Document Actions
Scale
Mar 12, 2010
Knowledge Transfer for Greater Impact
Hosted by Almaz Negash (March 2010)
The case of Sub-Saharan Africa
1. What needs to take place before we can even discuss knowledge transfer—in this case, skills development?
2. How do we engage the African Diaspora professionals to be a part of the long-term economic solution in Africa?
3. How do we go about creating the system/infrastructure that will support those social entrepreneurs who are willingly trying to transfer knowledge?
4. How do we bring dramatic new forms of public/private partnerships to provide a stronger support network for Africa?
5. How do we mobilize highly qualified and self-motivated African social entrepreneurs for capacity building?
Aug 11, 2009
Reflections on Beginnings
Hosted by Charles 'Hipbone' Cameron (August 2009)
It is time for a celebration!
Our friend and frequent Social Edge commenter, Dr Prakash Vinjamuri, recently wrote to tell us that his program - the Life-Health Reinforcement Group of Hyderabad, India, of which he is Executive Director - will celebrate its tenth anniversary on August 13th.
We on Social Edge would like to extend our warm congratulations to Prakash and his team, to wish him many more years of success -- and to invite those who read here to join us in that celebration by discussing your own beginnings.
- What brought you to the field of social entrepreneurship?
- How did your organization come into being?
- What anniversaries have you celebrated, and how?
Prakash also mentioned a couple of things that seem worth comment here: he said that Social Edge had given his organization a "wonderful platform to express ourselves" and spoke of the "warm feeling" he gets when he logs in here. Those would be gratifying comments to read at any time, but they also touch on two issues that seem crucial to our efforts here.
We want Social Edge to be a platform for social entrepreneurs, indeed, we'd like it to be wonderful.
- How are we doing?
- Have you found this place a useful platform?
And we want that "warm feeling" - more specifically, we want this to be a place where people can get to know and trust one another online. Because trust is the foundation for collaboration, and collaboration is one of the great multipliers of effort.
Businesses run on the single bottom line rely on financial gain as the great motivator for cooperation, while we in the social sector have an equal or greater emphasis on goodwill.
- Do you feel a kinship with those whose words you read on Social Edge?
- Have you made any friendly contacts here?
- Begun any collaborations with those you've met here?
We'd like to encourage that sort of contact, here on The Edge.
Prakash ended his message by saying he hopes to see "all our friends on The Edge during the dialogue." Let's join him and Charles “Hipbone” Cameron in the celebration and the conversation.
Mar 16, 2009
Boards as Leaders
Hosted by Hildy Gottlieb (March 2009)
If ever there were a group that takes a beating in the world of social change, it is boards.
To avoid dealing with board-induced headaches, social entrepreneurs often put off legally incorporating or filing for tax exemption. Established governance advisors have become household names around the globe, as they strive to address “the problem of boards.”
Most of us could recite the laments by heart:
• Board members “check their brains at the door.”
• Board members “make decisions at the board table they would never make in their own businesses.”
• Board members micromanage. Or they rubber stamp.
• Board members won’t raise money.
• And board members refuse to change!
With the drumbeat of frustrations voiced about boards, one would think we humans are genetically predisposed to be bad board members!
Is this really the best we can do?
In his talk at TED this year, Barry Schwartz (who holds Swarthmore College’s endowed chair as Dorwin Cartwright Professor of Social Theory and Social Action) shared his findings about what motivates people to go above and beyond in their jobs. According to Dr. Schwartz, the answer is neither about rewards (e.g. certification) nor punishment (e.g. strict enforcement of board expectations and policies).
What Barry Schwartz found, and what my own experience supports, is that the path to excellent performance is inspiration.
I have watched previously dysfunctional boards quickly transform to accomplish amazing things for their organizations and their communities. These are not well-heeled board members bringing in a lot of money or connections to people of means. They are ordinary people doing extraordinary work on behalf of their communities.
The single most important factor in that transformation has indeed been inspiration. Boards who are inspired to hold themselves and their organizations accountable for creating significant change in their communities not only accomplish tremendous end results - they also meet their legal and fiduciary requirements, as a means towards those visionary ends.
• What approaches have you used to aim boards at accountability for their highest potential - leadership towards creating significant community and/or global change?
• If you are a board member, in what ways do you see your role contributing to the impact bottom line? What barriers prevent you from focusing beyond the financial governance?
• How can social entrepreneurs ensure they recruit and educate board members who will aim their board work at accountability for impact, not just fiduciary obligations? From there, how can a group maintain that community-results-focused culture on the board?
• How can we make visionary, community-driven boards the norm rather than the exception in this sector?
Join Hildy Gottlieb, President of the Community-Driven Institute, in the conversation.
Feb 10, 2009
The Three Best (and Worst!) Decisions I’ve Made as a Social Entrepreneur
Hosted by Sam Daley-Harris (February 2009)
When Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus and Jamii Bora Founder Ingrid Munro joined me in New York City in January 2009 to announce that the Microcredit Summit had surpassed its goal of reaching 100 million of the world’s poorest families with a microloan, it was the culmination of more than 30 years as a social entrepreneur in the loneliest of fields—advocacy.
I’d founded RESULTS, the international citizens’ lobby on ending global poverty in 1980, organized Candlelight Vigils around the globe a few days before the 1990 World Summit for Children and launched the Microcredit Summit in 1997.
Here is my list of the three best and worst decisions I’ve made as a social entrepreneur.
• The Best Decisions
- Ask questions and listen to my gut
When I’d gotten over my hopelessness about global poverty in the late ’70s, I heard experts call for the political will to end it. I found that only 200 out of 7,000 students I spoke with knew the name of their Member of Congress, so I paid attention and started RESULTS with an emphasis on our second goal “to empower individuals to have breakthrough in exercising their personal and political power.”
- Partner with the most visionary, action-oriented leaders I can find
Beginning in the mid-1980s it was the late-Jim Grant of UNICEF, starting in 1987 it was Muhammad Yunus, and in 2006 it was Ingrid Munro of Jamii Bora in Kenya. Every advocate needs heroes and these are some of mine.
- Link all my work to bold global goals for which progress can be measured
Whether it was the World Summit for Children Goals set in 1990, the Millennium Development Goals set in 2000, or the Microcredit Summit Goals set in 1997 and 2006, it matters to know where you are headed and whether you are making progress.
• The worst decisions:
- Give up too easily on bureaucrats
I knew David Bornstein’s book on social entrepreneurs was real when I read how much resistance each of them faced, usually from government officials. But I can be more creative about taping their vision and winning them over.
- Give up too easily on funders
Setting bold measurable goals to be reached 10 years down the road are too much for most people to grasp. I need to be more creative in laying out bite-sized activities that produce progress toward long-range goals.
- Never fully embrace being a good manager
Starting up project after project is time consuming, but I can devote more time to listening to and supporting staff.
What were your best decisions? What mistakes have you made? Join Sam Daley-Harris, director of the Microcredit Summit Campaign, in the conversation.
Aug 19, 2008
Network Practices
Hosted by Mary Ellen Iskenderian, President and CEO of Women's World Banking (October 2008)
Social Change: Women’s World Banking and the Power of NetworksAs microfinance continues to evolve at an astonishing pace, we in the industry face the challenge of how to best navigate this changing landscape. One of the keys, I believe, to moving forward lies in the very way in which microfinance began – with the poor helping each other through the creation of strong support networks. The group lending model has helped millions, especially women, to lift themselves out of poverty.
As a network of 54 microfinance institutions (MFIs) in 30 countries, Women’s World Banking applies this theory at the macro level – that working together as a network is far more effective than going it alone.
Microfinance is context-specific and ultimately driven at the local level by individual MFIs. However, there is an exponential benefit to MFIs leveraging each other’s resources and expertise through a global network. By offering technical advice; assisting with market research and product diversification; and connecting MFIs with capital markets, a network can help MFIs develop institutional capacity and grow to scale in ways they could not on their own.
Perhaps the most important benefit of a network is the exchange of knowledge among peers. WWB has sent Moroccan MFIs exploring the feasibility of becoming regulated institutions to Peru, and our Uganda affiliate to Ghana to study different approaches on mobilizing savings. We regularly broker 7-10 exchanges annually. This interactive approach not only provides vital sharing of innovations but also serves to build smaller, equally essential networks amongst MFIs.
Similar to the group lending model, networks are also powerful in enabling members to hold each other accountable. WWB promotes open discussion among members to identify shared principles, including rigorous performance standards to which all members must adhere. WWB’s network members are secure in the knowledge that as they pursue large-scale social change—poverty alleviation through the economic empowerment of women—they are supported by an entire network of peer organizations that share their collective vision.
Some initial questions:
• In these days of limited funding, there is often a need to convince donors that supporting a network is as effective as supporting an organization that provides direct services. Do you face this challenge and how do you handle it?
• As a network it can be hard to quantify impact and also to get recognized for contributing to successes and inputs (for how much of the institution's success can a network take credit?). Have others faced similar challenges and how do they quantify their impact?
• Are organizations headquartered in the West/US and Europe or global networks perceived to be at a disadvantage compared to regional networks and grassroots organizations located in the countries which they are serving? What is the value-add of being a global network headquartered in the US?
Join Mary Ellen Iskenderian, President and CEO of Women's World Banking, in the conversation.
Apr 09, 2008
The Fetishization of Scaling Up
Hosted by Charles "Hipbone" Cameron (May 2008)
I wasn't at the Skoll World Forum in Oxford this year where Dr. Paul Farmer of Partners in Health gave his "Loyalist's Critique of Social Entrepreneurship. Mike Lee, who was present, described Dr Farmer's presentation thus: he "throws fireballs and gets a standing ovation." That's enough to make me want to learn more.
Here's some of what Dr. Farmer said:
What's been shocking to me over the past 25 years is the lightning speed at which policy makers, themselves shielded from the risks [that the poor face], decide that a complex intervention is too difficult or not cost-effective in Haiti or Africa, or not sustainable.
In microfinance parlance, many of my patients are 'poor credit risks.' But aren't they the very people we claim to serve in the first place? This is why I termed my speech a 'Loyalist’s critique' of our movement.
Commenting on these paragraphs, a blogger at ThinkChange India writes:
It's not that I'm anti-scale. As the Skoll Foundation states, we believe that social entrepreneurs "represent a powerful force for large-scale impact or equilibrium change". The tipping points for large scale problems are liable to require large interventions -- how can I say this -- which need to be large in scale, but also human in scale.
Quantity and quality: dollar figures and real people.
Quantity and quality: social programs and the people they serve.
Perhaps if we called ourselves servant entrepreneurs, we'd more easily remember what we're here for.
Questions:
• If you were at the Skoll World Forum and heard Dr Farmer, what nuggets of inspiration did you carry away with you?
• Have you found that funding requirements contradict your own needs and experience?
• Have you seen "efficiencies of scale" interrupting "effectiveness of human intervention"?
• How do you scale up without cutting corners in terms of the humans you serve?
Please join Charles "Hipbone" Cameron in this discussion, and let your voice her heard.
Nov 19, 2007
Beyond-the-Walls Leadership - 3
Hosted by Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant (December 2007)
Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod spent the last four years studying a dozen of the most successful U.S. nonprofits of our time. The groups included the well-known (Habitat for Humanity, Teach for America), the less known (Self-Help, YouthBuild USA), and the surprising (Exploratorium and The Heritage Foundation). Their secrets to success, as told in their book, Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits? To achieve wide scale, systemic social change, the social entrepreneurs must influence institutions beyond their four walls.
Great nonprofits:
1. Work with government and advocate for policy change
2. Harness market forces and see business as a powerful partner
[See the first discussion here]
3. Convert individual supporters into evangelists for their causes
4. Build and nurture nonprofit networks
[See the second discussion here]
5. Adapt to the changing environment
6. Share leadership
This is the third of a three part discussion series and focuses on the fifth and sixth of Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits practices: “Adapt” and “Share Leadership.” See also Part 1 for Advocacy and Business Partnerships and Part 2 for Evangelists and Networking.
For social entrepreneurs, adaptability is encoded in their very DNA. It’s the key to survival as well as an instrumental component to success. As Charles Darwin observed, it’s not the swiftest, or even the smartest, of the species that survive in the end-- it’s those that are the most adaptive. Adaptability encompasses the unique ability to balance creativity and innovation with disciplined systems and business planning processes. That way, successful nonprofits don’t get stuck in old ways or mired in bureaucracy; but they also aren’t overwhelmed by unbridled creativity and rampant innovation that can dilute their efforts across too many program areas.
“Share Leadership" involves the ability of successful nonprofit leaders to let go and share power with those around them—including founders! This does not mean that the founders and CEOs of the 12 nonprofits we studied aren’t extremely powerful leaders with exceptional entrepreneurial talents. But we think their success is inextricably tied to their ability to share that power with others, giving true authority and accountability to their senior management team, and finding ways to engage their board as leaders for the organization as well.
Some questions that this raises include:
1. Social entrepreneurs are known for introducing innovative ideas, and the typical social entrepreneur will inevitably produce many social innovations over the course of their lives. The challenge is how to harness all of that creative energy and develop strategies for focusing on a limited number of opportunities to achieve maximum impact. How have social entrepreneurs overcome this challenge?
2. Founders are notorious for their inability to let go of their organizations—it’s their baby after all! What strategies have you seen work to help Founders ease off the reigns and share power so that they don’t become the stop-gap that’s holding the organization back? What hasn’t worked?
3. Our “share leadership” findings resonate closely with Jim Collins’ “Level 5 Leader” concept, which he introduces in his business management book, Good to Great, and with his observations about the need for nonprofit leaders adopt “legislative leadership” abilities, which he writes about in his monograph, Good to Great for the Social Sectors. How have these frameworks helped Social Edge participants think about honing their own leadership potential?
Join Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant in the conversation.
Beyond-the-Walls Leadership (2)
Hosted by Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant (November 2007)
Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod spent the last four years studying a dozen of the most successful nonprofits of our time, including City Year, Environmental Defense, The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, National Council of La Raza, and America's Second Harvest.Their secrets to success? To achieve wide scale, systemic social change, the social entrepreneurs must influence institutions beyond their four walls.
Great nonprofits:
1. Work with government and advocate for policy change
2. Harness market forces and see business as a powerful partner
[See the first discussion here]
3. Convert individual supporters into evangelists for their causes
4. Build and nurture nonprofit networks
5. Adapt to the changing environment
6. Share leadership
[See the third discussion here]
This is the second of a three part discussion series and focuses on the third and fourth of Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits practices: Evangelists and Networking. See also Part 1 for Advocacy and Business Partnerships and Part 3 for Adaptation and Leadership.
This week, we will
• Convert individual supporters into evangelists for their causes, and treat their volunteers and donors as far more than just sources of free labor or an occasional check.
• Build and nurture nonprofit networks, approaching other groups as allies rather than as competitors for resources.
Discussion Questions:
• Inspire Evangelists
• Does your organization engage individuals as volunteers or donors, and have you built a larger individual member base?
• Do you have any high-powered evangelists for your cause, who can help take your organization to the next level? If not, why not? What’s holding you back?
• If so, what have been your experiences with engaging individuals from outside your organization (i.e. beyond staff and board)?
• How do you keep this community inspired and engaged over time—what are the tactical things you do in terms of convening or marketing?
• What have you learned from engaging individuals that you might share with others? Any advice or examples of what worked?
• Nurture Nonprofit Networks
• Does your organization work with other nonprofits or affiliates?
Please describe how your affiliate structure works…
• Do you see yourself as a field-builder, and seek opportunities to expand your impact by sharing power, credit, or resources with the field, and collaborating rather than competing? If not, why not? What’s holding you back?
• If so, what have been your experiences with nurturing nonprofit networks, or working in coalitions and alliances?
• How do you keep this network connected over time—what are the tactical things you do in terms of convening or communicating to the network?
• What have you learned from “nurturing networks?” that you might share with others? Any advice or examples of what worked?
Join Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant in the conversation.
Beyond-the-Walls Leadership (1)
Hosted by Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant (November 2007)
Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod spent the last four years studying a dozen of the most successful nonprofits of our time. The groups included the well-known (Habitat for Humanity, Teach for America), the less known (Self-Help, YouthBuild USA), and the surprising (Exploratorium and The Heritage Foundation). Their secrets to success, as told in their book, Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits? To achieve wide scale, systemic social change, the social entrepreneurs must influence institutions beyond their four walls.
This is the first of a three part discussion series and examines the first two practices of High-Impact Nonprofits - Advocacy and Business Partnerships. Please see also Part 2 for Evangelists and Networking, and Part 3 for Adaptation and Leadership.
They found out that great nonprofits:
1. Work with government and advocate for policy change—rather than shying away from lobbying or avoiding politics altogether.
2. Harness market forces and see business as a powerful partner, rather than just dismissing capitalism as the root of all evil
3. Convert individual supporters into evangelists for their causes, and treat their volunteers and donors as far more than just sources of free labor or an occasional check.
4. Build and nurture nonprofit networks, approaching other groups as allies rather than as competitors for resources.
[See the second discussion here]
5. Adapt to the changing environment, and find ways to balance creativity and innovation with disciplined systems and structure that allows them to achieve maximum impact.
6. Share leadership, empowering others to be forces for good, both within their organization and throughout their fields.
[See the third discussion here]
In addition, high-impact nonprofits have also mastered the basics needed to sustain their impact: attracting and retaining great people; finding sustainable sources of funding; and investing in their infrastructure and capacity.
We’re looking forward to sharing with you more about each of these six practices, and now will focus on the first two --working with and through government and business to expand your impact. We were surprised to learn that all of the great nonprofits we studied eventually gravitated toward engaging in policy advocacy and working with and through the private sector to affect social change.
1. How can social entrepreneurs overcome the obstacles that prohibit many nonprofit leaders from lobbying for policy change? For example, some are confused about how much lobbying is legally allowed, others are worried that they will lose donors or have trouble raising support for policy work, and others see politics as unseemly or just beyond the scope of their mission.
2. What are some the best practices of social entrepreneurs that do engage in policy advocacy--do they hire professionals or build capacity from within? Do they open offices in their capital city? What are some of the best tactics to succeed at policy work?
3. What are the best practices of social entrepreneurs that work with business to create social change that go beyond basic charitable relationships and create win-win outcomes for both the business and the nonprofit?
4. How do leading social entrepreneurs harness market forces for social and environmental gain, and change business practices for the better?
Join Leslie Crutchfield and Heather McLeod Grant in the conversation.
Oct 02, 2007
Case Study
Hosted by Charles "Hipbone" Cameron (October 2007)
an do to encourage and support a fine entrepreneur and his worthy social venture.David was born and brought up in Barbados in the West Indies, and when he heard about the destruction of the neighboring island of Grenada in 2004's hurricane Ivan, he felt compelled to do something. With school closures, new builds and a continuous renewing of resources in Scottish schools he wanted to recycle the discarded textbooks, furniture, computers etc., and help Grenada at the same time.
Thus far, on his own initiative, he has been able to send four ocean freight containers of educational equipment out to Grenada, and is hoping to send more. Next week one of his containers will be filled with surplus from 14 primary (elementary) schools, and he already has three other 40-ft containers fully loaded and ready to go.
Through sheer persistent foot-slogging and networking, David now has a source of surplus ocean freight containers at no cost, is getting ISO certification for them, another company has offered him free storage capacity, and a large high school which is being totally re-equipped has offered him all their desks, chairs, book cases, whiteboards, and other furnishings without charge. In addition, the Justice Dept. of the Scottish Office is providing him with youths to do community service by moving everything for him. These are kids mostly from less favored socioeconomic backgrounds who grew up with his children in the neighborhood where he has lived for 17 years.
Meanwhile, David says, there are schools all over the world that are under-resourced, where the children don't even have a desk to write at, let alone a chair to sit on. And mountains of good quality surplus educational resources are ending up in landfill throughout Scotland and probably Europe.
As you see, David can do a great deal with enthusiasm and persistence: he has the entrepreneurial spirit in spades, but not the training of a businessman. He's a Scottish schoolteacher with five months to go before retirement, at which point he wants to ramp up his efforts. He's also untidy, unbureaucratic, not an "office person", wonderfully warm-hearted, and in need of support from someone who can talk him (patiently, he says) through the various aspects of taking a wonderful and desperately needed idea and establishing it, leveraging his existing efforts to create a revenue stream that can sustain and grow his campaign.
Now that David's story has inspired you, can you help him? He needs::: support from people with business expertise and social conscience
:: help in evaluating his project, its strengths and weaknesses
:: to know where the project stands in terms of sustainability
:: where the project stands in terms of scaling up
:: support with all the administrative issues, business planning, presentation preparations etc related to the project, and
:: help in maintaining and updating his website.
Let's talk with David. Let's see what we can do as a community.
May 08, 2007
The Perils of Size and Success
Hosted by Charles "Hipbone" Cameron (May-June 2007)
Can the sheer size and success of a project imperil the good that we're setting out to do?George F. Kennan, in his book Around the Cragged Hill: A Personal and Political Philosophy, wrote:
"We are, if territory and population be looked at together, one of the great countries of the world -- a monster country, one might say, along with such others as China, India, the recent Soviet Union, and Brazil. And there is a real question as to whether “bigness” in a body politic is not an evil in itself, quite aside from the policies pursued in its name."
That's strangely compelling question, especially when you generalize it, by dropping out the phrase that limits it to "a body politic."
There is a real question whether *bigness* is not an evil in itself…
The whole business of the connection between excellence and success is not something we understand very well – can sufficient "quantity", by itself, change the "quality" of something from good to bad? Can there be – as the saying goes – "too much of a good thing"?
And to get more specific here, in terms of social entrepreneurship: is there a size beyond which further growth of a successful program has diminishing (and eventually perhaps, even negative) returns?
• Is growth axiomatically a virtue?
• Does enough quantity have the power to impact or change quality?
• Have you seen dangers or difficulties associated with the growth of your own enterprise?
• Is the change that often occurs as an initial visionary hands over the reins to those who can extend and expand his work most often helpful or harmful?
• Is there a "best size" for human projects, in the same way that there seem to be "best sizes" for community and communication within human groups?
• Do you have any advice for others about scaling up? Is there a "tipping point" to be avoided, beyond which additions of scale are counterproductive?
Your intuitions and counterintuitive suggestions are most welcome.
Join Charles "Hipbone" Cameron in the conversation.
Mar 31, 2007
Scaling Up for Social Ventures
Hosted by Jonathan Greenblatt (April 2007)
Social ventures often fall outside the typical boxes that we learn in business school. From value proposition to organizational design to marketing models, these enterprises seem to challenge conventional notions and management theories. But such structures hold relevance for the social entrepreneur and he or she must master them. Along these lines, for any new venture, one of the most complex tasks is achieving scale. Social enterprises are no different in this regard. In fact, the process can be even more complex in the realm of double- and triple-bottom line organizations.
When an entrepreneur launches a company with a mission in mind, the objectives tend to focus on social value – such as lives impacted, energy conserved or some other beneficial outcome that creates broader productive environmental and societal externalities. However, such businesses also need to abide by the classic laws of business and focus on topics like growth plans, mergers and acquisitions and exit strategies. These might seem like anathema to the socially conscious individual, but these concepts could be crucial to taking a social enterprise to the next level.
Like many things in business, scaling up is not quite an art, more like a science. So, we will try to develop some shared understandings to syndicate within the Social Edge community and beyond to the broader realm of people working in social enterprise. By considering some case studies and exploring ideas, we will evaluate scale-up strategies for social ventures that might enable an organization to amplify its operations and magnify its mission.
To get the ball rolling, some questions to consider could include:
• Are the challenges of growth similar or different for social ventures in comparison to traditional businesses?
• How should a social venture weigh potential tradeoffs when evaluating a scale-up opportunity?
• What are some examples of organizations that grew effectively through partnerships while maintaining their core mission?
• What are some examples wherein the venture diminished its effectiveness as a result of its particular approach to attaining scale?
Join Jonathan Greenblatt in the discussion.
Sep 25, 2006
Why (And How) You Should Scale Up
Hosted by Charles Cameron aka hipbone (April 2006 - Closed)
“Because we’re interested in doing good while doing well, doing even better by doing even more may not just be a powerful challenge, but also a significant way to reduce the ills and sufferings of the world around us,” writes Charles Cameron, host for this event.
Last July, Jacqueline Novogratz, CEO of the Acumen Fund, hosted a workshop on Scale and Replicability.
This wasn’t the only time we’ve looked at issues of scale here on the Edge – the subject keeps recurring. You may want to visit Willy Foote’s event on Geographic Expansion or Bonnie Koenig’s on Going Global.
Jacqueline Novogratz quoted the 5 R’s of scaling up from Rick Dees et al., Scaling Social Impact [Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2004.]
Readiness Is the innovation ready to be spread?
Receptivity Will the innovation be well-received in the target communities?
Resources What resources are required to get the job done right?
Risk What are the chances that things don’t turn out as expected?
Returns What is the bottom line in terms of quality and quantity of impact?
Those are five important questions, and I hope we’ll take advantage of this event to revisit them.
Some points we may want to pursue from the earlier event:
Picking up on Rick Dees’ fourth “R”, Cgasca noted, “It is important to understand that best practices or models are not always transferable to other cultural contexts.”
Probing a bit further, Peter Reese raised what seems to me the fundamental question: “Is the focus of multiplication on using similar methods in other settings or on achieving comparable results?
Along similar lines, Mitra distinguished between scaling up innovative ideas, and organizations. He commented that if your idea is sufficiently better than the ideas your competitors are proposing, they may become your local affiliates rather than your competition.
And Stefanski pointed out that if achieving the greatest social return while remaining sustainable is optimal, “it may be more practical for the entrepreneur to simply offer their knowledge and for future entrepreneurs facing similar challenges to find and apply the knowledge to their unique conditions.”
Each of these points probes the overall idea: they reflect some of the subtleties we should consider when thinking about the power of scaling up to multiply the good.
What’s your experience?
[Note: This is the first of two consecutive events focused on scale: the second, starting next week, will address what we might think of as the opposite imperative -- EF Schumacher’s idea that small is beautiful.]
Patrick O'Heffernan - Apr 11, 2006 3:47 pm (# Total: 25) I recently talked with a NPO leader who started a very successful local program that addresses a national problem. When I asked about national plans, she said she would not expand to a national program because the program would lose its personal contact which is what makes it work. I suggested a franchise and she agreed but neither of us could think of any NPO franchise examples. Do you know of any?
