting for the best social entrepreneur idea? Joining a cause? Signing a petition? Are you blogging and twittering to raise awareness? Loaning money to people in emerging markets? Feeding the homeless, donating new pajamas to foster kids, and giving toys to tots? Are you saving the rainforests one candybar at time and providing clean water one bottle at a time? Are you recycling, composting, reusing? Are you bringing your own shopping bags and your own coffee cup? Are you shopping ethically? Sustainably? Organicly? Locally?
Aren't you tired?
Are you trying to raise funds from all these exhausted people who just don’t have the bandwidth to be concerned about one more issue?
It’s more than donor fatigue, where people no longer give because they are tired of fundraising solicitations. It’s bigger. It’s issue fatigue.
Why might awareness be increasing but support waning? There are four main factors.
- It’s the economy. With the disappearing grants, dwindling corporate support, and declining donations, fundraising confidence is at 10 year low with more than 93 percent of fundraisers saying the economy is having a negative impact on fundraising. There is less money and more need.
- It’s the number of nonprofits. With more than 1.5 million in the U.S. alone (up about half a million in the past four years), and new people starting nonprofits, appeals are up and competition for discretionary funds is greater.
- It’s the awareness. With Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth and global leaders speaking out, people believe they need to change their habits to save the world. We have reached a tipping point in public understanding of climate change and many other issues.
- It’s the internet. With so many more ways for people to help and ways for nonprofits to reach supporters, it is no longer just direct mail. People can help their favorite nonprofits by nominating, voting, joining, sharing, evangelizing, blogging, petitioning, auctioning, gifting, loaning, and making small changes, taking small actions.
Despite greater means of reaching potential supporters, co-host Hildy Gottlieb, author and President of the Community-Driven Institute, argues in her blog that Social Media Fundraising is
a) not sustainable
b) scarcity-based vs. strength-based
c) counterproductive if we want to create a better future for our communities
So in the face of these opportunities and challenges, how do nonprofits filter through the clutter and competition and build sustainable support ?
Join Jill Finlayson and Hildy Gottlieb as they pose the following questions:
- How do you keep people from being paralyzed and overwhelmed?
- Does bite-sizing social actions make people more or less likely to participate?
- How do you engage people and enable them to help, without burdening them?
- What role does geography play? They say people tend to give where they live. Has that changed with the internet?
- How can your call for support make it through the barrage of information out there?
- Who can help “triage” the need for support and ways of helping, and provide matching to help connect donors and causes?
Aug 19, 2008
Where is the Money?
Hosted by Hernan Pisano (October 2008)
AN ECONOMIST'S ANATOMY OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUNDINGThree clusters can be identified in the for-profit to non-profit funding continuum:
- Business as usual
Globalization and technology increased the purchasing power of a significant amount of people at the “Base of the pyramid” making them a viable market. Return-seeking organizations and financiers acknowledged this and have poured organizational and financial resources into these markets. Economic agents (Social entrepreneurs?) access the capital markets in Wall Street with a not-so-novel pitch: returns. Funds operating in this environment are by definition, self sustainable. “Social entrepreneurs” operating in this cluster, are simply…entrepreneurs. Serving products to emerging social classes was the basis of fortunes of the Procter and Gamble, Ford and other “consumer” brands in the last century. Banco Compartamos, and Accion International are paradigmatic cases in this arena.
- Philanthropy as usual
Philanthropic organizations with no returns expectations work in environments where markets are inexistent and/or the population destitute –e.g. war or ecological crisis zones, endemic poverty, mental illness populations, child protection-. No returns can be expected and funding for these initiatives is mostly driven by multilateral organizations, governments, big donors. Paradoxically, funding for these initiatives has a positive correlation with wealth accumulation: the richer the wealthy become, the more they donate.
- Business as usual?
As philanthropic capital injections in machinery and human resources increase productivity, markets begin to operate and below-market returns can be made. Funds chartered to expect below market returns in exchange for “impact” (what is impact is something widely discussed.) operate in this area. At this point, Social Entrepreneurs might have a competitive advantage against classical NGO’s as they might offer returns (to be reinvested –multiplying the impact- or distributed as dividends.), but they cannot access Wall Street. This is NOT a self sustainable financing as it depends on being subsidized by philanthropist willing to trade profits for “impact”
The financing choices for social entrepreneurs are:
- (a) to be financed by the formal Capital Markets if they can offer competitive returns. Financing for initiatives on this arena depends on the economic development and markets existence in prior discounted areas
- (b) if they cannot offer market returns, social entrepreneurs must “hit” the philanthropic arena and compete for funding with classic philanthropy on the basis of being a more efficient (more impact and/or returns) capital allocation method.
Questions to ponder:
1. Who are those funds looking for below market returns?
2. Where are those funds working at the BoP, but looking for market returns?
3. How much do they invest?
4. Is this a growing asset-class market?
Join investment expert Hernan Pisano in the conversation.
Jun 26, 2008
New Model for Angel Investment
Hosted by Jessica Margolin (August 2008)
When entrepreneurs start a social venture, they are immediately in conflict: A social venture develops social connectedness, intellectual resources and skills, creative expression, personal health, a safer and cleaner environment. But most equity investors measure their own success by financial returns, thus the social enterprise must also meet financial expectations. When setting course, social entrepreneurs may be immediately caught between a rock and a hard place.
Microfinance has emerged as a solution by providing debt, which changes the expectation of risk, thus of returns. Microfinance manages risk through its small scale and other methods. Yet social enterprises, particularly in developed countries, often require an investment scale that microfinance can't address.
But a hybrid is possible.
An example of such hybridizing is what Marc Dangeard is building with the Entrepreneur Commons, which is explained on his blog as follows:
Interestingly enough this hybrid model may also help angels and other investors improve their return on capital: Marc relays that a study of over 1,300 VC and PE firms worldwide shows that the returns they bring on average is 3% below the S&P 500 (after fees; 3% above, before fees). So market rates are actually competitive returns, and investors receive steady revenue stream of debt repayments for the lifetime of Entrepreneur Commons, instead of the feast-or-famine of funding rounds and exits.
So the Entrepreneur Commons is an insightful way to solve the problems of
• providing seed capital for social ventures that facilitates non-financial asset building
• providing financially competitive market returns for investors
• providing liquidity for investors.
Questions:
• Do you know of other mechanisms that address all of these issues at once?
• If you are yourself an Entrepreneur or an angel or other type of investor, have you seen these dynamics yourself?
• Have you seen them resolved?
Join Jessica Margolin in the conversation.
Sep 10, 2007
Skoll Awards for Social Entrepreneurship 2008
Hosted by Bridget McNamer (September 2008)
The online application process for the Skoll Awards for Social Entrepreneurship is now open.Although the Skoll Foundation is now accepting applications and granting Awards on a year-round basis, to be considered for funding in advance of the 2008 Skoll World Forum, applicants should submit an Online Application no later than September 24, 2007.
The Skoll Awards for Social Entrepreneurship are designed to support and celebrate social entrepreneurs whose work has the potential for large-scale impact on the critical challenges of our time:
- Tolerance and human rights
- Health
- Environmental sustainability
- Peace and security
- Institutional responsibility
- Economic and social equity.
The Award includes funding to the organization of up to U.S. $1 million paid over three years for core support and an award (non-cash) to the social entrepreneur leading the organization’s work at the Skoll World Forum on Social Entrepreneurship taking place late March at the University of Oxford.
The selection process is highly competitive, with 10-12 Awards in each twelve-month cycle.
There are three changes in how the program is now administered:
- The Skoll Foundation is now accepting applications and awarding funding on a year-round basis.
- All applicants will need to complete an Eligibility Quiz in order to proceed to the Online Application.
- Starting in August 2007 applicants who are not selected must wait 24 months (from application date) before reapplying.
Again, to be considered for funding in advance of the 2008 Skoll World Forum, applicants must submit an Online Application no later than September 24, 2007.
Bridget McNamer, Program Officer with the Skoll Foundation, is online to help you better understand the process. Feel free to ask her any questions you may have about the Skoll Awards for Social Entrepreneurship.
Jul 25, 2007
The Social Entrepreneur's Pitch
Hosted by Patrick O’Heffernan (August 2007)
Making the Case in Five Minutes or Less.You finally got the meeting with an investor / program officer but as you set up your carefully crafted 15 minute-long PowerPoint presentation, she tells you something has come up and she only has five minutes. What do you do?
First, plan for it.
The standard pitch is usually 15 minutes – often on a PowerPoint - plus 15 minutes of questions. Have that ready, but come equipped with the 5 minute version.
Second, don't rush.
Being cool under pressure is a quiet way of telling the investor you can handle the pressure – without using up any words or minutes to say so. So resist the urge to skip the digital projector, turn around you laptop to face the investor, and rush through the 15 minute PowerPoint in five minutes. It won't work and it will be a mess.
Third, don't rely on your computer.
If you have 15 minutes, a projector and a screen, great – use them. But for the elevator pitch, always have a paper back-up, either in a ring binder or flip book that you can pull out and flip through. That way, you don't waste time scrolling through files to find the right one, or risk to have your computer battery die on you or your software crash, or have a screen pop up with all of the emails you sent to other investors. And have the pitch memorized in case you are actually standing in an elevator and can't show her the flip book.
Writing the pitch itself
Thinking on PowerPoint works best for presentations, especially elevator pitches. Try to condense the entire pitch into a single slide with the following information presented in full short sentences:
• A "bumper sticker" length title that sums the project up in 2 - 12 words
• Short statement of the idea and what it does
• Short statement of why this is unique.
• Short statement of the market or the population served
• Short statement of the cost and the status
• Statement of what you need and the terms
Example (this is a hypothetical product – it does not exist!!):
- Power to Pump – innovation brings water, electricity and income
- Lightweight, very high power water pump, works on solar or wind power, generates excess electricity for lighting. Technology licensed to local entrepreneurs who share electricity revenue with Power to Pump, a social venture.
- A high tech, low cost solution to drought and power shortages that can create small, village-level businesses, while self-financing its own distribution. Can be built in any country for a few dollars.
- Patented design licensed to village entrepreneurs for a small percentage of their income from selling electricity. License fees are used to support the non-profit, and to finance wider distribution.
- Simple design and construction will allow PtP to spread worldwide, raising living standards.
- Grant of $100,000 over one year requested to manufacture 10 demonstration pumps, create construction manuals in local languages and formats, send staff to help start local pump/power businesses in Kenya, Darfur and Ethiopia.
Next, do one slide with three bullet points on each of these points, giving details and references. You now have a very tight 10-slide presentation (plus title slide). Assuming 30 seconds a slide you have a 5 minute presentation, and you have the basic outline for your longer 15 minute presentation.
Memorize the five-minute presentation so you can talk it through without the slides if you have to, print it out and put it in a flip book or thin, lightweight 3-hole punch ( or 4 or 5 holes for non-US versions), and you should be ready for anything.
Add to this toolbox and join Patrick O’Heffernan in the conversation.
Jun 27, 2007
International Fundraising
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (July 2007)
political sensitivity and creativity. The sources are highly varied and complex and can be influenced by global or local politics. Many, but no means all, global donors operate in English, so a knowledge of other UN languages is very useful and for some grants, necessary.
Travel ability is also necessary. Meeting staff at the World Bank, the Danish development agency, the Asian or African Development Bank is very useful.
Attending global donor conferences like the Global Philanthropy Forum, or issue conferences on HIV, poverty, women's rights, agriculture development, etc. is also highly valuable to make connections.
International fund raising requires three basic tools in your toolbox:
1. A copy of International Fund Raising for Not-for-Profits: A Country-by-Country Profile by Thomas Harris. This encyclopedic guide is almost as long as a Harry Potter book, but it is the most comprehensive reference available about donors, tax and regulatory systems, not-for-profit sectors, and acceptable fund-raising methods in most countries. Online search can also turn up this kind of information, but all of the facts and context has been assembled in a very easy to search and use volume.
2. Knowledge of multilateral donor agencies. These IGO's (intergovernmental organizations) are key funders that distribute funds for regional development projects. Examples include the African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (AsDB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), European Commission (EC), European Investment Bank (EIB), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Multilateral donor agencies can be searched at the Information Exchange at the First Initiatives website. Some agencies and foundations work together on specific kinds of projects. A good example of this is the list of agencies that collaborate to support agriculture for developing countries through Farm Radio.
3. Knowledge of national governments' funding agencies. Some of the information needed for approaching national governments, such as England, Germany or Denmark - which all fund global NGO's - can be found in International Fund Raising for Not-for-Profits. There are also specialized websites for deeper information, such as Euromedalex, which lists donors to the Mediterranean region. One of the best sources of information is Information Exchange.
To add to this toolbox and tell us your story of global fund raising, click here.
Online Donor Databases
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (July 2007)
Fundraisers do most of their individual prospect research online. Patrick O’Heffernan shows you the pros, the cons and the costs.Fundraisers researching US donors often start with newspaper websites, where they can search for current or archived information on individuals. News sources can provide very good personal details, but only a very small percentage of prospects will be available. Cost ranges from free to a very small fee per search.
Biographical sites like Marquis' Who's Who in America are very good sources of biographical information on prospects, but they can cost more than US$1,000 a year, a significant expense for most small social ventures.
More specific biographical websites offered by Internet Prospector are free, but more limited in scope. They include African Americans in Biography and Women in Biography. Celebrity information can be found on the free site Celebrity Fan Mail. These sites are free and can have very useful information, but they are quite narrow and have small databases.
A few commercial search services, like Lexis-Nexis, search US publications for prospect information. They are very powerful and can return critical financial and biographical data very quickly, along with news and feature stories, but they are also quite expensive, with annual costs running in the thousands of dollars for a single license restricted to one person or one computer per organization.
Multiple-source search is a very powerful category of search websites that research prospects through tens or hundreds of public and private databases. These sites can return information on home ownership, stock holdings and recent sales, donations to non-profits and political campaigns, board memberships and personal biography. They range in price from the very reasonable NozaSearch, which charges a very small fee for each name searched, to sites that charge an annual fee such as WealthEngine or WealthPoint, which can cost several hundreds to well over a thousand dollars per year depending on features and use. These sites are invaluable –a critical necessity for major gifts fund raising. They give you the information needed to qualify a prospect and to tailor your solicitation, but, with the exception of NozaSearch, they can be quite expensive and you pay regardless of how much you use them.
Please join Patrick O'Heffernan the conversation and let us know of your favorite source that we missed.
Mar 12, 2007
Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained
Hosted by Jed Emerson, Timothy Freundlich and Jim Fruchterman (March 2007)
Over recent years many entrepreneurs have responded to the siren call of launching a new venture to advance social value, while incorporating strong and sustainable financial models. These entrepreneurs, whether operating nonprofit or for-profit corporations, are often able to secure early stage funding to test their vision, experiment with new business models and create an organization with the potential to generate real value for investor and stakeholder alike. Social enterprise ventures run the gamut of organizational types, approaches, strategies and forms. Once many of these organizations have achieved success at one scale, what they require are funds similar to second round or the “mezzanine funding” found in traditional for-profit, venture investing. Yet, almost all of these social entrepreneurs share one thing in common: they lack access to risk-taking expansion capital.
If this were due to an appropriate competitive scarcity, where vying best-in-class social enterprises won critical expansion capital through a meritocracy of well-ordered capital markets, then this might be a good thing. But, that is not why we lack the required capital. Social ventures lack access to capital because there are literally almost no institutional, professionalized and at-scale sources of expansion capital for social enterprise.
The problem is that for-profits with strong social missions often don’t qualify for investment within the conventional capital markets and nonprofits with commercial or market enterprise characteristics don’t have access to significant amounts or appropriately structured capital in the philanthropic capital markets.
This creates what is an untenable, and surely bizarre situation: high-performing organizations with demonstrated potential go un-funded, and mission-motivated financiers who could well be willing to integrate extra-financial performance into their understanding of returns, are left scratching their heads as to why they can’t seem to make the numbers square on deals too large for grant funds, but without corporate structure or market rate returns to support private equity investments.
In the end we see wasted time, and market moments lost which could mean success to the venture and the creation of a better world. Considering the level of nuance humans exhibit in almost all others areas of existence in terms of blending value, it is frustrating to those in the social enterprise trenches that our binary, two-pocket market wisdom is so ill-suited to the task at hand.
We hope this discussion and the larger paper form something of a manifesto, a challenge to investors and entrepreneurs to step into an evolutionary stance and begin to form a higher functioning social capital market.
To that end, a two-sided question emerges for your consideration:
• In order for it to be of use to entrepreneurs, what does this type of expansion capital need to look like?
• From a blended value investor or other capital provider perspective, what is required for larger flows of risk capital to be provided in this market?
Join Jed Emerson, Timothy Freundlich and Jim Fruchterman in the conversation.
Jan 26, 2007
Debt Financing for NPOs - Part 2
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (January 2007)
The response to my previous events about the Robert Steiner Foundation and loans for NPOs inspired me to do more research into the world of non-profit banking/credit for NPOs. The results were enlightening, but not especially exciting.
In the U.S., many for-profit banks offer services branded as "non-profit," which usually turn out to be their regular institutional services like credit cards, investment management, etc., slightly repositioned or rebranded for NPOs, but non significantly different from what businesses and individuals can get.
Some banks do actually tailor services to NPOs and train their staff in the finances of NPOs, but for the most part, this is limited to cash management, checking and other non-loan services, and these are marketed to colleges, hospitals, and private schools.
A few banks have created financing specifically for NPOs. The East West Bank of Pasadena (in California) offers financing for NPOs in the form of real estate loans, purchase/refinance, equipment financing, revolving lines of credit to bridge working capital needs.
Not-for-profit banks not in the international microfinance business are still an anomaly, as far as I can tell. The only one I could find is the Street Bank, launched a few years ago in the UK, which lends money to unemployed people to start small businesses. The Street Bank has been testing this concept for a year in East London, lending money to 110 people.
Based on this research, I can say that there is a ripe opportunity for social entrepreneurs. The for-profit financial sector sees NPOs mostly as a market segment and prefers to work with large semi-business non-profit institutions like colleges, schools and hospitals that have independent revenue sources and large capital or real estate assets that can collateralize loans. Most of the loans these clients receive in fact vary little from loans provided to for-profit entities.
Financing for NPOs that rely on grant funds and that do not hold significant assets that can be used for collateral are limited to very small personal loans, credit card advances, and co-signed loans. Outside of the microcredit world and the Rudolf Steiner Foundation, few banks will make loans based on grant letters and I could only find one (the East West Bank in Pasadena, California) that would make loans based on signature.
What has been your experience? Click here and join the conversation.