Would you consider reviewing a Christian outreach org. called Christian Business Men's Committee (CBMC)?
If so, consider - the org. first finds a man ready to take on the task of leading - this leader then works in his area to develop a leadership team (the committee) - The committee - made up of about 6-12 people with like minded attitude towards the outreach begin small and grow thier own 'franchise' as they see fit. They take on resp. for finances and work while following bluprint of the Org. james luther nxtrev.org
The Ford Foundation
Some great thinking on this topic has been done by Kirsten Moi and Greg Ratliff at the Aspen Institute. See http://www.aspeninstitute.org/site/c.huLWJeMRKpH/b.613655/k.70FA/Scale_and_Sustainability.htm for more info, papers, etc...
At Ford, we've done some thinking about scaled impact (not necessarily through social enterprise approaches). A publication that reviews some of our thinking appears at http://www.fordfound.org/publications/recent_articles/docs/asset_pathways.pdf.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 12, 2006 10:06 am (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi, Patrick:
- she said she would not expand to a national program because the program would lose its personal contact which is what makes it work
I personally don’t know of any NPO franchises, and a quick google brought me to a similar discussion at Omidyar where nobody mentioned any – but the idea of franchising tools was mentioned, along with a link to NGO-in-a-box:
- NGO-in-a-box is a physical box of CDs consisting of a complimentary set of peer-reviewed and selected Free and Open Source Software (F/OSS) solutions tailored to the needs of not-for-profit, non-governmental organisations (NGOs). In order to keep the product current and adapt to changing and regional user needs, the Tactical Technology Collective recommends establishing "a community of regional point people" to review use and make recommendations on how to adapt the box to suit the needs of their users.
Putting that another way, I suspect franchising as a term focuses on the organizational level, and that memetic seeding (ie the spreading of approaches and tools) may be the method by which the social entrepreneurial sector "scales up" organically…
Organizational scaling up is another matter altogether, in my view, because while it requires the development of leadership across an increasingly distributed organization, it doesn’t demand the same fierce level of individuality that originating a concept, approach and / or organization does.
I guess what I'm saying is that bottom up, a given successful approach can be scaled by others borrowing its concepts and implementing them in their own arenas -- while deliberate expansion of a success story from one arena to many is liable to be a top down phenomenon.
Entrepreneurs in general, perhaps, and social entrepreneurs in particular, are likely to be less focused on the organization (brand, continuity of org) and more on the process (insights, outcomes)…
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 12, 2006 10:36 am (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi James:
And welcome to SocialEdge.
You write of the Christian Business Men's Committee (CBMC):
- the org. first finds a man ready to take on the task of leading - this leader then works in his area to develop a leadership team (the committee) - The committee - made up of about 6-12 people with like minded attitude towards the outreach begin small and grow thier own 'franchise' as they see fit.
It's my impression that whether a particular project is faith based or not isn't the important distinction for us at Social-Edge -- our focus is on entrepreneurial spirit with social impact.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 12, 2006 12:51 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi John, and welcome to the SocialEdge forums.
I very much appreciate your pointing us to Ford Foundation and Aspen Institute resources on the topic of scale – one of the best affordances of a web portal such as our is the chance to bring resources together in a way that facilitates a fast learning curve for best concepts and practices in a given area. We’re also interested in building community, in the sense of bringing the people who post here together in ways that facilitate mutual trust and regard – the foundations of successful networking – so I’d like to invite you to comment at some point on your own work for Ford, your areas of interest etc.
On the specific topic of scaling, the Aspen Institute site you linked to details an approach which will provide:
- A new model for moving to scale with applicability in community development finance and, more broadly, in other areas of the nonprofit arena.
- A better understanding of the critical stages through which individual organizations and a field must move to reach scale, and the obstacles/challenges at each stage.
- A better understanding of interventions, intermediaries, systems and infrastructures that can facilitate and/or accelerate the process of moving to scale.
- A better understanding of the funding needed at each stage, and who the broader universe of partners/participants/stateholders might be.
- Descriptions of future research activities to fill gaps in knowledge and/or test critical hypotheses.
I’d like to ask you for your own sense of scaling up in general and franchising in particular. Many of the projects we discuss here are located in the developing world, and differences of culture and resources may be greater than within, say, the American urban environment. Is it your sense that “scaling up” in these circumstances should focus on something other than the organizational level, and if so, what other options do we have for optimizing the impact of our best practices a widely diverse circumstances?
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 12, 2006 12:54 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi John:
In the Ford publication on pathways to large-scale impact you refer us to, I was impressed by the final paragraph of Elizabeth Campbell’s Forward:
- While all frameworks are flawed in that they cannot fully capture real-world complexities, many can be helpful in organizing ideas and actions. We offer ours as a potentially useful tool for grantmakers and social-change agents wrestling with the puzzle of obtaining greater impact in their quest to eliminate poverty and injustice.
I have a keen personal interest in developing humanistic thinking tools to mimic nets or webs of tensions of this kind, with special emphasis on the inclusion of emotions -- which give intensity and coloring to the tensions involved – and a special interest in the application of such tools to conflict resolution in particular.
One of the major differences between linear (text based) analyses and visual (concept mapping) approaches is that they don’t privilege some of the ideas in play over others – whereas linear presentations (as in white papers, etc) emphasize assumptions and conclusions, and tend to polarize other positions accordingly. But this in turn carries a powerful implication for our manner of thinking about such things:
It implies that raising and holding a question in mind may in some sense be "truer" to the nature of complex problems than any particular closure-providing answer…
That's a somewhat unexpected idea, considering our society's usual "decision-support" orientation, isn't it?
tutormentor - Apr 13, 2006 3:50 pm (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I think part of the answer to whether or not an organization should scale up is what type of revenue stream does the organization have to support its operations in one or more places; and what type of work does the organization do.
For instance, in the traditional business model people exchange dollars for goods and services. If a business offers something people want at a fair price, most people will buy. Henry Ford got rich on this concept.
However, most non profits, supported by philanthropy or government grants, can't depend on this simple cash for goods/services exchange. Donors and grant makers are driven by many different emotions and politics, which means money does not flow consistently to any single organization on a consistent basis for a long time.
This article by Clara Miller, titled The Looking-Glass World of Nonprofit Money: Managing in For-Profits’ Shadow Universe, does a great job of illustrating why non profits struggle so much to be successful: http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/section/704.html
Thus, it would be foolish to try to operate multiple locations if you cannot assure consistent funding for staff and services.
A second consideration is the nature of service. If an organization is a "cookie-cutter" operation, that can be easily duplicated, with a few trained people, it's likely to have success operating in multiple locations. McDonalds, Starbucks, and many other corporations do this well. However, if the complexity of operating is more in depth, and varies depending on the client/customer and the community, then it may be more difficult to assure an even level of service across many locations.
I read a study of the Quantum Opportunities Program back in 1995 (here's a link:
| www.aypf.org/publications/RAA/12quant.pdf - |
One thing I always remember from this research was a statement that said "while you can franchise structure, you cannot franchise commitment". Thus, if an organization is a cookie-cutter operation that is easily duplicated, McDonalds, Starbucks, it is probably profitable to franchise. However, if the operations require a greater deal of local flexibility, or creativity, driven by variables such as the clients/customer, or the nature of the community, it's more difficult to operate multiple locations with any degree of consistency.
Thus, I follow Stefanski's advise, “it may be more practical for the entrepreneur to simply offer their knowledge and for future entrepreneurs facing similar challenges to find and apply the knowledge to their unique conditions.”
I maintain a library of examples of what a tutor/mentor program might look like, as well as my own vision of what a program might look like. Then I organize events that enable people to look at this information and make their own choices of which ideas they will apply to their own situation.
I go a few steps further by organizing knowledge and a database of youth programs, and then leading efforts to help them get critically needed resources, so that the local owner has more of the resources he/she needs to innovate ways to keep a youth involved.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 13, 2006 3:55 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi again, Dan:
I think your quote, while you can franchise structure, you cannot franchise commitment hits the nail on the head.
Always a pleasure to read you...
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 14, 2006 12:25 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Well, it's passover season for some and Holy Week for others -- I just wanted to note that if we slow down for the weekend, I hope we'll be able to pick up again therafter, and perhaps continue this discussion for another week.
And in the meanwhile, to wish all participants and lurkers the appropriate holiday good wishes...
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 20, 2006 7:45 am (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Ah well, I have the feeling in any case that we've continued this conversation over in the newer "scaling" item, the one devoted to the proposition that small is beautiful, or meaningful, or appropriate -- or that appropriate is beautiful, and meaningful... however you'd like to phrase it.
Please join us over there for continuing discussion of just how to ensure that good ideas and best practices get shared in ways that are responsive to local conditions... appropriate and sustainable.
One last stab at the idea of scaling up...
Think global, the saying goes, and act local. Scaling up can be thought of as the reverse procedure: acting local, then thinking global – or at least, thinking expansively. And whereas the basic logic of "think global, then act local" ensures that the wider context is considered while focusing down on problems at the level where they can be addressed in all their local specificity, "act local, then think global" has the advantage of taking success and hopefully replicating it, or in social entrepreneurial terms, doing better by doing more of the same good.
Pamela McLean - Apr 20, 2006 12:03 pm (# Total: 25) Thanks for this discussion, and the other related ones. There is so much I would like to join in on here - but I'd finish up writing chapters.
So - thanks to Charles and all contributors - and just an observation regarding “how the saying goes”.
I have had it wrong all this time – I genuinely thought it was the other way round. I'm always quoting it to my Nigerian friends involved in local community development as "Act local - think global..." This is because I want them to find time to share what they know with a wider audience, because what they are doing is relevant to so many other locations in rural Nigeria – and maybe elsewhere in Africa. They are are addressing real problems and have learnt so much over the years about what does and does not work.
It seems to me a tragedy if that expertise is only applied locally. Small is beautiful. Bottom up development is appropriate development. But local doesn’t have to stay completely local and unreplicated. We have to do far more to enable local actors to contribute to global thinking – but that entails opportunity costs for them – and local activists tend to be enormously overstretched. However they are the real experts and efforts should be made to learn from their experiences and knowledge. Surely now we have easier access to ICTs this should become more and more achievable. Maybe the saying should become “Think global – learn local – then act”
Pam McLean
Cawdnet convenor
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 20, 2006 1:31 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Pam:
Lovely to read you here once again..
FWIW, I just googled and got 187,000 hits for think global act local and 41,600 for think local act global -- and topping them both, 940,000 for the portmanteau word, glocal !!
Where that leaves us, nobody knows!
ValerieB - Apr 20, 2006 1:31 pm (# Total: 25) (oops, Charles slipped in while I was posting...)
Thought-provoking post, Pamela!
Learning how to do anything is such an iterative process. What I think a lot of us crave is the opportunity to reflect on what we are learning as we go with others on the path.
Volumes have been written about best practices, and much can be learned from reading them, but it's just so much more compelling to have a chat with someone who has been there, done that, and has some war stories to tell.
It's why I hope conversations like this one will continue.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 20, 2006 1:37 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi, Valerie:
Welcome to SocialEdge!
- Volumes have been written about best practices ... but it's just so much more compelling to have a chat with someone who has been there, done that, and has some war stories to tell.
Pamela McLean - Apr 20, 2006 2:01 pm (# Total: 25) Thanks for the replies Charles and ValerieB.
Ref "Learning how to do anything is such an iterative process."
Absolutely. And it's only as you are learning that you begin to understand what the question really is (or what it should be). Which IMHO is why the "traditional format" for doing proposals is all back to front - because too much funding is directed to "giving solutions" (as defined in the funding proposal - before work gets underway). Unfortunately precious few resources are available to get the question right first - so the "solutions" are often "less than helpful". Usually the people who do understand the questions/problems are not the people providing the "solutions" (Except where local self-funded solutions are provided to solve local problems - which is done with insufficient resources - by people too overstretched to put a proper funding proposal together). To get things right you need money,ideas, skills and networks - too often the money goes out insufficiently supported.
Ref "It's just so much more compelling to have a chat with someone who has been there, done that, and has some war stories."- I think my rant above comes from a feeling that Valerie and I may have some similar stories ![]()
Pam
ValerieB - Apr 20, 2006 2:50 pm (# Total: 25) Er, yes, I imagine so!
I have been struck more than once with how things get sort of twisted around when one is writing a grant application... in an effort to make one's own initiative sound like a good fit for the solution proposed by the funders, one spins what is hoped to be a compelling narrative. By the time I'm through, I almost believe the story I've written.
It would be so refreshing to be able to write a proposal which said something along the lines of, "well, we're not sure, exactly how we are going to go about this, but we have some really smart, experienced people helping us and we think we stand a good chance of figuring it out if we're permitted to explore a bit!
Pamela McLean - Apr 20, 2006 3:32 pm (# Total: 25) And what about the ones that only seem interested in paying for the fancy stuff. So when you want help to kick start a new project or part of a project they only seem interested in photo-opportunity stuff (the stuff that actually you could manage to do in cheaper ways than they are willing to pay for) It seems they'll pay for "shiny-and-new" rather than the "make-do-and-mend" "second-hand" "borrow-mine" "let's make a bit more space over here" creative maximising of resources that is the cultural norm - at least it is with the projects I know. But then they but won't help with the essentials - the things that can't be rustled up without finding the necessary money - because that's "only people" or "consumables" etc.....
tutormentor - Apr 21, 2006 1:46 pm (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Pamela, as one who writes too many grant requests that are mostly rejected, I feel your pain. Thus, I've been trying to change the paradygm and get funders to make choices of where they fund, based on where the need is, and what organizations in those areas are doing work that the donor wants to support.
One way to draw attention to where the need is would be for local organizations and their clients to use blogs to tell their story.
Ethan Zukerman wrote about aggregating blogs in his own blog at http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog?p-452 . I repeated his message in my own http://tutormentor.blogspot.com message of March 30, 2006.
If groups who have a common goal, or a common geography, or a common problem, can find ways to form networks of purpose, I think they can attract the attention of donors to their cause and perhaps make a significant shift in how funds are awarded.
I'm trying to apply this concept in building support for volunteer-based tutor/mentor programs.
Dan Bassill Tutor/Mentor Connection
JessicaMargolin - Apr 21, 2006 4:09 pm (# Total: 25) Cameron said, "I think your quote, while you can franchise structure, you cannot franchise commitment hits the nail on the head."
But, actually you can franchise commitment to some degree:
Step 1a, you see what parameters are necessary for commitment; to the extent you can build those, there might be a decision to proceed even if those areas aren't met.
Step 1b, you determine where value is created -- where the commitment is coming from. You can then incorporate the value-creation components of the structure of the franchise model.
Step 2 is of course creating feedback mechanisms and intervention points
Step 3 is stress-testing it.
I think it's important to leverage and learn as a way to reduce risks for potential funders, organizers, volunteers, and community members.
That said, the return might be longterm for a community, so I am always hesitant with "first you start with a self-sustaining enterprise...." as a stipulation for the franchise concept.
tutormentor - Apr 22, 2006 6:16 am (# Total: 25) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I agree Jessica, there are some ways to approach it. However, I don't think many of these are likely to result from the efforts of the small entrepreneurs who are creating new enterprises.
Instead, I've been looking for universities who might partner with the Tutor/Mentor Connection, to take on a role of "creating leaders" who might populate the field.
If I were a business with large sums of money, I could endow a chair at a university, or pay for this service. However, as a small non profit, my enticement is "vision" and the potential of a university to provide 'tipping point' type impact across an entire social sector.
If someone from a university wanted to tackle this problem, then some of the steps you've suggested might be steps they would consider.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 22, 2006 6:23 pm (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Pam, Val.
Okay, here’s the same basic issue surfacing in two places. Pam writes:
- it's only as you are learning that you begin to understand what the question really is (or what it should be). Which IMHO is why the o"traditional format" for doing proposals is all back to front - because too much funding is directed to "giving solutions" (as defined in the funding proposal - before work gets underway). Unfortunately precious few resources are available to get the question right first - so the "solutions" are often "less than helpful".
- things get sort of twisted around when one is writing a grant application... in an effort to make one's own initiative sound like a good fit for the solution proposed by the funders, one spins what is hoped to be a compelling narrative.
What are the obstacles to changing this pattern?
What can be done in individual situations where this pattern obtains? What can be done to address this pattern at a meta-level -- ie not only in terms of your own particular situation and project, but in terms of changing the overall approach?
Dan is offering one response in his post -- the use of blogs by local organizations and their clients to tell their stories. This is a grass-roots upward response -- but are there ways to ensure that the problem faced at the grass-roots level gets heard by those who need to hear it?
Dan also suggests forming networks of purpose -- but the key point he makes, I feel, is the need for an approach that addresses the paradigm under which we're operating:
- , I've been trying to change the paradigm and get funders to make choices of where they fund, based on where the need is, and what organizations in those areas are doing work that the donor wants to support
Pamela McLean - Apr 23, 2006 4:20 am (# Total: 25) Reference "Places to Intervene in a System" (Charles please give us the link).
It seems to me that there is often a good match between what funders want to achieve and what activists are trying to do. However,the mismatch comes at the point in the system where they try to communicate with each other. It is a typical problem of top-down and bottom-up failing to link up.
I am reminded of a useful analysis of this problem, by Stephen Musgrave (I could find the full reference). The analysis is based on a study of top-down and bottom-up initiatives related to e-gov in the UK, but he takes a systems approach which is widely applicable.
He describes something that I remember as “areas of confluence” (though that my not be his exact term). Basically – he suggests that more attention needs to be given to areas of confluence if the different inputs of “top-down” and “bottom-up” are to meet together and flow on effectively. Steven addresses the problem of mismatch between the cultures by suggesting that each side should have people who are given *equal status* who meet at the area of confluence – he calls these people “information czars”.
Dan’s suggestion of blogs is a step in this direction. In a way it is offering a strategy for crossing the culture gap, so that funders can get to understand something of the culture in which bottom-up initiatives work, and, as a result offer more apporprate mechanisms for awarding funding.
Another example of communicating on equal terms equally at the area of confluence was the redevelopment of a public open space in a run down area of London (near Kings Cross station). It was a requirement that anyone putting forward a scheme must show evidence that their proposals reflected local opinion and need. The plan that was finally adopted had taken an innovative approach to consultation. The company concerned had provided public consultation opportunities, but recognised that no young people ever attended, so their voice was not being heard. The invitation to the consultation process simply did not seem to apply to them. I often have similar feelings about funding proposal processes.
To overcome the problem of youth involvement the company sent out a professional film crew, with a young person acting as interviewer. They went to local youth clubs and other spaces where young people met, and asked their opinions. The resulting video was presented along with written reports of standard consultations.
The point of this example is that both sides were able to communicate without leaving their cultural comfort zone. The young people presented their opinions in a natural way –speaking informally and spontaneously to someone they felt comfortable with; wearing their normal casual clothes; and on their own territory. They came up with useful insight into problems and possible solutions. Similarly the decision makers heard those opinions in their cultural comfort zone - formal suits; offices and conference rooms; considering evidence in formal ways that they felt comfortable with.
Somehow activists and funders have to develop a cultural meeting point that is appropriate for both sides - I'm hopeful that Social Edge is the place it could start to happen..
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 24, 2006 10:38 am (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Pam:
You write:
- Reference "Places to Intervene in a System" (Charles please give us the link).
Places to Intervene in a System is Donella Meadows’ classic account of where interventions will have the greatest impact -- an astonishingly important paper for anyone hoping to change the way things are. Using Jay Forrester’s systems rtheory as her basis, Meadows shows that the greatest impact doesn’t come by influencing quantities (numbers, material stocks and flows) but from playing with the rules of the system (incentives, punishment, constraints), the power of self-organization, the goals of the system, and above all the mindset or paradigm out of which the goals, rules, feedback structure arise.
http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid790.php
Dancing with Systems: What to do when systems resist change is an excerpt from Donella Meadows's unfinished last book. Systems thinking says the future can't be predicted, but it can be envisioned and brought lovingly into being. Systems can't be controlled, but they can be designed and redesigned. We can't surge forward with certainty into a world of no surprises, but we can expect surprises and learn from them and even profit from them. We can't impose our will upon a system. We can listen to what the system tells us, and discover how its properties and our values can work together to bring forth something much better than could ever be produced by our will alone. A brilliant essay in favor of a fully human and humane understanding of complex situations, problems.
http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/pubs/Dancing.html
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 3, 2006 9:29 am (# Total: 25) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
This may or may not be a Biob Dylan quote, I forget -- but eirther way, this event will still be open for another week, so let's all just carry on carrying on..
Social Fusion: Taking it to Scale
Hosted by Jane Wales (October 2005 - Closed)
|
|
Audio Taken From Social Fusion Panel Discussion - October 28, 2005 at The World Affairs Council, San Francisco
|
Panel Discussion |
Q&A from audience
|
Going Global for the Greater Good
Hosted by Bonnie Koenig (January 2005 - Closed)
A number of the discussions on Social Edge deal with the different false dichotomies that have developed over time in the environment in which many of us work – business profit vs. social mission, government vs. business vs. nonprofit sectors, etc… I believe, from my work with a wide range of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and institutions that support them (foundations, support groups, etc..), that there is another false dichotomy out there that has received very little attention - the belief that NGOs are either domestic or international, and those that are “international” comprise a very small group. This belief often continues with the idea that there are a few very specific types of NGOs that are international, generally falling into the following groups. (1) Those that do work that is focused in other countries – over there - for example aid groups or human rights groups; (2) Those that work in an area that is increasingly believed to not have borders – such as the environment. And some people are increasingly aware of a third group: (3) Membership groups, mainly professional societies, that have members from other countries However, there has been very little attention to the growing number of NGOs that don’t fall into any of these categories but do consider themselves members of a global community. The reality is that there are numerous NGOs that have a strong local or national base, but are engaging internationally, many of them outside of the focus and programs of national networks and support groups, and thus often without useful resources.
What do I mean by the term engaging internationally? It is probably not a term unique to me, but I use it to refer to organizations that are in this growing group that are rooted firmly in local communities, or nationally, but have found ways to be part of a great global community while continuing to serve their local constituencies. It may not be apparent from the outside looking in, or even from their mission statement, but it can play a major role in influencing the organization they are, and how they do business. Often organizations evolve in their international engagement along a spectrum of engagement, becoming more engaged over time, or deciding they are happy at one spot along the spectrum. If you are working with an organization that is looking to engage internationally or expand its international engagement it can be very useful for your leadership to agree on where it thinks the organization currently is on the spectrum, and where it would like to go.
Why should NGOs and others that work with them be aware of this trend? Being open to discovering ideas from other cultures or countries that can be beneficial to the organization’s own national or local programs, or providing professional development and networking opportunities for those who are affiliated with the NGO, are just two of the many reasons why saavy leaders are broadening their global awareness and mindset. The participants in the discussion this week may have others to share or want to discuss this concept further. Sometimes there may just be one or two people within the organization who are looking to convince others of this perspective and looking for some good rationales (and you may be one of them)!
If you work with a group that is increasingly becoming internationally engaged, or would like to be more internationally engaged, how can you help your colleagues, staff or volunteer peers to make this transition? It can include an organizational cultural transition, new program development or just understanding that there are “easy to do” steps to take to begin or enhance your engagement.
Some questions the organization’s leadership will want to ask include:
- What is motivating your organization’s interest in an increased international engagement?
- Is your organization’s culture open to a broader outlook on the world?
- Are your vision and mission compatible with international engagement?
- How will/could increased attention to international trends advance your mission, goals or programs?
- What do you hope to accomplish by an increased international engagement?
- Do you already have members or other leaders in your organization from outside your headquarters’ country? What role(s) do they play?
- Integrating attendees and speakers from other countries in your annual conference.
- Expanding your network for information exchange and learning (forums like this are a great opportunity!).
- Summarizing relevant international ideas and themes for your organization’s leadership and staff (perhaps as an article or column in a newsletter).
- Integrating lessons from other countries into your own daily operations or programs.
Bonnie Koenig - Jan 18, 2005 11:45 am (# Total: 7) President, Going International
Welcome everyone to this discussion on operating in an international (or global) environment. I hope that we will be able to discuss our own experiences with engaging internationally and share some ideas for how to do this more effectively. I suspect that we all might be on different parts of the spectrum (from working with organizations that are primarily local or national but are just beginning to engage internationally, across the spectrum to those that operate more globally) so it might be helpful when you post a message if you share the perspective you are coming from with us.
Feel free to focus on any of the topics I’ve raised in my Introduction to the workshop. I’ve chosen one as well to help get us started: If you are currently working with an organization that is looking to engage more effectively what are some of the challenges you are facing?
Bonnie
Web Community Resource Networks
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the intro Bonnie.
Web Networks is a unique non-profit web service provider, based in Canada. We are extending our work with the Inuit to assist other aboriginal groups world wide use technology to support their culture and language.
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has published a story about this work in the territory of Nunavut to provide a new platform for Inuktitut computing, Attavik.net
We are interested in hearing from anyone interested in assisting--I'm at 1.800.932.7003 x.18 or oliver@web.net
Thanks,
Oliver Zielke, Executive Director
web.net
Evelyn Arce White - Jan 19, 2005 7:36 am (# Total: 7) International Funders for Indigenous Peoples
Thank you Bonnie and Oliver for your comments on such an important topic. My name is Evelyn Arce-White and I work for International Funders for Indigenous Peoples (IFIP) a recognized affinity group of the Council on Foundations . IFIP is an association of donors that support or are interested in supporting Indigenous Projects internationally.
Our mission is not only to provide a forum to funders to effectively increase resources to Indigenous communities internationally but to bridge the leadership and vision of Indigenous communities to the philanthropic world.
I do feel that giving internationally is a topic that still has a whole lot of room for organizing and research. For instance, we have seen research that shows that US Foundations give 1/4 of one percent to native projects in the US but there is no stats yet for how much is given internationally to Indigenous projects. The only other stats that I have seen is US foundations give 3% internationally but 2% goes to European projects so I would guess a very very small amount goes to really grassroots org and indigenous communities.