Timothy Freundlich - Jan 23, 2007 3:21 pm (# Total: 14) Director, Strategic Development, Calvert Social Investment Foundation and Founding Principal, Good Capital, LLC
Nonprofit Finance Fund ( http://www.nonprofitfinancefund.org/ ) and Calvert Social Investment Foundation ( http://www.calvertfoundation.org ), in addition to RSF, have been in the business of loans to nonprofit enterprise for awhile. We are $5m into a $10m social enterprise specific slice of lending at Calvert Foundation as we speak, and actively considering new deals (see attached for profile and how-tos).
One thing I've been working on of late is a new risk capital fund for "equity-like" expansion funding, to your point of lack of collateral backing for growth infusions of investment. If there's a gap for loans to nonprofit enterprises, there is a GRAND CANYON for risk taking burn capital! There's info at http://www.goodcap.net on this.
Best, Tim Freundlich
Calvert Foundation, Good Capital and http://www.xigi.net
|
Attachments: |
SEborrowerbrochure.pdf (189 KB) |
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 23, 2007 5:09 pm (# Total: 14) Perhaps we can jointly assemble a list. thanks very much
For the little guy, NPO funding is a drag. We often don’t fit the security blanket needed for mainstream foundations. Nor do we have the big celebrity board of directors to bank roll our visions. Any yet, like Tomas Edison, most innovations come from the fringes, not the conservative center.
I have run a small NPO for fifteen years. Recently I created a for profit social venture corporation to develop a revolutionary line of educational products for parents and early childcare providers. (over 65 million parents supported by 45,000 licensed providers in CA alone.) This subscription based produce line is distributed via NPOs, <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">United Way</st1:address></st1:Street>, the YMCA and other existing networks who are already serving parents and providers. NPO distributors receive a wholesale discount which represents approximately 40% of net. The remaining 60% is returned to social venture investors, who have the option of hanging on to the stock or designating their equity to other charities as did Paul Newman. We are in the pilot phase, doing very well, and expect a 1.5m investment to generate 6m to 7m (split 60/40 as described above) in five years. Any suggestions on innovative strategies for the initial 1.5M?
Michael Mendizza
A few other relevant examples engaged in different types of lending to NPOs:
tutormentor - Jan 27, 2007 7:16 am (# Total: 14) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
In a book titled "Good to Great and the Social Secto", Jim Collins talks about a flywheel effect of constant growth that leads organizations to become good, then great.
In a variety of articles under the heading of "challenges facing non profits" writers show how the inconsistent way that philanthropy and government funds social benefit organizations reduces the ability many of these organizations have to grow to be good, let alone great. These links are at:
Since 2000 many charities have gone out of business because of the sudden loss of revenue due to lower giving by business and foundations, and many, like my own, have taken on debt ( credit cards, personal loans, etc.) in order to stay in business or maintain continuity in key services.
Thus, if some billionare decides to set up a bank that would provide bridge funds/loans to help non profits cover cash flow fluctuations, or to bridge the times when funding drops due to unexpected events such as 9/11, or due to sudden crashes in the economy, such a fund could do much to help many more organizations stablize revenue, and thus stablize staffing, program growth, and social benefit.
The few groups I've investigated for loans, do not fund debt, but will fund capital improvements. As a leader of a small non profit ($350k-$450k annually), I'm not in need of capital investments, but of this more fluid form of support.
Do any of you know of such financing?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 29, 2007 8:32 am (# Total: 14) Is the main mission of socialling rsponsible finance to provide loans to the poorest and most underserved, or to those who offer the greatest chance of successfully buidling a business and repaying the loan? This question came up at a baord meeting of a micro finance organization recently - although it was in the context of that particular organization, it raised in my mind the question of themission of microfinance, microcredit, SRI (social responsible investing). My answer is all of the above - that it depends on the financing organiation, but at a larger level, should we try and insure that there is an even sprad of funds to borrowers from the $50 loans to start a bike repair shop in a remote village, to the $100,000loan to build a solar farm.
Patrick
Socially responsible financing is a relatively new model. We might call it Social Capitalism. It reflects Gandhi’s concept of trusteeship. At the core is the profound realization that we are not individuals. As J. Krishnamurti said, We Are The World.
Socially responsible capitalism means using our resources in a way that serves the well being of the largest social web of which we are a part. We are trustees of our energy and capital. Not owners. The scale of this perception matters little. An individual bike ship is just as socially responsible and a large international cooperative.
And there is certainly room for both, large funding organizations and those who fund smaller personal ventures. I agree with you. It is up to the funding organization to set their priorities. A drop contains an ocean’s wetness.
Michael
tutormentor - Jan 29, 2007 1:52 pm (# Total: 14) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Patrick,
The reason I use maps is that they show all of the geographic in a defined region where a social service is needed. In your question, you asked do we fund the most underserved, or those who offer the greatest chance of success.
In my mind, our goal is to make best practice organizations/services be in all of the places on the map where such services are needed.
I maintain a database of non-school tutor/mentor programs in Chicago. Many times people ask me to tell them who I think is the best tutor/mentor program in Chicago. I say, tell me your zip code and I'll tell you if any programs are in that area. It does not matter who the best are if they are not in the neighborhood you want to serve, or where you live. If there are no programs, or only poorly organized programs, donors, volunteers, community members, etc. need to find ways to learn from the best, and apply those ideas in making the programs in their own neighborhoods even better.
Thus, until the donor decides if he/she wants to end aids, stop malaria, improve education, etc. in ALL places where this is a problem, we'll have donors who are only solving the problem in a few places, while all other places continue to suffer.
On the other hand, networks of donors and service providers could begin to work together to make sure there were plenty of good programs in all of the areas where such programs were needed, and that they were sharing ideas and learning from each other so that all were constantly improving.
To me, this type of thinking opens the door to lots of other types of innovation.
I wrote about the use of maps in http://tutormentor.blogspot.com/2007/01/changing-demographics-of-chicago.html
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 1, 2007 11:45 am (# Total: 14) This is very strategic thinking. Too often NPOs focus on their silo and miss the larger picture. Maps bring up the larger picture. I also like to use matrices that show interrelationships.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 1, 2007 11:49 am (# Total: 14) Your willingness to take the time to develop this strategy and to take the risks it entails is the essence of social entrepreneurship. I would very much like it if you could keep us all abreast of your progress and at some point I would like to interview you for a podcast on what you are doing. Congratulations.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 1, 2007 11:50 am (# Total: 14) This is good data. I will assemble a list at the end of this event and post it.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 1, 2007 11:53 am (# Total: 14) Last week's blog discussed RSF Social Finance. check them out at www.rsfsocialfinance.org/415-561-6151. Also, try FJC: New York based non-profit that, in addition to rnning donor advised funds, does short term bridge lending for non profits (http://www.fjc.org/how_agency.html) posted by John
abromber - Feb 1, 2007 6:58 pm (# Total: 14) One thing you everyone has to keep in mind is that banks are strictly regulated by the Federal Reserve, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision and/or state banking departments. These regulations include "safety and soundness" criteria for underwriting loans that are somewhat inflexible. That's why so many banks do their NPO lending through CDFI's and other types of financial institutions. Credit Unions have a bit more flexibility, and loan funds are largely unregulated. There are quite a few loan funds that offer creative financing to NPO's.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 2, 2007 10:26 am (# Total: 14) Whichis why, as I understand it, tht RSF Social Finance is not a bank and does not want to be referred to as a bank.
Dec 26, 2006
A Financial Partner for Social Entrepreneurs
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan, Fundraising and Strategy Expert (December 2006)
In 1984 Mark Finser and his colleagues were ready to offer US $6,000 to a social benefit venture when a local school asked him for a half million dollars. He agreed to raise the money and that was the start of the investment and lending programs of RSF Social Finance, a fee-based non-profit financial services institution that provides social investing, lending, and philanthropic services to both NPOs and for-profit social enterprises. There was no term "social entrepreneur" in 1984, but like any group of entrepreneurs, they saw a need and filled it, thus helping to kick off the triple-bottom line industry we know today. The need RSF saw was the inability of organizations that did not fit the standard banking borrower profile to get loans.
Bank loan officers did not understand the finances of non-profit organizations and innovative social enterprises and turned them down. The result was that they were denied the kind of financing for buildings, equipment, expansion and new endeavors routinely available to profit-driven businesses.
Twenty-two years later, RSF Social Finance boasts a record of close to $100 million in loans to social entrepreneurs, operates donor-advised funds and helps organizations all over the world with their capital needs. RSF ended 2006 with $100 million in total consolidated assets and an outstanding loan portfolio of over $37 million.
For investors, RSF offers financial returns similar to a money market (4% in Q1-07). For donors, RSF offers an innovative social investment vehicle for undeployed charitable funds to maximize the impact of their philanthropy. For borrowers, RSF provides asset-based loans, bridge loans, and guarantee loans to NPOs and social enterprises.
RSF works closely with organizations to prepare them to apply for loans, helps them craft business plans, line up guarantors, and build relationships with other donors. Foundations are often pleased to have RSF-financed grantees because they know that a second set of professional eyes is watching the organization's books. They have also learned that when non-profits borrow money, they manage their funds very carefully to insure repayment.
Nevertheless, some NPOs are very reluctant to take on debt and many foundations will not allow grants to be used to repay loans, two barriers to providing NPOs with the same access to expansion capital as profit-driven businesses. And many NPO boards will not discuss debt because they are afraid they will be legally, and possibly morally, responsible if it is not paid back.
• What do you think?
• Has your NPO borrowed money, and if so was it a positive or negative experience?
• Does your board allow it?
• Do you see dangers in NPO taking on debt despite the high payback rates?
Rupert Ayton - Dec 26, 2006 4:11 pm (# Total: 61) I'd start with some more basic questons pertaining to how conscious people are of how money moves and works in society. Most of us operate within a financial system we can't see and don't really understand. We may exist comfortably in our given environment, but when put in another, such as being a non-profit director, we may not be well enough equipped to make effacious decisions.
This "unconscious incompetence" is very difficult to overcome when money decisions are involved. Sometimes those seemingly most qualified to make decisions are the worst. It's why financial scam artists target successful male senior executives. The scam artists know that their marks will never admit to not understanding financial strategies, and will never, ever admit to having been duped.
To further demonstrate the point, I recently visited the Titanic exhibit in San Francisco. Yes, the Titanic may also be a fine example of unconscious incompentance itself. But the illustrative point here is one display that drew some oohs and aahs from the visitors was the paper money recovered from the Titanic. Unlike dollar bills today, the bills exchanged on the Titanic were drawn on private banks. The Titanic sank more than a year before the advent of the US Federal Reserve banking system that we all take for granted today. Take a recent dollar bill out and read it carefully. Do we know what "legal tender" means? Do we know the purpose of the Treasurer of the United States? Or who the Treasurers have been?
During the holiday season, I was thinking about the positive benefits that "work" and "business" provide in our society. Each individual brings in an income (hopefully). With that income, that individual generates demand in goods and services. Say what you will about the Friedman family, but they understood that money does move from those how want a good to those how create that good.
The conscience is responsibility of the dollar-holder. How many of your holiday/Christmas/New Year purchases were socially conscience? I am trying to improve, but still have room for improvement.
I don't mean to introduce a new variable, but my business brings more traffic to other nonprofit revenue-generating ventures. Are ventures like mine also elegible/good candidates for this type of financing. (mastroianni_mark@hotmail.com) - Live Responsibly in the New Year!
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 26, 2006 10:16 pm (# Total: 61) I will ask Mark to come on and respond to your comment. I agree, but how much time can any NPO director give to understanding. Let's see if we can find a tghreshold. Incidently, was the Titanic exhibit worth the ticket price of $22?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 26, 2006 10:32 pm (# Total: 61) On the other hand, many will say that there are already many banks loaning to businesses, so why let them compete with NPO's for NPO loans?
kmniazi - Dec 27, 2006 12:08 am (# Total: 61) Development Professional
First, this initiative was new to me (even after 22 years of operating), so thank you Patrick for increasing my knowledge.
Second, I am a great believer in running NPOs like for profit organizations. By this, I mean that the NPO HAS to carry out social benefit activities, but its sytems / staff / results are held up to same scrutiny as a for profit organization.
for example, a NPO providing grants to small businesses for purchase of consultancy services (BDS is the term in vogue). its staff can be asked to provide details on how much they spent on promotional activities for its services and what was the return on the expenditure (ROI Marketing).
kmniazi - Dec 27, 2006 12:10 am (# Total: 61) Development Professional
the organization would be a hybrid NPO (this was the word, i was trying to describe)
plamb - Dec 27, 2006 10:35 am (# Total: 61) Paul Lamb
Patrick: Great and important discussion. Thanks! My own experience with loans to nonprofits in the U.S. has been very positive. Institutions like the Northern California Community Loan Fund provide superb services to organizations and community-based projects struggling to stay afloat.
In my humble opinion, one of the biggest challenges NPOs face is a lack of experience using traditional financial tools, along with a mentality that "loans are for business". It would be great to see more training of nonprofits to take advantage of these offerings and to better understand existing and emerging financial options.
Speaking of emerging options, as direct microfinancing (i.e., Kiva) and person to person loans (i.e., Prosper) become more popular, it opens the door for a variety of choices not previously available to the social sector.
Finally, not to get too far off topic, but some other financial tools for the social sector worth considering are social credit cards and social currency. See: Social Credit Card and Ithaca Hours.
Rupert Ayton - Dec 27, 2006 2:01 pm (# Total: 61) I learned two things at the Titanic exhibit that may just have made it worth the price of admission: how big the lumps of coal that fired the boilers were, and that a coal strike had caused a coal shortage for steamers; Titanic was given the priority on available coal and other steamers were idled; the end result being a lot of unfortunate passengers had their berths transferred to the Titanic. It makes me wonder a little about the transfer of ill-fortune from one person to another, coal miner to passenger.
Which leads me back to RSF, which is the perverbial diamond made from coal when it comes to money. As I write this Siegfried Finser's book has just arrived in the mail. It's titled Money Can Heal. Money is a medium, not an object. What good fortune or ill-fortune does it transfer? Who makes that decision?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 27, 2006 2:09 pm (# Total: 61) That is what social edge is for. Incidently. I recorded teh interview with Mark Finser and will try to post it (may need some editing). Will let everyone know when...soon I hope.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 27, 2006 2:13 pm (# Total: 61) I will check out the Titanic exhibit when I am in SF Friday. As to your questions: It can and often does transfer both ill and good fortune. The decision is made by the transferer. In practical terms, however, the good or ill of money depends on the environment within whcih it flows. It you have been following my conversations with a Amazonian Shaman, you will see that introducing money into the village - regardless of motive - brought ill. When you add corporate transfer of moenyv- corporations having no morals by definition - the scale of ill can become tremendous. (I am not anti-corporate; I am anti giving corporations the same status as humans without investing them with morals and a conscience.)
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 27, 2006 2:19 pm (# Total: 61) You are right on the moeny when it comes to using finance - most NPOs are clueless because it has not been an option and financial risk-taking is not in their (our) DNA. I love the idea of training; perhaps we could get at least a powerpoint or podcast lecture up on the site. Hopefully Victor or Mark Finser will weigh in. As to the creidt cards, another great idea. Non profit banks could compete on social iterest rates..hmmm.
Pamela McLean - Dec 27, 2006 4:12 pm (# Total: 61) I am encouraged to find in this thread that people (besides me) who are involved in social ventures might need training about the possibility of borrowing.
When I first found social edge I thought that perhaps I could claim the label of "Social Entrepreneur" to describe my role in pushing forwards with an innovative project in rural Nigeria. Previously the only labels I'd been given were "philanthropist" and "stupid". "Philanthropist"was totally inappropriate as I didn't have any spare money to speak of to put into the project (instead I had information-type things like vision, knowledge and skills). "Stupid" was probably a more accurate label as my obsession with the project was competing against my day job and winning,
Although "the project" has made real progress in various directions and attracted some positive outside interest my feeling that I probably couldn't claim to be a "social entrepreneur" has kept increasing - and now I describe my self as a "Life-Long-Learner" or "self-directed student".
I think of "the project" as a piece of practical research into the potential of ICT enabled opportunities for education/training in rural Nigeria and similar environments, I recognise that I am not working alone any more - "the project" is now surrounded by a vibrant e-network of mentors, collaborators, supporters and "skill givers" of various kinds - there are even beneficiaries of "the project".
However regarding "social entrepreneurship" I see myself as a non-starter because I have never really managed to get any kind of meaningful relationship between the project and money - and it seems to me,from reading Social Edge, that the right relationship between projects and money is key to being a "real social entrepreneur".
Who knows, things might change. According to this thread it seems I might not be the only person involved in social ventures who needs some training when it comes to thinking about "how money works". Maybe there is hope that sometime I shall graduate from being a "self- directed student" into being a "social entrepreneur"
Pam
tools4humanity - Dec 27, 2006 4:37 pm (# Total: 61) Mohamed Maie Tools For Humanity
Back to basic traditional and meaningful methods which I found very interesting social justice movement. As several post conflict countries and extrem poverty communities trying to make with the help and support of NGOs or NPOs, I can vision how west world is changing and how it's very important partnership between north and south social enterpreneurser to make some contribution toward the social purpose and put their agenda new honest models for empowerment.
I admire social edge's forward direction, I start small project with Somalia and I can see how many life and poor families benefit very little money we riase and re-distribute. I encourage RSF social finance blue print or easy way to model.
How can we get more information ??
Thanks
Mohamed Maie
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
debt traditionally implies assets. social enterprises that need expansion capital don't have the assets, or the factorable receivables, to warrent debt service. we are raising an equity fund from investors who expect a return on their capital to place into a dozen or so social enterprises, non profit or for profit. goodcap.net. be glad to explain more, engage in a discussion, etc.
isbume - Dec 28, 2006 5:15 am (# Total: 61) I am glad to join this conversation. For organisations like ours in Nigeria (Institute of Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship (Centre for Integrated Rural Development Initiatives), finding financial support to back up sustainable entrepreneurial ideas that can achieve sustainable reduction in poverty is a heavy task. The idea of establishing entrepreneurial bank is a worthy one. However, we should not forget that intended beneficiaries should be exposed to the skills of funds management as well as assisting them to build up their integrity in service.
Many lack the funds management ability and the skills for planning their development projects. This means the bank should assemble a team of multi-disciplinary individuals in entrepreneurship as a way of helping the beneficiaries to take good advantage of the facility.
Our NGO has been faced with acute shortage of fund to get our small business incubation facility off ground. The presence of a social entrepreneurship bank will definitely make a difference if the rate is safe and fair to beneficiaries in developing countries.
I will be very much glad to read from individuals and groups that can assist us. We will be prepared to make a fair return. We believe that social entrepreneurship should not be a jamboree. Social enterprise activities should be able to make a fair return on the investment of supporters. This is the only way for recircling the available fund.
Regards to all.
Segun Benson
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 28, 2006 9:11 am (# Total: 61) I unerstand what you mean about the relationship of the project to money . As a fund raiser for 25 years I have generated over $60 million and for at least $20 of of that, the relationship of money to the project was not rally clear (but th relationship of the donor to the project was !) . I agree with you that an important aspect of social entrepreneur is the realtionship of money to project and vice-versa. That leads to sustainability. Hopefully this site can help with that.
I will seriously explore some kind of instuction in non profit loans. Mark Finser is outof town until after the New Years, but when he returns, I will ask about finance instruction for NPOs.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 28, 2006 9:14 am (# Total: 61) Thee are many "non-profit banks" that actually call themselves "micro-lending agencies". Are these useful/available to you. I am on the obared of one that makes loans to women in Guatamala, Equador and souther Mexico. Is there a similar bank that makes loans in Nigeria? If not, I think there is a business opportunityhere for someone with capital and a heart
mfidelman - Dec 28, 2006 9:17 am (# Total: 61) Center for Civic Networking
There are a lot of non-profit cooperatives that seem to have no problem taking on debt, as well as well-funded sources of debt that serve cooperatives (both for-profit and non-profit). The Cooperative Bank comes to mind.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 28, 2006 9:32 am (# Total: 61) Mohamed Welcome and we are very glad to have you. Pleae continue posting as your viewpoint is very valuable. Feel free to put up a longer post about your work. As to information: RSF bank is at www.rsfsocialfinance.org. I noteice there is a new non profit bank in the UK...see my next post.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 28, 2006 9:33 am (# Total: 61) Brum trial sparks non-profit bank http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk
Nov 29 2002
A new bank - trialed in Birmingham - was launched today which aims to help people get back to work by offering them loans to set up their own businesses.
Street, which will be run on a not-for-profit basis, will lend money to unemployed people who want to become sole traders or small-scale entrepreneurs but find it difficult to get credit from the major lenders.
It will also give loans and financial advice to people who already operate as sole traders or run businesses employing no more than five people.
The group today opened a branch in Bromley-by-Bow, east London, following a year-long pilot in Birmingham and Newcastle, during which it leant money to about 110 people, ranging from window cleaners and dress designers, to newsagents and market traders.
It hopes to expand to have about 40 branches across the whole UK during the next five years.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 28, 2006 9:42 am (# Total: 61) Which Cooperataive Bank? The one in the UK (www.co-operativebank.co.uk) is employee owned and does work with NPO's. The one MA (www.thecooperativebank.com) is a commercial bank. The National Cooperative Bank (http://www.ncb.coop/index.aspx) makes loans to coops in the US.
mfidelman - Dec 28, 2006 9:47 am (# Total: 61) Center for Civic Networking
I was thinking the National Cooperative Bank. I know there are other debt sources as well, for the coop sector.
The non-profit coop sector seems to provide a good example of a sector where reasonably large amounts of loan funding are available, and used, by non-profits. There are probably lessons to be learned here.
DR.PRABIR DUTTA - Dec 28, 2006 10:17 am (# Total: 61) CALCUTTA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
To be candid no organisation is without profit.Because we express profit in terms of money.But if we express profit in terms of return of investment--it could have gained beyond profit in money terms;but in context of community and society.Thus once Human resource is being turned into Human capital;they know how to bring finance and physical resources and that show sustainability of organisation by overall profit.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 29, 2006 9:59 am (# Total: 61) Do you know of other banks that loan more widely?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 29, 2006 10:01 am (# Total: 61) I agree that we all make profit in some form...when I worked for Gov. Jerry Brown he used to talk about "psychic dollars" as our profit (i.e., compensation for low pay). But I am not sure what you mean by a difference betseen human resoures and human capital....doesn't "capital" de-humanize humans?
mfidelman - Dec 29, 2006 10:24 am (# Total: 61) Center for Civic Networking
My point about the Coop Bank is in response to the opening statement that "some NPOs are very reluctant to take on debt and many foundations will not allow grants to be used to repay loans"
Non-profit coops are a sector that seem to have learned to use debt in much the same way as traditional commercial businesses. I think that there are lessons to be learned by non-profits there - about when and how to use debt - lessons that probably need to be learned before we're going to see more general debt avaialability to the non-profit sector.
All of which is a very different set of issues than those addressed by micro-lenders.
DR.PRABIR DUTTA - Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am (# Total: 61) CALCUTTA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
Existing management system oflate showing liabilities for societal development. But while accounting this liability is not yet considered by the Accountant. Traditional Accounting system prevailing thus fails to boost modernization. Sometimes exellance is being suppressed by organized mediocrities. This sort of hindrance is possible to be removed by changing and incorporating the welfare accounting system. From manufacture to marketing process the lots of pollutants are being produced. Traditional accounting system remains silent on this issue. The prevailing system refrains to bring natural resources viz. land, air and water etc. used in manufacture process. The cost of these resources were not being taken in preparation of balance sheet by the Accountant which is now mandatory in company acts. It is liability of the management to pay for pollution removal technology and it is felt to be essential what amount of money is being spent for the welfare of the society. Principle 16th of the Rio-conference declaration on environment and development states that national authorities should endeavour to promote the internalization of costs and use of economic instruments, taking into account the approach that polluter should,in principle, bear the cost of pollution and measures to protect human health and the environment from the harmful impacts of persistent pollutants. In natural resource accounting the quantity of resource is to be multiplied by the market price for getting money value. There are some resources which have no market utility at present but exist possibility in future.Now health is one of the criterion of HDI(Human Development Index) accordingly nutritious diet of animal origin is vital per se healthy animal may be considered as HI(Health Index) of a nation. Can any country be called developed without healthy productive livestocks? So there is necessity of shadow accounting for animal resources for future generation which is being ignored both by economist and accountant. Modernization means certain shifting from traditional system for convenience of good production and marketing keeping conformity the pace of development.Say for example, entry of high-tech application in medicine has brought convenient more accurate methods for diagnosis and efficient treatment facilities.While accounting on money spent by the client appears to be more; becomes cost effective and same as in traditional system when period to cure is less with minimum expenditure and more satisfaction avoiding complication of old system. This is true and same while application of high-tech for animal health, production and welfare of animals and public health. Similarly computer application in account system itself is cost effective where staff wages fall with higher efficiency. The important role played by accounting can be appreciated by considering the example of national income accounts. Estimation of GDP are so ubiquitous that one forgets that such estimates are little more than in old system.Suppose a man marries his maid and the couple do not employ another maid, national income decreases as unpaid household work is not valued in national income.It appears fall of income in traiditional system but welfare accounting estimates to judge the modern performances; though expenditure is more at first instance but if degradation guarded ultimately gains in profitability over all.For example, the productivity improves when a land is left fallow.The load of carbon dioxide in the air or organic wastes in water get absorbed and the air and water quality improves which were lost by over use.So accounting is not perfect if our perception about the kind of development and in turn the policy is not taken. When a person saves he plans to be better off in the future; if he lives beyond his capacity his plans to be worse off ultimately. This is the actual meaning of welfare accounting – a logical extension of ideas while organizational accounting. Doing business in a better way means- doing faster, less cost, with less waste, higher quality and in a simpler way.All good business all over the world will have to be done with commercially functional and socially beneficial.This business skill that can be learnt which empowers people by adding strength to their natural abilities for improving teamwork, productivity where exists appropriate profits. Integrated social and economic assessment(ISEA) impact and environment in welfare accounting can not be avoided. To replenish the traditional accounting by welfare accounting, political will and understanding of social benefits should be reckoned with future perspective. Government may provide some incentive like tax benefit if any organization plays a role for welfare along with profit.
isbume - Jan 2, 2007 5:01 am (# Total: 61) Hi Patrick,
Compliments of the Season. I am always impressed with the commitment of the gentlemen at the Socialedge to the idea of entrepreneurship as a basis for championing sustainable development in our world. I love your dedication and zeal to be of help to people of this generation. I received your post with great relief and trust you will be of assistance to us.
In Nigeria we do not have a micro loan facility of the sort you mentioned. Even the conventional microfinance institutions are not really living up to expectation. I believe a micro loan industry of the sort mentioned by you will be able to help us to jump start our idea of small business incubation facility in Nigeria.
In this new year, and particularly in the first quarter, we will be glad to take-off as we already have 6-acre of land for the project. I have written extensively on this idea, even at the international level. I presented a paper to the 4th Global Conference on Business and Economics which took place at Oxford University, Oxford, in the year 2005. The paper contained the idea of Small Business Incubation Facility as a strategy for alleviating economic poverty in developing society like Nigeria.
We are anxious to conduct a pilot stage of the project after which we hope to replicate it in other Local Giovernment Areas in the State. Finding a financial support will go a long way to drive our entrepreneurial spirit along. Many will be sustainably brought out of the poverty level as we have mapped out high-growth agro-industrial enterprises having abundance of local raw materials. We are out to strengthen the agro-industrial base of the rural people and thus help them to maximise their economic potentials. In addition, we are geographically focus, and this is in the area of people living in fadama areas with high enterprise potentials but who do not know how to tap into their resources.
We will definitely appreciate your assistance of connecting us to the organisation with the capital and a heart to assist developing countries like Nigeria.
Remember, we love the work you are doing across the world.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
isbume - Jan 2, 2007 5:14 am (# Total: 61) Hi Kevin,
I find your posting very interesting. Our organisation will probably benefit from your organisation's support. We have a project idea needing support and which we believe will make a difference in the position of many poor in the rural areas of our country. It is the idea of establishing a small business incubation facility. We hope to incubate a lot of small business operators in various agro-industries enterprises for a given period after which they will be able to stand on their own in a competitive business environment.
We will be glad to hear from you on how you can be of assistance. Please contact me on isbume@yahoo.com at your earliest. Let us network for the good of our fellow men in the land of the living.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 2, 2007 12:30 pm (# Total: 61) check out Africa Pride micro loans <http://www.opt-init.org/framework/pages/appendix2Case1.html> this may be a good source for you
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
thanks for the inquiry segun. i've responded via email. also our folks at synapse fund could be an option. i don't know enough about what you are doing to tell exactly. is there a profile of your organization on social edge and i didn't see it? (i confess i'm not as familiar with the social edge interface as i'd like to become. here is the map of synapse and their relationships in our xigi database. http://www.xigi.net/index.php?map=entity&map_en=551
Hi Patrick
The conventional wisdom is that the only options available to Social Enterprises are grants/gifts or loans of one type or another.
I've been working for some time now on simple new production/revenue-sharing options - Capital Partnerships - using the unintended consequences of the UK LLP (close cousin to the US LLC - no relation whatever to a US LP or LLP).
In this model investors simply receive a proportional share of the production - or the revenues from the sale of production - of a productive asset which they finance as "Capital Member" and the Social Enterprise operates as "Operating Member". It's not borrrowing, and its's not Equity as we know it, either.
I also advocate mutualised credit through "Guarantee Societies" where bilateral "trade" credit is subject to a multilateral guarantee, backed by a provision into a Default Fund.
There is a lot of material at my site
Also recently started a workspace
http://www.omidyar.net/group/opencapital/
aimed at teasing out the issues and leading to practical applications.
I am working on a number of prototypes in Scotland and Norway in the context of the "Hanseatic Microfinance Initiative", and we have initial funding from the Norwegian government plus considerable interest from local government.
To date, I have found it virtually impossible to get these concepts across in the US because thinking seems to be so totally embedded in current stereotypes.
Still, I live in hope.
Best Regards
Chris Cook
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
Chris cook said" "I am working on a number of prototypes in Scotland and Norway in the context of the "Hanseatic Microfinance Initiative", and we have initial funding from the Norwegian government plus considerable interest from local government.
To date, I have found it virtually impossible to get these concepts across in the US because thinking seems to be so totally embedded in current stereotypes."
We are not finding that to be the case, though the movement is not as fast as we would like, we think there is a revealed appetite for something more.
Good to hear it Kevin.
Having had a browse around your site, I am interested in what you are doing but it is not at all clear to me - maybe I missed something on the site- how your solution differs from conventional Equity and Debt.
I am tapping in to some seriously interesting new financial tools - I used to be a Director of the International Petroleum Exchange, so I have some knowledge of financial products of all types.
The market in Equity Release (merely one application of the model) - where I have developed what I believe may be an optimal new product - is illustrated by the fact that in the UK alone there is over £1trillion in property owned free of mortgage by over-65's.
If you are interested, please email me on cojock@hotmail.com
Best Regards
Chris Cook
44 7770 843087
P-CED
Hi Kevin,
By the sound of it, you and I are singing from the same hymnsheet as you may see at www.p-ced.com
Chris and I have been talking a lot and he's certainly opened my eyes to possibilities which are staggering in their implications.
Hope you join in on our discussions.
Regards,
Jeff
isbume - Jan 3, 2007 7:36 am (# Total: 61) Hello Patrick, I am impressed with your speedy response to our request. The idea you suggested will be taken up. I do hope to find solution. We see you gentlemen as champions of positive transformation in developing countries. As we are seeing, we hope to find a tremendous improvement in sustainable enterprise development among voiceless and vulnerable people in developing societies if you keep up the pace at which you are going in finding solution to the need of the poor.
Our organisation is interested in contributing to an explosion of small scale businesses in developing countries of the world starting from Nigeria. With the help of people like you with heart and mind for this innovative approach to entrepreneurship we can find strength and encouragement.
I love you.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
isbume - Jan 3, 2007 7:42 am (# Total: 61)
Hello Kevin,
Thank you for your email and your posting on the discussions. I will check the site for the detail information on how your organisation can be of assistance. This kind of network is what is needed. A practical approach devoid of theoretical ambiquity that does not address the need of the poor.
I surely will get back to you in a couple of days. I will also discuss your programe with the rest members of our organisation. We are active and alive to be a blessing to many in our generation.
The Lord bless the work of your hands.
Segun Benson
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 3, 2007 8:57 am (# Total: 61) I think we have enough material here for a summary/bullet-point list of options for NP financing. I am especially interested in capitol partnerships. Independent films sometimes are financed this way - its called "participation". It makes a lot of sense. I will be in London in late Feb and if possible would like to chat. I think this is the right time to introduce the American NPO community and donor community to the wide range of forms of financing out there now.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 3, 2007 9:01 am (# Total: 61) I think that all of us here are very interested in how well you fare in exploring these new financing tools in an African context.
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
we are taking in equity from investors who want a financial return (though the investment is philanthropically motivated; lots to say on that). then we are investing in non profits and for profits. in for profit social enterprises as traditional equity, essentially. in non profits, the investment could be in the form of deeply subordinated debt (no debt service, but the interest capitalizes until some agreed upon revenue milestones, or other targets or met) or it could be revenue rights, depending on the nature of the enterprise and the opportunity. for the investee, it functions like equity; aligning investor interests with the success and growth of the enterprise. obviously, we are limiting our field by looking for enterprises with real and substantial growth opportunities.
Patrick
I've prototyped a Capital Partnership on a film "The Art of Flirting". `For £20 we created Art of Flirting LLP as a "wrapper" for it and we evolved a very simple and consensual LLP agreement setting out the relationships.
The Actors didn't get paid: they got "Equity Shares"/ Participation in the Gross: the producer didn't get paid either, and neither did I - I got a 5% proportional "Equity Share" in the Gross revenues -IF THERE ARE ANY.
Now, we needed £10k for lights, cameras, sandwiches etc and two "Capital Partners" came in on the basis that in return for the use of their Capital they got x% of the revenues - if there are any.
Now that's not Debt (cos there's no obligation to repay the capital) and it's not Shares as we know them, Jim.
But it IS tremendously tax effective because UK LLP's are "tax transparent" (ie " pass through" like the US LLC they resemble and improve upon) and the Capital Partners have genuinely made losses they can offset at their highest rate.
Simple, but hugely effective.
I believe that Capital Partnerships make possible investments that are not viable any other way. But they can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear!
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 3, 2007 4:45 pm (# Total: 61) As part of a film investment group, I hear pitches every month from indie fim makers, some of whom capitalize their films in a similar fashion. Or, they have the film paid for and tehy seek capitalization participation for marketing and distributor fees. Either way, it is the same as you described. I believe NPOs can do the same thing even if they are C3's
When you say "Capitalization" how are the indies constituting their films? Does anyone wrap them in LLC's?
The way I see it, a good structure would be an "umbrella" generic Indie Film LLC with the following members:
(a) an Indie Institution/Foundation, which "owns" the IP purely as "Trustee" or Custodian;
(b) "Guilds" or unincorporated associations of Indie film Makers etc ;
(c) a "Guild" of angel Investors:
(d) a management partner/ platform provider;
(e) a "Club" of Indie watchers.
Each film would be the subject of a "sub-agreement" I call an "Enterprise agreement". The master LLC agreement would incorporate a Creative Commons licence.
The Indie's, Investors and Managers would share revenues (if any) from customers in pre -agreed proportions set out in Enterprise Agreements, and the relevant "Equity Shares" in individual films would be tradeable on the Guild site.
The same approach works as a wrapper for any other IP, and in particular gives rise to a "CommonSource" software wrapper which is BOTH "Closed"/Proprietary (because only LLC members can use it) AND "Open" (because anyone may consent to and sign up to the LLC agreement).
We are also exploring the use of this approach to bring together commercial investors and academic institutions in a non-toxic way to develop research.
Best Regards
Chris Cook
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 4, 2007 2:50 pm (# Total: 61) Many indie producers create LLC's and sell units, or shares. Ssome offer to repay investors +10% out of the first proceeds and then a share of net after the distribution fees, production costs, actors participation, marketing costs, etc.
Others borrow money against proceeds, with a co-signer who is often also an investor.
I like the Guild idea and will bring it up at our next Film Angels meeting. It would not work quite the same,for legal reasons, but it is a good model.
Inciodently, we are seeing "packages" coming from talent agencies looking for investoers. the package includes the script, director, talent and distribution contract. The agency is looking for production money; they don't need marketing or distgribution fees beause that is sltgheir part of the package. Of courfse theys get fees from the actors and directors too.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 4, 2007 2:54 pm (# Total: 61) Kevin How would good capital feel about investing in sustainable agriculture projects in a developing country? Small cap investments ($1000 - $5000) with 3-year return horizon and ongoing revenue after that.
ClaraJ - Jan 6, 2007 3:35 pm (# Total: 61) Founder: Be Good, Give Goooood (tm?), Promote Good
Kevin Doyle Jones,
Buon Giorno! How do you say how are you in your language? Sono Chiara di Assisi o di Corea o di tutto el mundo. Parlese italiano? Su cara est molto intelligente. (You look like a massive leader). Will you tell me more about your personal spiritual autobiography and why you chose this particular site to blog? I also have an interest in setting up a bank... pero no puedo explicar ahora. Tal vez, si dios quiere en el futuro antes de mi vida est completa.