I think one of the best ways to link all of our circles is to attend meetings and conferences that address this topic inorder to learn the latest and who to partner up with and build RELATIONSHIPS. I believe strongly in collaboration and I think we waste alot of money and time because we sometimes don't want to collaborate and combine our resources.
IFIP is holding it 's annual conference on May 19 and 20 in NYC and welcomes donors to register. We will be bringing in expertise to speak about the latest on how the Patriot Act is affecting international grantmaking and how now several Indigenous communities are being labeled terriorist, we will be looking at International Indigenous educational and language intiatives and also look at some funding strategies, coordination and long term goals of the Indigenous peoples that were affected by the Tsunami amongst other topics such as sustainable development and environment.
IFIP has collaborated with First Peoples Worldwide in publishing the "Indigenous Peoples Funding and Resource Guide" that was developed to assist Indigenous communities and grassroots org to become effective grantseekers inorder to build capacity for their communities. We have been able to distribute hundreds in English and Spanish to communities and org all over the world and do so by asking donors to purchase hard copies for their grantees, it is a win-win situation. The guide is 167 pages and has a listing of over 200 foundations, elements of writing a proposal and provides techniques on how to research foundations with a listing of resources.
If you want more info about IFIP, how to become a member and our work, send me an email at ewhite@firstnations.org
Respectfully, Evelyn
Bonnie Koenig - Jan 19, 2005 8:24 am (# Total: 7) President, Going International
Thank you Evelyn and Oliver for your posts. I agree with Evelyn that “giving internationally is a topic that still has a whole lot of room for organizing and research”. I see that Caroline Hartnell of Alliance will be hosting a workshop on Social Edge on this topic next month.
Evelyn (and Oliver indirectly) also make a very important point about relationship building. As most people who are reading these posts are most likely aware, relationship building is very important to succeeding internationally. However, those of us who are not from cultures where the time needed to build relationships (sometimes even years) is a given, can underestimate the amount of time and commitment building successful relationships cross-culturally and across national boundaries will take. I have found that this is an important shift in organizational culture that may need to take place in local or national organizations that are increasing their international engagement.
Bonnie
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jan 22, 2005 7:02 pm (# Total: 7) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Bonnie, you wrote:
those of us who are not from cultures where the time needed to build relationships (sometimes even years) is a given, can underestimate the amount of time and commitment building successful relationships cross-culturally and across national boundaries will take
Thank you so much for this. It gets, I believe, right to the heart of enduring relationship, which is trust -- a real, human quality, not something that can be recommended over the weekend by a seminar leader, noted on the back of an envelope and be in place in one's life on Monday.
I see many drivers in the social entrepreneurial community that have to do with quantity -- and the urgency and vast scope of need in the recent tsunami are illustration enough of how important quantity, scaling and speed can be -- but here in the social sector above all, it seems to me, we must remember the importance of the qualitative, of the small and the slow and the subtle as well as the vast and the accelerated and the basic.
Both head and heart have their blessings, and likewise both the quantitative and the qualitative, both the immediate and the profound. Let's make sure we don't lose sight of the significance of either one.
Trust is a wonderful example of this -- there's a kind of quick trust that we very often rely on, that's based on signalling the immediacy of a situation -- but like so many other "quick" versions of things, it's a temporary fix, and its enduring counterpart, though more costly in time, effort and sincerity, is far more reliable and richly rewarding for all involved in the longer term.
Bonnie Koenig - Jan 24, 2005 1:25 pm (# Total: 7) President, Going International
You make a wonderful point about the balancing of the quantitative and the qualitative, and the need to be flexible in how we balance them – this goes back to one of the themes I initially introduced about the false dichotomies that are out there and how important it is to understand that what may appear to be at opposite ends of a spectrum, are not always mutually exclusive.
You can often start a relationship (especially in the entrepreneurial or “private sector” environment – where something tangible needs to get done right away, or goods or services need to be exchanged) but it is often hard to sustain that relationship unless you take the time to build it. This is something that engaging in the international environment – and taking time to learn about different cultures – can teach all of us. Your example of the tsunami relief is illustrative – it is one measure to organize the important but temporary relief supplies, and a whole different challenge and set of measures to organize programs that are sustainable once the initial media focus has passed.
I have been told of a Chinese proverb that talks about the many levels of trust – from the casual (or business) relationship where you might trust someone in a one-time exchange, all the way to the trust between a parent and child, and how important it is to understand at what level trust has been given.
Do others have examples of where they or their organization have learned lessons from other cultures through engaging internationally?
Bonnie Koenig - Jan 25, 2005 7:21 am (# Total: 7) President, Going International
Thank you to everyone who joined the workshop this week - either by actively posting or by just "stopping by" to see what ideas were being discussed. I hope you found some ofthese ideas thought provoking...and continue to work with them. Making local-global linkages can be a powerful tool for the work we all do.
Bonnie Koenig Going International
Geographic Expansion
Hosted by Willy Foote (June 2005 - Closed)
In 2004, EcoLogic Finance went before its Board to seek approval for expanding its activity beyond its initial focus on Latin America. This paper lays out the factors that led to this decision and thereby frames some of the key strategic and logistical issues involved in the decision of expanding an organization’s geographic reach.
What factors may prompt this process?
- Growing global demand for your product or service. In our case, the global demand for “sustainable” coffee trade finance has been and is expected to continue growing exponentially. The fastest growing market is in East Africa, which is where we first expanded to in late 2004. In terms of overall size, the next largest markets outside of Latin America are in East Timor and Indonesia, which is where we expect to be working by 2006.
- First mover opportunities for your sector. Based on our track record and growth, we are well positioned to be a leader in our field, but only if we have the breadth to address the global need, not just that of Latin America.
- Request of key stakeholders. A critical part of the success of our business model involves working closely with premier market makers like Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Royal Coffee, and Starbucks Coffee Company. When, across the board, these important partners expressed enthusiasm for expanding collaborative efforts to places outside of Latin America, it was difficult to ignore.
In December 2003 the Harvard Business Review published an article called “Growth Outside the Core,” which outlines some important lessons from private sector companies that are relevant in considering geographic expansion. In a study of the drivers of profitable, sustainable corporate growth, they analyzed 181 different companies in the 1990s, and reached two major conclusions: first, they found that most sustained, profitable growth comes when a company pushed out the boundaries of its core business into a so-called adjacent space. They identified six types of “adjacencies,” ranging from adjacent links in the value chain to adjacent customers to adjacent geographies.
The second finding was that companies consistently and profitably outgrow their rivals by developing a formula for expanding those boundaries in predictable, repeatable ways. Companies that hit upon a repeatable formula have success rates of twice that, and some drive their rates up to 80% or higher. Repeatability allows the company to systematize the growth and, by doing so, take advantage of learning-curve effects (e.g., repeating formula over and over again to refine skills and systematize processes that are developed mostly through guesswork the first time). The majority of standouts have one or two powerful, repeatable formulas that generate successive waves of new growth, allowing them to push beyond the boundaries of their core businesses.
The authors conclude that combining repeatable formulas with adjacent geography can often lead to a breakthrough in performance. Specifically, they cite numerous companies that successfully made adjacency moves with little risk by simply changing a single variable – geography – but continuing to sell the same product to the same customers using the same repeatable formula. Thus, risk was managed effectively because the product sold did not change in terms of customers, supply chain, or market channels.
In looking at this description, we realized that we had the exact ingredients the authors claim makes for a successful performance recipe. Namely, we would be dealing with the same buyer partners, the same supply chains, and the same products; we would be changing essentially only the variable of geography.
Armed with not only the adequate motivation to consider this decision, but also the potential for this being a path toward “breakthrough performance” in achieving our mission, we got down to the brass tacks of what we needed to consider to move this initiative forward. During the workshop, we invite you to consider whether your organization might be ripe for expanding its geographic reach, including identifying whether you have a “repeatable formula” that will not only help you serve a larger marketplace, but also my be a linchpin for breakthrough performance for your organization. Furthermore, we invite you to consider and think of additional such as the listed below that will important in taking this step:
- How would geographic expansion affect your current operations and organizational structure?
- Do you have a realistic handle on the costs of expansion to new areas?
- How transferable is your model to other geographies?
- How will you address the language barrier in new locations?
- Are there greater risks inherent to new areas versus your existing geographic focus?
- Are there more untapped opportunities in your existing geography that you should consider before expanding geographically?
ShoreBank Enterprise Pacific
We are grappling with a similar suite of issues in rural coastal Oregon and Washington. In the last decade we've successfully and serially appended new geographic markets that share a history of reliance on natural resources, and thus culture, beliefs, values (in a broad sense). We've used these commonalities--and a shared crisis of economic restructuring--to deliver relevance to our portfolio of loans and relationships. But the combined and contiguous geography does not add up to scale, so we've settled on the interim notion of "density of impact" to achieve relative "scale of impact". Now we are seeking avenues to export our "advantaged" product lines--small business and community development finance--to other rural communities in the Pacific NW.
We're not dealing with a language barrier--just a culture barrier (think wheat instead of fish and trees). We're pretty clear that efficiencies are available through transaction volume, and we hope enough so that we can continue to customize investment terms rather than demand "conformity" from people who need anything but conformity. Technology--in sales and management--is clearly an expensive challenge. Likewise, we know that customer intimacy (read: localness) is necessary to take more than nominal investment risks (and manage them for return). Finally, true scale will demand an urban presence--easy to do, difficult to achieve while remaining relevant to rural communities and people.
Willy Foote - Jun 15, 2005 4:43 pm (# Total: 4) EcoLogic Finance
John, you are right that geographic expansion is one way to achieve volume and thereby, scale, but it can be easily thwarted without a good understanding of "cultural" factors.
We have definitely dealt with a number of cultural factors in our first foray into Africa. It became clear very quickly that a key to our successful expansion was going to involve leveraging relationships with groups on the ground that had that "cultural" knowledge. Are there partners outside your normal realm that you might look to help navigate the cultural barriers?
In our case, we quickly found that the East African Fine Coffee Association would be a strong ally in the process. The direct parallel for this organization serving Latin America isn't an on-the-ground type organization. Hence, we would have never initially suspected that this type of organization would provide us the type of intelligence that would help us address cultural issues.
Another thing to consider is that, perhaps "scale of impact" may be the place you should continue to focus until some of the factors are in place i.e. the market demand and the relationships.
Pamela McLean - Jun 16, 2005 4:04 am (# Total: 4) Willie Foote wrote "Look for partners that can help you with the cultural barriers... geographic expansion... can be easily thwarted without a good understanding of "cultural" factors...in our first foray into Africa. It became clear very quickly that a key to our successful expansion was going to involve leveraging relationships with groups on the ground that had that "cultural" knowledge..."
It is great to see this point raised, and the increasing appreciation of the need to work in collaboration with local expertise, cultures and social structures.
In a separate thread I have written about how CawdNet (active in rural Nigeria) is separating out its social and entrepreneurial activities. We are now able to serve as "Knowledge Brokers" providing support services and introductions for people/organisation who want to explore and develop their interests in Africa - especially, but not exclusively, in rural Nigeria.
Pam
Willy Foote - Jun 16, 2005 7:27 pm (# Total: 4) EcoLogic Finance
CawdNet sounds like they're really on to something by disagregating their social and entrepreneurial activities in rural Nigeria. Not that these components aren't inextrictably intertwined, but it makes sense to tease out one's understanding of local expertise, cultures and social structures from the core entrepreneurial activities of an enterprise. I'm curious though, in offering this bundled knowledge as a value proposition in and of itself to folks looking to develop interests in Africa, does CawdNet capture that value through a service fee of some sort?
On a related note, and perhaps this is somewhat unique to our "green" lending strategyy, but we have found that one of the best sources of on-the-ground "cultural knowledge" is actually our buyer partners in the US and Europe. Not that they're all experts in local culture per se (i.e., languages, political nuances at village level), but within the context of local business culture as it interfaces with international trade, the best source of insider perspectives on what's doable and what's not -- in our case, how to manage risk in the ag lending sector -- often comes from international buyers who have been working on the ground for years. As long as we, as a financial-services nonprofit offering concrete benefits to buyers and sellers engaged in direct commerce between the North and South, can demonstrate a win-win propostionto these supply chain partners, our business allies provide a wealth of intel on cultural factors that affect business results in the field.
Scale and Replicability
Hosted by Jacqueline Novogratz, CEO, Acumen Fund (July 2005 - Closed)
Scale in most industries has a fairly clear definition and includes a range of options, such as franchising, joint venture partners, or a centralized organic structure. In the field of social enterprise, however, scale is a more elusive concept.
Scale requires a meaningful growth in the volume of what an organization produces and delivers, with a corresponding impact on lowering the production or delivery costs of providing goods or services. Scale also means thinking about replicating the delivery of products and services in other locations, either through direct replication, franchising or partnership with other organizations. How can this be achieved?
Debating Scale
Academics agree that scale presents a challenge to all enterprises, especially those in the social sector. Published articles offer advice on appropriate organizational structures, the value of networks, how to consider national expansion and tailoring solutions to local contexts. We think that an article by Dees, et. al., “Scaling Social Impact”1, may offer a simple but effective framework for the critical issues to address prior to scaling, which they term the “5 R’s”.
While this framework is not exhaustive, Acumen Fund would like to test this theory against the reality of your experience. We hope that your practical knowledge of working at the forefront of social enterprise can deepen our understanding of common challenges. We also hope that, by sharing solutions to these challenges, we can contribute to each others’ progress and growth.
Readiness - Is the innovation ready to be spread?
Before spreading an innovation, you should ask yourself whether there is sufficient evidence of success: i.e. are you sure it will work anywhere? Your success may be dependent on unique leadership or local conditions that may not be present in a new location.
To determine readiness, you should articulate your project’s “specification”: what factors contribute to its success and how each factor relates to the goal. The aim is to standardize the innovation so that it can be implemented without the presence of the founder.
This specification should be simple, containing as many elements as needed, but as few as possible. It might be helpful to begin by calculating the unit cost of impact (e.g. dollars/house) and determining whether that level of efficiency can be achieved elsewhere. If not, why not?
Receptivity - Will the innovation be well-received in the target communities?
Even if you carefully define your target market, each community will respond differently to your efforts. Will all your customers or recipients understand the innovation and what it has to offer? Does it represent a major change for them? Are there already existing alternatives that you will have to compete with or address?
Innovations must consider the social context of new communities. Will the residents trust you and your representatives? Will there be resistance, and if so, how can you overcome it? Are the target communities willing and able to invest time and resources in adopting your innovation?
Resources - What resources are required to get the job done right?
Some ways of scaling up require fewer resources than others. Often, working with partners can reduce your cost and increase your capacity, without giving up too much independence or control. If you choose not to collaborate, your ability to recruit and train capable staff may determine the rate at which you can expand.
Lack of funding often prevents organizations from scaling up. How long will your current source of income last? Do you need to develop short-term (donor) funding to scale up? And will you be able to generate income after that funding runs out?
Risk – What are the chances that things don’t turn out as expected?
It is difficult to predict the future. Entrepreneurs should consider the possible outcomes of their expansion and have a plan for each course of events. For example, some communities may implement the innovation incorrectly, or worse yet, abandon it entirely. You can reduce this risk by maintaining control over new parts of the organization, but this might also prevent new branches from adapting to their particular situation. What can an organization do to grow rapidly while minimizing its risk?
Returns - What is the bottom line in terms of quality and quantity of impact?
You should decide how you hope to balance the quantity of impact (i.e. how far the innovation is spread) with the quality of impact (i.e. how well the innovation is implemented or delivered). There is usually a trade-off here: a more loosely controlled organization may yield a greater quantity of returns, whereas tighter management may increase the quality.
Questions for discussion
- How does an organization decide if its innovation is ready to scale?
- How do you determine whether your innovation will be well-received in other communities?
- How can you ensure adequate resources for scale and replication?
- How do you assess the risk of attempting to scale and replicate your organization?
- What organizational structure (branching, collaboration, franchising, etc.) would increase your reach without compromising your service?
Jacqueline Novogratz - Jul 5, 2005 3:57 pm (# Total: 17) CEO, Acumen Fund
The Acumen Fund staff is looking forward to an interesting dialogue with all of you over the next week. In addition to responding to the kick-off questions above, please feel free to raise any other issues you feel are relevant.
Warm regards,
Jacqueline
Cgasca - Jul 6, 2005 2:50 pm (# Total: 17) Social Entreprenuer
I liked the 5 R's as an outline for exploring if an organization is ready to scale up as theorical framework.
On the ground I would however, look at the effectiveness of organizational operations. How many staff do you have? Can they communicate effectively and make difficult decisions even if it means conflict? Is the link between operational performance and meeting mission goals clear? Does staff demonstrate entreprenuarial problem solving skills? What are the organizational decision making processes and do they match the nature of the project, for instance consensus versus entreprenuarial decision making models.
In addition one could consider the financial sources of funding, do they match the uses? Do the funds have the right characteristics and longevity to complete the scale up phase? How does the balance sheet look? Does the organization have the financial capacity to take on risk without loosing existing programs and service?
I was also happy to see the warning that what is accepted in one community may not be in the next. In Canada we started a micro enterprise fund using the Grameen bank model. However, it did not work in the Canadian cultural context so we modified to fit. It is important to understand that best practices or models are not always transferable to other cultural contexts.
I visited your website and was very impressed by the scope of your work. I am trying a similar approach but operating North America and utilizing joint venture agreements with the private sector. I am avoiding nonprofits as their decision making cycle is too long and funding sources are often too restrictive, unreliable(short term) and with poor timing (it can take too long to obtain funds).
However, being committed to community well being I am exploring how to achieve the same results using private sector methods and incentives. I have chosen to focus on the needs of the secondary labor market (working poor).
mitra - Jul 7, 2005 3:59 am (# Total: 17) Natural Innovation
This article is thought provoking. I am interested in scalability, both for innovative ideas, and organisations, because without the scaling it is hard to have a real impact. I'm a big believer in the three-stage process for solving a problem.
1: Do it once - prove an idea works in the real world 2: Replicate, or scale it - make the effects multiply 3: Leave it - because any idea or organisation dependent on its founders isn't sustainable.
Back in 1988-89, some of us took a project we were working on, and scaled it internationally. So I thought it might be interesting, to apply the points from the article retrospectively. I believe the thinking behind the replication may be applicable to other situations.
The project was introducing the NGO world to online communication and information sharing, the first two cases being GreenNet (www.gn.apc.org) (which I started) and IGC/PeaceNet/EcoNet. The scaled project became the Association for Progressive Communications (www.apc.org) and it spread to Australia, Canada, Nicaragua, Brazil in that first year, and now to maybe 25 countries.
I should say, this is my personal opinion, and everyone involved in the process will of course have seen it differently!
1: Readiness: Is the innovation ready to be spread. "Before spreading an innovation, you should ask yourself whether there is sufficient evidence of success: i.e. are you sure it will work anywhere? Your success may be dependent on unique leadership or local conditions that may not be present in a new location."
We were confident that our idea was NEEDED everywhere, not that it would definately work. It was certainly dependent on leadership, so the key to replicating it was finding appropriate leaders in each country who we could support to adapt our idea to their context. We felt that there was an urgency to solve the problem
"To determine readiness, you should articulate your project’s “specification”: what factors contribute to its success and how each factor relates to the goal. The aim is to standardize the innovation so that it can be implemented without the presence of the founder."
The challenge I believe is to figure out which bits need to be standardised, and which need to adapt to be adaptable, I don't believe the cookie-cutter approach works especially if moving to new countries or cultures.
"This specification should be simple, containing as many elements as needed, but as few as possible. It might be helpful to begin by calculating the unit cost of impact (e.g. dollars/house) and determining whether that level of efficiency can be achieved elsewhere. If not, why not?"
We certainly didn't go into that much detail, each case had to work out how to make it work in their unique situations.
Receptivity - Will the innovation be well-received in the target communities?
"Even if you carefully define your target market, each community will respond differently to your efforts. Will all your customers or recipients understand the innovation and what it has to offer? Does it represent a major change for them? Are there already existing alternatives that you will have to compete with or address?"
At the time we were developing the APC there were was very little competition the idea, and we found that in many cases our approach was sufficient enough of an improvement that the "competitors" became the local affiliates. The lesson here is that if your idea is that much more effective then the competion gets co-opted, and the "competitors" are also the most likely to have good ideas that you should be learning from.
"Innovations must consider the social context of new communities. Will the residents trust you and your representatives? Will there be resistance, and if so, how can you overcome it? Are the target communities willing and able to invest time and resources in adopting your innovation?"
Our decision process involved identifying communities where people were already trying to solve the problem, and then working with them. Yes, of course there was resistance (to using modems instead of phones), but that was part of the challenge.
Resources - What resources are required to get the job done right?
"Some ways of scaling up require fewer resources than others. Often, working with partners can reduce your cost and increase your capacity, without giving up too much independence or control. If you choose not to collaborate, your ability to recruit and train capable staff may determine the rate at which you can expand. Lack of funding often prevents organizations from scaling up. How long will your current source of income last? Do you need to develop short-term (donor) funding to scale up? And will you be able to generate income after that funding runs out?"
This is a very good point, our methodology involved sending a staff person from an existing node to a new partner for a period of a few months. We would also work with the new node to raise grants specifically for each new node, using our credibility (we'd done it ) and theirs (local knowledge) as a more convincing argument. We also raised funds earmarked for the expansion as their was resistance to using locally generated funds for it.
Risk – What are the chances that things don’t turn out as expected?
"It is difficult to predict the future. Entrepreneurs should consider the possible outcomes of their expansion and have a plan for each course of events. For example, some communities may implement the innovation incorrectly, or worse yet, abandon it entirely. You can reduce this risk by maintaining control over new parts of the organization, but this might also prevent new branches from adapting to their particular situation. What can an organization do to grow rapidly while minimizing its risk?"
I think risk is inevitable, providing an on-site staff-person was important to reducing it, also integrating the new partner fully into the organisation as quickly as possible so that problems could be sold. However I think its important also to allow for failure, and accept that it can be better to try 10 cases and fail in 2, than to spend the next year sifting through the 10 and only work with the 2 or 3 absolute certainties.
Returns - What is the bottom line in terms of quality and quantity of impact?
"You should decide how you hope to balance the quantity of impact (i.e. how far the innovation is spread) with the quality of impact (i.e. how well the innovation is implemented or delivered). There is usually a trade-off here: a more loosely controlled organization may yield a greater quantity of returns, whereas tighter management may increase the quality."
I disagree strongly that tight control yields greater quality. On the contrary, working to support a local organisation to adapt made sure that the quality was maintained. This is particularly important for innovations coming out of America, where there seems to be a tendency to think the whole world works the same way!
I hope this retro-spective is useful to others, though the Q&A might not reflect the process we went through totally.
- Mitra www.mitra.biz/blog
(responses please to my email mitra@mitra.biz, or in the topic, please don't send messages to the messages system here as it doesn't notify me by email and I don't get to see them! )
Bazaar Strategies
Very thought provoking subject matter - thanks to our host.
In reading the summary and reactions, it seems that although it is not implicitly stated (so I could be misinterpreting), there appears to be a false assumption that it is up to the incumbent innovator/entrepreneur to assess where and how to scale their solution. This is a reasonable assumption for a profit-driven organization where market capture is an important facet of profit maximization. But for a social enterprise, isn't an outcome of financially self-sustaining while achieving the greatest social return optimal? If so, it seems more practical for the entrepreneur to simply offer their knowledge and for future entrepreneurs facing similar challenges to find and apply the knowledge to their unique conditions that they know best. This thinking may not work for a product producing entrepreneur like ApproTEC where scale of production is a factor. But for a service-oriented solution such as the wonderful New Heroes case of Albina Ruiz trash collection in Peru, I think this is a more appropriate approach.
I suppose there is a role for some sort of franchising model where licensing revenues could be applied to increasing awareness about the entrepreneur's solution, although it is probably more efficient to leave that task to 3rd party communication intermediaries.
With this in mind, going back to question #1, perhaps the question could be phrased as "What does a person need to know to assess applicability of an innovation and how to apply a proven innovation in their own setting?". Question #2 might be posed as "How does a person validate that an innovation is applicable to their community and gain necessary partnerships and support?"
Each of these questions I think begs for a set of tools/replicable methods to help guide future entrepreneurs. Many such solution frameworks exist in the commercial sector to address such questions and I think more can be done to create and disseminate such tools for social entrepreneurs. This I think will lead to the most effective way to propagate these innovations. I believe Stuart Hart is active in this area at the Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise. Are there particular methods/tools others have encountered they found helpful?
Kind regards - Scott Stefanski
karenborchert - Jul 7, 2005 10:06 am (# Total: 17) The Campus Kitchens Project
Hello All, Thanks for starting this discussion. My colleague and I met recently with Greg Dees on a trip to Fuqua Business School and were excited to get some resources on scale in the social sector. For The Campus Kitchens Project, we have established what we believe is a replicable model through six pilots on college campuses. The program recycles unserved food from campus dining halls, utilizes on-campus kitchen space and student energy to prepare and deliver those meals to those in need in the community, and provides leadership opportunities to students.
We are now interested in moving toward a network of affiliated, rather than centrally owned programs for all kinds of schools: traditional 4-year institutions, high schools, middle and lower schools, and technical/community colleges.
Jacqueline's question #4 regarding organizational structure has been a major factor in our new business plan, as it directly affected many of the "R"s. According to our very helpful legal advisors, true "franchising" could set up some paperwork and legal needs that would really tax our resources, increase our risk, and possibly bring down the receptivity for potential host schools.
We have chosen instead to try a "licensed affiliate" model where each local Campus Kitchen will be hosted and fully owned by the school, who will license the use of CKP's name and mark. Licensees will then have access to the CKP training, resource library, intranet, and ongoing support. The license's renewal each year will be contingent on the affiliate adhering to CKP's basic programmatic and organizational standards, but will not be a true franchise. (By the way, we've learned that saying "franchise" is ill-advised if it's not a true legal franchise.)
Have others had success or specific challenges with this type of model? Have you used other models for scaling that you have found to be more effective?
Our greatest challenge at this point is actually putting the model fully into action. Resources don't allow for a full-out recruitment/scouting trip for new Campus Kitchens, yet in order to expand, we will need to get the materials and information out to as many school administrators, dining services staff, and service learning coordinators as possible. Any advice you have on this would also be very helpful.
paul_hudnut - Jul 7, 2005 9:26 pm (# Total: 17)
First, the article that is summarized is: "Scaling Social Impact Strategies for Spreading Social Innovations." Stanford Social Innovation Review 1, no. 4 (spring 2004): 24-32.
Second, I' like to comment on one issue of scaling that may be a key one for the "hybrid" companies, like ours. We are a non-profit, using donor funds/investment to develop a technology to help clean up the air in Asian cities by retrofitting 2 stroke motorcycles. We plan to sell these retrofits as our primary business. My comments reflect our plans, anticipated challenges and ideas, as we have not yet started sales.
These sales will provide our company with a small operating profit in time; however, we are aiming at making a significant impact. To do this, we will need to install hundreds of thousands of retrofit kits. The scale requirements to fund this level of inventory through our supply chain are significant. It is a challenge we will need to overcome as our business begins to grow. In a for-profit, debt financing could be used, but this is more difficult for a non-profit, operating with thin margins in Asia. But I am not aware of any non-profits that have been able to achieve significant scale of sales of a manufactured product.
My belief is that as other entrepreneurs tackle similar chronic problems with distributed solutions, they too will encounter this issue. Perhaps another enterepreneur will come up with a financing solution.
We have begun to investigate several ideas to address this challenge, but my belief right now is that at least in the early years, our supply chain will need to "clear" within the net payment period. In other words, the microfinance lending for the motorcycle driver will need to fund the various suppliers within the "net __ days" period. This is indeed a challenge in a supply chain with components coming from Europe and U.S. as well as Asia.
We are also looking at a franchise type approach for developing a system of installation garages in the Philippines. Our plan is to keep these very basic, for two reasons. First, the simpler they are, the easier they are to replicate. And second, the simpler they are, the cheaper they are to start, and the more likely the can be started with minimal capital.
A final observation. By being mission driven, instead of profit driven, I agree with one of the earlier posts that this provides a potential for faster dissemination and, perhaps, less need for control over the business model, franchise approach, etc. We will gauge our success by whether retrofit (or other cleaner transportation)technologies become ubiquitous, not necessarily by the size of our organization. Different capabilities and approaches in different areas may increase the speed of diffusion.
We will see!
Question for the discussion as a newcomer; Is the focus of multiplication on using similar METHODS in other settings or on achieving comparable RESULTS?
Have seen how the same METHODS yield different results (nature of the impact on individuals and communities) and how seeking the same RESULTS requires significant variation in methods.
Looking forward to your perspectives.
Acumen Fund
Reading Mr. Hudnut's entry (#6), I am reminded of the challenge that we often encounter at Acumen Fund of finding business models that address both product financing and distribution networks. Since we work with both non-profits and for-profits, we find that both share the same challenges when it comes to reaching out to low-income markets. While for-profit companies may have an easier time accessing debt financing, it is still not guaranteed for companies with an innovative technology, or a business model designed to impact social issues like poverty or the environment, and not simply maximize profit.
Products designed to address the needs of low-income consumers are often out of reach due to high capital costs. However, before this even becomes an issue, the challenge of access to working capital for retailers and distributors prevents the product from even reaching the market, whether they are for-profit or non-profit. Without guaranteed sales, a retailer or dealer is rarely willing to invest their own resources in inventory. Often both distribution and financing need to be addressed with one solution, wherein financing is secured and made available to the end user, in essence by pre-financing products and projects.
At Acumen Fund, we see the opportunity to not only invest in products and services that can be scaled up to address large social problems, but also to develop and invest in financing mechanisms that make it possible for distributors and consumers to access products and services. We are currently working on financing mechanisms for low-cost housing, urban water infrastructure, and community-scale water treatment systems. Both for-profits and non-profits need to have access to financing mechanisms that can increase access to small-scale but high impact solutions. Without innovation in this area, the ability to scale up products and services will continue to be limited.
Jacqueline Novogratz - Jul 8, 2005 2:30 pm (# Total: 17) CEO, Acumen Fund
In response to Peter Reese’s post (and thanks to others for their rich input) – you raise a great question. In short, I think the (possibly unsatisfactory) answer is “both are correct.” While I am not a believer in cookie-cutter replication, I think there is a lot of evidence that entrepreneurs can provide unique solutions to reaching the poor with critical goods and services, if they have a variety of successful methods at their disposal. That invariably means that the results will be different, in both quantity and quality. In fact, newer, hybrid approaches come from this use/re-use approach, offering a cyclical feedback to the originator. If one is seeking similar results, such as providing home ownership alternatives for people earning $4 a day or less, then a complex variety of methods will inevitably be required – each market is completely unique. In the end, both the application of methods and the achievement of results come down to solid management. This is a critical piece surrounding the issue of scale – it will rarely occur if there is little focus on this area. What have others experienced?
- Jacqueline
mitra - Jul 8, 2005 3:08 pm (# Total: 17) Natural Innovation
I think Peter Reese raises exactly the critical point, of course the same METHODS will create different RESULTS in different contexts. I believe the key is combining the knowledge of what has worked elsewhere with the local leadership and knowledge of the context, i.e. to use SIMILAR methods to create SIMILAR results.
- Mitra
DR.PRABIR DUTTA - Jul 8, 2005 10:41 pm (# Total: 17) CALCUTTA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
It works in:HEART. H-Harmonisation E:Equivalance A:Assessment R-Risk T-Transparancy
Michael Chertok - Jul 10, 2005 8:55 am (# Total: 17) Interesting discussion! I'm particularly interested in the issue of financing for scale.
Paul Hudnut writes, "sales will provide our company with a small operating profit in time; however, we are aiming at making a significant impact...in a for-profit, debt financing could be used, but this is more difficult for a non-profit." I think Paul faces a challenge that may be somewhat larger in scope because of the capital required for large-scale production of a 'product', but the nature of his challenge is typical for many social enterprises.
If an enterprise is likely to deliver significant financial returns to scale, then commercial debt or even equity investment will probably be available to finance growth. However, when scaling or replicating is primarily about social impact, it is understandably difficult to find commercial capital, even if the enterprise is well managed and will be financially sustainable or even marginally profitable.
Does this mean that social enterprise will always be dependent on philanthropic capital to scale? Or that as social entrepreneurs we need to develop models that scale with large financial returns (perhaps sacrificing the scope of our social impact)? Or is there some other solution?
israel venture network
Hi Everyone, Hi Jacqueline!
Isabel Maxwell here in Israel, International [Active] Chair of the Israel Social Entreprenreurs Program ("SE")for the Israel Venture Network (www.israelventurenetwork.org) - a 4 year old 501 3c dedicated to systemically improving the education system here and other strategic intiatives, social programs , of which SEs is a new iniative now in its second year and selecting 3 new Fellows this summer; 2 are already active - developing innovative and sustainable solutions IN Israel specifically. I really have enjoyed this whole posting and it gave me much food for thought.
I realise that most people don't think of Israel, a country the size of the state of New Jersey, as a "poor country", iIt does not have the huge population numbers or malnutrition or disease issues common to so many larger countries. Its external image to the world has long been one of a 'brainy country' (!) full of military might and innovation, alas constantly in the news for its long and terrible conflict with the Palestinians. It is this very conflict that has had an appalling long-term effect on the economy and social structures of the country as a whole, to say nothing of the long-term psychological and behavioural damage to those directly suffering from the conflict . The education system is infact in dire straits and as a strong believer in Education as one of the best ways to attack poverty and multiple social ills, we are very interested here in SEs who have innovative solutions in the area of education, as well as in other areas such as urban renewal, the environment and conflict resolution. As "G-Day" approaches (pull-out from Gaza day coming right up in August), we are watching here with bated breath...
The 5 Rs are extremely helpful principles to help one stay focussed and realistic about ones project/idea. The one thing that came to my mind strongly which I thought might be helpful to share here, thinking about my experience here in Israel with my umbrella organization, IVN, is the value of Evaluation and Partering.
Professional and real Evaluation of projects is so vital. We have hired a professional evaluator for the organization as a whole who divides up her time among the initiatives and we have a reporting structure that forces us in a good way to really examine regularly our work in the field and its impact. Until we did this, our initiatives were benchmarked in an ad-hoc fashion and we were not able to report back to our funders or to ourselves with any accuracy or with meaningful data. Now that we do we have gained their confidence and their continued and expanded support.
From the very beginning, our organization has sought partners in the field and they have been of immense help, not only with monetary resources for the projects but with real help and resources on the ground in Israel. The New Israel Fund and Sacta-Rashi organization to name but two, are such examples. Partnering is a great way too of fighting the huge fragmentation of citizen sector organizations, and in this way, IVN has been able to distribute 10X its actual direct resource distribution in the field.
These are the two most valuable things I have learned experientially from working here on the ground for the past fourteen months.
All the best to everyone! And thank you to Skoll for this highly innovative and superior interactive web site which is bringing together the SEs of the world and more.
|
Attachments: |
isabel maxwell.jpg (29 KB) |
Cgasca - Jul 11, 2005 11:36 am (# Total: 17) Social Entreprenuer
Does this mean that social enterprise will always be dependent on philanthropic capital to scale?
The nonprofit sector's source of capital is government through tax policy or program spending. Donations are driven by affinity, which could mean that when replicating a program, one needs to ensure that similar donors exist in the area. This also impacts scale possibilities as donors preferences impact how much capital is available for various community investments. Unlike for profit companies the nonprofit sector has two markets, donors and consumers of their services. Ensuring there is a donor market is equally important as determining community needs.
Do we as social entrepreneurs need to develop models that scale with large financial returns (perhaps sacrificing the scope of our social impact)? Or is there some other solution?
There is more than one solution. As social entrepreneurs it is our goal to understand, the donor market, what drives our community's well being and market opportunities, to craft initiatives that create a better world. Our solutions will be based on how well we utilize our entreprenuarial imagination and ability to dilouge (think together) to create community benefits. In this sense models could be as diverse as entreprenuers and the communities they live in.
However, if we examine or communities it is likely that we will find that populations can be broken down into:
Populations that are well served by the market. Products and services are widely available and consumers receive the value they expect.
Populations that are under served by the market. Products and services are available, however, consumers pay a premium to access services. For example; check cashing, interest only mortgages, calling cards, etc. The underserved market may exist becuase of cultural differences or a percieved lack of financial ability.
Crisis populations that are not served by the market. Products and services are not avialable or beyond the ability of consumers due to health, income, or family violence. This market is where the nonprofit sector and government program spending does most of its work.
To develop scale one could consider the underserved market as potential opportunity for expansion. The underserved market is larger than the crisis population and it generally has income. Pricing, convenient access, and realiable service are key for this market. Serving this market with product or service lines designed for them could prove to be a source of sustainable capital for social enterprises and also serve to meet our social impact goals.
Methods or results? Methods provide opportunity to develop values and affinities that can serve to improve our communities in an intagible way. Results is what we want! Scale, replication and best practices could be considered terms of reference to be validated by community needs.
Mario Oliveros - Jul 11, 2005 9:21 pm (# Total: 17) Hello everyone, wonderful discussion.
I thought I would add a perspective regarding finance and scale from Asia-Pacific through an NGO called Unlad Kabayan. We employ an innovation in community-based financing to launch microenterprises in migrant communities in Asia, orginally in the Philippines and now with replications in Indonesia, Bangledesh, and South Korea.
We have developed a model called MSAI (Migrant Savings for Alternative Investment) that harnesses the development finance potential of migrant remittances. Specifically, migrants are organized into savings groups, they pool portions of their earnings, and these are invested in microenterprises, like merchant businesses, diversified farms, and manufacturing.
In some cases, we provide additional funding through microloans or we develop partnerships with the public or private sector, but in general, migrant communities are able to generate the majority, if not all of the financing to launch projects, and we have proven to be successful and replicable across a number of cultures and geographic locations.
However, our main challenge has been to achieve scale, mainly in terms of either generating additional investments or in gaining access to export markets.
The interest in the promise of remittances has grown substantially in the most recent years. With this interest, there is also doubt and skeptism. Unlad has been at this for over a decade, but still consider MSAI to be an emerging and evolving model. Nevertheless, we know we have been successful to date, and the most clear proof has been the local people we have been able to empower. However, as this discussion has demonstrated, we face the same challenges that other social organizations face, and there is no silver bullet.
I apologize that our website is currently experiencing problems, but you can read about us through an Ashoka Changemakers award we won several months ago. http://www.changemakers.net/journal/04november/contest.cfm
Jacqueline Novogratz - Jul 12, 2005 8:40 am (# Total: 17) CEO, Acumen Fund
Thank you all so much for contributing to this discussion. We really appreciate your willingness to share your challenges and the lessons you’ve learned through your own experiences. As we wrap up the discussion today, I’d like to try to address some of the great points you’ve raised.
Thanks to Mitra (#3) for the very interesting post-mortem of APC. In a world where data is hard to come by, some of the best learning has to come from the kind of critical application of detailed case studies to frameworks like Dees, et. al. Very fair point on the nature of control and quality: innovation; more flexibility can indeed lead to important process and service improvements that will improve quality. But, it’s also true that where there are improvements, there are likely to be potential deviations from the model that detract from quality as well – in other words, some changes will be for the better, while others will be for the worse.
Scott Stefanski’s post (#4) was also helpful in surfacing an assumption with which we might quibble: that it is up to the incumbent innovator/entrepreneur to assess where and how to scale. We like to think that one of the more important value added services that intermediaries like Acumen Fund can play is helping to answer these questions during the due diligence process. There are several social entrepreneurs we have worked with that want to scale regionally, but have never considered national or international options for scale and replication. Not that national or international growth is necessarily the right answer, but we at Acumen Fund (and many other social investors) often help put these questions on the table and provide some of the analytical resources to help make the right decisions. One tool that we have developed to help answer these questions is a fairly simple (although it can look complex) financial and operational planning model (an Excel workbook) that asks the entrepreneur for historical and projected operating data, and then defines the required capital to achieve that level of growth (with various options in terms of debt, equity or even grant financing). While this is a fairly typical tool used in most private equity or venture capital shops, by adapting it to meet the needs of social enterprises, we have something that can help us get to this answer of whether and how to scale more quickly.
Karen Borchard’s innovation (#5) is quite exciting and the methodical way you are approaching scale and replication through licensing sounds like a very strategic approach. There is a great McKinsey Quarterly article on non-profit structure by Maisie O’Flanagan and Lynn Taliento (“Nonprofits: Ensuring that bigger is better,” The McKinsey Quarterly, 2004 Number 2 – it was discussed on this site when it was published) that outlines some of the pros and cons of affiliates vs. licensing vs. franchising. One resource that you might consider in terms of tapping into networks of campus administrators is the National Wildlife Federation’s campus ecology program that works extensively with university procurement officers on recycled products, renewable energy resources, and local agricultural product.
Paul Hudnut’s comment (#6) that mission needs trump the model is a fair point, and that diffusion of the idea might be more important than scale or replication within a particular organization or business. In its obituary of Jack St. Clair Kilby, co-inventor of the integrated circuit, The Economist this week (July 9, 2005, Vol. 376, No. 8434) notes that in Kilby’s Nobel prize lecture, he quoted fellow Nobel laureate and inventor Charles Townes as saying, “It’s like the beaver told the rabbit as they stared at Hoover Dam. ‘No, I didn’t build it myself, but it’s based on an idea of mine!’ ” I think we would agree with Paul’s point, but from a tactical perspective, believing in diffusion as paramount can tempt an organization to view “thought leadership” and policy advocacy as higher potential ways to “scale the idea” than the hard work of building the business. While we would agree that ultimately the results are what matter, don’t let that allow you to lose focus on building the business. (And if you plan to sell your product in India or Pakistan, please let us know!)
Michael Chertok’s point (#12) really nails the link between scale, financial sustainability, and the role of charitable capital. Acumen Fund believes that charitable capital, if converted into risk capital (debt, equity, credit enhancements), can have the patience and high-risk tolerance to help social innovations scale using the disciplines of a commercial mindset. We think that for some social innovations (but not all), financial sustainability and scale must go hand in hand, as it is hard to imagine scaling a model that has unsustainable economics at the operating unit level - otherwise, the bigger you get, the more you have to raise, which is a tall order for even the most determined fundraiser! But we believe that the sector has just scratched the surface of ways to tap into commercial capital to be used for social purposes, and think more charitable capital can be deployed to build financially sustainable enterprises.
Hi Isabel! Thanks also for your post (#13). You bring up an important point, which gets back to the first question we raised: the role of evaluation in assessing the readiness to scale. We have been investing heavily in metrics that aim to do the same as your evaluation initiative. We seek to work with entrepreneurs to develop a set of metrics that will help them manage their business (and assess opportunities for scale), and inform our decisions about whether we should continue, increase our investment, or consider a soft exit. We also firmly believe in creating a metrics culture where we don’t ask anyone to measure anything we are not capable of measuring and reporting ourselves. And as we realize the limits to our evaluation capabilities (and the cost of bringing them in house)—we can’t do rigorous academic studies evaluating the full impact of a malaria bednet—we have started to partner with organizations like the CDC, PhD students and professors at UC Berkeley, Michigan and Harvard to ask (and hopefully answer) questions we would never have had the resources to answer on our own.
Finally, Cgasca’s point (#14) about understanding the underserved markets is exactly in line with our approach. Many of the world’s “poor” at the bottom of the pyramid have steady jobs, but face frustratingly high costs of housing, lack access to clean water, and can’t find affordable healthcare. Many of them resort to paying higher rates for legal goods, navigating the grey and black markets, or doing without. We believe that markets may never reach what Cgasca calls the crisis populations, but markets are functioning in many underserved communities—we’d just like to see them function more effectively and sustainably, in ways that give the poor access to goods and services and the dignity of choice. This, we feel, can be the right role for charitable capital to play, by taking the risk to help entrepreneurs make these markets function more efficiently, equitably and transparently.
Again, thank you all for your contributions to what we feel was a very productive workshop!
Warm regards,
Jacqueline
Grant Hunter - Oct 10, 2005 12:06 pm (# Total: 17) Franchise Consultant
Hello Jacqueline,
Not sure if this discussion is still active, but as a Social Edge newbie I wanted to add my thoughts.
I work as a franchise consultant and broker, representing hundreds of traditional franchised businesses to find and qualify prospective franchisees to work in them. My goal in this arena is to identify, optimize, blueprint and market proven social enterprises. "Proven" as I use it, means that the enterprise is achieving social impact and is at least paying for itself, if not running a surplus.
RE: readiness to scale, the 5R's you list Jacqueline are a great start. With re: to franchising in particular, there are some other criteria I would look at closely (i.e. are the operations simple enough to be learned in 2-3 months? do you have the management, board and staff capacity to support a franchise channel? , etc.) Ultimately if these criteria are met, then franchising may be a compelling alternative.
Franchising helps an organization bypass the need for forfeiting equity or raising (as much) capital to expand on its own. Metrics and measures for both financial and social returns can be woven into the operations manual to scale accountability along with growth.
Social franchising is not a new idea. You allude to it Jacqueline, in the McKinsey article which I would love to see. (“Nonprofits: Ensuring that bigger is better,” The McKinsey Quarterly, 2004 Number 2) Please pass along if available. However, the twist I have on social franchising involves taking successful social enterprises and blueprinting their operations to sell to other "like-missioned" nonprofits. For example, imagine an environmentally-focused nonprofit signing on as an eco-tourism franchisee or an elderly-focused nonprofit becoming a non-medical home eldercare franchise.
To be sure, each organization, geography and population served has its own peculiarities. With so much mission-overlap in the nonprofit sphere, however, there is a place for more explicit, paid knowledge-sharing through models like franchising and licensing. I would love the chance to discuss with venture philanthropy funds like Acumen Fund, a partnership for identifying and funding successful social franchises. Replicating measurable success is a triple win for franchisor, franchisee and investors alike.
Social franchising makes sense to me. Love to hear your thoughts.
Regards, Grant Hunter
Why you shouldn't scale up (small is beautiful)
Hosted by Charles Cameron (April 2006 - Closed)
Charles Cameron writes that one of the brightest shining events of the many that SocialEdge has presented (and still contains in archived form) was the Sohodojo-inspired Small Is Good World at the Skoll World Forum.
In this week’s event, a companion to last week’s workshop on how and why to scale up, he returns to the theme of Small is Beautiful, asking for your experiences and reflections on EF Schumacher’s (small, beautiful) idea and how it applies to our field as social entrepreneurs.
Here is Toby Beresford’s description of the Small is Beautiful approach, taken from that forum.
Small is good is a change of mindset. A new way of approaching the problems and opportunities the world presents.
• In social terms it means direct one to one relationships matter – your family, your friends and your neighbours.
• In political terms it means communities matter – let the people closest to the problem choose how to solve it. It recognises that the man in Whitehall (or Washington, or Jakarta…) doesn’t know best.
• In economic terms it means small shopkeepers and producers can deliver better overall value to the consumer than giant chains. This value might come through stories of provenance (organic, free range, fairly traded), better service (be known by name), reduced environmental impact (seasonal vegetables), and local appropriateness (get your special Battersea cakes today.)
To choose small is good you have to let go of your centralising instinct. You have to believe in the potential of the empowered individual, the resilient family and the vibrant community.
How’s that for a set of criteria? Who among us doesn’t believe in the potential of the empowered individual, the resilient family and the vibrant community?
Please share with us your own experiences, questions and insights regarding the small-is-beautiful approach.
Marguerite - Apr 23, 2006 7:49 pm (# Total: 132) I was delighted to review CAWD and CAWDNET -- an interesting note is that I am currently involved in a "relocalization" effort in a small community in So. Calif. that faces some of the same challenges as does CAWD. Due to the "peak oil" crisis that is about to hit us full on as gas prices escalate, we see the need to grow food locally and learn how to process it for future use. And, guess what,I've just heard some women say "But I don't know how to cook" meaning "from scratch" so use to prepackaged food we are today. And, I'm sure that before its all over we will be grateful for solar cookers. So there's going to be a need here for vocatonal training to enable and empower us in relearning survival skills as the costs of transportation make food and other necessities of life unaffordable for the average person as the limits to resources force change of an unprecedented magnitude upon us. The demand for skilled counselors to aid in facilitating this change will far outstrip the supply as community after community seeks to become self-sustaining and reaches out for assistance.
I believe networked ICTs, as CAWD views them as: "creative combinations of ICTs and human networks" (in small communities if I may add) are the answer, and am currently constructing what is intended to be a major website as part of the worldwide ICT that is spontaniously forming. In this sense, "small is beautiful" as we create spaces for learning/remembering to take place and then apply it at the local level. Since the natural flow of the Universe is from micro to macro this will allow for a natual transformaton to take place which will be "holodynamic" in nature and replace the hierarchial and unatural structure we have today that leaves us in an unbalanced and dis-eased position.
Simply due to the magnitude of the challenges the human family faces today, micro-management offers the only humane solution which will avoid large numbers of people being dropped through the cracks.
marguerite (ecopilgrim@aabole hm)
P.S. My website at www.tii-clics.org needs maintenance and we are working on that as well as getting up several new sites which will provide curriculum for our virtual university. We are also linked to the International Academy of Holodynamics, another virtual university,hosted by Dr. V. Vernon Woolf, who was instrumental in creating "perestroika" in Russia. Vern will soon have courses online at the Academy. www.holodynamics.com Dr. Woolf specializes in the development of high performance teams to manage social change. As well, he is developing a prototype Wellness Center which uses natural healing combined with some conventional methods. This program has been 10 years in the development stage and is designed to work in small local communities to create change through health practices.
Thank you Charles, for the opportunity to post here.
I have mailed you from a learning angle on motivating educated graduate unemployed and underemployed youths suffering from exposure to private sector work atmosphere hailing from marginalised sections of our society.
Our dean Dr R.Bharadwaj renowned Economist and former director of Bombay University, school of economics has conducted a pilot study on this target population in chamrajnagar one of the most backward district of Karnataka state.Incidentally this district is just about 170kms form worlds IT Capital, Bangalore city in India and our study has found the most pathetic living conditions of graduates and post graduates of Mysore and Bangalore universities. All these unemployeds are also from the most backward communities untouched by opportunities of employment in market economy organisations. There are many areas geographically neglected and sections of population marginalised for centuries in our country. If it interests, I can send the results of that study in few days time .
Hence we have set up a centre for social enterprise and incubation centre for Social Enterprises(SE) on our campus to expose such students to stimulated, modern corporate atmosphere and then after helping them to get out of their inhibitions asking them to start some small enterprises/businesses of their own in a new atmosphere .
We are now in a process of net working like minded organisation as there is a vast scope for encouraging SE small businesses in Indian region.
Our centre aims at bettering the life of such people by encouraging them to organise and enterprise .I am committed to this mission as I believe, that which changing world perspectives, marginalised sections have to be introduced to institutions of market economy or they will become extinct.
Your comments on how small these businesses got to be to sustain themselves .Also E-Mouth this information to other like minded or facilitating organisations
Assoc.Prof. Madhukar
Email:intechibm@gmail.com
Intech Institute Of Business Management.
Bangalore University
Web: intechibm.org
Pamela McLean - Apr 24, 2006 6:13 am (# Total: 132) I wish I had time to respond fully to the postings from Prof Madhukar and Marguerite. I would like to follow up areas of overlap with you both. I feel I could spend days talking with each of you exploring ways that our initiatives could complement each other – but resources do not allow. That is ironic really as we would probably find that we are duplicating effort to a ludicrous degree. Let us not forget each other’s interests.
Nigeria has the same problem that Prof Madhukar describes of graduates with no employment prospects. There are precious few real jobs on offer - unless you know people with influence. The young graduates know they should be doing something more intellectually demanding than subsistence farming, or petty trading - but what opportunities are there for self employment - other than armed robbery? That is not said flippantly - there is no social security system in Nigeria, and armed robbers are a constant threat and reality. There is such a waste of talent amongst Nigerian youths - made more tragic in my opinion because many of the young job-seeking Nigerians that I have met are idealistic, industrious and desirous of helping to create a better Nigeria.
I have heard of various initiatives that could be relevant for these young people – along small is beautiful lines that would promote genuine community development – but I haven’t got the resources to follow up those tantalising information trails on their behalf so that we can act on them.