Hope you understand my global language. If not, Google has some great language translators.
p.s I do not want to mislead you. I was born in Korea and live - well, my house is in Silicon Valley - but my home is tutto el mundo wherever mi corazon e mi amore e mi famiglia estan y estaban. Heaven and earth.
Sae Hae Bok Manni Badduseyo. Buon Anno. Happy New Year.
Piace. Peace. Pyungwha.
A bientot. aka "Chiara di Assisi"
isbume - Jan 8, 2007 8:18 am (# Total: 61) Hello Patrick,
Thank you for your effort on this site. Let me make my request for explicit. We are in search of the door-key for unlocking the economic potential of the poor in rural communities of Ogun State, Nigeria.
This key is to open the door that will lead to an explosion of cottage/small scale agro-industrial ent
rprises that will bail out the rural poor from their state of economic slavery.
Our Institute needs individuals and groups with the capital and a compassionate heart to lift the poor from the dunghill into the palaces of their economic destiny. We are prepared to make a good return for the supply of this key.
For sure, we are prepared to start off with high growth enterprises that will loose the rural poor from the chain of abject povertyu. As honest and skilled stewards we are prepared to provide interested enterprise angels with returns for their equity capital contributions.
The economic needs of the rural poor in our community is an opportunity for enterprise angels to make additional income and to put smile on the faces of family heads, housewives and children in our community. It will also trnaslate into relieving our own long term burden to usher many rural dwellers into their era of economic independence.
For this pilot project, isbume has multi-=disciplinary team of professionals dedicated to trural enterprise development to justify the congtribution of individuals and groups to isbume's pfroject tagged: Operation Sustainable Ebnterprises Expolision in the rural areas of Ogun State, Nigeria.
Interested individuals and groups can please contact me on isbume@yahoo.com for further information and clarification.
Remain bvlessed.
Segun Benson,ACIS, M.Sc.(Aston) President and Head of Missions
Sustainability Banker, Lawyer & Pioneer
As Rupert Ayton and Kevin Jones know, I am working to create a bank whose loan, credit card, insurance and other operations generate sustainable, resilient communities using an objective benchmark called sustainable resiliency™ (SR).
My experience as a small NPO in NYC was that, while commercial banks would pitch us for business, they did not understand the cyclical nature of our government grants.
My vision is that NPOs whose activities generate regional sustainable resiliencywould qualify as better borrowers because their activities are implicitly part of the improved credit rating for SR-leveled institutional debt (something I call socially-responsive debt, SRD).
I am looking for foundations, like Skoll, and others who are interested in exploring and supporting the domestic and global implications of SR and SRD finance.
Best regards,
Bruce
Contact Info:
Bruce Cahan, President
Urban Logic, Inc. (A New York nonprofit, qualified in California)
email: bcahan (at) urbanlogic.org
isbume - Jan 9, 2007 4:59 am (# Total: 61) Good day Patrick,
Thanks for your posting to Kevin Doyle Jones about agricultural project in developing societies like Nigeria. I am interested in Kevin's response to your posting.
I indicated an interest to have the support of individuals and organisations like Good Capital. We look forward to hearing from you and Kevin. We appreciate your beautiful contributions on this forum.
Remain blessed.
Segun
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 9, 2007 8:35 am (# Total: 61) Bruce That will likely alwauys be the case for most banks as NPOs are not a large enough part of the market to stimulate training and hiring of bank officers who do understand NPO financing. That is why an alternative is being developed. But, I predict athat at some point the commercial banking world will take notice and incorporate NPO financing into their routines. there are already glimmers of that happening. One thing about capitalistic entitites - they jump on opportunities.
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
it's on our radar. our first fund is domestic, or principally a domestic footprint (i.e. a remittance business that had a positive impact in the u.s and in mexic might make it in, e.g). but we are working on something we are calling the digital village fund
P-CED
Kevin, This is very much the heart of what we've been working on over the past 3 years, Developing a model for digital villages that not only empowers but provides a revenue generator for onward social investment.
Having proven in Russia that full cost recovery from business driven investment can be returned over 5 years, this now moves into the area of the more than full cost recovery component, supporting a partial cost recovery component for a specific social object.
Essentially, we're talking about an economy of scale for national level schemes in the order of $100m investment being deployed over 4 years.
Until I began talking to Chris recently, others would have me believe that other than large scale international development funding there was no way that private capital could be attracted to such projects.
I'm glad to report that I now have a different view and it doesn't stop there. Housing, energy, agriculture and many other social needs in the developing world all have the potential for shared asset investment which is in essence, partnering with the poor.
Chris has already demonstrated this potential, with a wind energy project in Pakistan. There will be many more, I'm sure.
Jeff
nkafka - Jan 10, 2007 2:25 am (# Total: 61) Nik Kafka
RSF highlights a finance gap that has often existed even for well established NPOs & social enterprises in developed countries, but one that is at least begining to be filled.
Similarly the huge rise in microfinance has brought significant social benefits by plugging the gap at the level of individual entrepreneurs in developing countries.
The social enterprise spectrum is however so broad that there are a wide variety of organisations of intermediate scale who are still underserved, particularly in developing countries.
At Teach A Man To Fish for example we're working with educational institutions in developing countries to build up school-based enterprises capable of generating income to support teaching activities.
Too large for microfinance, too unusual for commercial banks, these small scale social enterprises represent a legitimate social investment opportunity capable of generating risk-based returns - yet finding finance to support their growth is a real challenge.
We're currently looking at setting up a fund to meet this need (albeit at the very earliest stages).
If anyone has any interesting ideas or experiences to share, please get in touch!
Cheers
Nik
For more info see http://www.teachamantofish.org.uk/
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 10, 2007 10:54 am (# Total: 61) Nik I checked out your site and am very impressed. This a natural collaboration and well presented. DI seeyou are building an international networl. I am goinf to rocommend to
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 10, 2007 10:54 am (# Total: 61)
isbume - Jan 11, 2007 6:12 am (# Total: 61) Dear Nik,
I am impressed with your great idea on developing entrepreneurship at school level. This looks like what we are trying to do at the Institute of Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship through our small business incubation facilities. We are very much interested in devel;oping agro-industrial enterprises. Please let us get in touch. I am on isbume@yahoo.com I will like to network with you further.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
Patrick O'Heffernan - Jan 16, 2007 10:16 am (# Total: 61) I have received some comments offline that continuing this discussion but with a slightly different direction would be useful. The direction that has been suggested is what are the drawbacks to borrowing money for NPOs, and some real experiences from NPOs that borrowed money. Another suggestion was, given that some states are putting the brakes on NPO conversions to For-profits (Kansas, Maryland, N North Carolina and Washington State among others), and debt can have a role in these decisions, do NPO entrepreneurs need to start thinking more precisely about debt and future strategy.
principal at Good Capital, goodcap.net
is what a social entrepreneur needs if she is looking for expansion capital. that is, where debt service is delayed until growth milestones are reached and the ability to pay a return to the investor is possible. from the standpoint of the entrepeneur, the money invested acts like equity; the investor and investee's interests are aligned for growth. im an advisor to a calvert social investment foundaiton $10 social enterprise debt fund, and we have not found that entrepreneurs who need growth capital typically have assets or receivables that can service traditional or even newer types of soft debt.
isbume - Jan 18, 2007 4:26 am (# Total: 61) Dear Sirs,
Hi! I'm Noah Roger from Cameroon, CENTRAL AFRICA, and we are starting a social enterprise dedicated to providing efficient and affordable technologies in water, energy and agriculture to the people to emancipate them from poverty. At this time, we have 3 products to market:
1. Portable water purification devices that can worn around the neck and turn any surface water-wells,river,sea...- into safe drinking water. And it costs only $5.
2. Efficient solar oven lasting as long as 20 years and heating quickly. People get a cheaper and healthier cooking device and protect our forests. The larger ones can be used to start a micro bakery therefore providing income to a community or a group.
3. Manual irrigation pumps to help increase the income of small farmers.
At this time, we are looking for financing for this project that will return a lot of social benefits and a good financial return to investors.
read more about us on www.investorworldonline.com and click on sanaga emancipation corp. under "companies to watch". A business plan is available on request.
Looking forward to hearing from you very soon.
NOAH R. JUSTIN, CEO
SANAGA EMANCIPATION CORP.
PO BOX 12 107 YAOUNDE CAMEROON
TEL-237 983 84 68
Email: sanagafinancial@yahoo.com
Director, Social Alchemy Pty Ltd, Australia
Dear Segun,
Looking forward to connecting soon by email about our work supporting drought affected and isolated rural communities in Australia.
I will contact you by email separately, and I can be reached at matt.jones@fusemail.com
Regards,
Matt.
Nov 07, 2006
Why is it hard to ask for money?
Hosted by Kim H. Erskine, Philanthropic Advisor, University of Oxford’s North American Offices (November 2006 - Closed)
So You’re Afraid to Ask for Money By Kim H. Erskine, Philanthropic Advisor, University of Oxford’s North American Offices
“I could never do that!”
“I’ll do anything but ask for money.”
Those of us who do various forms of fundraising hear these comments a lot, but when the head of a non-profit organization said this to me, I realized it was worth looking into.
There are many reasons why people are afraid to ask other people for money, including the fear of someone saying “no” or of finding out that the person doesn’t want to support the cause. Another common roadblock is timing. A friend of mine describes “the ask” as awkward. He would rather take the time to tell the prospect about the cause and why he’s interested, but he hates flat out asking.
Just as there are many people who are afraid to ask for money, there are others who actually like fundraising. These people have developed different attitudes toward asking people for money. The best fundraisers I know realize that “the ask” is not about them. A “no” is not a statement about self worth. By asking people to help a cause, these fundraisers feel they are offering the opportunity for others to invest in the project.
They are helping people become philanthropists. This work does not come out of a scheme to get money, but rather out of a belief in the project or organization the fundraiser is working to support.
Another reason some people actually enjoy fundraising is that asking for money can also be about developing relationships. Once you realize that you are not asking for money for yourself, you can spend your efforts introducing the prospects to your organization. At the same time you are developing a relationship with them. People give to people. Donors are the people who feel a part of your organization and want to support the cause.
When making introductory visits and calls it is very important that you are upfront with people as to why you are calling. If the prospect is aware of the purpose of your visit, some of the awkwardness of the conversation is eliminated. For example, “I’m calling from ABC Organization and I would like to come to talk with you about our plans and about your involvement / support of them.”
By using an opening line like this you can weed out those who are not interested without putting a lot out there. You will know that the people you are meeting with are interested in your organization.
You might not be able to figure out why you feel uncomfortable about fund raising, but the more committed you feel about the cause, the less difficult it is. Dig deep and appeal to the philanthropist in yourself. Help others see and buy into your cause.
When first time donors are asked why they made their first gift, many times their answer is “I was never asked.”
Questions? Comments? Join in the conversation.
Keely Stevenson - Nov 7, 2006 4:55 pm (# Total: 25) Acumen Fund
Thanks for hosting an important discussion. It is a great topic-- something that I find hard to do actually. As part of the training for the Acumen Fund fellows, we have to raise US$10,000 this year. We will be living in developing countries and will have to do much of the "asking" remotely...through phone and email. Any tips on how to establish relationships for fundraising well when not face to face? Especially if we do not have an existing network of potential donors now?
goalguy - Nov 7, 2006 6:04 pm (# Total: 25) Marc A. Pitman
Kim: Great discussion!
Keely: Are you planning on starting to raise the money before you go? Or will all of it be raised remotely?
Marc Pitman
mfidelman - Nov 7, 2006 6:22 pm (# Total: 25) Center for Civic Networking
It sort of depends on what you're going to be doing while living in developing countries. If the work is sexy, or can be made sexy through good photography and reportage, then you might consider maintaining a blog that gives a running commentary on your work - and, of course, include a visible request for support, and an easy-to-use donation mechanism (e.g., PayPal or Amazon). You'll need to do some work to get the word out - but if you can capture and hold a reasonably sized audience for your work, $10,000 is a pretty small amount to raise.
Miles Fidelman
phdgmourey - Nov 7, 2006 7:17 pm (# Total: 25) Hi keely:re. remote asks
The warp speed 7 way to raise money in your case?:
http://www.fundable.org/examples (interesting)
http://odeo.com/about (join for free, do a podcast and see what does happen)
http://www.fundraiserhelp.com/free-fundraisers.htm
Au revoir
Pascal Gillon infogatherer.com
Kim Erskine - Nov 7, 2006 9:26 pm (# Total: 25) Oxford University - North American Office
Dear Keely;
First of all good luck!! And you might think that raising money is about you but it is really about the project you are working on. Really great suggestions about getting the word out there, blogs, podcasts etc. The more you can involved people in what you are doing the more they will want to support your efforts.
If you are like me and challenged by blogging you might want to think about starting a "newsletter" which you can send via e-mail to everyone you know. it might be dailiy, a couple of times a week, weekly or monthly, depending on your own style. You might give people the option to opt out, but you never know who the people you do know know. Someone may have a conversation that resonates with something you wrote and pass along your newsletter, and the new person might just be interested.
Also you may wish to think strategically about building your contact base. You have already added 4 new contacts from here. You might also be interested in checking out a networking site. www.linkedin.com has worked really well for me in identifying people who may have an interest in what I am doing. It relies on people introducing people they know and respect to others with in their network. Check it out.
Hope this helps.
Kim
tutormentor - Nov 8, 2006 7:19 am (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I've been doing fund raising for the non profit I lead for the past 14 years. While I believe passionately about the cause, I get paid from the money I raise, which always makes me feel a bit guilty in asking. Many people seem to think that charities should be led by full time volunteers who don't get paid and mysteriously raise their families on no income.
I come from a corporate advertising background in which we used weekly print, radio and TV to tell about 20 million people that we had merchandise they might want as affordable prices and at stores near them. Those who were looking for tires, shoes, jeans, etc. and lived near one of our stores were likely to respond if we kept sending ads every week, and if we lived up to our promises when they came to our stores.
This is a direct exchange of goods and services for customer support. I've applied this same thinking in building a database of more than 12,000 people, and an Internet network of many thousands. By telling people of our services and pointing to web sites that show what we do, we're advertising for customers (donors and volunteers). This has helped us raise over $4.2 million over 13 years.
Yet unlike a business who keeps a customer once that customer begins to shop at his store or buy his services, the non profit donor keeps changing his mind about where to give and how much to give, based on social/emotional factors not related to the quality of my products or the location of my non profit. Thus, each year we constantly need to find new donors to replace retired donors. This is what makes the work frustrating.
Most of the fund raising guides I've read show that volunteers need to be the ones raising money, and making the asks, not the paid staff. One reason may be that volunteers have no personal gain (salary) from the process. Thus, I've built a network of volunteers who are involved in telling our story and expanding our base, and I support this in a variety of ways.
Since I'm always looking to expand this network of volunteers and donors Kim's use of Linked In is of interest. Can you describe how much time you spend on Linked IN and what steps you take to find potential contacts?
Kim Erskine - Nov 8, 2006 9:13 am (# Total: 25) Oxford University - North American Office
When I first heard about LinkedIn I was hesitant to join... I was not sure it wouldn't sap all of my time!!! I love to fiddle!! But when someone I really respect asked me to join I signed up. I had it scour my outlook contacts for those already on... There were quite a few. I also invited several people who joined.
Now when I am looking for funding in a specific area... say Biomedical engineering I just plug in a few keywords and get a listing of folks who have an interest in this area. Also people who are angel investors and philanthropists also list themselves as that. If appropriate I will follow up with the person thorough my other connections.
I has proven itself to me.
Keely Stevenson - Nov 8, 2006 9:41 am (# Total: 25) Acumen Fund
Thanks-- that was all good advice.
There are 7 fellows and we will be working on pretty exciting projects realted to social enterprises... for example, I am working in Tanznaia with a social enterprise called AtoZ which is making 7million long lasting bednets to prevent malaria. There are some distribution challenges on how to get the products out to the market in a sustainable way.
I will try to use photos and video as a good tool and market it through the blog and newsletter options...
Thanks for your help!
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 8, 2006 4:09 pm (# Total: 25) Most of my professional friends are in LinkedIn for job and sales contacts. Most of NPO friends are in Omidyar and Care2 for fund riasing contacts. Working with people in your networks, een if you don't know them personaly (you soon will) makes it easier to ask also.
goalguy - Nov 9, 2006 12:10 pm (# Total: 25) Marc A. Pitman
Keely,
The photos and video will definitely help you tell the story!
You may find some helpful info in the "ask" section of my blog:
Keely Stevenson - Nov 12, 2006 7:02 pm (# Total: 25) Acumen Fund
goalguy, i luv the blog and passed it onto some friends. thanks for the link. I especially liked the Aug 23 entry on using stories.
also, Kim, good news: I went to a party this weekend and made a few "asks" which were successful. Closer to my goal already.
tutormentor - Nov 13, 2006 8:49 am (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Thanks for pointing us to your blog. Lots of good advise. I'd like to expand on the concept of rainmakers.
Traditionally, this concept is applied for building business or raising money for your own company or non profit. Those organizations with exceptional rain-makers do very well. The others don't.
In the competitive, for-profit world, this is just fine. However, in the non profit world, this means some charities doing needed work in some locations are well funded, as long as the rainmakers stay involved, while others doing similar work in different locations, may not be funded at all. This means the people who need these services in some places are not likely to get them because the non profit is not good at recruiting rainmakers.
I posted a message on my blog last week that is intended to teach corporations to "adopt neighborhoods" rather than just schools, or single agencies. http://tutormentor.blogspot.com/2006/11/principal-for-day-should-focus-on.html
I use maps to point to all of the places in Chicago where tutor/mentor programs are needed, based on demographics of high poverty and poorly performing schools. I provide an on-line data base of existing programs, that you can search by zip code, to determine what programs exist in the areas of high need. The goal is to draw donors to all programs, not just one or two with good rainmakers.
I use my blog, and a conference that I host every six months (http://www.tutormentorconference.bigstep.com) to inivite program leaders and those who care about tutor/mentor programs, or who want to end poverty, or improve their workforce, to come together and think of ways they could increase the pool of money available.
In this concept, I'm trying to recruit rainmakers who don't focus on a single program, but instead focus on many program within the same geography. At http://www.lend-a-hand.net you can read how lawyers and judges in the Chicago Bar Association are beginning to take this role. Since 1995 this group has awarded more than $500,000 to one-on-one tutor/mentor programs in Chicago.
My goal is to recruit others who will blog this concept during the next six weeks, with a goal of recruiting more rainmakers who will focus their ability on funding all programs doing needed work in a city, not just the one or two programs they support.
My vision may seem a bit crazy, but it's beginning to have an impact. If we can recruit champions from every industry, who each duplicate what's happening in the Chicago Bar Association, we can increase the flow of resources into tutor/mentor programs in every neighborhood, and keep that flow more consistent so that over time, these programs have greater impact on helping kids to careers.
I believe this concept can be duplicated in every city, and every social sector. It just needs someone to build and maintain a master database of everyone doing similar work, so that rainmakers can shop and choose who to help based on where the need is greatest, and who is doing this work.
tutormentor - Nov 13, 2006 1:24 pm (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
One of our volunteers has created a video that interviews tutor/mentor program leaders who have participated in Tutor/Mentor Conferences in Chicago. You can view it at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8pqrFrhjUc
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Nov 14, 2006 6:50 am (# Total: 25) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
WYWTD is WYWBA - meaning > What You Want To Do is What You Will Be Assured
Its seventh year of my work from the organisation I initiated - Life-Health Reinforcement Group.
The above statement comes from the experience I gained.
Initially for the first three years I just hesitated to ask,reasons:
- As I felt the money I get/recieve is the money earned and it has to be used in such a way that yields results.
- My organisation when it entered many established NGO's were trying to withdraw.
- I didn't have needed completion time for getting elgibility such as FCRA.
- Being from Medical profession many felt I was wasting time.
- When I needed many had lot's of reasons for not supporting.
- I was not falling under stated categories of funding - such as issue based,context based........... as my organisation was trying to understand - why so many resources around, why people are still suffering for want of basic needs?
- None of my family members or known assosciates had taken up social intervention as purpose of Life.
- SO, initailly until and unless you demonstrate (in my case) you will not get needed response.
These are my quick thoughts emerged out of the subject initiated by Kim.
I should say my hesitation costed many things -
- I had to borrow to do what I wanted to do.
- I couldn't support my family.
- I had many situations, which I could have avoided, but still - I couldn't come out because of passion what I am doing and thus inability to come out of it.
So, I learned hard way and I stand by what KIM made it straight in his introductory remark -“I’m calling from ABC Organization and I would like to come to talk with you about our plans and about your involvement / support of them.”
Today I started asking and I am able to move forward.
So - ASK if you want to SERVE for life.
Kim Erskine - Nov 14, 2006 8:53 am (# Total: 25) Oxford University - North American Office
What a great story. Many people hide behind excuses, fears, and ignorance, instead of just going out and doing, and many just don't even know where to start... They can face hard lessons, as you have done. I am sorry you had to go through those, and I wish you all the success in your endeavor. Hopefully by talking about the process we can help others move through the process of feeling more comfortable with the ask and out to the other side quicker. In this area as in so many others, knowledge is power...
Kim
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Nov 16, 2006 1:06 am (# Total: 25) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Kim,
Knowledge I do agree has the power but I realized power has more value if beholders understand that " Life we hold now may not hang for long" as being said by one of my well wisher yesterday - "prakash just imagine 100 years from today none of us here, today, will not be their".
After hearing this I feel even more commited for today for better tomorrow.
I have inumerous things to share and I see very few have time & energy to face & understand the only certain thing of life i.e death.
So, ASK to realize when you are alive.
HI all,
It's nice to see Keely online. I remember you from your early days working at Skoll! I think the main focus needs to be on the cause, as various of you have mentioned and much less on the ask. If you introduce the cause, the mission, the results of your organization, or the one you represent, you can test the waters and see if it resonates with the person to whom you're speaking. Just like any sort of relationship (think of meeting a new person, moving on to dating, etc.), you start with small bites (or bytes!) and then move the conversation from there. If the person tells you upfront they are definitely NOT interested, you move on. If there's at least a little interest, you continue. I do lots of "touches" of a prospect, to email updates, offering "goodies" as appropriate (tickets to an event, e.g.) so they get used to hearing from my organization. Farther down the line, you can ask them to support the cause. If they are really interested before you get to the ask, you can move up your timetable for asking. Once they become contributors, then periodically (often annually) you can meet and the ask will become a smaller part of your conversation/interaction, as they will now have become involved. I would be happy to speak more with anyone on this subject. I think the fear is misplaced about "the ask" -- it's like imagining the wedding before the first date!
Barbara Lamb Hall
KCSM Major Gifts Officer
(formerly of Village Enterprise Fund)
tutormentor - Nov 17, 2006 2:15 pm (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
In a message I posted on Nov. 13 I mentioned the work I've been doing with the Lend A Hand program at the Chicago Bar Association since 1994. On Wednesday of this week the Chicago Sun Times donated $2 million to the Lend A Hand, which will be distributed over the next few years as grants to volunteer-based tutor/mentor programs in Chicago. The impact of this will be to increase the annual grant pool from $30,000 this year to more than $300,000 next year.
This is what's possible if you focus on the cause, and focus on all of the agencies in a city doing similar work, rather than just your own. If I had tried to launch this partnership by just asking the Lend A Hand to focus on my small Cabrini Connections program (and in 1994 it was only in its 2nd year), they would not have responded. But I focused their attention on the entire map of Chicago, and on the nearly 200,000 kids living in poverty who would benefit if they were in a well organized tutor/mentor program.
This is what I mean by a "rainmaker" working as a third party, or intermediary, to raise resources to support a charity cause. If many leaders of similar organizations take this role in a city, state or country, I feel this success could be duplicated more often, and in more places.
It's taken lots of luck, and the work of many people beyond myself to make this happen. But this demonstrate's what is possible.
I wrote about this in my http://tutormentor.blogspot.com blog.
mfidelman - Nov 17, 2006 4:20 pm (# Total: 25) Center for Civic Networking
Barbara, Well put!
This is similar to any sales situation. First you get to know your prospect and help them get to know you. If you're doing things right, you never have to ask - they ask you how they can help.
Miles Fidelman
Kim Erskine - Nov 18, 2006 4:52 am (# Total: 25) Oxford University - North American Office
I couldn't agree more with you Barbara and Miles. By knowing and believing in your organization, you are well on you way to finding the financial, as well as the emotional capital you will need to succeed.
There are times however that unless asked your prospect may never give what you ask for. This can be especially true when what you need is money. There can be assumptions on both sides, from the organizations' side "If he knows us as well as I think he does than he knows what we need help with. He has seen our budget, deficit, whatever and knows how he can help." to the prospects side "Since they have never asked me to help in a monetary way, I will keep on helping as I have, and introduce them to people and push the organization with people I know. When they need my help or my money they will ask."
In relationships too we can forget that the other person cannot read our minds, and this can and does lead to misunderstandings. I do believe we get the help we ask for, we just have to be clear what it is we need help with, and for, and to let others know as well.
Kim
Yes, Kim, I agree. There are instances where you need to directly ask for the financial support. Sometimes your prospect will be direct and ask what you need or what they can do. If so, make sure you walk through that door! If they don't, then, yes, go ahead and ask ("Yes, we need $5,000 to start the XYZ program"). Then hush up and wait for their response.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Nov 20, 2006 8:52 pm (# Total: 25) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Kim & Friends,
I like to share about my work & the situation I live in -
"Couple aspiring to become pregnant are coming to our clinic > their wish is being heard and they are blessed with a child > child grows and some reason gets deviated and lands in a situation where in there is nobody to take care > with power bestowed on us in implementation of Child Care & Protection Act we are able to take care of them and give them direction > Meanwhile whoever comes for clinical help we are able to guide them and treat them, at times save lives > As women moves into her menopause we are able to back them up and improve their quality of life > People who are aged and who are residing in our area are personally taken care and we are able to meet their basic needs.
While all the above situations and interventions are going on, one thing which is standing out is our approach to food -- from production i.e. from protecting farmers who produce food to attending to people who are hungry (which is done through open house) is what we are able to do.
All these activities are carried out with thorough reflection on Life, which is done under banner - Life-Dialogue"
With rapid urbanisation in villages & cities - process lost its space, where in service is understood as responding to demands - with sort of population explosion & inadequate public infrastructure & increase in, for profit private sector - service with a process based appoach has less space for understanding.
The expectation from the society is mostly to responding to their medical demands rather than understanding "how they could play major role in preventing themselves from situations of deviance of physical health, mental trauma & indebtedness".
Friends what I like to submit here is that, most of my work doesnt fall under any 'fundable category/ies'. As I see unless they understand interconnectedness of my various activities, it is unethical for me to ask.
Friends, I see their is need to have dialogue on this & I see our work is a good case study for the people who thread a " road less travelled" & help how we can ask, to move forward.
-surya.
Good Life Centre is a registered NGO, serving the people with disabilites and deprived women of our society... presntly we run a residential care centre for mentally challenged and orphans, total strength is 90.
we are depending on donations from public and as such there is no international support.
we need support and guidlines to develop our activities and to provide a better standard of living to our kids....
We are authorised by Govt.of India, to receive foreign contribution towards development of our society..Reg.no.075820335
Good Hearted well-wishers could contribute/donate for the cause of mentally challenged orphans and women.
you may also kindly transfer your donation to our bank account: In India: ICICI BANK , A/C No.603701147662 and In abroad : ICICI BANK a/c no.603701147663, Chennai - 600073.
our home address: GOOD LIFE CENTRE 12 LOGANATHAN STREET WEST TAMBARAM, CHENNAI - 600045 goodlife1996@yahoo.com www.goodlifecentre.org 044-22264151 / 52
kindly visit our web; www.goodlifecentre.org
Looking forward to your valuable support to our dear children.
With respects and thanks
K. BASKARAN Director
|
Attachments: |
Goodl Life.pdf (700 KB) |
goalguy - Dec 12, 2006 8:24 am (# Total: 25) Marc A. Pitman
Kim: I love your comment "In relationships too we can forget that the other person cannot read our minds, and this can and does lead to misunderstandings."
In ANY relationship that's true...I <i>still</i> try to read my wife's mind. After 12 years of doing it wrong, I should no better but I still do it!
That's also why I'm a BIG proponent of an "ask" not being an "ask" if you haven't mentioned a specific dollar amount. The donor has virtually no way of knowing what you're asking unless you say it clearly.
am looking for a donor who can donate money to me in order for me to purchase even second tractors and ploughs.i need to carry out a farming project that will help old peoples homes with food and money for their upkeep. anyone willing to help shall be thanked from above. the estimated money that is needed is US1000000.00 or any one can donate tractor(s) and plough(s) in kind.
thank you
Yours Faithfully
Wellington Gambe
Sep 26, 2006
The Ins and Outs of Foundations
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (March 2006 - Closed)
By Patrick O'Heffernan, Fundraising Expert
1. Set up a personal relationship first. Foundations are made up of individuals. Individuals read your proposals. Individuals make the grant decisions. If you are applying to a large foundation, your first contact may be a web page where you find the guidelines and forms to fill to request for funds. Try to go beyond this: call staff members to let them know of a project or a conference that advances the foundation’s agenda, or to connect them with an organization in the field, or even to send them a study. If you do it right, the foundation staff may even help you write the proposal.
2. Build a relationship with foundations the same way you would with private donors. Plan to take time with a foundation just as you would with a private donor, and seek out “connectors” and “influencers” – people who can make introductions for you and whose word foundation staff trusts. Offer to help a current foundation’s recipient that could benefit from your experience. Offer help to a foundation staffer in the form of advice or contacts, the way you would build a web of interest around a private donor.
3. Being in the right place at the right time can be the key to a grant – and being there can be part of a strategy, not just luck. Attend conferences where foundation staff will likely attend as well. Go to conventions of foundations (get yourself invited by a current funder). Publish articles in magazines read by foundation staff, particularly on the subject you seek funding in. Produce studies that advance both yours and a foundation’s agenda and mail them out. These kinds of activities can replace months of relationship building, and even result in a request for proposal.
The bottom line: To get the most out of a foundation, you often must put something in.
Post your questions and comments, or share your experience here.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 15, 2006 9:46 am (# Total: 15) One of the best ways to be at the right place at the right time is foundtaion sponsored gatherings of donors and activists. You often have to be on the grapevine to learn about them, but if you do and can go, they can shortcut months of work and lead to immediate grants
University of North Carolina
Could anyone on this listserv suggest foundations who fund domestic violence advocacy and research?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 16, 2006 5:47 pm (# Total: 15) MS Foundation for one....do you have access to the foundation center database?
Under One Roof - Mar 16, 2006 7:02 pm (# Total: 15) Mike Marshall
I'm looking for foundations that might be interested in investing in organization with a 15 year track record of generating unrestricted revenue on behalf of local AIDS service organizations.
Social Enterprise and Microfinance
Dear Patrick and listservers,
Are community foundations different from foundations in the steps outlined about in relationship building? And, what community foundations are active in the greater DC area (No.VA. and MD).
thanks
dt
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 17, 2006 10:39 am (# Total: 15) Yes, community foundations are a different animal and they do operate differently. A community foundation focuses its giving in a "community", usually geographic, and it often raises money from wealthy individuals and businesses in the community to redistribute in the form of grants. Community foundations also often focus on social services, education, economic development issues within their chosen community, rather than political issues.
Not all community foundations retrict themselves to a geographic community; a very few define community as a community of interest, i.e., a particular issue, but these are rare.
Check out www.mdcommunityfoundations.org for community foundations in Maryland. The Council on Foundations has a community foundation locator: check out www.cof.org/Locator/ for a site to help you find community foundations in other locations.
Rajendran mariagnanam
Sir,
I was trying to find out organisations that would help people from lower economic strata to help themselves .
I found the social edge just by getting answers to my key word inserts in the yahoo /google search engines.The organisation is wonderful in its build and in its focus to such social matters.
Iam not a founder or co founder of any organisation as such.Contribution to social cause have me been in my mind for last many decades.May be I dint get the right time to focus or circumstances dint allow me to pursue this.
Now Iam 53 years young with lots of hands on experience in social aspects with social interaction among indians(across indian geographies) .
I do desire to contribute to the people from any where who can be benefited through my experience and also start up an org for the same to deliver goods by collaberative help by way of advices,couselling ,directions , best practices and ofcourse no the least the funding ,fund raising methodologies.
Lastly to have a close looped linked organisation which can sustain such help and delivery of goods through building a mix of business cum social trust which are interchangeable.
I need the expert advices of the honourable people who are into this social edge to help me in such a venture to carry out the same goals what all of you have.
I do have incorporated an agro pvt ltd company which has not started /comenced any business to provide jobs in any sector of agriculture or agro related products or services through out the geography. I do need contacts to carry out exports to ensure fund development to side line the other activites of social trust to go side by side . The profits generated will be useful in creating jobs and funds to carry out other job generating activities that brings in better economic stature to socially edged people.
The common facilities for people who really cannot reach or be employed in the unrelated job could be structured through SHGs and othe social trusts as existing in various countries.
Iam planning to start up a trust soon for the cause.
Please give me your views and best practices and correct me if my thought process for the same goal is right.
Also I need help to propagate the business venture to enhance and pursue the goals that is beefited to the cause of social edge.
With warm regards to all wonderful people
Major M Rajendran
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 17, 2006 5:34 pm (# Total: 15) it is critical to customize your approach to foundations, and to follow the procedures they publish. A foundation that says no "phone calls" should not be called. A foundation that says "no electronic submissions" should not be emailed proposals. If you want to work with a foundation like Omidyar that encourages participation in its online community, you should participate in its community. If a foundation says it does not accept unsolicited proposals, don't send them one (but find out how they do selelct organizations to fund).
None of this means you should not develop relationships. It is always easier if you know someone than if you don't know anyone. If a foundation discourages calls and meetings and you encounter a staff member at a conference, by all means talk with him or her. If you publish an article and you get an email from a foundation staff or executive asking a question, follow up and deepen the contact if it seems adviseable. Relationships count, but so does following the guidelines.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 17, 2006 5:47 pm (# Total: 15) Although you are from South Asia, it is uncanny how much your ideas resemble those of a friend of mine - also formerly from the ag sector - who started a foundation to provide micro loans to women in Guatamala (see the film posted last week on the NamesteDirect foundation).
Providing fund raising advice specific to India and even more so, to an organization that delivers goods is something that a loclal expert will have to help you with. I would contact Jill Harris at the Delhi office of LEAD International B-10, 1st Floor Greater Kailash, Enclave Part-II New Delhi 110 048 Phone 91 11 29225474/2921547
LEAD runs workshops and trainings in virtually everything that you asked about plus they have a network of 1200 people around the world - many in India - who work in non-profits and help others.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 17, 2006 5:57 pm (# Total: 15) The Foundation Center grants search engine lists 2300 grants for aids services and 228 for AIDS research. You should go to http://fconline.fdncenter.org/srch_grant.php and refine the search and look at the available grants to determine which would be helpful. You willhave to register with the Foundation center to search, but it is worth it. You might also check government grants at NIH www.nih.gov/.and HHH www.hrsa.gov/
Rajendran mariagnanam
Dear Mr Patrick,
Thanks for your prompt reply and giving me some vedge to get in.
Iam very thankful to your wide knowledge which I feel would be benefited to me and others.
Hope to keep in touch with you.
With warm regards
Major M Rajendran
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 18, 2006 6:10 pm (# Total: 15) That is what Social Edge is for...people helping people. Let us hear about your experience.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 21, 2006 11:31 pm (# Total: 15)
ruthnorris - Mar 24, 2006 3:01 pm (# Total: 15) Skoll Foundation
Thanks Patrick and colleagues for a very interesting discussion.
I'm glad you clarified the point about tailoring the approach to the specific foundation in question. I'd like to point out that the Skoll Foundation actively discourages grantseekers from investing time and resources in a process of "cultivation." Instead, we try to make our guidelines and criteria as clear and specific as possible. Anyone can find out by visiting our website whether their work and stage of organizational development is a potential match for the Skoll Awards. And if it is, they can submit their application online to be evaluated competitively with those of other grantseekers in each cycle. Yes, there are Skoll Award recipients each year whom we had no knowledge of or contact with before their online applications arrived. The important thing for us is a very close fit and exemplary performance on the criteria.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 27, 2006 10:08 am (# Total: 15) Ruth Interestingly, I have heard from some grant seekers that they actually prefer to work with Foundations like Skoll and Omidyar that discourage cultivation -- they say it enables them to focus on what they do, rather than on what may be unprofitable cultivation, and that they use the time they would have spent on cultivation to increase the number of proposals they send out. There seems to be an age and grant size breakdown...older development staff and those working for larger organizations seeking larger ($500K and up) grants, seem to feel most comfortable in the cultivation mode, and younger grant seekers and those working for smaller grants seem to prefer the online and no culitvation routes.
My sample is totally non-scientific, so I make no claims that this is a trend, but there is definently an efficiency argument for eliminating cultivation as part of grant seeking from foundations. But, as you say, the best rule is to follow the guidelines and desires of the foundation, which will make the decision on fit and performance.
Private Donors - Part 1
Private Funders are Difficult. Are They Worth the Effort? Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (February 2006 - Closed)
Raising money from private individuals is often very frustrating, even for Americans who have honed the “major donor ask” to a fine art. Simply finding the right donor and then building a relationship is often daunting for a small NPO. The process can last two years, followed by months of agonizing over when to ask –and how much to ask for.