Marguerite – I’m glad you relate to CAWD and Cawdnet - I see so much overlap with your concerns too - small-scale developments, enterprise, Californian and Nigerian experiences with solar energy, and more. We have much to learn and we need to learn with each other and from each other, There are so many of us doing similar things - if we consider it all under such headings as sustainable energy, enterprise and livelihoods. We need to come together more effectively – and that is what ICTs are helping us to do. It is simultaneously local and global in ways that “outsiders” do not understand.
Perhaps this experience/lack-of-experience of the local-global reality is part of the conceptual difficulties that we are have sometimes regarding communication on issues of scalability and funding and suchlike. It occurs to me that the kind of activists I know, in their tiny, struggling and largely self-funded organisations are a bit like parentless children. We are continually pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps, falling on our faces, picking ourselves up, learning from our mistakes, plodding on - because things can’t stay as they are and forwards is the only possible direction. It shouldn’t all have to be learnt in the school of hard knocks. We know where we are headed – but struggle to find the words to express it to people who don’t share experience of our reality
I don’t really think we want to “replicate” or “scale up” our projects and organisations any any more than children want to be cloned – we just want to grow naturally. Currently we are isolated and our growth is stunted. Our vision and energy is sapped by constant struggle for the basics of day-to-day survival that mature organisations take for granted. We need some respite and nurturing while our organisations/projects/systems continue to learn and develop and grow. We need a chance to grow up more as “part of a family” rather than as “struggling street children”. Then that family will grow, as new collaborations and replications of ideas and projects happen. Maybe I take the analogy too far – but I don’t know how else to express it.
I am trying to express the organic growth of “our kind” of projects and organisations. It comes back to valuing and counting-in the intangibles of information, ideas, networks, trust and all kinds of social capital. It comes back to learning as you go along, within your own projects and through information exchange with other projects. It comes back to equal partnerships, mutual-mentoring, and community-based, needs-led development– development where problems and needs are evident but poorly defined. It comes back to solutions having to emerge – not be pre-defined and imposed.
Hmm - and that of course brings us back to the issue of funding proposals that we were discussing a few days ago…
JessicaMargolin - Apr 24, 2006 11:33 am (# Total: 132) Pamela said: "I don’t really think we want to “replicate” or “scale up” our projects and organisations any any more than children want to be cloned – we just want to grow naturally. Currently we are isolated and our growth is stunted. Our vision and energy is sapped by constant struggle for the basics of day-to-day survival that mature organisations take for granted. We need some respite and nurturing while our organisations/projects/systems continue to learn and develop and grow. We need a chance to grow up more as “part of a family” rather than as “struggling street children”. Then that family will grow, as new collaborations and replications of ideas and projects happen. Maybe I take the analogy too far – but I don’t know how else to express it."
Interestingly, my thoughts along this line came up because the ED with whom I was writing grants was spending so much time explaining what she was doing yet had ever-increasing requests for more explanation. In other words, it was a way to facilitate getting the 80%+ out there for her so she COULD concentrate on growing "her own" programs.
Marguerite - Apr 24, 2006 8:26 pm (# Total: 132) My feelings are that writing grant proposals and waiting for funding is like waiting for a personal ride on an Apollo project -- it ain't going to happen and if it does the funding is going to be tailored to the funder's agenda and won't fit yours. There is an excellent book on this put out by Kumarian Press, sorry I can't think of the name of it right now but do a Google for them and search their catalog. Lot's of good books written by people who have been working in development and in the know at the local level from this publisher if you haven't tapped into them as yet.
Really do believe the answer is to create a local currency -- with the price of oil escalating we're going to see a major worldwide depression and the only way to survive this is for communities to delink from the national economy and become a sustainable living community that is self-secure regardless of where they are. Another resource that is absolutely marvelous on this is: Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism by Richard H. Robbins. He also has a website on the Net so again Google for it. He gives an example of how the Guarani in Venezuela survived for hundreds of years using a local currency and investing in the conventional market when it was to their best advantage and staying out of it when it wasn't. They also practiced a form of agro-forestry which conserved their capital and acted as their savings bank from which they did not spend.
I think also that employment opportunities are in short supply. The statistics are that only 30% of the worldwide laborforce, due to technological advances, is necessary to provide all of the goods and services for the 6 billion plus people on the planet. So, we have a tremendous oversupply of skilled labor. And while the need is for entrepreneurial skills, we have millions trained in management with no place to go. Also, for the first time in the history of the world in the early 1990's the labor market became delinked from the stock markets as more people derived income from the markets through passive investments than from the efforts of human labor. (Rifkin - End of Work 1997) Everything is stacked to create more poverty and the push is relentless.
I have copied our discussion here and will stay in touch. We must get these ICT's up and running so we have information exchanges going. Warm regards and love to everyone.
marguerite ecopilgrim@aabol.com
following notes of anilpansari Pamela McLean Jessica and MargolinMarguerite down sizing is is a classical thought of all business giants . Down size to profit or scale up to profit and in the process eliminate labour , retrench office staff and executives ,out source for momentary demand ,ditch people during lull periods and so on with their games.... .Traditional agrarian economies provided more security than the present where do the neoeducateds go unpredictable corporations, suicidal agrarian economy
Madhukar
intechibm@gmail.com
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 26, 2006 1:55 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Prof. Madhukar:
Thanks for your comments. I’m not sure quite where you are going with your more recent post. As you say, businesses routinely scale up or *downsize* for reasons of ROI, and the results are often not pretty in human terms, What do you see as the solution, how does social entrepreneurship fit into the picture, can downsizing be both profitable and socially healthy?
Regards,
Charles
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 26, 2006 2:07 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi again, Pamela:
You write:
- I wish I had time to respond fully to the postings from Prof Madhukar and Marguerite. I would like to follow up areas of overlap with you both. I feel I could spend days talking with each of you exploring ways that our initiatives could complement each other – but resources do not allow. That is ironic really as we would probably find that we are duplicating effort to a ludicrous degree. Let us not forget each other’s interests.
One option that we’re considering is having a forum here designed specifically to invite people to make those connections – but I suspect that where very busy social entrepreneurs caught up in working the many details around an undefended project in the field are concerned, the first condition for moving to the stage where such connections are made would be to realize that they can be made slowly in an asynchronous medium such as this one.
Posting we seems to have common issues, I’m interested and would like to talk more, in other words, is in fact a first step, and I’ll get back to you in a week or so is an acceptable response, with I’ve been thinking a but since you said you were interested in our approach, and realized that one aspect of our work that might work for you too is this-and-this a week or so later beiong a follow up that really kick-starts the detailed transmission of ideas.
A slower pace may be a viable workaround for being too busy to network right away, I mean.
Hope this helps,
Charles
JessicaMargolin - Apr 26, 2006 2:25 pm (# Total: 132) In my experience, downsizing is wellknown to be a manipulation to increase short term stock price in exchange for longterm value creation, except in relatively rare situation where it's an unfortunately necessary thing to do because of previously inept strategic management in organizations that actually can afford strategic and risk management processes but don't. Ironically, but with no humor, the very people who have instituted the poor systems and mismanaged the organization tend to be the ones who decide who must go when the business is, in effect, failing.
Unfortunately very small enterprises don't have the risk management or strategic planning resources available to enormous companies, so the real economy in my mind is the ability to have occasional slack to devote to those endeavors, as Pamela says.
When I first heard a Social Edge talk over a year ago, I ended up with a grid, with the speakers down one side and the reasons I would need to talk with them along the top. In that way, by simply putting a note to myself in a box, I could track which things I needed to bring up with whom.
It might be a nice enhancement to be able to grid something here, where in addition to a discussion forum there's a series of topics (for example) along one axis and people who need or have resources or ideas in those areas in the other. Some other dimension (color?) could be used to encode the urgency of the situation, so that people could enter notes in the grid box that corresponds to them; maybe an additional dimension (font, shape) would correspond to something else like distribution, or education, or physical materials.
Sort of a super-bulletin-board; in any case a different way to organize multi-noded information.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 26, 2006 2:34 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite:
You write:
- Due to the "peak oil" crisis that is about to hit us full on as gas prices escalate, we see the need to grow food locally and learn how to process it for future use.
http://biorealis.com/resumes/projects.html
I'd be very interested to see his response to your comment.
Re your name, Turtle Island Institute... I'm a big fan of Gary Snyder, incidentally. I once had the privilege of co-teaching a course with GS, Richard Nelson and Paul Shepard at Lake Tahoe… what a fine group!
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 26, 2006 2:56 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hello again, Jessica:
And thanks for all your contributions here.
- When I first heard a Social Edge talk over a year ago, I ended up with a grid, with the speakers down one side and the reasons I would need to talk with them along the top. In that way, by simply putting a note to myself in a box, I could track which things I needed to bring up with whom.
- It might be a nice enhancement to be able to grid something here, where in addition to a discussion forum there's a series of topics (for example) along one axis and people who need or have resources or ideas in those areas in the other. Some other dimension (color?) could be used to encode the urgency of the situation, so that people could enter notes in the grid box that corresponds to them; maybe an additional dimension (font, shape) would correspond to something else like distribution, or education, or physical materials.
As it happens – way above my head – Anthony Judge recently published an account of toroidal grids, suggesting they are superior to matrixes in handling the challenge to richer comprehension and how it needs to match the complexity of policy-making -- especially when different factions prefer to order their understanding of complex systems in different ways If your head for math is clearer than mine – which seems entirely likely – you might be interested to read his comments:
http://www.laetusinpraesens.org/musings/torus.php#from
!!
Warm regards,
Charles
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Apr 26, 2006 9:03 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Checked in to this dialogue at the fag end but I like to place these in front of the group:
- Being small is being big at heart
- Being small is being sure
- Being small allows you to take informed decisions
- Being small says you are serious
- Being small says that you are available
- Being small states that you are accountable
- Being small says you are contended
- Being small says you are prepared to stretch to survive
These are learnings gained through the work we are involved in.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 27, 2006 9:46 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Interesting -- thanks for those points, Surya Prakash...
Charles
isbume - Apr 28, 2006 9:03 am (# Total: 132) Dear Pamela, I am very much delighted to know that you are in Nigeria and you are doing a great work. My name is Segun Benson, a British-trained Nigerian professional with many years of experience in consultancy and training. I will like to meet with you as I am very much involved in this idea of small business incubation facilities which I developed as a way of achieving an integrated entrepreneurial development in rural areas of Ogun State, Nigeria. Recently, I presented a paper to the 4th Global Conference on Business and Economics, which took place at the Oxford University, Oxford, England: 26-28th June, 2005.
It is true that there is need for entrepreneurship development, but we need to identify the sector area to be developed in order to achieve sustainability for our youths and unemployed graduates. I feel that small business incubation concept with solve this problem greatly. The paper which I presented to the conference is titled: The Dynamics of Small Business Incubation Facilities in Fadama Areas of Ogun State, Nigeria: An Anti-Poverty Device. If you are interested, I will send a copy to you.
I will like to discuss with you further on how we can network here in Ogun State, Nigeria. I am the current President of Kings & Priests Network Nigeria (a non-governmental organisation) as well as the President and Head of Missions of the Institute of Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship here in Abeokuta, Ogun State.
I really believe that small is beautiful and the only way we can make it work in the area of entrepreneurship in Nigeria is to focus on high-growth enterprises in the area of agro-industrial development in the rural areas.
Please, let us talk further.
Meanwhile, remain blessed.
Segun Benson
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Apr 29, 2006 9:27 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Segun:
Thank you so much for your post above -- this is exactly the kind of connection and "mutual aid" that SocialEdge hopes to encourage. I hope that both yourself and Pam will keep us informed as to the results of this contact.
Regards,
Charles
Pamela McLean - Apr 29, 2006 3:48 pm (# Total: 132) Thank you Surya Prakash for the list "Small is ….". In addtion I also suggest that small is:
· Knowing where you are going and why
· Finding others who are going in the same direction and working together.
· Fitting in with what's happening elsewhere and going along with it - as long as it won't take you backwards.
· Moving ahead with frequent changes of direction (like a yacht tacking across the wind
· Seldom going straight ahead (we can’t go like a powerboat that can over-ride local winds and currents).
· “Learning by trial and error, error, error” - to quote Buckminster Fuller via Donella Meadows. (Thanks to Charles for the links to Donella Meadow's work).
· Being rich in things you *can't quantify* like trust, relationships, ideas, local knowledge, networks, vision.
· Being poor in things you *can quantify* like buildings, equipment, finance.
Pamela McLean - Apr 29, 2006 5:15 pm (# Total: 132) Hello Segun
I am happy to hear from you. Please do send me a copy of your paper.
First I had better clarify my involvement and geographical location.
I live in the UK and spend “working holidays” in Nigeria. I got involved in community development projects “by accident” in 2000 when a Nigerian friend in the UK wanted help with some emails and phone calls and such like. I never expected my involvement to grow the way that it has – and never expected it would include going to Africa. I have now been to Nigeria seven times on what can probably best be described as “working holidays”. My home computer has come to serve as a kind of “UK office” for various development initiatives. And I have found myself deeply involved with some of the work on the ground that my African friends are doing.
When I am in the UK I can be helpful because I know what is happening in the projects and I have a broadband connection 24/7. Because I am “bandwidth rich” and my friends in Nigeria range from “bandwidth challenged” to “bandwidth starved”, I can be a kind of pro-active information channel on their behalf. In that role I have to get my head around a lot of information, so I am a lot less ignorant than I was six years ago.
I also have a teaching and training background, plus some knowledge of ICTs and systems, all of which has led to a long-standing interest in the relationship between educational systems and ICTs. This means that I am intrigued by how we can make the most of the improving communication channels that we now have (between the “connected community” and the rural community networks that I link with) in order to improve opportunities (formal and informal) for relevant education and training. Of course given the lack of employment opportunities we have to think about vocational education and business incubation. We are also concerned with health education and any other practical knowledge that is beneficial for community development.
To get an idea of what I do when I am in Nigeria see some news and photos from my trip to Kaduna State in February 2006 (emphasising links with schools). News http://www.cawd.info/home/writeup/#blog-9 Photos http://www.cawd.info/home/writeup/#blog-10 Other activities and more photos can be found at http://www.cawd.net/daisy/CawdNet/g1/748.html There’s not much about the health work there. We don’t really have the resources to get more that a flavour of things up on the Internet. Our small business ideas don’t feature there yet eithere as we don’t say we are doing things until we really have something to show – but I can tell you more about “work in progress” if we discuss ideas together.
The community projects I am most concerned with are in Oyo State, and Kaduna State, but I do have additional links with projects elsewhere in Nigeria and some other African countries. I also try to network with people in various virtual communities if it seems they have interests that overlap ours.
Please tell me more about your work in Ogun State. Let us “rub minds” and see how we can finds ways to improve what we are doing by sharing information about what we are doing.
Pam
Marguerite - May 2, 2006 7:35 pm (# Total: 132) Charles, thanks for inviting someone knowledgable in sustainable living to the forum. The Turtle Island Institute name came from Gary Snyder's poem; however, I am closely associated with Native Americans on both sides of the Border and live in a wilderness area of So. Calif. not too far from the Border.
Let me tell you where I am coming from. In 1997, I wrote a proposal which was presented at the highest level of the Mexican government, and which was received with interest. The proposal, entitled: Hands Across the Border: Operation Lifesave was to build the Ecological Life Systems Institute along with a model for a sustainable community in So. Mexico -- possibly in Chiapas. The construction of the community was to have been accomplished by *campesinos* who were potential migrants and the purpose of this was to dramatically reduce migration from south to north and as well make Mexico a model for sustainable development for the world thru ecological restoration. The plan was for the government to pay for the "hands-on education" for the campesinos and in addition they would have been compensated for their time and provided with room and board. In return, upon graduation from the University, each campesino would agree to committ the next five years to going out into other areas of Mexico and starting a satellite ELSI CAMPUS andcompleting other sustainable communities in the adjacent region. In this manner, the whole of Mexico could have been ecologically restored and business development based in sustainability would create jobs for millions of potential migrants.
There is funding for this type of project available from the UN as it fits into Agenda 21. What is necessary is to lobby the Congress of Mexico (or another country) to request the funding from the UN. At that time, the governemnt would have provided us with the land to do the first project. But in spite of interest from the gov't the project never came together -- perhaps it was just not the time.
However, when I grasped what could be accomplished in this manner, I said: "why not do a "virtual institute" and we could then create "community learning and information centers worldwide (spaces in which community members could come together and learn how to make their community sustainable aided by courses and info from the website) That vision is now coming into being as I am involved with several volunteers who are creating the online Institute. Funding has always been a problem and then all of a sudden a team comes together. So maybe this is the time. An associate and I are now involved in a small community in So. Cal. where I live in facitating transformation to relocalization and sustainable living. However, the gas prices have not as yet reached the "high" that will push the needed change, but it is in site now at $3.29 a gallon.
Since I have been closely associated with Dr. V. Vernon Woolf for almost 18 years, www.holodynamics.com, who was very instrumental in creating social change in Russia, taking that country from communism to perestroika, I am very well informed on "what to do" on large scale projects and would like to work with a team, or put together a high performance team, of those interested in creating change at the community level on a small yet potentially massive scale
This can be accomplished with little funding. All a community needs to establish a community learning center is one computer. There is no need for a fancy building -- just a place to meet and begin applying one's skills on the surrounding land using the creative skills of those who are most familiar with it and are ready to start small and build sustainably using whatever is at hand. With the end of oil we may again turn to human labor and doing things like planting four kinds of beans in a punctured hole in untilled soil to ensure that regardless of the weather one of those kinds of beans will ensure a healthy crop.
Thank you for this opportunity to tell about my project.
marguerite ecopilgrim@aabol.com
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 3, 2006 2:32 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Being big is like being away from reality.
While I serve (as part of my daily routine) 31 aged people in urban slum, I see their expressions towards 'Life' amazing.
I like to quote few of those:
- She is now ripe anyway she is going to fall.
- In life we cannot do away without food or work.
- I am forced into begging by my daughter-in-law, she says what will you do sitting idle at home.
Some of these expressions you would definetly miss if you are 'Big'.
And you will deffinetly miss Life.
All I want to say is being close to work and understanding dynamics of survival, will help to evolve a beautiful life and thus bringing meaning to our existence.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 3, 2006 9:54 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Thanks, Pam, for your addition to Surya Prakash’s list.
I suspect there’s a general rule here which we might be able to elicit, which would explain all the instances you’ve both quoted -- something along these lines:
- Each human has an (enormous, but nonetheless) limited amount of attention to offer, and the larger the scale of a project, the smaller the amount of attention available to be spent on any particular aspect of that project.
What I’m trying to get at here is something like the idea that with two arms, you can hug one person or hold hands with two. Hugging conveys far more intimacy to the one person than hand-holding as the middle member of a chain can convey to the pair of people on either side of you...
So there’s a richness of contact -- and yes, a real, inimitable intimacy – when we’re hands on with a given kind of problem on a small (local) scale, and while we can also apply our insights to the same kind of problem on a larger scale, in so doing we diffuse the intimacy and sensitive exactness of touch which is the glory of the smaller scale effort.
In practice, this means that scaling up requires compromise while offering the potential for large scale effects, whereas scaling down allows far greater specificity and attention to (human and situational) detail, but has effect only within its (by choice) restricted canvas.
In that context, I’d particularly like to draw your attention to Pam’s observations about quality and quantity, to the effect that the small is beautiful approach means:
- Being rich in things you can't quantify like trust, relationships, ideas, local knowledge, networks, vision.
- Being poor in things you can quantify like buildings, equipment, finance.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 3, 2006 10:13 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Suriya Prakash:
Thanks once again.
Charles
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 3, 2006 10:16 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Marguerite:
As so often here, your post contains plenty of points one could pick up on and comment at length about, but I’d really prefer just to single out one specific point and without further commentary, pose it as a sort of koan or meditation point for us all to consider:
- the gas prices have not as yet reached the "high" that will push the needed change
isbume - May 3, 2006 10:26 am (# Total: 132) Hello Pam,
I am quite impressed with your level of involvement with development efforts in Nigeria, particularly now that your home computer in UK facilitates as "UK Office" for various development initiatives in Africa and Nigeria in particular.
We will be very much prepared to work with you in the area of information exchange that can lead to an explosion of small scale agro-industrial enterprises in the rural and urban areas of Nigeria. Through this we intend to strengthen the economic hands of the poor in Nigeria and thus participate in fostering economic independence of the poor majority starting from Ogun State.
On a personal note, I have the rigorous British education and training with many years of experience in the private sector of Nigeria as a Consultant/Lecturer. The endemic nature of economic poverty in Nigeria challenged me to join the voluntary sector of the Nigerian economy. I want to contribute to making a difference by facilitating an explosion of small scale businesses in the society, beginning from the rural areas of Ogun State. In the urban areas, I am interested in contributing to the creation of job opportunities through sustainable entrepreneurship among university undergraduates, unemployed graduates in diverse disciplines, unemployed civil servants retired before their time.
The platform for realising these objectives is the Institute of Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship (Centre for Integrated Rural Development Initiatives). As the head of this non-governmental training and educational outfit, I have designed and implemented various training programmes on entrepreneurship and small business initiatives. Presently, I am a part-time Lecturer at the Centre for Human Resources Development of the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State. I have authored two important texts on enterprise management. The latest is titled: Introduction To Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Emphasis for A Developing Society.
In addition, I have over fifty presentations at Seminars, Workshops and Conferences. The arrow heads of my recent presentations are targeted at popularising entrepreneurship and small business development initiatives. In this regard, I am a member of the Technical Committee on Resuscitation of Ailing Industries in Ogun State (a State Government project). Last year, I presented a paper titled: "The Dynamics of Small Business Incubation Facilities in Fadama Areas of Ogun State, Nigeria: An Anti-Po verty Device" to the 4th Global Conference on Business and Economics which was held at the Oxford University, Oxford, England: 26-28 June, 2005. This paper contained a concept for propagating agro-industrial small business enterprises. The concept is what I called Small Business Incubation Facilities (SBIF) Concept. (A copy of the paper is attached as requested).
The challenge before us now is how to source fund to test out the concept before proceeding to set it up in various parts of Ogun State and other parts of Nigeria. The incubation facility will be used to promote high-growth agro-indusgtrial enterprises that will accelerate the much needed industrialisation that will raise the GDP level of the society sustainably.
We will need your kind support by way of linkage to interested donors and agro-industrial technical volunteers that can provide the seed for an explosion of appropriate agro-industrial technology to be used in the Incubation Centre.
At the moment, we have in our team Agric. Engineers, Civil Engineers, Agric. Extensionists, Agric. Economists, Chartered Accountants and other professional compliments.
We are all committed to the philosophy of Selflessness and Volunteerism in order to realise an explosion of sustainable small scale enterprises among the poor in our society. We have over three hundred graduagtes registered with us to be incubated. We are only waiting for a seed-fund to jump start the project.
Pam, with your many contacts in the UK and in Nigeria, I want to believe that the good Lord is leading me to meet with you. Please kindly lead our way to the gateway of funding opportunities to start the small business incubation facilities project in Nigeria, beginning from Ogun State.
I believe that many people in Nigeria are highly expectant about this project coming on stream. Again other social entrepreneurs across the globe will benefit tremendously from the success of this project.
The creation of this forum by Chales Cameron will go down in history as a powerful connectivity for raising the hope of many social entrepreneurs as we are able to reach out to influential individuals like you and thereby champion the interests of the poor across the globe.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
email: isbume@yahoo.com
|
Attachments: |
gcbe[1].p_1.doc (410 KB) |
Marguerite - May 3, 2006 3:31 pm (# Total: 132) Charles, you are correct about change and resistance to it even though it is really the only constant in our lives. What I feel is that change is so incremental most of the time we don't notice it. However, we have now reached a point where the human family is facing what is described as "a crises unprecedented in human recorded history". And in order to meet this challenge and survive as the human family, we are going to have to change from a waste-creating society to a sustainable-living society and do it through achieving a quantum leap in consciousness on a worldwide scale. As Thomas Berry has written: We will go into future as a single sacred community or we will perish in the desert.
What science knows today is that societies and cultures form a "collective consciousness" which may be compared to a group of birds in flight or a hive of bees having "swarm intelligence" and acting as a single coordinated unit through largely "unconscious action". Thus whole societies or nations may get locked into habit patterns that are a reflective of the "fight or flight" syndrome and not be able to see any other way out. It is in essence "an immature behavior pattern".
However, by making the invisible visible, or bringing the subconscious into the "now" we can, using a newly acquired trait of the human family, reflexive consciousness, begin to make conscious choices thus releasing ourselves from unhealthy habit patterns of the past and create new pathways of consciousness that lead to healthy lifestyles and a viable future.
For me, this is also about rediscovering who I am in the context of the greater world today. Again, for myself, I find this easier to do within the small rural community in which I currently reside. I've been able to reconnect with the earth as I knew it as a child growing up on a farm. Like so many of us, I had become "dissociated" from reality and The Oneness of Everything as I got caught up in the specialization" and "advanced technology" that appears to have gone beyond what is "appropriate" by any means. In so-doing, I have learned to treasure the infinite beauty of "smallness". It is to me the heart and soul of what I consider "home".
I appreciated very much what surya prakash.wrote about smallness and Pam's response to him.
marguerite ecopilgrim@aabol.com
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 4, 2006 8:59 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
It was clean addition to the list.
Your points infact enriched me.
I had to go back to socialedge memebership data base to know you.
Good to know that you are open to share.
I feel with my 20 years of close observation of Life, we deffinetly detoriated a lot.
- Failing to understand feelings - Dived real deep into mess - Connected to share the worst situations
All said and done but we came closer to know world is same wherever we are.
I feel we should stop to bluff and share reality.
Pain has to be addressed and pride has to be protected.
Sense of shame has to be infused and thus prove we are HUMAN.
This is possible only if we are small and be available without conditions.
As a statement close to JFK - " Hottest places are reserved for those who remain neutral in testing situations"
Feeling good to know you.
-Surya Prakash,Hyd,A.P.India.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 4, 2006 12:16 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
HI Segun --
I can't do that, I'm afraid, but if you go to your user's profile (by clicking on the image that's where you want your photo to go) and then click on the words "edit my profile" the software will allow you to upload it yourself.