No wonder most organizations prefer to work with foundations, development banks and government agencies. While their politics may be mysterious to some, at least they have routines for asking, and schedules for making the decisions.
Here are three reasons why you should still find the time to work with private donors:
1. Some private donors can actually give more than institutions. While many foundations and agencies have large budgets, the funds are split among many organizations and there are limits on the size of each grant. Getting a very large grant from a foundation involves just as much relationship building and negotiating as a private donor gift would. Besides, private donors who have entered into a relationship with you can focus the majority of their giving on your organization.
2. Private donors can move much faster than institutional donors –in the right conditions. If you have built a good relationship, or if you have been introduced and are supported by someone who has a strong relationship with the private donor, and if your timing is right, the decision can be made in days, not months. And they often will do it without an elaborate proposal.
3. Finally, private donors, once they are on your side (or on your board) are far more loyal than foundations or development agencies. The upside of spending 18 -24 months building a relationship with an individual often means she or he is with you for many years... a rarity among institutional donors.
So what has your experience been? What advice do you have on private donors? I would like to start a conversation on how you build those relationships. Tell us your story below.
Dominique Callimanopulos - Feb 7, 2006 8:56 pm (# Total: 26) Elevate, Inc.
There are many variables when it comes to working successfully with individual donors, and these are accentuated when seeking private giving for new or start up organizations.
In the past several years, I have done fundraising for a few start ups, and have learned important lessons:
1. The network and skills of the founder or leader of the organization are key! It is the Founder's network that is going to get the whole ball rolling. His or her acumen, good judgment and appeal are essential for a good campaign and the success of the organization. Whatever issues a founder brings to the table will invariably be reflected by the organization. An important question to consider is whether your Founder (or you, if you are the Founder) is COACHABLE! The outcome of most meetings with individual donors in the early years of start up rest on the competence of a Founder. Likewise, their ability to attract a strong Board, that can perform an essential fundraising duties, is also a key consideration.
2. Fundraising, as the old adage goes, is "friend-raising" and TAKES TIME. It takes years to create a strong consituency of individual donors for any organization. Donors do not like to be treated as "targets". They are people first, with complex lives and many interests and your relationship with them has to be handled with the sensitivity you would bring to any relationship you care about.
3. Donor education, overload and burn out. Donors are increasingly educated and savvy people, schooled in the philanthropic conversation and scrutinizing of their investments. For fundraising to be successful, and organization must really have its act together. Likewise, being a philanthropist can be draining--as donors know groups are out for their money. Inauthentic interactions can be wearing for all concerned.
4. Fundraising is not an isolated function. Fundraising cannot be separated from the overall strength of an organization. To present well, an organization needs strong program development, an active, committed Board, and a strategic development plan. I have had many groups want to hire me as a fundraiser, and in some cases, have had to stregthen and advise on all the aspects of the organization.
5. Donor sources should be diverse. You really need a multi pronged approach to find donors: Good PR, regular special events, and tapping into your donors' networks are essentials. Best thing is if you can motivate and mobilize your donor base to find new donors. That again, comes down to the conviction, energy and vision of a NGO leader and staff.
These are just a few points, but I think they're important ones to include in the conversation!
Jochen Holtrup - Feb 8, 2006 2:53 am (# Total: 26) The Care Club (c)
At first exuse my miserable english - it`s a little bit rusty since school days:-)
Our experience is, that the biggest problems are to get trought right to the funder. It is sometimes more harder or difficult to get over the net of people that are around a welth man. You find people on the other side of the telephone that are "caring" so much about their boss that you are sometimes in situations, that are rediculous. They have no idea, but are asking questions, that you are sometimes wish you are at a institution. Because they think often, that you are only a bagger and have only a "crazy" idea, because they are not realy into social things. 2 times´, after month, we stood in front of a funder and he asked, why we didnt come earlier - what do you say then...?
warm regards
jochen
Windy International Youth Foundation
I think private donors are very difficult to create a good relationship with, i started looking for some about three years ago and still am on them. They have made my projects stand still. They are very difficult to get. What do say about this? Help us. More vulunerable people are suffering, they need our help.
Pamela Hawley - Feb 8, 2006 12:39 pm (# Total: 26) Founder and CEO, UniversalGiving
Dear Patrick,
I absolutely agree with you about cultivating relationships with high networth donors! Our experience at UniversalGiving has been extremely positive.
If you have the right tools, such as business planning, budgets, vision and values; the right management team; an excellent presentation and presentation skills; and sincere motive, you will succeed.
Many funders do move very quickly when they are inspired by a right idea, right leadership and values. In addition, you can often present the reports, charts and graphs that are meaningful to your organization and board, rather than what is required by an institution. At the end of the day, the funder wants to see results, which can be manifested in different types of reporting.
Additionally, working with these donors provides diversification in your funding. It also often leads to referrals. And for our team personally, we enjoy this relationship with our donors. The relationship is very direct, clear, productive. It is also a joy to work with individuals who are often used to making quick business decisions and want to invest in a nonprofit with clear goals and results.
Patrick, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on this issue. Thank you for raising it. All my best! Pamela
tutormentor - Feb 8, 2006 6:21 pm (# Total: 26) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I think all of the suggestions for finding private donors are great and I've applied them to raise more than $4 million since 1993 when I launched Cabrini Connections and the Tutor/Mentor Connection with 7 volunteers, 5 students and no money. However, I'm never received more than $10k from a private donor, or more than $40k in a single year from a corporate/foundation donor. Thus, I'm constantly applying all of the suggestions to build and sustain a diverse, and loyal donor base.
However, I'm also trying to do something else. In 1993 I began building a database of organizations in Chicago that offer various forms of volunteer based tutoring/mentoring in the non school hours. I began to plot this information into a Geographic Information System so that I could create maps showing where these programs are located in the city. I add overlays on the map to show where poverty is most concentrated and where poorly performing schools are located. You can see this in the Program Locator section of http://msg.uc.iupui.edu/TMC/html/index.php
With this information I feel it's possible for all of these programs to work together to create a greater, and more frequent public visibility (like advertising) that seeks out people who want to end poverty through education and programs like tutoring/mentoring, and who learn to make choices based on tools like the Program Locator that show where the need is. Using the search features a donor can look at the map of the city, pick a section of the city where he wants to be involved, and then search the zip codes in this section to determine what programs are there, what age group they serve and what they do.
Based on this strategy, the more ways we educate people about the issues, and about ways tutor/mentor programs make a difference, and the various ways they can give time, talent and/or treasure to help one or more programs grow, we can increase the pool of donors in a category, and the distribution of donors into all neighborhoods, not just those with high profile organizations and professional fund raising staffs.
If we can have just a small influence on donor choices, that leads donors to look for programs, based on a shared commitment to solve and important problem, we can lower the emotional and fiscal costs of searching for money, and maybe keep a few leaders involved longer, thus improving their experience, and the quality of leadership they provide.
Is this working? Our program locator attracted close to 20,000 page view in 2005. A program at the Chicago Bar Association distributed $45,000 in grants to 17 different programs in December 05 (http://www.lend-a-hand.net).
Can it work better? As Bill Clinton said at the funeral yesterday for Coretta Scott King, "the difficulty of success does not relieve one of the obligation to try" . If anyone reading this leads a volunteer-based tutor/mentor program, why not join us and try to make this work for you?
Dan Bassill
Tutor/Mentor Connection
http://tutormentor.blogspot.com
Mathew Emery
From the perspective of a small private donor. There are a small number of organizations where I know the ED, program officers, and/or other staff and have a reasonably clear read on their (leveraged) social impact on the ground. These relationships have been built over the course of 5-10 years. Though I am a small private donor at present; I certainly intend to make large contributions over time as my means and time expand. For example, going cycling with a program officer for one of my favorite organizations once per year or so to hear what's happening.
Look at your full staff and volunteer base as assets in the private donor game. In the 'Good To Great' book, it maps to the concept of slowly but slowly building the momentum of your fundraising Flywheel.
My Best,
M.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 10:20 am (# Total: 26) Dominique makes excellent points that are echoed in Mathew's post. Relationships are key, and, as Dominique points out, the networks and history of hthe founder or ED are often the most important. However, there is a danger here that if the founder or ED leaves, the networks with go with her or him. There is often a temptation by both the ED and the Director of Development to let the ED handle high donor relationships while the DoD writes the proposals, throws the house parties and works with foundations. While this is the most efficient arrangment for a small NPO, it can be a mistake unless both people make a point to introduce the DoD to all major donors..
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 10:30 am (# Total: 26) Dominique writes about donor education, overload and burn out...noting that donors are increasingly savvy. She is exactly right in saying that NPO's must really have thier act together before approaching a donor...there is nothing worse than going through the effort to meet a donor -- which Jochen rightly says is not easy - and then making a pitch not relevant to the donor. As she says, inauthentic interactions can be wearing for all concerned, and figuring out a social connection and then using it for a dumb ask is a kiss of death.
You should study a private prospect as carefully as you study a foundation, even though it is not as easy (if you have access to Wealth Engine or one of the private donor search engines, it can be a bit easier). The best way is to work with an "influencer" -- a person who knows them well and who trusts and supports you. The influencer can help you understand who the donors support, why, how much, and the best way to develop a relationship that is both authentic and profitable---not easy.
The best way is to introduce them to your work with the knowledge that they have some interest, and then let them seek more from you. Not always easy, takes much time and patience, is a gamble, but can pay off big.
.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 10:44 am (# Total: 26) While working with European donors is a little different than US donors (who are much more savvy and systematic about their giving, as Dominique notes) the principles are the same.
First, how to get through the "screeners" as we often call them in the US...people whose job it is to keep people like you away from their boss. I try to avoid them altogether by working thorugh a peer, that is, a person who is the donor's peer and knows her or him socially or professionally. This is usually done through a board member or an advisory board member. (more about this is a later blog)
If you don have a board member or advisory board member who can do this, do you work with an attorney, acountant, consultant, etc. who also works with the donor (I recently was introduced to a donor by a caterer! who produced a party for me and who also produces parties for the donor..who I havd been tryint reach for months).
Also, don't forget family and relativies...do you have a cousin who owns a company that does business with a company owned by a donor..or a sister married to a friend of a donor's,or ...you get the picture. The point is, who do you know who might know the donor?
Another way is to speak at conventions and conferences that the donor attends. Since you can't know what he or she will attend, get out and speak as much as possible and you may get lucky (or other donors!).
Finally, to answer your question, what is your answer to the question why didn't you tell me sooner?....I would say, "it took us a while to reach you, but our work and our message got better while we were trying, so it was worth it for both of us. Now, here is what you need to know....."
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 10:55 am (# Total: 26) Windy, Do you have a Board of Directors or an Advisory Board? This should be the place to start. Also, as Dominique and others rightly point out, it takes a lot of time..as long as 18 months --- to build relationships. However, once those relationships are built, you will have a pool of people you can go to for emergency funds or new project funds...without the red tape of a foundation.
To your specifics, I understand about not starting projects until the donors agree to pay (and writes the check!). I always try to seek mutiple sources of funding -- private donors, foundations, government funding - for a project. The advantage to this is that you avoid to some degree the O.P.S. problem -- "Other People's Schedules" . While you will still be subject to the schedules of the donors, it won't be a powerless dependence -if you have multiple proposals working thorugh mulitple processes, some will be faster than others.
Another advantage of this is that as you get grants and start projets, you will have more to show private donors, who can pick off a piece of a project and offer to fund it while a foundation picks up a larger pieces.
Your comment about people are suffering and need help can be a powerful message to private donors, but it should not motivate you to skip cultivation that can build relatonships for long term funding. If you do not have the time to work for 6 - 18 months with a private donor, you should focus your energy on instituional funding for immediate needs, but make sure you have a board that gets your message out to donors...they might surprise you with the funds to improve or extend a project funded by a foundatin or government.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 11:02 am (# Total: 26) You put it exactly right and so succinctly! In the best of all worlds, your donors work with you on specific projects, not to manage them, but to bring in other donors. This kind of relatinship sometimes happpens through donor organizations like Threshold, where donors can bring in directors of organizatons they support to brief other donors.
The quick businesse decisions you mentioned are,I have found, the result of strong realionships, good preparation, and an honest, direct ask. When you have a long standing relationship with a private donor, you know what she or he will fund and how much, so you can call them only with appropriate requests at appropriate times. If you do your homework -- make a pitch geard to that donor with the facts they like, often they can say yes or know on the spot.. and send the check on the spot.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 9, 2006 11:17 am (# Total: 26) Dan, I always love your posts...you bring such good thinking and ideas to the site. The GPS process you describe is brilliant...are you an engineer?? (sounds like something one of my graduate students at Georgia Tech would have done).
In any case, a suggestion for it to work better is to apply for a speaking spot at an AFP annual meeting, both national and regional I think it is something that should and would be welcomed and will generate quite a bit of donor interest. I would also write an article for Philanthropy Magazine and send it to Tides, Threshold, etc. for reprinting in their newsletters to donors. And if any of the foundations that fund you have newsletters or magazines, send it to them also.
As to your comment about $10,000 being your highest private grant, that will depend to a certain extent on what you are asking for. I got a $10 million private grant at one point, but it was part of a $60 million capital project and it came from a funder with a private foundation who had a 10 year relationship with the institution (and I was part of a team that put it together). It takes time and scale.
tutormentor - Feb 9, 2006 6:32 pm (# Total: 26) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
A few years ago students from Northwestern's Graduate School of Management did an audit of the Tutor/Mentor Connection and they recognized that we we doing good work but without adequate resources. One of their suggestion was to build a team of students from various universities who would work together to support the project.
I've tried to get this going in many ways. Most recently I've been able to get a discussion launched in the forums of http://msg.uc.iupui.edu/TMC/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=PNphpBB2&file=index
Patrick, I encourage you to read this and include this idea in any information you share about the T/MC. What I propose is building teams of business school students from different universities who share ideas and compete with each other to see who can do the most to draw resources to tutor/mentor programs in their community on an annual basis. One of the groups I'm taking with is the Oxford group I met in the Social Edge forum a year ago. I encourage you to point some of your own graduate students to this forum. Maybe they can form a team that gets recognized in FORBES as a Best Practice some time in the future!!
Imagine bright B-school students building marketing plans that draw visibility, volunteers and donors to charities in their community. Imagine an international competition and a Noble Prize type recognition of who does this best. Once this starts the ideas from each group become the starting point for the next year's competition, meaning they all innovate from the best work of everyone else to constantly improve the impact of what they do.
Combine this with my previous post and we have a low-cost, on-going, and highly visible way to draw a more consistent flow of needed resources to volunteer-based tutor/mentor programs in different communities.
Obviously, this is a concept that could be duplicated to support any charity category, not just tutoring/mentoring.
I'd love to have your help to make it a reality.
tutormentor - Feb 10, 2006 9:07 am (# Total: 26) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I encourage you to visit Greenstar.org and introduce yourself to them. They have been setting up satalite powered community centers in remote locations and helping them to generate income through producing and selling local art, similar to what you are doing. Perhaps you can partner with them, or find a web based organization who understands this model and will help you. Another group to look at is http://www.aurashouse.com/. This is an example of how someone with web skills is helping people in communities like yours. Perhaps you could become one of their sponsored groups.
In our May eConference we're inviting people who have launched web based strategies like Aura's House to talk about what they do, so others might duplicate their work. Look in the Discussion forums of http://msg.uc.iupui.edu/TMC/html/index.php to see how Aura's House led this discussion in Nov. 05.
Good luck.
Dan Bassill Tutor/Mentor Connection
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 13, 2006 12:41 pm (# Total: 26) I did check out your site and it is (1) EXCELLENT and(2) an inspiration for futher discussion. Send me an email and we will continue talking
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 13, 2006 12:46 pm (# Total: 26) I have forwarded aurashouse to a freind of mine doing the same thing in Latin America, and to another friend of mine who runs a foundation that provides micro grants to women in develping countirs (mostly Gutamala). Thanks for hsharing this.
Dear Patrick O Hefferman,
Its a great pleasure for the concern you have ,to enable people find lasting solutions to the problems plaguing them.
We are grateful and we hope to contact the above references .We rest assured that with your assistance , together we will make a small differnce big change to improve the welbeing and safeguard the livelihood of marginalised artisans and farmers in rural communities in Cameroon.Hope you could please forward our Association mission aurashouse.Through this we are confident as a mentor and tutor are dreams will one day come true.
I wish you please send me your email address to enable us, send you photos of the fair trade global journey which was hosted in Cameroon from the 27-31/01/06.
NDOPCRAFT was priviledged to be approved by IFAT as one of of the main fair trade organisation to host the global journey in cameroon.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Hi to you all
I have read this discussion with interest. The one factor that I find missing in most NPO's focus is that in an endeavour to create sustainability you have to create sustainable economic demand and that is a missing factor.
whether the demand is only economic or emotional is irrelevant. you need to identify your target market and identify what would motivate the creation of demand (so as to satisfy "needs").
for example:
economic demand. the one major reason that we have identified a lack of economic sustainability is the fact that individuals and organisations embark on projects for which there is no market. Often there is no market for a variety of reasons ... but the most common is the fact that there isn't enough currency in an area to sustain demand i.e. money moves out of community faster than it can satisfy demand. what is needed are different methodolgies to retain currency for longer time frames and to get currency to circulate more, this in turn results in an increase of disposoble income
emotional demand. it is no different than economic demand. you need to identify the emotional needs of yr donors before you approach them. then you have to create the mechanisms and vehicles that motivates them to choose you versus the 1000 others that you competing with, not to mention all the other parallel demads that r made on the disposal income of individuals and/or organisations.
laurinda
tutormentor - Feb 14, 2006 4:46 pm (# Total: 26) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Your suggestions on creating demand are important. However, the best reason to respond has little impact is too few people are exposed to the idea. This is the challenge most small organizations or individual entrepreneurs face.
The Internet enables us to not only spread our message (economic or emotional) but also to connect with others and collaborate on message development strategies. For instance a few weeks ago I gave someone in Australia some ideas that she might use in engaging businesses in her tutor/mentor program. Last week she sent me a copy of her invitation and her agenda. It included our ideas. However, her invitation was done on a pdf with an animation element included. I thought it was really good. Thus, by networking, we both learned something.
Thus, while we think of what we say to potential donors, we also need to be thinking of ways we might work together to increase the number of potential donors who are listening.
Dan Bassill http://www.tutormentorconference.bigstep.com
Dominique Callimanopulos - Feb 18, 2006 5:03 am (# Total: 26) Elevate, Inc.
Reaching new individual donors online has become a breakthrough source of revenue for many groups. Ephilanthropy.org is a great organization to support online fundraising efforts.