Hope to "see" you shortly!..
Marguerite - May 4, 2006 5:27 pm (# Total: 132) Hi Segun, had the time to really read your project complete with attachment. It is very well layed out and reflects your years of expertise. However, I am wondering as to the target market for your agro-industrial production, and would you also share what is intended as the source of both production and transportation energy? Of intereest to me also, when I'm looking at "agriculture", is whether or not you are planning to grow organically?
marguerite
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 5, 2006 2:43 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Please refer to 34 post of mine - Want to miss Life?
There while quoting expressions I wrote-
Today the person in the context passed away.
The aged lady is survived by 3 sons and a daughter.
Last son gave her a room with asbestos roof.
Since three months she is not well.
Frankly, none of her children ownwed her.
The slogan underwhich we serve the aged is - Add value to remaining years.
This is done by keeping them in their own homes and provide services at their doorsteps.
Being from medical profession a caution taken is not to medicalise the services.
The entire excercise is done to demonstrate need to take care of the aged by the community
I am saying all these because - today when she passed away, I saw how real is this - knowing an unknown person and making part of our system and thus feeling loss, is possible only if we are small.
So my conviction is further strengthened being small and being available adds essence to life.
-Surya Prakash.
isbume - May 5, 2006 7:13 am (# Total: 132) Hi, Charles. I have successfully uploaded my pix. Thank you.
Segun
isbume - May 5, 2006 9:25 am (# Total: 132) Hi, Marguerite. Thank you for taking the time to read through my post and the attachment. I will be glad to receive your comments on the concept of small business incubation facility discussed in the paper.
Concerning the three issues raised in your post, I am very much pleased to provide the following responses: First, concerning the target market for the agro-industrial production activities of the incubation centre. This consist of rural farmers, graduate and undergraduate agricultural students and other unemployed individuals interested in agro-industrial enterprises. These are people interested in converting existing agricultural products into semi-finished products.
The target market outlets for their products are primarily the local small/medium industrial concerns that are dependent on the products from the incubation centre. Later the international market will be given consideration in order to generate foreign exchange.
Secondly, the sources of energy for the production and transportation of the products of the incubatees are electricity, gas and petroleum products.
We are aware that these are now becoming expensive products for the kind of industrialists we are planning to incubate. In this regard, we are in the process of entering into a partnership with a UK-based Charity organisation that is commencing a project titled "Let There Be Light" for impoverished people in Nigerian villages. This project will provide low-cost electricity through the solar power system for the beneficiaries of our incubation facilities. This project is built around the successful village solar cooperative approach in Sri Lanka and will facilitate solar electricity to our small business incubatees. In this way we hope to expand rural enterprise activities considerably.
On the third point, we believe that growing organically is the only strategic option available for a project like ours. This is the reason why we are concerned about starting with selected rural communities to establish the sustainability of the project before replicating it in other rural and urban communities in the country.
I will be pleased to hear further from you about what you are doing to strengthen the economic hands of the poor and to make our world better than it was before we were born.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
Marguerite - May 5, 2006 3:52 pm (# Total: 132) Suryah Prakash, your message touched my heart for I am an "old woman" age 74, but on many days, I look and act as if I were 54 -- so I feel age is relative. It is my intent, if I can honor my committment to be of service to humanity and to remain active, to live another 20 years or more. I am thankful for the Internet through which we may "travel" and get to know one another, and weave this beautiful tapestry of love and caring worldwide. Being able to connect in this "small" way within the greater context of the whole of the Internet and World Wide Web is, I feel, a very special thing for us to be able to do.
And I am in complete agreement with you that we should cease medicalizing people and instead create spaces of peace where people can learn to heal themselves. And people need to be at home with their families, not shunted away in some cold sterile medical facility. In working to compose the website: "Pathways to Consciousness" one area which has emerged is "the placebo effect" or how our "belief system" influences our "wellness" or "illness". This, of course has then led into the study of "natural healing practices" as conducted by many indigenous people worldwide. The statistics of healing from the "placebo effect" are startling when compared to those of allopathic medical practices, and as in many other areas of "supposed" technological advances, there is beginning to emerge doubt as to the efficacy of the treatments in many instances. That is not to say that allopathic medicine does not have a place in today's world but perhaps on a different level and after efforts at "self-healing" in a warm loving and supportative environment have been exhausted. But along with Dr. Woolf and another associate, we are focusing on the power of the human mind and its ability to not only heal disease, but its application in the field of disease prevention through what is known as the "relaxation response" among other things.
But, I do believe these things have to be conducted in the context of sustainable living practices which erase poverty and provide for security within the community so that we can safely and comfortably practice "homecare". Does this make sense?
What are your thoughts on these things, Surya Prakash? I am very much wondering what your "take" on "modernity" as practiced by the Western world is? Do you feel it has more to offer than what is found in the so-called "developing world"?
BTW, I have tried to upload a photo and failed. I have some files that have recently become corrupted and I'm having some dlifficulties I don't know how to resolve. Will keep working on this.
marguerite
Marguerite - May 5, 2006 7:30 pm (# Total: 132) Hi Segun,
Nice to get your response. I am confused as to what the meaning of turning "existing agricultural products into semi-finished products" is. Could you please give some examples of these products? Also, am I to understand that the producers in some instances are also the end users of the products?
I'm very impressed that in an oil-producing country you are planning to integrate the use of renewable energy into the process. Too bad the U.S. couldn't have been a little more foresighted -- we would not be facing the severe consequences that we are now had our leaders not suppressed initiatives in this field of endeavor.
Anyway, if international marketing is not productive for you due to an international economic crisis, do you anticipate that local consumption can handle production sufficient to keep the incubation enterprises viable? I suppose being in an oil-producing country has its advantages with regard to exports into international markets, but a concern might be with where the money will come from to purchase the exports. I cannot help but feel we have already entered into an enormous worldwide depression that is not readily apparent as yet, but which can only deepen as the oil crisis deepens and global climate change progresses.
It appears that unless local communities delink themselves from the national economy through creating local currencies, then poverty will only grow worse as communities "go down with the ship". Just the disintermediation in the marketplace due to the "churn" as we make the forced change to another fuel source(s) guarantees economic crisis.
Segun, you wrote in your message:
I will be pleased to hear further from you about what you are doing to strengthen the economic hands of the poor and to make our world better than it was before we were born.
My response is that other than creating local currencies, I really do not know how to strengthen the economic hands of the poor. What I do realize is that the driver of our worldwide social system is The Global Monetocracy System which is based in capitalism which requires continual growth to remain in force, so it literally "eats" everything in sight. And in the hands of private enterprise, there are no built in controls with which to manage it. And in a world of finite resources the rapaciousness of this system is devastating. Perhaps competition by the Euro is the answer -- only time will tell. However, with the end of oil, we will see the end of "petro dollars" and there is, as yet, no one energy source that can replace the power that oil has given us. With the end of oil, will control by the elite who have heretofore managed to maintain world control by controlling the majority of the world's wealth disappear? There is a lot up on the "option block" IMHO, which is why I feel so strongly that the people of the world must hold out their hands to one another and unite in a cooperative effort. Always before we have become divided. It seems to me that now is the time to stand up and say "No more" as world citizens united for peaceful co-existence.
May you remain blessed as well.
marguerite
marguerite
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 6, 2006 1:04 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Marguerite & members of social edge,
I like to begin this dialogue by quoting what being said by Martin Luther King: Even If I knew the world would go to pieces , I would still plant my Apple tree.
I see the each of the words described as vices in various scriptures - Bible, Quran, Bhagavat Gita.............. were clearly internalized and practiced,so we ceased to be being Human.
Thus living in immortal world is understood as "Way of Life".
I see while we reflect Life, we also have to spend to understand fact of Life - Death.
In modern living I see scope of access to basics still remain advantage for few because of insecure 'moves'by individuals & institutions.
Life goes on not because of decisions and provisions made by Politicians/Bureaucrats/Buissiness Men or Women,it is because few are able to withstand creulity of Life being unfare and thus taking position to be just.
Ability to withhold history and pass on natural ways of survival is need of the hour.
Being available irrespective of your resourcesfullness is an essential componenet to grow and serve.
Expectations are bound to rise and so also acceptance of reality, thus deffinetly we can set clear agenda of action.
We need to accept limitations and also face failures.
Deffinetly world has become tough and we are getting enough and more feelers to say - stop explaining and just keep doing good work.
Process based approach has very little space but it's the only way we can develop beautiful world.
We believe this and we are doing this and we are enjoying this.
-Surya Prakash,Hyd,A.P.India.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 6, 2006 3:12 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Segun:
Glad you got your picture uploaded – nice to “see” you here!
Re: Segun Benson's Project
In your post, you mention a project titled "Let There Be Light" for impoverished people in Nigerian villages providing solar-powered low-cost electricity, and say the model for the project is a village solar cooperative approach in Sri Lanka . My thought here is that it might be neat to have a world map here on SE where (in this case) an arrow would connect Sri Lanka to Nigeria, indicating the source and destination of what we might call an act of “conceptual franchising”. Given how important visual impacts can be, I believe that looking at such a map when it has a number of such arrows in place would give great encouragement to others considering the possibility of applying the lessons of one place in another…
Thanks again,
Charles
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 6, 2006 3:26 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Surya Prakash –
Thanks for your post about the woman who was “ripe and ready to fall” – it’s touching to hear of her passing, and I send my condolences to you and to her family and friends. How strange and wonderful that we can be touched this way, across all distances, by each others’ words.
- today when she passed away, I saw how real is this
You quote Martin Luther King:
- Even If I knew the world would go to pieces , I would still plant my Apple tree.
- "Rabbi Yochanan Ben Zakkai says: If you are holding a sapling in your hand, and someone says to you, 'here comes the Messiah!' -- come and plant the sapling, and afterwards go and welcome the Messiah"
and
- Anas b. Mâlik relates that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “If the Hour arrives and one of you is holding a date palm sapling, then he should go ahead and plant it before getting up from his place if he is able to.”
It’s rather wonderful to have voices from three major traditions saying the same basic thing – and in each case, the advice is so practical, so down to earth!
Best wishes, and thanks again,
Charles
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 6, 2006 3:41 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite:
What a lovely post!
You write:
- The statistics of healing from the "placebo effect" are startling when compared to those of allopathic medical practices,
I also agree with you that the area of alternative currencies is important – and share your sense that we may be at a point where not just altruism but sheer survival demands of us a shift in living in the direction of cooperation and good faith.
Warm regards,
Charles
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 8, 2006 7:41 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I was busy with Annual ritual of annual report writing, so the responses of Charles, McLean & Marguerite moved me and made me complete the job.
Here our work is small in nature but regular in charecter.
I see each one of you are blessed with tremendous knowledge and experience.
Good that I had opportunity to post & recieve replies, that too in depth.
When Charles quoted two in response to MLK quote, it was exciting enough.
When McLean extended my points with her experience, it helped to complete the cycle.
Marguerite's saying that "your message touched my heart for I am an "old woman" age 74, it only said how young she is.
Age has no meaning if you are not able to respond to situations which you could execute.
I see all three of you are blessed souls.
I dont know how many times I thanked socialedge within and in the report too.
I wish I get a day where we can meet and I can see you and listen to your experiences.
Must be high ask but I will pray for that.
Keep smiling and keep sharing and help the society to grow to be more human.
with warm regards,
-surya prakash.
isbume - May 8, 2006 12:07 pm (# Total: 132) Hi Marguerite. Thanks for your response to my post. Your response contains a lot of points that could not be addressed in a single post. I however will like to respond to the threads that are of importance for now.
First, about turning existing agric. products into semi-finished products. By this I mean raw agricultural products like cassava can be turned into cassava pellets, industrial starch and its other derivatives for other industrial users. The oil in cashew fruits nut can be extracted for use by industries producing thinner used in the automobile industries, cashew fruit can be converted into cashew jam and marmalade. Palm tree fruits can be used to produce palm oil which can then be used by industries producing butter and so on. These are some of the types of activities to be carried out in the incubation centre.
These products have ready home market as well as international market. The main concept is to use the incubation centre facilities to strengthen agricultural production at the same time encouraging agribusinesses that have export potential.
On the question of international market for the oil market. I am of the opinion that the market will continue to remain viable. But the fact is that those who control this market are the very rich people in Nigeria. This is not done on a small scale because of the capital outlay involved. We can not go into this area. Interestingly, the way this market is being managed in Nigeria is such that electricity power generating sector is highly centralised to the point of being inefficient and and represent a waste of important national fund. We have a convulsive electricity power supply and so every serious entrepreneur has to think of alternative source of energy in order to stay alive and competitive. Our country's situation is curious and does not fall into the picture you have about the developed countries of the world.
In essence, our decision to combine alternative source of energy into electricity is a strategy to stay alive in spite of the hiccup in the electricity industry in Nigeria. It has nothing to do with the international market for oil.
You mention the idea of local community currencies as a means of strengthening the poor. Well that is an area that is difficult for me to comment upon, particularly from my background. But I do know that creating local community currency is not the issue per se but that of the attitude of those people managing currency on behalf of the rest of the people. Many people in authority are less concerned about the poor or underprivileged and as such they mess up the economy by their naked greed.
The only way I believe the poor can be helped is to open their eyes to the technique of income generation and entrepreneurship. Imparting to them the ability to scan their environment for income generating opportunities and providing them mentorial services with integrity and transparency. When every one in society is able to make meaningful contribution to the economic developpment of their community, then there will be an upsurge in the aggregate income of the people. This will be more relevant for everybody.
We will be glad to work with you on this platform. Particularly where there is an opportunity to source agro-industrial equipment and machinery that can assist us in the sustainance of our agro-industrial activities at the incubation centre.
Wishing you the best as we seek for credible ways of improving our world.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
isbume - May 8, 2006 12:18 pm (# Total: 132) Hi Charles
Thanks immensely for that rich insight about mapping. It is a worthy contribution.
Thanks.
Segun
Marguerite - May 8, 2006 5:17 pm (# Total: 132) This is such a wonderful thing to be able to converse so openly with people from other countries and to find out about who you are and your lifestyles. If we could just connect millions of people in this manner we could end the horror of war and begin to live in peaceful co-existence.
Charles, your sharing of the story of how people watched the deer and followed their lead was wonderful. My research shows that homeopathic medicine has a greater healing ratio than do the drugs produced by the chemical companies. I do believe the mapping can provide colorful threads as we weave the tapestry that connects us all as we share in-form-ation.
One of the things that has crossed my mind as we have communicated here is that the culture of the developing world is so rich. I would say to anyone there that it is, IMHO, extremly important that we preserve the richness of your lifestyles and do not get caught up in the ideas of the modern world and its madness due to the "pathology of dissociation" from which we suffer. May I refer you to the website of Dr. Jay Earley. www.earley.org Both Freud and Jung felt that modern society was neurotic due to what Freud felt were "cultural urges". Today, social psychologists such as Dr. Earley and Ken Wilber who has written about 18 books on the field of human consciousness and upon whose work Jay Earley's is in part based, and Dr. Vernon Woolf, agree that modern society suffers from the pathology of "dissociation" from reality, from the natural world. Jay Earley writes that at the beginning of our social evolution there were certain basic qualities inherent within our world: natural living, community, belonging, vitality, and equality. But over time, as we began to seek more power in the world and what Earley termed: emergent qualities,such as technology, rational thinking, and social organization (read government, global monetary system, legal system, formal education) suppressed the basic qualities at the expense of our health and wholeness. We became totally "unbalanced" as we are biologically unprepared to handle or manage these emergent qualities since these things were not part of our biological makeup in the beginning. The dissociation from our basic qualities leaves us in a world that is largely devoid of meaning. In essence: we have lost our soul -- our integrity, our compassion for others, our ability to love. This is reflected in how we manage ourselves and as we can readily see we have regressed backward into a world in which war and terrorism are assumed to be natural acts, as is the destruction of our life support system. What is necessary for us to do is to reintegrate the basic qualities back into our lifestyles so that we may regain our health and wholeness. Those of you in the developing world are still so much more connected to your roots, and herein I believe lies our hope. So, please, I encourage you to value who you are and your culture. Do not become mesmerized by the "American lifestyle" and its "siren's song" which is largely an "empty tune".
Along these lines there is an Internet Group: The Global Justice Movement which is a discussion group with people from different countries on it. A prime concern of this group is ending world poverty through changing the global monetocracy system. You may seek subscription to this group through the following To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 8, 2006 8:09 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Marguerite - You once again made your point clear and loud.
I dont know how I am going to sound , but the fact is that I/we are living in active zones of voilence.
I see war or terrorism is what we see - what we fail to account is -
- number of untimely deaths - every season, if it is summer - we have cases of deaths due to sunstroke, not just epidemic but pandemic. Last rainy season we had heavy rains in hyderabad, to clear rain water on roads they opened manhole's - unfortunately a couple were on scooter and got stuck in the middle of the road, so the husband asked wife to get down, she got down straight down into the manhole. She was 40 years old with two daughters and her body was found nextday a km away from the point she fell.
- We dont have water, water we purchase , as water is available for commercial use.
- Houses are constructed with no planning - a very visible lapse of sense prevails, each house is calcualted with value of money and the rent it can generate, just concrete jungles.
- Food is sold and purchased with no thought - that it is food that saves, heals & protects.
- Medicines are understood ( especially allopathic) cure for any ailment, with no proper prescription or reason are consumed, both genuine & spurious drugs are available & consumed.
- Educational institutions with no infrastructure and atmosphere are available,but for a cost - as education is no more understood is the reason now we are able to communicate and relate.
- Now I see if we enquire in random, one may not have had food but he will be having a mobile.
Why am I saying this, because I see we lost direction & purpose, I like to quote Socrates here -
Socrates says at his trial,
"that the difficulty is not so much to escape death; the real difficulty is to escape doing wrong".(Apology 39a).
Friends of socialedge, we are living with painful heart,we have to release ourselves with these, we have to wake up and say clear and loud that we dont accept anything going wrong anywhere.
I see war or terrorism we can get some leads to question but what about this, if we educated people, who were fortunate enough to learn, intepret, are not able to fully deliver.
Education is for action not for survival or accumulate or get secured.
To live with pain though you are no way responsible, is enough reason for us to free ourselves by questioning wrong doers.
In developing world we dont need external enemies we have developed enemies within - Politicians, Bureaucrats & Buisinessmen, now we have new breed added to this list - Educational institutions.
I see they have to reflect and they have to understand what thay are in and what they have to do.
As long as people are understood as products to push products, we will continue hear and see things of worst kind.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 8, 2006 8:59 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Thank you all so much. Putting it simply, you are fantastic.
Margeurite says:
- I do not know when this forum will end, but want to remain connected and to enlarge the circle both through the Social Edge and uniting in other ways.
- I can almost feel the interactions getting richer and deeper as [the participants in this event] get to know one another post by post.
Patrick O'Heffernan - May 10, 2006 8:10 am (# Total: 132) Charles, One of my clients, a TV network, needs to scale up - get more viewers - to increase the impact of its message. Another client, an activist organization, sees cloning itself in many local organizations it smost effective strategy. I think scaling depends on your objective.
kmniazi - May 10, 2006 1:15 pm (# Total: 132) Development Professional
Dear All,
My apology for the jumbled up email, but I just read the previous discussion, so kept jotting down notes.
Charles, You might want to make these events more prominent in the newsletters to attract more people. In order to create connections, you might also want to explore the option of setting up a group in linkedin or any other social networking site, as long as it is free to use.
Anil, If you are looking at nos, I suggest you take a look at the definition of SMEs in your Country. e.g. in Pakistan, if you have between 10 to 99 employees, you are sme or if you have 2 million to 40 million in assets, you are sme. anything less than these, you are micro and if larger, you are large enterprise.
Segun, Please check out www.smeda.org.pk and their "Entrepreneurship Development Strategy" and "Entrepreneurship Development Center Models". They are both available for free download and can act as a guide map to promote entrepreneurship. I would like to have a copy of the "The Dynamics of Small Business Incubation Facilities".
Jessica, Your Grid Idea seems interesting. have you worked out some further details? We might be able to use it elsewhere also.
Madhukar, There is no magic bullet, which will ensure success. I have found out that "I" need to be fully informed and with the right connection, if "I" am to provide services, which will increase the probability of success for the people, who approach us.
Pamela, I am afraid that, we seem to be destined to replicate the same mistakes and learn from the same failures. Though, things are a lot better (just look at this discussion, how many different nationalities), they could be better still. As far as graduates are concerned, the problem is that, Universities create EMPLOYEES and not "EMPLOYERS". You have to change the complete mind set / culture, otherwise the Nigeria story will / is being repeated all over the third world. You might to talk to GBSN or some Universities (Business Schools in US / UK / Europe) to support your progrm by providing students.
Finally, a debtable point. While I believe that Small is beautiful, but one might want to think about the dangers of staying small too long (Italian Cos are an example). I am not saying that, every enterprise has to grow big, but if I don't seriously consider scaling up at the right time and without exploring the option thoroughly (listing advantages / disadvantages & possible options - franchsing etc), then I am not being sincere to the people, I am working for.
Regards
Kamran
Marguerite - May 10, 2006 1:46 pm (# Total: 132) Hi again everyone -- my apologies for taking so long to respond but sometimes there are not enough hours in the day.
Surya Prakash writes in part:
In developing world we dont need external enemies we have developed enemies within - Politicians, Bureaucrats & Buisinessmen, now we have new breed added to this list - Educational institutions.
It is the same here in the developed world and as to the new breed you state being "educational institutions" this may be the worst of the breed for it indocrinates our children before they have a chance to develop their natural/ innate intelligence. It is for this reason I want to spread the Habitats in Harmony Community Learning and Information Center concept internationally, encouraging people to create spaces within their community where hands-on-experiential learning may take place among members who hold tremendous amounts of wisdom within their psyche, but through the educational process we are "dumbed down" so as to be robots so as to serve the artificial world we have created through our pathology of dissociation -- the lens through which so many of us now view the world.
What is so horrible is so many now view the aberrent world we have created as natural as we see through these distored lens. We now justify and rationalize things such as war and terrorism and the use of depleted uranium with a half life of 4.5 million years, and which has the capability to change the genetic code of all humanity, and we call ourselves "civilized" while doing these things.
What is necessary, I believe, is to create an alternative system which operates outside of the conventional modern system where authentic hands-on experimental life-long learning may take place as community members exchange in-form-ation and apply it at the local level, thus creating a pathway to consciousness and a return to wholeness through integrating the basic and emergent qualities so they are balanced.
And this is how we weave the tapestry by holding our hands out to one another and beginning these learning centers -- sharing knowledge and creating friendships that cannot be broken because they are based in health and well-being and in unfolding of our fullest potential -- thus choosing life.
A group that has begun a movement similiar to what I envision is The Post
Carbon Institute: www.postcarbon.org They are involved in "relocalization" and creating sustainable living communities here in the U.S.
blessings to all
marguerite
Marguerite - May 10, 2006 2:25 pm (# Total: 132) Segun, I noticed a message come through on the Global Justice movement list which I previously mentioned.
It was with regard to the World Bank announcing that it is giving "interest free loans". The comment with regard to this message was that even though "interest free" the dreaded "structural adjustment program" would still be in effect. This seems to tie into an earlier part of the discussion of how impossible it is to obtain funding that serves the interests of fundee rather than of the funder.
I also recalled the name of the book on this subject: Roles and Relevance and it is published by Kumarian Press. www.kpbooks.com/
Since you mentioned "cattle raising" as still part of your agri-program, may I also recommend "Beyond Beef" by Jeremy Rifkin. While cattle-raising for beef production is the fourth largest revenu-generating business in the world, it is also the number one cause of desertification worldwide and is also the driver of world migration problems. In 1997, 100 million people were in forced migration worldwide, many of them women and children forced off land due to cattle-ranching and increased deforestation. Topsoil is now disappearing at a rate of 17% faster than it can be replaced. Dependent upon region it can take anywhere from 500 to 1000 years to replace one inch of topsoil. So, while it may provide for immediate returns, the long term outlook is devastating.
warm regards and continued best wishes for your endeavors Segun.
tutormentor - May 10, 2006 3:06 pm (# Total: 132) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
I've just read through the entire conversation and I'm glad someone tried to summarize if a few messages back. I share many of the frustrations and goals of Margurite and agree, "If we could just connect millions of people in this manner we could end the horror of war and begin to live in peaceful co-existence."
I started coming to Social Edge almost two years ago and have built some growing friendships based on the knowledge we're sharing. As a result, I was invited to host a discussion, that's going on at the same time as this one. It's titled "Building a Network of Purpose" and it draws from many of the ideas discussed here in a set of questions aimed to identify new ways to overcome the barriers or create new paths to success.
While I'm hosting a discussion on Social Edge, I'm also co-hosting one at http://www.mentoring.org/community, and another on May 17 at an IUPUI portal. These will lead to a face to face conference in Chicago on May 25 and 26 (25th since 1994), and then more on-line forums in June.
They are all intended to draw more people into the conversation and to focus on what we do now that leads to what we want to happen later. For instance, while school is ending in a few weeks, the new school year starts in a few months. The programs operating now will all be looking for volunteers in the fall, which means the ideas we share now, and the collaborations we build now, could lead to more volunteers in the fall.
Getting volunteers in August and keeping them through the school year are two distintly different challenges. Thus, while our event in May focuses on helping programs get volunteers in Aug/Sept. it also focuses on helping them keep the volunteers throug the year. It also focuses on ways to raise money to support the process. In November we'll do another conference series, and the work we do now can lead to the one in November being more effective in building visibility, and building DONOR ATTENTION as we move toward the December charitible giving period in the US.
Thus, our aim is to think three, six, nine and even 12 months out in a cycle that must repeat every year with more people involved. While I focus this on tutoring/mentoring, I think that this type of thinking can be duplicated by groups of people focusing on any common purpose.
I hope some of you will cross over and introduce yourself in the discussion I'm hosting and that this will bring some who are visiting me, into this discussion.
That's one way we can work together to increase the network.