FYI--My travel philanthropy company, Elevate Destinations, will be launching an online feature this Spring which will allow travelers going anywhere in the world to donate to a screened non-profit or NGO in their country of destination.
For more info or to be considered as a non-profit beneficiary, please contact us at info@elevatedestinations.com. The feature is not yet up on our site, but you can get a sense of our orientation at www.elevatedestinations.com. We hope to start a travel dollars revolution!
The great thing about our new program, which is called TRAVEL MATTERS, is that organizations do not have to be online or have a website to profit (as many don't, particulary small worthy groups overseas). Elevate will collect the donations through PAYPAL on our secure site and forward them through ordinary means.
Cheers,
Dominique
Dear Dominique Callimanopulos,
Its a great pleasure to learn of this , wonderful live changing online donations ,that TRAVEL MATTERS has introduced .
We are grateful and wish to be included as one of the non profit organisations ,which looks forward to improving welbeing and safegaurd livelihood of marginalise artisans and farmers as while as a community free from HIV/AIDS.
We therefore call for your consent to include or organisation as one of those to benefit from these online donation.Together every one benfits more.
Dominique Callimanopulos - Feb 20, 2006 4:53 pm (# Total: 26) Elevate, Inc.
pa tom-
Please email me directly at dominique@elevatedestinations.com.
We will forward you an application to become a non-profit partner.
Thanks,
Dominique
Dear Dominique,
Its a pleasure to read from you.The development of individuals ,small scale farmers ,artisans and the empowerment of the rural woman is essential for the economic and social development of rural communities .
We look forward for your assistance through your expertise ,to provide us with the necessary tools to ignite our projects and mission to fruition.
OTHER BETTER WORLDS ARE POSSIBLE
thanks
Patrick O'Heffernan - Feb 21, 2006 10:06 am (# Total: 26) Thisis the kind of exchange that we hope for every day at socialedge. Thank you Dominique.
CHRISDANIEL - Aug 7, 2006 3:24 am (# Total: 26) PROF.DR.J.CHRISTOPHER DANIEL
Dear Dominique:
Greetings from GOODWILL. Please take a few moments to visit our website at http://mfcs.malianfoundation.org/goodwill/. You will get to know of our work in India on our website.
As a member of “SOCIAL EDGE’ I am pleased to contact you and introduce me to you as Executive Director of Goodwill Social Work Centre, Madurai, India .I am a former professor of Social work at Madurai Institute of Social Sciences, Madurai, India. I am VICE CONSUL of the First children's Embassy in the World Medjashi- Macedonia.. I am a Networker registered with the Global Links Initiative,UK(http://www.glinet.org). The Goodwill social work centre is an Indian Non Governmental organization registered under the Tamilnadu Societies Registration Act 1975 and Foreign Contributions Regulations Act 1976,Government of India in order to be eligible to receive grant funds from international funding organisations.Our Centre is a member of the World Association for Non-Governmental Organization(WANGO),USA. I am glad to let you know that our organization is included in the NGO database of the websites: http://www.idealist.org/ (Action without Borders), http://www.enscw.org/, http://www.euforic.org/ and http://www.charitynet.org/
It is so delightful to visit your website and to know of your organisation and its various activities. I learn from your website that you are working with NGOs in developing countries. Would you be interested in partnering with our organisation and providing any funding for taking up development programmes for poor and disadvantaged children,youth and women in rural and urban areas in Madurai,South India. I would be very grateful for any help and support you might offer to our centre. I send you further information on hearing from you. Best regards.
Prof. Dr.J.Christopher Daniel, M.A.Ph.D (social work)
Executive Director
Goodwill social work centre
No; 5, south street extension
Singarayar colony
Madurai-625 002, India
email: chriskan@satyam.net.in
Private Donors - Part 2
Hosted by Patrick O’Heffernan (March 2006 - Closed)
Cultivation is often cited as the key to success with private donors – and it is – but how do you get that first meeting?
Patrick O’Heffernan, who likes to say that “the best gift you can give your friends is your friends,” recommends to find connectors – people who know many people and love to get them together – then work with them to create an exchange of “gifts”.
He recommends three steps to reach this goal.
1. Start with who you know
Where are your connectors? They could be on your board, in your family, or among your friends working for other NPOs. Develop a list of prospects that you wish to approach, and ask your contacts if they know any of your prospects. With your board and staff, you can do this formally by circulating a list; with others, a conversation or phone call will work best. When you get a “yes, I know her,” find out the strength and nature of the relationship and if your contact can set up a social lunch or just send an invitation to an event. Then follow up with the help of your connector.
2. Don’t rush, listen
Regardless of the nature of the meeting, spend most of your time listening for common interests. Learn what they are interested in, what their priorities are, and who is in their network, especially the “influencers” – people whose opinions they trust. Give them your message, but keep it low key and frame it so that it fits into one of their interests (which it should, since you have researched them before the meeting). The key is to take it easy, look for common interests, and listen!
3. Give them something
Once you know their interests and priorities and you are no longer a cold call, get back to them with something useful and valuable to them. It could be a report, an introduction to someone else you know who can be useful, an invitation to an event that tracks with their interest but is not easy to get in (and during which you can spend some time with them).
This last step is most important. When you build a network of relationships with a person, they see you as part of their network, rather than as a single dimensional contact who will eventually ask for money. If you bring other people into the relationship, you develop stronger, multiple ties. As you build the network with your prospect, get to know their “influencers”. Many philanthropists rely on a small circle of “influencers” to help them decide on whom to give to, and also to bring them ideas and people. If these people are not part of your network, you will have a much harder time.
Share your experience in building relationships with prospects. Post below.
As Chip Conley is fond of saying, "it's all about long-term relationships." No donor likes being treated like a walking checkbook. You want to cultivate a relationship with the whole person, not just their credit card. Focusing on long-term relationships (what do you want the person to think of you 20 years from now?) will ensure that you act with integrity toward that person. And relationships are mostly about integrity.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 21, 2006 11:29 pm (# Total: 8) I build relationships with people who are interested in my clients, even though they are ot prospects. They may know prospects, the may become donors, they may have good ideas and good connections. And, because I am not thinking of them as a checkbook, there is more authenticity and integrity in the relationship.
P-CED
Here's my problem Patrick. We've just completed 3 years of research and published a proposal, organised contacts with prospective technology providers, networked with in country civil action groups and presented to local political leaders and an international childcare NGO.
The proposal defines a national stategey for broadband deployment servicing 25,000 communities, a national level microcredit proposal on the solidarity group principle and a target social object, a childcare reform proposal funded by the profits of the former to liberate 100,000 children from underfunded orphanages and reduce overall welfare costs. Projected seed funding of $500 million to be repaid over 4 years.
Quite a proposal, I know and with monthly budget of $500.
The problem is now small funding, the cost involved in continuing to network to spread the message. For instance having been invited to partipate in a networking session with an in-country NGO, the cost of attending perhaps $20-30 is out of budget. We have to decline.
Networking as much as we're able in the virtual world offers a lot of opinions and manifested in a single $10 donation.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Jeff
(Parents Association of Mentally Challenged persons)
Our organisation is an Association of Parents of Mentally Challenged Persons,working in the different field of Mental Retardation in Bihar.
A brief introduction of our Non Profit NGO is being given hereunder;
Organization name : MARGDARSHAN
Contact person : Meera K. Sharma Chief Functionary
Address : MARGDARSHAN E-48, Peoples Cooperative Colony Kankar Bagh, Patna -800020 BIHAR (INDIA) Telephone number : +91-612 2361475, 0091-9835263648
Email address : mentalguide@yahoo.co.in
Mission of the Organization : to work for the betterment of Mentally Retarded Persons
Details of Organization :
Our Organisation is a Non Profit Society established in the year 1997 and duly registered under the Socities Registration Act.
The idea behind establishing the present organisation is to bring together the Parents / Guardians of persons with mental retardation and/or other disabilities, for conducting reasearch and promoting positive social action, to work for their care, training and rehabilitation. The aims and objects of the organisation also include everything anciliarry and incidental to the aforesaid objectives.
It is also important to mention here that for fulfilment of its aims and objects, the organisation is also permitted by the Govt. of India to receive Donations / Funds from the foreign Nationals / Organisations as per the provisions of the Foreign Contribution Regulations Act. The organisation is also registered under section 12A and 80 G of Income Tax Act.
ALL DONATIONS MAY KINDLY BE DRAWN IN THE NAME OF "MARGDARSHAN"
Area of Operation : Presently in the State of Bihar
Fielf of Interests of our NGO:
* Alternative Education * Children & Youth * Education * Employment * Fitness & Nutrition * Foundations & Fundraising Coalitions * Health & Wellness * Poverty
Industries
* Charity * Education * Healthcare * Medical Services * Not-for-Profit Organizations
One of the keys I find in building relationships with potential donors or connectors is to remember to have faith in the project I am fundraising for and myself. Although this seems simple, it is easy to let the self-doubt voices creep up in my head. Although they are not audible, the other person can sense them.
“Confidence and Clarity” are a mantra that I often repeat to myself as I try to relax before entering into a meeting. As Kevin Danaher said “relationships are mostly about integrity.” Don’t forget to have integrity with yourself.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 23, 2006 1:48 pm (# Total: 8) I find that there is a balance in meeting prospects for the first time...you have to balance listening to them against your enthusiasm for what you are doing. Whneen you do talk about your project, then your confidence comes through. Often private donors are self-made people...women or men who have built a business or who run a company or foundation. They have self-confidence that is undentable...and they can see it in people they talk with.
Clarity is an interesting concept. You have to be very clear about your project, its goals, how it will work, what the problems are and what you will do about them. I often try ot list all of the quetions and objections I can expect to hear and then answer them. If the answers do not come easily, or I have to make them up on the spot, I don't have clarity. It is also good to prsent the project to a friendly but critical audience beforehand ...someone who can spot a lack of clarity and tell you honesty so you can figure out the answer. If you do get those questiions..."who are you trying to impact?", "how will you to accomplish this?" "what about....."? and you have good solide answers that just roll off, you will impress the prospect and she will walk away saying you know what you are doing.
P-CED
There's a saying that comes to mind when I think of this topic - A man of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds.
I've just been reading David McClintick's recent article entitled 'How Harvard lost Russia' and now know why operating in the target region of the former Soviet Union is sch an uphill struggle, tainted by the very association with Western economic development, in spite of our minor success in the Tomsk region.
Is it in any way possible to convey integrity when both donor and recipient must have little confidence?
There's another problem. Elsewhere on Social Edge I'm reading about a future concept of Social Enterprise operating in a virtual environment, this is how we've been working to a great extent over the past 3 years so it's no revelation.
The more fundamental problem here is, who are the donors and how does one contact them? Taking a stance for enterprise rather than charity naturally excludes a lot of the potential but there are surely other organisations who can see the value.
Here in the UK we have all manner of organisations and government departments making statements about poverty eradication, but try contacting them in a virtual world. In the greedy world that I've experienced as a small business, who can I trust who wouldn't see the business potential without the social benefit. Can I rely on my proposal copyright for instance, to protect the needs of those we're trying to serve?
Perhaps someone knows that rarest of commodities, a few good men, or women for that matter?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Mar 27, 2006 10:21 am (# Total: 8) ..but it can be a challenge in a highly competitive, no rules environment." That is a statement of principle; now to the reality that you describe.
I read the same article and was dissapointed, but not surprised. I suspect that there are many similar examples around the world....some the result of World BAnk or development bank practices.
I don't know the answer the answer to your questions, especially the first one. I always maintain that you start with telling the truth, but then I recall Henry Kissingers's maxium about advancing positions that "have the added valaue of being true" as standard operating procedure in much of diplomacy... i.e., say and do what is in your own interest and if it is true, so much the better (although it might not matter).
I think - but don't really know - that your situaiton is very tough and possibly somewhat unique when compared to those faced by most NPOs. Having said that, we are all struggling with the balance between social welfare and enterprise. I would welcome comments from asmany of our readers as possible...this sounds like a very ncessary forum. Thank you for raising the issues...I wish I had more answers.
Fundraising Events: “At the very least, don't lose money!”
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (December 2005 - Closed)
You can’t always guarantee to meet your dollar goal on fundraising events, but you should at least break even if you take the right steps.
The first and most important step is to have a plan and a budget – not just for this event, but for your entire year’s events. The budget should cover both cost and expected income, so you can see if the labor that goes into events is worth the income. When you do plan an event, be clear if this is a “soft ask” or a “hard ask” event. In a soft ask event, you tell people what the organization needs and how they could help, but you don’t put them on the spot to give right then. Soft asks are most appropriate in countries where giving is preceded by one-to-one social process. In an hard ask event, you let them know you expect donations at the event and you give them a way to contribute immediately. Hard asks are common in the USA and becoming so in Europe.
Second, be clear that this is a fundraising event, not a celebration with an ask tacked on. A true fundraising event follows a logical format, even when the event is billed as celebrating something else. The end point of a fundraising event is the ask; a celebration may have another focus, or none at all. In the USA and much of Europe, people are pretty clear that they will be asked for money; other cultures may differ and you will have to be more subtle.
Third, get sponsors to cover your costs and give them credit at the event. Food from a local restaurant or farm, drinks from a winery or brewery or juice and water from a distributor. Food and drinks are a major cost and if you start an event with them covered, you odds of a profit go up significantly.
Fourth, get a few donors in advance and “salt” them in the event so they can stand up and make a pitch for you with the credibility of having given already. And this guarantees you revenue in advance. They can also “syndicate” donors – ask people to come forward and join them in reaching a goal. If they offer to match gifts made that night, even better. Ideally, this will be set up in advance.
Five, ask from the heart. It is hard to make a personal connection when asking for money in a group, so personalize the ask by having someone with a personal connection make it. She/he can tell a personal story of why they give and why they are not embarrassed to ask.
Lastly, give people a range of gifts to give and a variety of ways to give. Make each amount important (i.e.: $1,000 will buy the 20 tube wells we need for this village, $5,000 will finish our promotional film, $500 will buy brochures). Offer to take pledges, credit cards, checks, stock gifts. There is no guarantee, but if you take these steps, the chance of losing money goes down and the chance of exceeding your goals goes up. I have only skimmed the surface.
Post below to tell us about your experiences.
DrNancyWilliams - Dec 8, 2005 7:58 am (# Total: 11) Nancy Williams, Ed.D.
I have been running a 501(c)(3) since 1989 as the president and visionary. My main function has been to produce Montessori teacher education courses and to design fast-giveaway teacher education courses for use in large scale formats in developing countries. My passion and talent is in designing teacher ed courses. I have been keeping the organization together through my dedication alone. There are two board members beside myself, both are committed to the purpose and function, but both have large responsibilities with their paying jobs, thus, there is no financial commitment from either and both contribute what they can. Our short courses are ready to take to the global market as a means for training a significant number of the 30 million teachers needed in order to fulfill Millennium Development Goal #2 (primary education for each child by 2015). We have a viable (and quite impressive) product. My problem is that I am not a technical writer and do not have a good feel for fundraising. Although I have been to the Foundation Libraries and have compiled lists of possible donor foundations and sponsors, not one of them has provided a positive response and I spent too much money on mailings. My only hope seems to have a miracle donor show up out of nowhere and give me several hundred thousand dollars a year - someone who comes with camera to document our work, communication skills to build a donor base, and who helps with the budget.
My income has been unpredictable and insufficient. I take approximately 5% of whatever donations mysteriously come in for personal care (clothes, hair, well-being). I have been of the mind that I am an entrepeneur and must give all and more to developing my ideas. Thank goodness for my friends and family who respect and support my vision. For years now, I have been living in donated homes, driving donated cars, eating donated food, traveling on donated airline tickets..... However, it's time for me to have a salary and to take the organization to the next level. It's time I bring in a full support structure. I have developed "wish" budgets and have extensive operating plans and production strategies. The organization and courses have received scattered and unexpected financial contributions and support from the British Embassy in Nicaragua, Save the Children in Nicaragua, Plan International in Nicaragua, Department of Social Development in Mexico, Department of Education in Mexico, Department of Education in Nicaragua, Department of Education in Bolivia, Rotary Clubs in Mexico, and many private and public school teachers and children.
I am at a loss for what to do. I have taken grant-writing classes, but I think the problem is that the organization is so small and has no reliable budget. I do not have an annual report. If ten dollars was donated, I used it to put gas in the tank and drive to one of the pilot sites in Mexico, or to pick up donated Montessori materials. How do I document unreliable and unpredictable budgets? It truly is a miracle we have maintained our integrity as an organization, but we are strong and have an excellent program. We are just three women who believe in what we do and are very good at keeping on track with the goals we have set forth. However, we are not fundraisers nor grantwriters. Where do I go to find a fundraiser? What are the laws about paying fundraisers? Can they still take a percentage of what they bring in?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 8, 2005 11:59 am (# Total: 11) This is a serious question that deserves a thorough answer. Email me through Social Edge and I will put some thought into it and email you specifics by Monday or Tues. In the meantime, you should apply to attend the Social Innovator Incubator (see homepage of Social Edge) and you should contact the Association of Fund Raising Professionals regarding help. And yes, you can pay a fund raiser on a commission basis.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 8, 2005 10:40 pm (# Total: 11) Dr. Williams' question will actually be addressed in my next blog, which will talk about making the transition from hand to mouth fund raising by the leader or founder to a systemic fund raising operation. We will cover that next week, but in the meantime, a good source for fund raising assistance is a local Foundation Center, or the online Foundation Center <http://fdncenter.org/>. There are also many other sites, but this is a good place to start. The next place to look is the Association of Fund Raising Profefessionals <http://www.afpnet.org/>. There are professional headhunters who can find the right development director (I can provide names by email).
DrNancyWilliams - Dec 9, 2005 10:28 pm (# Total: 11) Nancy Williams, Ed.D.
Thank you for the suggestion to apply for the incubator. I am already benefitting and have not even completed the application.
Best, Nancy
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 11, 2005 11:05 am (# Total: 11) The discussion seems to be good, but it is realy difficult to get in touch with organisation that can serve social changed, must of them fund seminar and not field work, for example action research in the field with villager.
Find attach, a document, I did not put the budget, but it is a frame of our activities in the field, but nobody is willing to support us.
The texte is in french, if you need a translated version, let me now
Thanks again Flaubert
|
Attachments: |
Doc de base de Zenu.doc (111 KB) |
evonne - Dec 13, 2005 3:27 pm (# Total: 11) AMO Studio
Patrick, thank you for this guide. I remembered you from Omidyar Network and enjoyed your words of wisdom (condensed perfectly as a resource for one of my clients).
Flaubert, it can be VERY DIFFICULT to reach out in regions where there is little attention given. Most field-based actions seem to flourish when they find a traveling partner overseas who sponsors the work on a long term basis. I have assisted clients here in the US to set up companion organizations to support endeavors like yours and there are people out there who have the resources to help you.