Marguerite - May 10, 2006 3:17 pm (# Total: 132) Since we are facing crises "unprecedented in human recorded history" it appears that the number one need is for "information" which will help people both cope with and mitgate the crises. The three major crisis appear to be:
1. Disintermediation in the marketplace as many businesses give way under the pressures created by the end of cheap oil, gas and other fossil fuels. Even were we to find the perfect enegy solution, which may well be "free energy", then it will be at least 20 to 30 years before production is sufficient to meet demand and make a difference. The depression caused by the "churn" alone is predicted to be worldwide and run very, very deep.
2. Global Climate Change - This phenomenon is proceeding at a far faster pace than scientists could possibly imagine as computer models were inadequate to reflect the real pace of global warming and the melt down of glaciers worldwide. Now the visual evidence is staggering and the implications far-reachng.
3. The Pathology of Dissociation From Which Society Suffers. It becomes more apparent every day that as a society we have gone mad. We only need to look at the devastation around us to know we have created an "aberrant society" -- no culture in their right mind would destroy their own life support system the way we are doing along with creating war and terrorism on other humans -- I don't know how many of you have seen the pictures of those committing torture on prisoners at Abu Graib and saw the smiles on their faces as they did so. Those committing these acts were daughters and sons of our neighbors -- kids our kids grew up with.
If I were a TV station wanting to increase my viewership I would certainly design programming (learning modules) that addressed these issues. It is my belief that the public knows there is something drastically wrong and are getting tired of "the Great American Dream" kind of crap that is presented today as "reality" but they don't know where to turn for help.
However, what I am witnessing are "hourse parties" or "salons", as some are calling them, where select DVDs which provide accurate information are viewed by small groups who bond together and take direct action to provide security in their communities through enacting sustainable living practices. This is like an underground movement building toward health and wellness creation and a TV station that has the guts to jump in and grab this market and run with could soon be "top dog". What we know is that life its always moving toward health and well-being as it is our normal state. So, the "butterfly is seeking to emerge from its cocoon and expand in all of its beauty". Now is time to grab its wings and fly away for those who dare wipe the clouds from their eyes and see Truth in all of its magnificense -- it is the way to "embrace life" and continue growth.
marguerite
I am holding the field for the fullest potential in this event to unfold now in the best interests of all concerned.
marguerite
.
i
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 11, 2006 8:57 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Skills and Knowledge have no much space in the present day world especially development world, here we had elections in 5 states and the politicians promised, Rice, Color TV's and Mobiles.
When people are understood like this, how can we ever grow and how we can claim we are developed or developing.
Alternatives are less prescribed as they know life has alternatives and they are not marketable but they are useful and effective, they are less accepted.
When you have less of resources we have to search for alternatives.
They may not be replicable but are effectives contextually.
One has to encourage and support efforts for making life much easier and beautiful.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 11, 2006 10:04 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi, Patrick:
- I think scaling depends on your objective.
With admiration and gratitude for your presence here…
isbume - May 11, 2006 10:10 am (# Total: 132) Dear Kmniazi (Development Professional)
It is a great delight to have you come on the forum. Thank you for the response to my post. I am particularly grateful for the link to www.smeda.org.pk. I have been at this site and found it very useful for any serious person interested in entrepreneurship development. The people have done a lot of work worthy of praise.
Concerning my paper, please click the attachment section of my post to Pamela, a contributor on this discussion. By clicking on the attachment you can read and download my paper titled: The Dynamics of Small Business Incubation Facilities in Fadama Areas of Ogun State, Nigeria: An Anti-Poverty Device. It is just that simple. I will be glad to read about your comment. You may send me a private response as my email address is contained in the post to Pamela. Sincerely, I will be glad to exchange information and knowledge with you.
Stay blessed as you continue to find ways of empowering people for sustainable economic development.
Segun Benson
isbume - May 11, 2006 10:17 am (# Total: 132) Hi Pamela,
How are you? You have been off the forum for too long. We love your contributions and would want you to continue. Have you been able to digest my paper and what is your view about the small business incubation facility concept which was discussed in the paper? I will be glad to read from you. You may also contact me through my email address.
I want to express the desire that people like you and others in this forum should keep the communication alive even after this forum. I have seen a lot of serious development professionals from different backgrounds and culture making productive contributions to this forum.
I love it and I pray the wisdom of the Lord will continue to abound to the originator of this beautiful concept.
Remain blessed.
Segun Benson
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 11, 2006 10:19 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Kamran:
Thanks for your post, which was timely rather than late ; )
- you might also want to explore the option of setting up a group in linkedin or any other social networking site, as long as it is free to use.
- While I'm hosting a discussion on Social Edge, I'm also co-hosting one at http://www.mentoring.org/community, and another on May 17 at an IUPUI portal
I personally spend time here in Social Edge and in Howard Rheingold’s private Brainstorms community, and know I’m quite resistant to checking regularly elsewhere – I don’t mind dipping on occasion, I just don’t get into the habit of visiting other places with the kind of regularity that creates "membership" and "bonding". So if there was an equivalent of RSS that allowed me to aggregate Dan’s three almost concurrent online conferences, that would be (for people with my kind of online habits) a big step forward.
Just a thought – not posted because I think my own habits are of any importance, but because maybe there are enough like me that such a project would be worthwhile…
I would also echo to you the point I just made to Patrick, Kamran, favoring flexibility in the choice to scale up or stay small. Machines would probably need a rule to handle such a choice – thank goodness we’re human, and can nose around , check out alternatives, have hunches, and choose… ; )
Thanks again!
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 11, 2006 10:37 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite –
Recognizing the "war" and its urgency as you describe it [with the three aspects in your next message, Enlarging a TV audience, Disintermediation in the marketplace, Global Climate Change, and the Pathology of Dissociation as major fronts in that war, no?] on the one hand strengthens your own clarity as to the crucial importance of certain efforts and indeed shifts in consciousness at this time. -- but I suspect it also makes you sound more alarmed (anxious? strident?) than many people feel comfortable with. I guess this has been an issue many times on the rolling edge of change (where evolution and revolution, for instance, may be terms for the alternatives, or abrupt and gradual, or whatever).
I don't have a solution for this quandary, but it does look like a tricky issue for us to negotiate: how do we express calm concern, so that we don't sound like chicken little, but aren't asleep at the wheel either?
I hope I've expressed myself well enough to make sense in friendship here, no criticism intended -- and would very much value your thoughts on this...
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 11, 2006 10:44 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Segun:
Thanks again.
- I want to express the desire that people like you and others in this forum should keep the communication alive even after this forum.
Pamela?
Marguerite - May 11, 2006 3:23 pm (# Total: 132) I am drafting a reply to both Building Networks of Purpose and Charles' comment with regard to "comfort levels" as we discuss "change". However, halfway through this exercise, all of a sudden the whole page just "flew" away and I lost it all. I've had this happen several times and it is very frustrating as I am under time limits. Will try to compose the message in MS WORD and paste it in to see if that works or else add it as an attachment. Any insights on this?
marguerite
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 11, 2006 6:15 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite:
I sometimes write a paragraph, add the phrase "[still working on this post, saving as I go]", save, then move to the next para, removing the "[]" when I'm pretty sure I'm done.
Looking forwrad to your post.
tutormentor - May 12, 2006 9:03 am (# Total: 132) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Hi Charles,
At http://groups.blogdigger.com/groups.jsp?id=2849 you can see an example of how blog discussions on a common theme are aggregated in a single site. That's one possible solution of the future.
However, when I participate in these discussions I have a vision of an inverted pyramid, or a funnel. The walls of the funnel contain all of the various conversations where people are talking about issues related to the mission of the Tutor/Mentor Connection. These feed down to the bottom of the funnel, which in my case is http://www.tutormentorconnection.org, where I not only hope to aggregate people from many different discussions into one on-going effort, but where I also provide a vareity of information links that people can draw from in their discussion and deliberations.
While there are many things I'd like to be able to incorporate into my home base, this is where the Network of Purpose sees a map that shows all of the geography of a city where the network needs to achieve its purpose.
What I do should be duplicated in other cities, by partners who share the same goals, and who work with me to build this network of purpose. However, it can also be duplicated by people who have a different purpose.
On May 17 I'm going to give an overview of the resources on the T/MC web site during a one our session hosted at http://econference.uc.iupui.edu/ I hope you'll join in if you have time.
Marguerite - May 12, 2006 11:51 am (# Total: 132) Creating Networks of Purpose
This is such a great concept as it encompasses
both small and big. Each separate component of
the network is a “particle” but when networked together
creates a “wave” effect with all of the parts working
together synergistically creating “bigness”.
There is an Implicate Order to the Universe (David
Bohm) which says that it organizes from micro to
macro.
So, if we understand this then, we know that to be
effective, we need to organize from the individual
upward to the community/group level where we have
“swarm” or “systemic” intelligence” operating in such a
way that we can utilize this “effect” to facilitate change
at a “mass” level.
We know that groups/systems/communities take on a
personality of their own – in other words, the system
”encodes” or “in-forms” itself taking on certain behaviors.
To change this system, we need to “re-code or “re-inform the
system so that it takes on a new behavior. Since form follows
function, this means “in-forming” the system as to what its
structure is to be in order for it to function at its fullest potential.
(Thus we create the mission statement.)
In order to evaluate the system, we do a general systems
analysis and determine where the weak points are in the
system so that we can then go into the system and re-inform
it so that it is functioning at its fullest potential.
Since I am most interested in facilitating change for the purpose
of transforming society from a waste-producing society to a
sustainable living society so we can, as a world society, move
forward into the future in health and wellness, then I need to be
able to facilitate change at the community level by inserting new
and valid in-form-ation into the system at that level as it is most
closely linked to our life support system (ecosystems) which
supply our basic needs. This must be our first concern.
So, through forming community learning and information centers
in small communities worldwide and networking them together,
from a website, we can then re-inform many communities at the
same time and monitor the system created to ensure
that it is always in balance and thus working at peak
performance in the best interests of all concerned.
Since, like individuals, there are no two communities exactly
alike, each community needs the individual freedom to “in-form”
itself according to its individual needs so as to remain “in balance
at all times”.
But each community (particle) maintains its own integrity and acts
autonomously. Through networking, we are merely aggragating
the particles together to form a wave (whole dynamic) that is,
when taken together, more than the sum of its parts and acts
synergistically. This is the way our bodies are designed with each
cell acting as a stand alone system that is frequently replaced.
Cells then create organs which are also stand alone systems which
become “organizations of systems” called a body. Think about how
we refer to our nervous system as a network".for instance. We as
individuals might consider ourselves as particles in the network
of life. We are able to disengage ourselves from these networks,
exerting freedom of "conscious choice" and form a new networked
pattern, and in so-doing create a differential holodynamic.Our potential
for creating different dynamics is virtually unlimited when we make
conscious choices in networking ourselves together in different
ways.
We are talking here about “organic spherical or holodynamic
design” as opposed to a hierarchial top down linear design.
So, we have created an “open system” which is free-flowing
as opposed to a closed system which can only lead to death
through stagnation at some point.
This change has a lot to do with the evolution of human
consciousness as we move from left brain linear consciousness
or right brain wave consciousness and into holodynamic or
integrated consciousness as brain function changes due to
our need to adapt to the environment we have now created.
We are now on a new frontier -- having met the "limits ot growth"
in our exterior world, we must now turn our attention to the
phenomenon of the human mind and begin to "think" in new ways.
Doubts now exist as to the ability of the human family to meet
this challenge. If we do, we will emerge from the present period
as not merely survivors, but as human beings in a new reality.
These concepts are taken, in part from the work of Dr. V. Vernon Woolf, Holodynamics.
www.holodynamics.com Dance of Life - 2005
Marguerite - May 12, 2006 11:38 pm (# Total: 132) Charles, I appreciate your comments with regard to expressing "calm concern" rather than sounding "strident" or "anxious". But let me give you my point of view.
For the past 5 - 6 years, I have facilitated what we refer to as a "Co-learner's List" on the Internet. And on that list I have people like Fred Burks, who was a former translator for both Presidents G.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Fred publishes a newsletter: www.WantToKnow.com in which he exposes information for which there has been a "cover-up" for some reason or other. And I have international journalists, several psychologists working in the field of social transformation, an ecological designer, several published authors of widely read books, college professors from major universities, etc., on the list, most of whom prefer to remain anonymous. Then there are "just people" who serve as "information gatherers" who survey the Internet for information published to major websites which are related to the critical issues of the day, and they forward them to me as the facilitator. I then sort through them and pick three or four of what I consider to be the top stories and I comment on them and forward them on to the list. And, until very recently, I have spent 10 - 12 hours a day, 6-7 days a week doing this. So over the past years, I have reviewed thousands of articles which reflect upon the most critical issues of our time. And, while I don't pass all of these articles on to the group (which totals approximatley 300 people) the group has become very sophisticated and well informed on a broad range of subjects.
And, we frequently analyze this information to determine what's propaganda and what is valid. Over the past few days, we've been dialoging on energy issues and discussing nuclear vs solar/hydrogen vs zero point energy relative to the relocalization movement, global climate change and the end of the fossil fuel era, and how a new energy source will effect the world economy, labor markets, etc. We then try to disseminate this information as widely as possible through other Internet lists.
So, when I'm posting here on this forum, that's what I'm doing -- disseminating valid "in-form-ation" so that people can, if they so desire, "in-form" their respective communities in order to provide for security through implementing sustainable living practices, which will not only enhance lifestyles with regard to "human values" but with regard to both planetary and cosmic (spiritual) values as well, paving the way for peaceful coexistence.
In analyzing all of the data that comes across our desktops and realizing how many "tipping points" have been passed, or we are near to passing, it is difficult to present the information without sounding anxious. Frankly, from my viewpoint, "the sky is falling" and like Paul Revere, I'm riding through the darkness of the night as fast as possible trying to awaken people to the rocky road that lies ahead as we are faced on all fronts with resource shortages.
But resources shortages are the result of the manner in which we think about and consequently use resources. By changing the manner in which we think, (elevating our consciousness to another level) we can change the manner in which we use resources, and, thus, create abundance.
It is a matter of making conscious choices.
Which bring us back, Charles, to a point you made earlier about "being resistant to change". And what's so overwhelming about this is that in order to survive as the human family, given the current state of the planet, we have to make a 180-degree turn around and that's almost impossible for most people to imagine. Well known mangement guru, Peter Drucker, wrote in the Harvard Review awhile back, saying: "Every organization must be prepared to *abandon* everything it does. Please note that Mr. Drucker did not use the word "change" he wrote "abandon". He also said that "there is no placid backwater in which to sit this one out"
I frankly don't know what to do about people who get uncomfortable when its laid on the line like this -- we've soft-pedaled the seriousness of this too long. I have six grandchilden whose futures have been stolen and that pisses me off -- excuse my French. And, I really don't know what else to say.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 13, 2006 6:08 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Dan:
I haven’t been able to get through to http://groups.blogdigger.com/groups.jsp?id=2849 as yet, but will try again. I like your image of the funnel, and gathering blogs together by RSS is certainly the beginning of what I’m after – let’s hope this kind of clustering gets easier, to include diverse (and sometimes private) spaces such as SE and other conference settings. Meanwhile, I hope to be able to join you May 17 for the one hour session -- do you know what time it will be?
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 13, 2006 6:11 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Given its title, I wonder whether this post of yours was intended for Dan’s Creating Networks of Purpose event, rather than here? The very fact that I'm asking the question indicates how closely our various conversations seem to converge around points of common interest, so I'm not too worried in any case -- just wondering.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 13, 2006 6:19 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite:
Your "Co-learner's List sounds wonderful.
You write:
- there are "just people" who serve as "information gatherers" who survey the Internet for information published to major websites which are related to the critical issues of the day, and they forward them to me as the facilitator… until very recently, I have spent 10 - 12 hours a day, 6-7 days a week doing this
- In analyzing all of the data that comes across our desktops and realizing how many "tipping points" have been passed, or we are near to passing, it is difficult to present the information without sounding anxious. Frankly, from my viewpoint, "the sky is falling" and like Paul Revere, I'm riding through the darkness …
The question, to my mind, is one of rhetorical strategy – how can we alert people to the fact that there’s a fire in the cinema without causing a stampede? Maybe the angels have it right, opening the most astounding sentences with the phrase, Fear not…
Warm regards as ever,
Charles
tutormentor - May 14, 2006 4:54 am (# Total: 132) Cabrini Connections Tutor/Mentor Connection
Charles,
I agree that there's an overlap in our discussions. But that's good. If you look at the tutor/mentor eConference strategy, we're trying to get similar conversations started all over the world, then linked to a common information source(S) and a common purpose.
At this stage, each conversation has it's own entry point, and own leader. However, by aggregating similar conversations in the same time frame, we create a greater awareness, and we enable people from different discussions to connect with each other, as we are doing here.
My overview of the T/MC web resource will be on May 17 at 2:30 EST.
The agenda page is http://econference.uc.iupui.edu/Agenda/tabid/132/Default.aspx
You need to register in advance (FREE) for this, using a registration button in the upper right corner of the page.
I hope that some folks who are involved in visual databases and social networking might join us. Maybe they can help us create that funnel type of connection.
Marguerite - May 14, 2006 11:07 am (# Total: 132) Hi Everyone,
Charles, the Creating Networks of Purpose is sort of a "catch all" and since time is limited right now, just used it in that manner.
I agree with Dan that there is a lot of overlap going on. In fact in conjunction with the "Co-learner's List" am working with a group that wants to either create some new software or find something appropriate we may not know about to use with the Pathways To: website that I'm creating as an "updraft" of the Co-learner's list.
The website in conjunction with forums will permit us more graphic content which can convey whole concepts at a glance thus eliminating the tediousness of so much text. The Pathways To: series will focus on "in-form-ation" related to different topics such as the evolution of human consciousness and how to apply this knowledge to achieving sustainable living communities which can lead to world peace. The pathways, in essence, are the threads of the tapestry. And, the website provides the "curriculum" for the "virtual university" into which internationally-located "community learning and information centers" can tap into for guidance as to how to get from Point A to Point B, etc., in creating this "great social transformation" in the shortest possible time, restoring the planet's ecosystems to peak efficiency, thus restoring our life support system.
In essence, the community learning and information centers are really land-based co-learner's groups who take the in-form-ation gained from the virtual university and combined with their own "inner knowledge and awareness of their bioregion, apply it locally" in a "hands-on learning experience" to create sustainable living communities. And, it doesn't matter where in the world a community is located, its members can still access the "virtual university" in order to acquire any additional tools and skills necessary but not already available in the community. In other words, they are getting the latest available in-form-ation and having conducted a general systems analysis of their community and identified the "breakdown" points, can then skillfully insert new information into the system so that it is always free-flowing and live-giving thus eliminating any possibility of corruption and stoppage.
Those who want to be "information gatherers" who supply in-form-ation to the virtual university can form individual co-learner's groups and scour the internet and other sources for information so that it can be processed and formatted for inclusion into a "pathway" as part of the curriculum of the institute.
Close your eyes for a moment and imagine what could take place -- the potential for positive change that we can create -- if we have this virtual university in place as a website, and we had communities worldwide simultaneously taking action to transform themselves from waste-creating to sustainable-living entities. And, they are all working together cooperatively as a networked "wave" creating harmonious love and peace.
And, what if this was an all-volunteer effort with thousands of people donating a few hours every day as a "power-to-the-people effort" working synergistically?
Could we begin this here? recruiting retired people, students, and others who can spare the time, and have the creative mind power to organize this.
Essentially, I feel it is already happening but it has just not coalesced as yet into a worldwide movement with focus. But when as I interact here with all of you great people, the excitement starts to build because this is "doable" and we are making a great start I feel --What say the rest of you?
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 15, 2006 5:19 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi Dan:
I've registered for the conference, but find it seems to require Macromedia Flash, which I don't have and don't seem to be able to get, because I don't have admin privs on my computer (it's a loaner). I'll try fiddling with the thing, but at the moment it looks as though I may not be able to attend, except in spirit.
Best wishes in any case, and perhaps (fingers crossed) I'll manage to see you...
Marguerite - May 16, 2006 11:37 am (# Total: 132) Dan, I am completely "out of the loop" as to your event; however, I see great relevance between Tutor/Mentoring, Co-learner's Groups, Community Learning and Information Centers, and facilitating the "great transformation" from a waste-creating society to a sustainable living society on a worldwide scale. And I support your efforts.
Co-learner's groups/Community Learning and Information Centers are actually "mentor-tutor" relationships based on the idea that learning is a two-way street and each of us has something of value to offer in the exchange with everyone else. So rather than being hierarchial in nature, it is a circular configuration based on sharing and cooperation with everyone in the circle "equal" to everyone else.
This co-learner's idea actually emanated out of the need to set up organizations that were effective to protest against hierarchial organizations such as in the WTO protest in Seattle several years ago. The organizers saw a need to design a "leaderless" organization that had many "heads" and did not rely on just one source or leader for in-form-ation, but was designed so that everyone in the circle was equally "in-formed". In this manner if one person was "disabled" anyone else in the circle/organization could take over any position so that movement was always open and fluid with a positive orientation. Initially, the person with the most "in-form-ation" on how to proceed in the appointed mission took the center position and then in a give and take manner (feedback combined with new in-fo) the group in-formed themselves. When special details were needed, the person most knowledgeable in this aspect took the center circle position and the process was repeated and "response-ability" shared among all.
In the Habitats in Harmony Community Learning and Information Center/Co-learner's Group we are establishing, it has been determined that the highest priority for the human family right now is to restore our ecological systems in bioregions worldwide to pristine health so as to rehabilitate our life support system, for if we fail to do this then nothing else matters as we will not be able to survive if the destruction continues. In order to accomplish this, the human family, beginning with each individual must relearn (re-inform) him/herself in order to rebalance the system so that we may move forward into the future in health and well-being as a whole integrated and fully balanced system that is sustainable.
This is a humongous task and there are questions as to how we may accomplish this, but to use an an analogy: how do you eat an elephant? the answer is "bit by bit", and we can accomplish this task "community by community" and networking ourselves together "in a common purpose". And, since "civilization was built on land" we must begin our restoration/rehabilitation efforts from this point (micro) upward, learning as we go "how to tread more lightly" on our Mother and treat her with respect.
In this respect there is an organization "Redefining Progress" where individuals and communities may go to determine their "ecological footprint". www.rprogress.org/newprojects/ecolFoot.shtml Take a quick check and see what kind of impact you and/your community are making.
isbume - May 19, 2006 7:02 am (# Total: 132) Hello Kamran,
I trust you were successful in downloading my paper from the attachment section to Pamela. I believe you have a rich knowledge of SME. Can we please dialogue. I will be glad to have your comments on the Small Business Incubation concept discussed in the paper.
It may interest you to know that I am currently involved in the World Bank Assisted Fadama Development programme in Nigeria. We are in the process of fine-tuning the concept in Nigeria. We are also looking forward to an opportunity of replicating the concept elsewhere. The comment of an experienced development professional like you will be of great benefit to us. Please speak. You may wish to contact me through my email address: isbume@yahoo.com
I wait to hear from you today or tomorrow.
Remain blessed.
Segun
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 20, 2006 2:31 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Hello everyone!
One of the key things I learned during last week
tragedy in my home is that, its good to be small on all counts,
but I see if you dont have mechanism of merging with or say be part of larger community there is danger of efforts being lost ending in no results.
I see being small you should spent quite a time to communicate.
Communication is vital or say backbone for the energy spent.
I see for small being beautiful - Turtle can be used as a symbol.
The entire effort should be how well are you related with community you represent.
Make sure you are part of the community.
Or say you are extension of the community.
The stronger the link, more the chance of you surviving in difficult situations.
Friends these days I am recollecting words of Wills Smith who on his recent visit to India said in one of the interviews -"Life is not fare, so you have to be just".
Its just decision to be small but we will be unfare if we dont have merging mechanism with the community.
Hope I could communicate.
-prakash.
Marguerite - May 20, 2006 3:41 pm (# Total: 132) Surya Prakash writes in part:
The stronger the link, more the chance of you surviving in difficult situations.
Good to hear from you again.
I very much agree with this, and it is much easier to build small strong links with flexibility than large links which tend to become rigid.
Social studies reveal that it is difficult to manage more than 250 people in a unit/group. The ideal is "self-organiztion and management" which seems to occur naturally in a small group. At this level the unit/group owns the situation and is much more able to resolve any problem that occurs because they are "close to it" and thus able to view the "whole dynamic" of it.
The solution to any problem always lies within the problem.
And again, if one needs more "power" with which to resolve the problem, it is always easy to "network several groups or units together" and unite them in a common purpose -- the *mission* at hand determing how large the networked unit needs to be in order to be effective. However, no group in the unit would exceed 250 in number. But again, there is no hierarchy -- each group appoints a representative and representatives continue the circular formation rather than the hierarchial one. In this manner the strength of each group is reinforced, which, in turn reinforces the strength of the unit as a whole.
I also equate "power" with "presence" and feel that anyone having participated in martial arts will agree that power (of the mind) is much more potent than is "force" as it is achieved through "balance" or "being centered" at all times.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 21, 2006 6:18 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Its small group who is communicating on small is beautiful.
But I see there is serious dialogue and acknowldgment also going on.
Why dont we become a small group within the small is beautiful and exchange views on a continuim, that is:
I like to share with you what I am going through,
Frankly I am going through a real rough patch.
But whenever I like to share I see whether I am deviating from the purpose.
Unfortunately after some age your proffession and personal life becomes one unit.
I see always sharing with you relaxes me.
Though I am trying to withold I will share- in january I lost my brother who was forty six and on May 15th my father who was 73 years passed away.
As I am medical person it happened when Iam around, virtually both collapsed in my hands.
My brother had long term illness and my father was very close to my brother as they were in same profession.
It's quite heavy.
Bye,
prakash.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 21, 2006 4:38 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hello again, Suriya P{rakash:
I am sorry to hear the news of your father and brother, and send my respectful condolences.
If I'm not mistaken (and please forgive me if I get this wrong), suriya is the sun, and prakash the eternal light, unborn and undying. May you and all beings be bathed in its radiance.
Marguerite - May 21, 2006 6:50 pm (# Total: 132) Dear Prakash,
It's OK to share concerns -- with me there are no beginnings or endings -- it is just all part of the same continiuum of life.
I am sorry to hear of the loss of your father and brother from this earthly plane.
Have you had any contact with them since their departure?
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 21, 2006 8:29 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Marguerite:
A pleasure as always to read you.