Your challenge is to find the right person who really cares about the people and projects you are initiating. Translating your documents into English may help you get there (I unfortunately do not read French). I understand that it's a tremendous amount of work to try and reach out in these ways but know that there are many people who want to help new projects succeed.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Dec 14, 2005 12:35 am (# Total: 11) I also do not read French. If you have a translated copy, send it; if not do not go to the trouble to translate it for us. Evonne has very good advaice. I would also look for a network that can be helpful. Try the LEAD International network (www.lead.org). There are over 1200 LEAD graduates in 100 countries who work in all aspects of a sustainable society and are often in touch with many of the NPO networks in the countries they are in and are very helpful to other NPOs.
Thanks a lot for your advice, Patrck and evonne. I will translate my document.
I woulk like to follow you evonne in that way of setting compagnion organisation, could you please give more details on th process.
you can also write to me through this email adress zenu91@zenu.org
Thanks again
Victor - Dec 14, 2005 10:35 am (# Total: 11) Flaubert, Vous devriez lire le blog sur Blaise Judja-Sato que nous avons posté il y a quelques jours: http://globalxfr.blogspot.com/. Bonne chance!
Victor
Bonjour Victor,
merci de votre proposition, je suis aller dans la site de Blaise et je trouve ce qu'il fait de trés interessant. Que dites vous de notre document ?
We have change the language and I coul see someone says, Those french are the same, Sorry; I used to listen to it here in Cameroun where we can exchange in both languages.
Thanks again
I want to put my pictures on the page, how to do it ? Thanks for help
Online Proposal Applications and Donor Aggregation: A New Trend?
Hosted by Jim Fruchterman (November 2005 - Closed)
Technology enables donors to quickly find proposals, compare them, and stay completely anonymous during the selection process.
Donors join an aggregator group to get access to grant applications posted on the site by many nonprofits. The site groups the applications by theme and puts them into a standard format. Applications are also searchable by keyword, so that donors can look for a specific topic and quickly compare several applications.
The process is fast and efficient and fair - applicants are all equal because they know nothing about the donors, so there is no favoritism or politicking.
The drawback for applicants is that they do not know why they are rejected. A few sites enable donors to comment on proposals in forums. The comments are anonymous, but applicants can read them for insight into their strengths and weaknesses. Donors can also directly contact applicants whose proposals they like to gather more information.
If you are applying through a donor aggregator, keep a few things in mind:
First, make sure you state your purpose and describe your project very clearly in the first two lines. Donors will skim lists of applications that have only one or two lines and a link to the full application. If your request does not come through clearly, it will be ignored.
Second, follow the format. The program will probably kick your application back if you don’t fill in the blanks correctly, and the search mechanism may not pick up your application if you don’t put the right information in the right places.
Third, participate. Some sites have forums, like the one you are reading. Join them. Not only will you meet other grant seekers, but donors sometimes participate in the forums.
Finally, don’t rely on a donor aggregator site: apply in several places.
Let us know if you have tried an aggregator site and what your experience has been.
jimfruchterman - Nov 8, 2005 2:35 pm (# Total: 21) Benetech
Are you talking about GlobalGiving and GivingGlobal, or something else?
Care For The Kids - Nov 8, 2005 2:35 pm (# Total: 21) PJ Williamson, CEO
I have never heard of these before, I would like to know how to find them and how to apply.
I accidentally sent our logo as an attachment I do not know how to take it down I apologize.
|
Attachments: |
Care for the Kids 4.jpg (12 KB) |
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 8, 2005 5:59 pm (# Total: 21) You don't find them easily because donor aggregators are not a class of donors, but a technique for circulating proposals to a gorup of donors anonymously. A foundation like Tides has been doing this for many yers, but without the technology. Now new technology is available to make the entry of proposals easy and their searching by donors easy. Take a look at http://www.newprogressivecoalition.com/ for an example. Go to the marketplace. It is a political site, but the important thing is the technology and the design. The team at this site has seamlessly combine technology with an understanding of the needs of donors and the desires of grant seekers and built a system that will be duplicated rapidly.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 8, 2005 6:00 pm (# Total: 21) This is interesting. I would like to know more about online proposal applications and donor aggregation.
|
Attachments: |
IDEI-logo.jpg (15 KB) |
Alliance for Conflict Transformation
Thanks for the interesting information on donor aggregators. Do you have suggestions for how to find/approach groups who might be interested in supporting international work?
Anna Raksany - Nov 9, 2005 9:41 am (# Total: 21) What do you think we'll see in the coming years in the prevalence of online applications and donor aggregates? It seems like a natural step for donors/fundraisers when a technology like this becomes widely available. But so far I haven't known any group who has applied for or received funds with this method.
Towards well-being
Hi, This altogeather interesting and useful.Can I get list of donor aggregators.
vsuneel
tutormentor - Nov 9, 2005 9:06 pm (# Total: 21) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I think the aggregator concept has merit and would certainly like to find a few sites who do this. However, I'd also like to share a different version of this that I've been working on.
I lead the Tutor/Mentor Connection, based in Chicago. I focus on volunteer-based non-school tutoring and/or mentoring programs. I've been building a database of such programs which I aggregate at my web site. By maintaining one of the most comprehensive databases of Chicago tutor/mentor programs, I'm able to lead public awareness efforts intended to draw anyone who values tutoring/mentoring through my site and on to various programs in the city where they can volunteer or be a donor. I'm also able to reach out to business and professional groups to enlist them to adopt tutoring/mentoring as a cause. For instance, a Lend A Hand Program (www.lend-a-hand.net) at the Chicago Bar Association now raises money that goes to grants given to tutor/mentor programs.
Based on this concept there are a few next steps a) if these programs can tell who they are and what they do on web sites, the web sites should be the proposal, and sites like mine would then be the aggregator, by hosting links to a large percentage of the programs in the city. Finding ways to get all programs to have web sites that do a good job of telling the program's story is a challenge, but one that could be overcome.
b) if programs begin to find benefit to the services of the aggregator, then they also can begin to share the role of creating public awareness and recruiting donors to find tutor/mentor programs throughout the city, thus increasing the number of donors who use the aggregator site to pick which tutor/mentor program to fund. This is happening. At the conferences I host each May and November all of the speakers volunteer their time, which is one way they contribute to our efforts to help them get information, and to create greater visibility
c) expanding this concept so that more foundations would drop the competitive application process and begin to choose who to fund based on their belief in what works, and their choice of where they want to make a difference (zip code, city, etc.) would lead to a reversal of the current process and lower costs for acquiring and getting funds, thus maximizing the dollars available for service.
The challenge with any aggregator concept is attracting donors to the aggregator site in the first place. We're a long way from the day when donors make their giving decisions based on an organization's web site, but I believe this can happen as more people learn to shop on line.
You can see this in action at http://msg.uc.iupui.edu/TMC/html/index.php. I'm always looking for others who'd like to help make this concept a reality. It's in the self-interest of people who operate charities to do so.
Dan Bassill Tutor/Mentor Connection
I work for a visiting nurse association that deals with clients from two counties in California and the tail of two other counties. Will these aggregate donors be willing to fund for specific areas or is this for organizations that reach farther across the nation or globally? I am finding that corporations and foundations other than local community foundations don't want to work in local areas unless they are "grassroots, new, innovative". What happened to tried and true, cornerstone nonprofits that have a track record and are in the trenches doing the work?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 10, 2005 4:25 pm (# Total: 21) This is only the beginning of a trend. There is no list of aggregators anywhere that I know of, but I suspect there will be soemtime next yera. I am going to start some research of my own on this. I have dealt with foundtions like tides that represent many donors, and of course there are Funds like CAlvert and Fidelity that do they same. The aggregator concept is using new technology. I think it is a trend to watch, rather than an immediate opportunity unles you fall within the issue areas of the NPI site. Let us know if you find others. I know from experience that as soon as this technology is noticed, firms will emerge to do the same thing and to sell the technology to foundations.
tutormentor - Nov 10, 2005 8:59 pm (# Total: 21) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Tina, I think that groups within a geographic area who do similar work, or who are all sub-contractors on a common goal, eg. community building, could create an a web site hub that would be used to attract and educate donors to the need for on-going funding over many years in order to reach a desired goal.
Two challenges: a) building a database that shows the relationship of the different organizations listed b) attracting and educating potential donors so that they fund the repetitive actions that over time can achive a result, vs the new fad that gets attention, but becomes old and loses support
If you can build a network of organizations that will work together (the aggregator) then you've a better chance to figure out solutions to part b.
The conference that I'm hosting in Chicago next week is part of efforts to get programs connected. On the home page of www.tutormentorexchange.net is a power point essay titled Theory of Change which describes this process of building a community of organizations that share a common goal.
Dan Bassill
Hii,
This is an interesting development.please give us more hints.we are a young non profit organisation and seeking serious partners.we have ready proposals.Advise us on the way forward.Sometimes the wait is long and frustrating.Is there a faster way?
tutormentor - Nov 11, 2005 12:43 pm (# Total: 21) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
The faster way is build it yourself. By that, I mean learn who the other organizations are in your neighborhood, city or country who do the same type of work that you do. As you build this list, find a way to share it via the internet, so that you are creating an aggregator site that talks about ALL instead of just YOU. Then begin posting stories about the good work these groups do and the common need each group has for donations. If you start this, some of the others will join you in building traffic to the site because they'll see that it has a direct benefit to them, not just to you.
While you may not have your own web site, you could set up a FREE blog web site, as a launching pad for this purpose. Once your aggregator site is up, you may find similar groups in other cities or countries. If you link to them, you create a greater aggregation, that is more visibile, and thus more likely to attract donors.
Good luck.
Dan Bassill
That is a wonderful suggestion and surely we will work on it.We will enhance networking and other avenues also.Hope it works.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 13, 2005 9:17 pm (# Total: 21) This is a development I raised in my last blog and I am delighted to see that other are way ahead of me. Can you post the details of the conference you are hosting and perhaps how people on this site could get transcripts or recordings. Thanks
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 13, 2005 9:32 pm (# Total: 21) The use of technology to gather applications and distribute them to donors is natural development and I see it growing. I could also see the technology used to match micro credit donors to recipients by using intermediaries who have online access. There is no limit to the applications, but there are conditions. The fact that this topic has generated more posts than any other of my social edge blogs indicates that we will see more of it and that it will move beyond the political advocacy into all areas of grant making
This discussion is very interesting to me. Unfortunately I have not been around to follow up. But nonetheless, I just want to say that this is the first time I am hearing of donor aggregators. I am very pleased with the suggestions that Basil has made. I hope it works. I think I will also go into the websites sited to see what is going on there so that I can learn more.
Beatrice
Rural Women Development Center (RUWDEC)
tutormentor - Nov 14, 2005 1:24 pm (# Total: 21) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I encourage anyone who is interested in this topic to visit http://msg.uc.iupui.edu/TMC/html/index.php between Nov. 17 and Nov. 31 to introduce yourself and network with me and others.
Getting proposals aggregated or web sites aggregated is just the first challenge. Getting thousands of potential donors to look at the aggregation portal every week is a bigger challenge.
One solution is to join together in various portals at certain times each year to discuss ways to meet these challenges. If enough people, from enough places gather with us this week, we create NEWS, and that generates media interest. This can lead more donors to make year end charity contributions to programs linked in the T/MC web site, or who participate in the forums.
Thus, you can make the strategy work for you if you take a role in building the internet traffic needed.
Dan Bassill Tutor/Mentor Connection
Thanks Dan. I will check it out.
Thanks dan,
Patrick
Overhead
Hosted by Eric Weaver (November 2005 - Closed)
NPO executives all over the world mention overhead and how difficult it is to fund them. “They agreed to pay for our programs, but not for our overhead,” an NPO Executive Director recently told me.
Indeed, some foundations and development agencies have overhead formulas that pay 15% - 20%, but many refuse to pay any, or are silent on the topic, leaving you to guess.
What can NPOs do about this, other than complain in funder forums? In my practice, I have used a number of techniques to bring in the money to pay overhead. My advice:
1. Include an overhead budget item in grant proposals, but label it “operations” or “operating support”. Try to avoid the word “overhead” unless the funder has a specific policy on providing an allowance for overhead costs. In this budget item, list the support costs required for the program, based on a percentage of total NPO costs. For instance, if your executive director spends 15% of her time on this project, allocate 15% of her salary and benefits to it.
2. If the funder has a policy of not providing overhead or limiting it, you should still line-item these costs, but show them as the organization’s matching contribution to the project. If it is appropriate and will not interfere with other fund raising, you should also approach one of the NPO’s individual donors with a request to match the agency funder by paying the overhead charges.
3. If there is any resistance, talk about it with the funder. If there is a limit on the dollar amount of a proposal and the overhead number will cause the proposal to exceed the limit, discuss it with the program officer beforehand to determine if including it in the request will hurt your chances, or if showing it as match will improve them.
I can’t say I am always successful, but it has often worked. What works for you? Click here and let us know.
Eric Weaver - Nov 15, 2005 1:39 pm (# Total: 9) Lenders for Community Development
I think the solution to this problem lies in building your organizational model from the beginning with a focus on significant sources of unrestricted support. A lot of organizations get started with primarily program funding, and then when they begin to grow the cost of overhead can be crushing. Our organization is fortunate in that we have a group of member banks which have agreed that, along with providing us with lending capital, they will each make an unrestricted contribution each year. We have also found that individual donors and most corporate donors tend to be far less restrictive about how their funding is used.
Overall, we are finding this is a problem that seems to be getting less serious, not more so, as more foundations start to move to a comfort level with general operating support. I'm curious if others are seeing this trend?
Eric Weaver
Lenders for Community Development
San Jose, CA
Youth Services System, Inc.
There have been policy initiatives to move funders to recognize that for organizations to carry out programs, there needs to be internal support. The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy ( I believe) has made this argument.
I think that Eric's point is well taken. I am a board member of an organization that does arts and leadership work with teens. With the help of Americorps volunteers this work has expanded. The supervisory needs, training needs, and just on-the-spot problem-solving is getting beyond the grasp of the founder. This group is not bureaucratic, anti-bureaucratic, if anything, but to be effective, there is a need for an ongoing core of staff, not just one person with a vision.
I agree that there are ways to describe the administrative functions/rent-mortgage, etc./ that make up the overhead to allow funders to pay those costs. However, I still see funding requests that very clearly will not pay those kinds of costs knowingly. The potential disaster is that by accepting these funds, a well-meaning executive and board can overextend themselves--committing to programs and goals that may not be attainable. Who gains when that happens?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 16, 2005 10:44 am (# Total: 9) I have also seen the shift in attitudes in some foundations and even with private donors, but the it is slow, and often the overhead allowances come with restrictions despite initiatives like the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy and the Indepdent Sector. In answer to myk's question,is that in the short run the organization's clients are served and the staff on that program is served, both for the duration of the budget. As long as other funders know (or don't ask) if they are underwriting the overhead for other progrms, it can work. But that is the problem...at some point it does not work. Worse, without the fundraising infrastructure to continue support for programs, we see the tragedy of both staff and clients being let go "when the grant runs out." This is not an overhead problem per se, but the lack of overhead does contribute to it. The solution is for donors to accept up front the share of operating costs that underwrite the programs -- including fundraising costs, and for NPOs to clearly calculate these costs...both without artifical percentage limits, but possibly with benchmarks or other standards of comparison between types of grants (i.e., some programs require much more overhead than others).
jimfruchterman - Nov 29, 2005 2:19 pm (# Total: 9) Benetech
We know what our numbers are, and we know our actual overhead numbers are 15-18% for fund raising, accounting, the CEO and the like. That doesn't include indirect costs like rent, phones, Internet connection, etc.
I absolutely agree with the avoiding of terms like overhead (or G&A). Some European funders thought that these are the same as profit or fee: something extra. So, we do use terms like finance and management to cover these terms.
Jim
The problem of funding "overheads" - or indirect costs, as we call them more euphemistically here in the UK - has been widely debated for a number of years. A couple of years ago the organisation I work for - an association of CEOs of voluntary / third sector organisations, equivalent I would guess to NPOs - developed the Full Cost Recovery Toolkit.
In a sentence, this toolkit helps British organisations (at least those engaged in service delivery) calculate and understand the total cost of their project activities, including an appropriate proportion of their overhead costs. I don't want to do cheap advertisement, but if you're interested you can check out this link: http://www.acevo.org.uk/main/publications.php?content=pubdescription&pid=146&category=Main+Publications
What is most interesting here is that the British Government (in particular the Home Office, together with one of the most important funders of the sector, the Big Lottery Fund) has agreed to endorse the principles of Full Cost Recovery, and has committed itself to putting these principles into practice. This means that in the next few years thousands of voluntary organisations in the UK will become more sustainable in their contracting practices. Perhaps a good example which might be exported elsewhere?
Cgasca - Nov 30, 2005 1:08 pm (# Total: 9) Social Entreprenuer
Operations funding is a systemic problem. The basic sources of funds for nonprofits are government and donors. Government use to be a significant source of operating funds. Donors basically focused on program funding. As government has reduced its funding to nonprofit services, nonprofits have had to figure out how to cover operations or present them to donors.
Since donors give by affinity they are not necessarily interested in funding operations. From my perspective nonprofits need to learn to develop a business case for donors. The business case is simple you can't get apples if you don't water the apple tree.
A nonprofit currently carrying out a capital campaign included operating costs as part of its campaign. When asked about it, the answer was simple we can operate an asset without staff. Presented with that view donors did not even flinch. This organization is raising 52 million dollars.
Of course the real solution is to address the nature and characteristics of nonprofit capital through government policy.
tutormentor - Nov 30, 2005 5:15 pm (# Total: 9) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
This is a huge problem and results in a waste of many of the dollars that are given to charities. There ought to be a solution.
I read that many suggest educating the donor. I would like to see a web site that is aggregating donors and trying to do this education. If anyone has such links, let's build a list. Maybe we can support these groups, or draw ideas from them.
However, my feeling is that many of the donors are set in their ways and won't change easily. Thus, my suggestion is to focus on future donors. There are many emerging donor web sites, but I'm not sure which of these is teaching donors to fund general operations at agencies that do the work or serve the cause that the donor wants to fund. If someone has a list of these, let's support them.
If there is no list, lets create the organizations who do this. Over the next 20 years millions of dollars of Baby Boomer wealth will go to charity. If we sit aside and do nothing, most of this will go to the old line charities, and have the same old problems. However, if groups work together, maybe a growing percent of new donor dollars can focus on general operations.
Why not think even further into the future. In America there are government dollars available for service-learning, learn & serve, etc. These are programs aimed at creating habits of service, while reinforcing concepts of learning. Why not try to embed the curriculum with habits of giving, so that as young people grow to become adults they learn to pick a cause and support it consistently with flexible dollars. While most will never be millionaires, some will. I