Here's a contribution from someone who practices the very small with a large heart. My friend (and Friend) Marshall Massey is walking across the US from Omaha to Virginia on his way to a speaking engagement, and blogging as he goes:
- Such beautiful country! And such kindly people in it. The sun shone, the hills rolled, the leaves of the trees sang in the wind. When the land thrives as it did that spring day, one can easily fail to think of the missing species (bison, beaver, waterfowl, etc.) that would have been there had it been wild, and believe that one is looking at Creation in its full glory. Certainly God’s glory shone through it. Cattle grazing at the fences next to the highway traded looks with one another as I appeared, and then retreated to the far corners of their pastures. I think I was offered a lift, unsolicited, from passing drivers seven times that day. I declined, thanking each driver for her or his good will and thoughtfulness.
- I thought of how wonderfully knit the people of this region are, that they are so ready to give care even to passing strangers. And how connected might this knitting be to the hope of preserving the land and restoring the biotic community? I’d guess there’s some sort of connection. What would it take to nurture this sort of knitting elsewhere? Does anyone reading this have any thoughts?
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 22, 2006 12:25 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I went to http://journal.earthwitness.org/, I saw his journey and interpretations.
I saw how beautiful the journey he has undertaken.
Each journey scheduled or unscheduled has a meaning and meaning gets enhanced if you communicate, Marshall Massey is fortunate that he is able to communicate.
I see there is need to observe & learn from the people who dont have this ability.
The one who draws milk
The cup which carries coffee
The paper we read
The pen which we use
The dress we wear
The house we stay
The vehicle we drive
We move
Without knowing or say
Without Acknowledging
That there are people
With heart, mind & energy
Who gave us luxury to move.
I see we need to create more space for such expressions and I think Marshall journey is towards adding meaning to these.
With best wishes for his journey and waiting to learn more from his intepretations.
-Surya Prakash.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 23, 2006 6:30 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I was reflecting on these days of mourning, the suffering one has to go through while death is on its way to take over life.
I saw both in the eyes of my father & my brother.
My brother looked towards me and the eyes said do something.
My father eyes & moves reflected that it's over.
No doubt I was a standing spectator, with no answer.
While my family is mourning, I am placed in a situiation where in I keep getting questions, one in frequent is the Knowledge around is it insuffecient or is it that if it has to happen it will happen.
Are the people who are surviving or without disease, can avoid to go through process of death taking over life.
Then why we are not able to work towards developing or contributing for common good.
Why we became so complicated to understand the fact of Life.
Friends these days are haunting with thoughts.
A thought which is coming loud and clear for me is that - time has come to extend or expand family beyond fourwalls and see it merges with thecommunity so that any loss is societies loss.
-Surya Prakash.
Marguerite - May 24, 2006 12:03 pm (# Total: 132)
For quite a few months now, I have been studying deeper than before into human consciousness and its evolution so as to attempt to answer some of the many questions about life and meaning for a book entitled The Sacred Quest.
One of the things of discovery is that the human energy system, as with all life systems, is always moving toward well-being. So, now I have come to the place of understanding that even in suffering one is moving toward well-being, And as it is with individuals so is it with social systems and the world.
For me anyway, life is about learning and while I am always learning, the lessons which arrive for me are always more profound and lasting if they are accompanied by pain. So, now knowing it intimately, I no longer try to escape the pain but bear with it and ask what the message is for me. In confronting the pain in this manner, it lessens over time and I have grown and become more balanced, so the suffering lessens. In knowing this, assume it is true for others. So, while I can offer compassion and understanding, feel that each of us must travel our own personal journey through this space of our own making. So, while one can "walk into consciousness" with others and hold their hand in comfort, we cannot take the walk for them.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 25, 2006 12:44 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
In my trainings I keep one excercise common : i.e pinch yourself and by it one realises that pain is deffinetly personal.
Intensity varies with pressure and area.
Similarily, pain I see one can understand, one didn't go through, in fact I keep praying that none should go through.
Life & Death is what I have seen and gone through.
I see we are hesitant to fully deliver.
We always have reasons for not able to give full.
Withholding resources is one of the reason for development inetrventions not able to happen with pace which they are supposed to move.
I see lot's of hesitation to express.
I see we are developing and spreading lot's of insecurity among our present generation.
I see small acts of expressions and acts only have lead to big effects.
This can happen only if reaction time reduces to bare minimum.
Thus confidence is built and we can have better tomorrow.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 28, 2006 7:17 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
McLean,Marguerite,Segun,Charles,Dan.................
Where are you all.
I think this dialogue is happeneing.
Hope to see you sharing, in this forum.
-Surya Prakash
Pamela McLean - May 29, 2006 2:22 am (# Total: 132) Where are we? - Pamela McLean is still around for one - still reading with interest when I have time - absorbing what is being said and adding it to my thinking - but not able to contribute at present. I hope the thread will still be open when I have time to come back...
Pam
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - May 29, 2006 12:48 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
I'm here too, Pam and Surya.
Victor was saying the other day that this item has a life of its own -- we may all be a little out of breath right now, but I'm certainly happy to see the conversatiuon continuing, and will say more when I've something to say...
Warm regards to all!
Pamela McLean - May 29, 2006 1:37 pm (# Total: 132) Was it here or somewhere else that I saw a discussion about organic growth and organisational growth - and the way that way that living systems can be thought of as complete at the level of single cells, or organs (heart, liver kidney etc) or individuals (a person, an animal etc) or groups (families, teams, flocks, swarms etc)?
I think in this model we (the various individuals and groups here) are all a bit like separate cells or organs -- and we don't need any one cell or organ to grow huge, or to replicate itself - we just need the appropriate cells and organs to cluster together and collaborate to create appropriate "bodies".
How do we know which organs will fit together? I think that is to do with being a "body of thought" first... then the different "organs" will come closer to start functioning together instead of separately. (I could explain this better, and take the analogy further - as I do in my mind - but time - and my typing speed is against that) I wonder what others think.
Pam
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 29, 2006 10:34 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
One of the key things I see Pam that if we can share memories, we will be able to thread better.
I see the time we are given and the activities we are involved in and the responsibilities we hold, not allowing us to be available to share and hear.
I see the game plan of multipliers is also that, that we who want to be natural are made into products, who are lost in doing the same thing for lifetime as the demand is such.
I see we have to move from the doing the samethings, see that they are takenover by next generation and thus we will be available to share our memories and hear beautiful experiences thus to grow, contribute & merge.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 30, 2006 4:06 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Friends,
This thought I like to share -
As I saw death taking over life, I felt is it so simple.
When I see life moving I see it is so tough.
So, is it that Iam advocating death.
No, I am glorifying the process of death overtaking life.
This lesson of being witness to death and its strength of putting an end to Life.
I always thought Life and glorified Life and now I see reality is death.
It's time to celebrate when we are alive and accept death.
So much into it, I see I have lots to say and I see it's this reason I keep posting.
Hope this small world has space for these expressions.
-Surya Prakash.
Marguerite - May 30, 2006 10:18 am (# Total: 132)
Hi Everyone -
I'm still around, but have just kicked off a new Co-learner's list with former astronaut Brian O'Leary among others. This is an international list to discuss NewEnergy in the form of Zero Point Energy and other alternatives and the role they will play in creating sustainable living communities. We are also discussing the great need for a quantum leap in consciousness to allow us to think in this manner and cut new neural networks that are the pathways to a peaceful future. Most people at this point cannot conceptualize Zero Point Energy, but then there was a time when almost no one could conceptualize a round earth, Jesus or God. Neither did anyone know what a Nation-State was. I think now we are having to stop and consider what are "natural" boundaries and what are "artificial" boundaries and consider what artificial boundaries and/or mythology has done and continues to do to create an unreal and many times aberrent world due to the hatred engendered by mind-screwing about things that have no basis in reality -- racial prejudice for example, religious differences, and borders.
Think about it. How much less deaths and suffering would we have if we all lived in the real world with only natural boundaries.
Anyway just not enough hours in the day -- but please, don't go away.
.
isbume - May 31, 2006 8:53 am (# Total: 132) Hi, everyone, I am still around. I keep looking for interesting ideas to stimulate me. I am very practical on the side of poverty alleviation through small business development. I want something sustaining. That is the reason why I am glad to read Pamela McLean's post.
Pam, glad to have you back into this discussion. Can you please post me a comment on my paper which was sent to you. I will like to know what we can do together to move the people in Ogun State, Nigeria, out of poverty sustainably. I really love this kind of thought to flow in this discussion.
I look forward to hear from you soon.
Remain blessed.
Segun
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - May 31, 2006 7:56 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Yesterday while I was thinking, I came across these words - "no matter how well you organize yourself to know, you always fall short of something"
Age,education,exposure do not assure, its but for this fact one has to make efforts to have dialogue to enhance, clarify & move forward.
Second major observation is that unless family becomes part of the community, issues & pain remain personal.
Friends, our efforts should be to unite the world and make the world as one unit( it is one unit), as said by Marguerite -
Think about it. How much less deaths and suffering would we have if we all lived in the real world with only natural boundaries.
we have lesser chance of facing or we have more energy to face situations which hurt us.
Share, keep sharing, please dont withhold -liberate yourself.
- surya prakash.
isbume - Jun 1, 2006 9:38 am (# Total: 132) Dear Prakash,
Thank you for charging us on. We all need one another and as such we need to share and not withold. Life is about sharing and prospering. I wish we can plug ourselves into this philosophical thought.
Remain blessed.
Segun
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 2, 2006 3:51 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Good Segun, good to read your words.
Your consistent note in your posts - remain blessed prompted me to send this site address -http://www.mayyoubeblessedmovie.com/onemillionblessings.html.Please visit if possible.
This was sent by my canadian friend.
I am happy the dialogue is on - I only wish this to be made known on the home page of SE, so that busy schedulers could visit or re visit the workshop and share their beautiful thoughts.
Hope Victor and his team reads this above sentence and takes a decision.
GOD BLESS SE.
-surya prakash.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 2, 2006 10:32 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hello again to Pam, Marguerite, Surya Prakash and Segun:
It's just wonderful to see how this event has turned into such a magnetic ongoing conversation.
Marguerite:
- This is an international list to discuss NewEnergy in the form of Zero Point Energy and other alternatives and the role they will play in creating sustainable living communities. We are also discussing the great need for a quantum leap in consciousness to allow us to think in this manner and cut new neural networks that are the pathways to a peaceful future. Most people at this point cannot conceptualize Zero Point Energy, but then there was a time when almost no one could conceptualize a round earth, Jesus or God. Neither did anyone know what a Nation-State was.
Pam:
- I think in this model we (the various individuals and groups here) are all a bit like separate cells or organs -- and we don't need any one cell or organ to grow huge, or to replicate itself - we just need the appropriate cells and organs to cluster together and collaborate to create appropriate "bodies".
- How do we know which organs will fit together? I think that is to do with being a "body of thought" first... then the different "organs" will come closer to start functioning together instead of separately
Regards to all…
Charles
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 2, 2006 10:38 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hello again!
You write:
- I only wish this to be made known on the home page of SE, so that busy schedulers could visit or re visit the workshop and share their beautiful thoughts.
Best wishes as ever,
Charles
Marguerite - Jun 2, 2006 6:25 pm (# Total: 132) Hi everyone,
Charles thanks for bringing out the points in Pam's message because I've been flying through here at breakneck speed lately and really missed the essence of it. The way she expresses it reminds me of the Dalai Lama's book: The Universe in an Atom in which he mainly compares quantum physics and Buddhism finding there is little if any difference. It appears to be true that the Universe is just a replication of an atom but at with much greater depth and breadth of complexity.
Anyway, as to 'the question" -- Our group, which is headed up by former astronaut Brian O'Leary, as he considers it critical that we get to Zero Point Energy if we are to have a chance at mitigating global climate change, needs to have a forum structured like this one at Social Edge because we need to address several other different topics at one time related to ZPE or other forms of energy we are referring to as "new energy".
Is it possible to obtain the name of the software being used here?
Or, another alternative -- would Victor consider putting this forum on the Social Edge with Bryan and myself as facilitators. He travels a lot which is why I am including myself as a facilitator. Or, you Charles as I could use some extra time to work on the book I'm writing and the accompanying website.
This is a subject on which we need "enlightenment" ASAP as much new research is available on it which needs to be made available to the public at large so we don't get hung up in the nuclear thing. We have some very in-formed people on this list along with some who aren't and are committed to renewable energy -- so the dialogue gets very interesting and we cover a lot of territory each day. So a very lively happening as we get over into the area of human consciousness and realize that it will take a "quantum leap" for most to be able to deal with the future. This would attract another sector of people, including some research scientists, to The Social Edge.
You know, with the end of cheap oil in sight, we currently have no energy source that can power an airplane. And ethanol, which will compete for land with our food supply, is now considered the top energy supply to power our automobiles. This is very, very serious stuff.
with warm regards,
marguerite
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 3, 2006 6:54 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
With Marguerite recent posts I see seriousness of science and scientific knowledge and need for convergence for sharing on - ZPE.
I keep getting stuck at this, I was a medical student when I lost my sister in 1983, I saw paucity of knowledge and technologythen, if she would have been alive now she would have had treatment for her problem - Tricuspid Atresia.
After 17 years my brother was diagnosed in the year 2000 june 7th that he is suffering from Primary Pulmonary Hypertension (PPH). The doctors world over declared that we can prolong his life but we cannot assure and he was on some experimental drugs and he survived for 6 years from the day of diagnosis and he died, in 2006 Jan 20th.
Unfortunate that I am writing about deaths and experiences after death in this floor, but I cannot quote from any other or others experiences - please excuse me for that.
I see that 20years fom now had my brother survived he would have treatment - Science always growing but at it's own pace - unlucky me.
Moving from this just let me share what is coming to my thought now:
I see that we have two worlds:
1) A world of plenty of resources of all kinds and opportunity to think, act and justify.
2) Another world lack of the above or inadequate access or selective access to resources and here in this world too justification exists and when questioned no answers would satisfy the reasons for justification.
Queit painful Charles,Pam,Marguerite,Segun, Dan and others who are reading these lines.
Still we have to move on.
I like to strip myself and shout at these shameless and ruthless individuals that - is this what we expected out of so much knowledge accumulated to be available for few and they have guts to justify.
With all respects to all the individuals who have spent their life time to help us relate like this with one touch of a button - I like to submit YES we have to move on, but with caution.
We are always, at the end of the day being dictated by the powerful and weak individuals who decide about our life - a life our parents who with utmost care and affection brought us up to survive and serve.
Friends this is deffinetly not an emotional post, but a post with heavy heart, to say I love you so much that I want you to spread the word that, let no being die to meet selfish needs of few.
Your,
Surya Prakash.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 3, 2006 10:23 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi, Marguerite:
I've spent quite a bit of time on a variety of boards over the years -- here on Social Edge, in Howard Rheingold's private community Brainstorms, on the Financial Times boards, etc, and I'm happy to say that the software I like best, Caucus, has recently been made available at no cost in open source form. It used to require a fairly costly license, so this is a real blessing. Your best option, from my POV, would therefore be to set up your own server and run Caucus on it.
Caucus.com
Marguerite - Jun 3, 2006 11:16 am (# Total: 132)
Hi Charles
Thanks for your quick response --
and quick message to Surya Prakash -- You have some great thoughts and I
will respond ASAP.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 7, 2006 2:52 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
We should really break out a birthday cake and some candles! Let's keep talking...
Marguerite - Jun 7, 2006 10:49 pm (# Total: 132)
Hi Charles, OK let's keep talking. Do you know that I still marvel every time I pick up the phone and talk with someone on the other side of the world. And now with the Internet and the marvels of it. Just a couple days ago I asked re: software and you came back with CAUCUS.com. So, just today I got a msg from my friend in London who has a server and it looks like we are going to be able to install it along with ImageMagick so as to continue the forum on New Energy which we have started as PTP, in a very professional format. Not only that, but I love it that CAUCUS is really designed to do online ed courses -- The Turtle Island Institute needs this kind of program as we are a virtual univeristy -- just getting off the ground -- and not knowing really how to go about things, but now with this program coupled with a website we can go, go, go.
The idea also is for us to learn how to do things without money so that we are not indebted to anyone who can then pull our strings, if you know what I mean. Originally, we had a 501(c)3, but then decided we did not want to go this route, but want to try and create a "self-organizing movement" of people who will create sustainable living communities internationally and weave this tapestry that is life-sustaining in a very organic way -- not something that is tied to the bottom line. So, far it seems to be working. It has been amazing how many things have happened along the way where out of the blue, a big chunk of information such as this software program seems to almost "fall out of the sky" just at the right time. So, I do thank you again, Charles for your assistance with this "small piece" of a very large tapestry we are weaving here. And I'm so thankful for the miracle of communication we have. I send a message from So. Cal. to you wherever you are and then one to London, England that will enable us to engage millions of people from all parts of the world in learning how to make this a better place. We are truly blessed.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 8, 2006 6:40 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
We have lot's of pigeons around.
For my work & life they are the motivation.
Whenever I am down I come out of my house, to see pigeons.
I usually see them in pairs and common site I see them is pecking each other.
Then suddenly they move and will hop back.
I see them pushing if any new commer comes & hops in their area.
Still they cometogether when grains are served, they neatly finish everything.
At night across the window I see they hanging on quietly, only move if they are disturbed by sound.
Small world no doubt but free of institutions & occupiers.
If you live them alone they live & survive.
All my work is about this - doing away with institutions & making food available for our fellow human beings, no doubt we are small but we have will to do & survive.
your,
surya prakash.
Marguerite - Jun 9, 2006 9:14 am (# Total: 132) Sitting here at my computer, I just looked out the window and my very small hummingbird friend flew up to say "hi". To keep myself sane in this chaotic world I garden and this year for the first time in almost eight years we had a good amount of rain -- so the blossoms are spectacular this year. Several years ago I decided that I wanted to live surrounded by beauty and moved to this wilderness area away from the traffic and the craziness of the city.
My last home, before losing it all, was a six-bedroom, four-bath edifice complete with swimming pool. Now I live in a 24' RV in among pine trees, black locust, oaks and manzanita in the high desert and foothills. I find I much prefer the latter -- the smallness of the RV with windows on all sides gives me the feeling that I am out-of-doors all the time and am a part of nature. Working on this book, The Sacred Quest, which is about the evolution of human consciousness -- the biology of it and how it works in conjunction with cosmic consciousness is the most rewarding and exciting thing I have ever done. The environment combined with this rewarding work has allowed me to take down the last vestiges of artificial boundaries conferred by our present social structure and become part of the oneness of it all. As my mind heals, I also pray that my body, which is beginning to feel the ravages of time lived in a hostile and stressful world, will heal as well and give me many more years in this paradise. Given that I could do it all over again, I would never have left the peaceful beauty of the Ohio countryside that I grew up in for the artificial world of the city.
Not too long ago, author Jared Diamond wrote that quite probably the biggest mistake that the human family made was giving up the "hunter-gather" way of life and becoming agriculturalists. Civilization as we know it has been built on topsoil but at the cost of it -- today topsoil is disappearing 17% faster than it can be replaced. Dependent upon location it may take from 500 to 1000 years to replace one square inch of topsoil. While our focus has now been drawn to global climate change and the end of cheap oil as the crisis, the end of topsoil and with it our water supply may be the "gotcha" of all times.
The great question to ponder is: Why is humanity, wth all of our supposed intelligence such a destructive force against the very system that suckles us? our life support system?
I hope to find answers as I search the secrets of human consciousness for "The Sacred Quest"
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 9, 2006 8:48 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Charles, Pam & Marguerite,
Whenever I read your posts - I see wealth of knowledge.
So much of reading being done and I see your ability to quote appropriately says how well you read.
I see I am midst of such great resource and your quest to do something more meaningful and ability to acknowledge, says how well you respect others view points.
Marguerite says - the most rewarding and exciting thing I have ever done - Writing the book -The Sacred Quest, which is about the evolution of human consciousness -- the biology of it and how it works in conjunction with cosmic consciousness.
Energy & motivation I see in the posts is so inspiring.
As I said before I wish more join this journey - small is beautiful.
Towards bringing new energy I am sharing content with some of my friends and inviting them to write ( if they are convinced only).
I wish, just a suggestion - is it posibble others who are reading do invite your friends.
This workshop is turning out to be holy.
You can say visit the site for small is beautiful and get blessed.
Your,
surya prakash
Marguerite - Jun 10, 2006 11:41 am (# Total: 132) surya prakash, you are a jewel among jewels. I feel so fortunate that we have met here like this. And, "yes" -- I will prepare a message and invite some of my friends to meet us here and join in "weaving the tapestry". Let us see what we can accomplish together -- those of us who are here now -- if each of us can bring only one other and we keep duplicating in this manner we could grow quickly.
marguerite
Marguerite - Jun 12, 2006 3:10 pm (# Total: 132) I have sent out invitations to almost 300 people to join with us here, but so far no takers. This is extremely disappointing to me as I have just recently viewed a video containing the information upon which "An Inconvenient Truth" is based. For those not familiar with this new movie release, it is about the challenges the world faces with Global Warming and is presented by Al Gore.
There seems to be a great deal of denial going on with regard to this subject; however, Jim Hansen, G.W. Bush's advisor from NASA on global warming recently said that the administration had been censoring his reports so as to play down the affects of this occurrence to the public. How this jeopardizes our personal security is demonstated in the video I viewed by a glacier dissolving into the ocean just 35 days after scientists had viewed it and said it would be there another 100 years.
The pictures shown as supporting data for global warming and as being "man made" are both dramatic and frightening. There is evidence that the Gulf Stream has now slowed by 30 percent over the past decade. And there is nothing to stop it from continuing. The last time this happened, a Little Ice Age occurred making much of Europe an extremely hostile environment. I also just read an article by well known biologist, Elisabet Sathouris, in which she writes that we will see a forced migration of unimaginable proportions due to global climate change. And, Al Gore is telling us that there is little doubt now that we will see this in his lifetime.
I urge everyone who has the ability to see "An Inconvenient Truth" and wake up to the reality of what is occurring on our small planet. Without cooperation and a williness to share information and resources, there is grave doubt as to how the human family will manage this worldwide crises unprecedented in human recorded history.
It is obvious that government does not know how to address this crisis -- it appears that we the people are on our own. This demands that we hold our hands to one an other and form international "networks of purpose" for mutual universal aid and support. This is not a time for war and more destructive behavior.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 12, 2006 9:45 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Dear Marguerite,
Right now I am holding your hand.......................................................did you feel it.
That's the power of human being.
We can place ourselves anywhere, only thing is that we have to feel for it.
I keep getting amazed power we human beings blessed with.
Unfortunately, when you say Life does matter there are 'N' who add 'n' to the word - Life does'n't matter.
I always lived and going to live till I last and I die everyday because of these 'n'.
But it doesn't matter.
But I live because when I know I am not alone.
In socialedge I see people like me who are serious about what they say.
That's beautiful isn't it.
So, we are limited only to the extent of being truthful to ourselves, we have to be cautious there are constant forces who tempt us to deviate, we are strong no doubt but they are weak, so we have to eat well, think well and execute.
I wish you great health and happy times.
Let insecure people fool themselves in closed environment.
We are birds, lets fly and spread the word.
Your,
prakash.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 13, 2006 11:35 am (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
- Paramount Classics has committed 5% of the domestic theatrical gross for An Inconvenient Truth to be donated to a new bipartisan climate effort, Alliance for Climate Protection.
This is really a pretty spectacular arrangement -- Participant Productions produces movies with socially significant themes, Participate encourages viewers to collaborate on activities which address those themes, using the movies themselves as launching points.
I urge you and all who read this post to keep tabs on these two important sites, and join in the action as appropriate.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 15, 2006 9:36 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I see that we are pausing in between.
I feel or wonder whether we can afford to?
I see the so called "Development" (Market expansion) is happening, crossing all boundaries lets reflect right now the speed, absolutely no pause at all.
We are just pawns in there hands.
When food is what we need to survive, grow & sustain, see how it is traded - brutelessly.
Actually like air,sun, ideally food should have been available without conditions, is it happening.
Reality is we paused and now we PURCHASE.
So, appeal my friends - dont pause just communicate and share your experiences, your expressions might help us not to pause.
your,
surya prakash.
Marguerite - Jun 15, 2006 1:51 pm (# Total: 132) Prakash - I feel you holding out your hand and am clasping it in mine. Yesterday wrote two messages here and before I could send them, for different reasons, they got deleted -- so I got the message that what I wrote was not as valid as it could be and I needed to "phase space" or step back and look at things more closely -- ensuring I am acting with regard to the situation -- not being a "reaction" to it.
Went to the participate.net website which Charles referred us to -- it was interesting, and, also found a link to a new organization that is setting up a means for individuals like you and I to "pod-cast" -- it's like being a mini radio station. Have you checked these things out yet?
Am also trying to set up the Caucus program on the website where the Turtle Island Institute is hosted so we can do both forums and online educational courses re: evolving human consciousness to the next level, and achieving sustainable living communities, from that site.
My plate is overloaded at present and am trying to give consideration as to how to rearrange things so as to focus my energy and make the greatest impact with the largest number of people possible at this time.
I believe this is through formin "Co-learn'er's Lists" and engaging the largest number of people possible in forming "Networks of Purpose" -- Purpose being to evolve human consciousness to the level necessary to deal with the complexity of the challenges with which the human family is faced today. We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto -- this is a whole new world that the human mind is not currently prepared to manage effectively. We have to develop this talent at the same time we are coping with the problems -- but, this is OK as the solution to the problem always lays within the problem itself.
So, grant me the time to ponder this -- any suggestions are most welcome.
Brisbane Institute for Strengths Based Practice (Inc)
Hello: I am impressed by the level of discourse that you Guys Prakash hip bone marg and others take this forum to.
I am a new entrant to this new world of connecting. I liked the concept of spiritualizing wok, life and lives and if this forum does provide just a few people that opportunity to re-live their passions and practice compassion- that is great. That is actually recognizing there is divinity present in every one and that is the first step to take. Practice compassion while building courage to accept reality and assist each other to build hope and resilience. I am a resilient worker. I teach practice and build hope.
Surya Prakash- Marg described him as a jewel amongst this group of thinkers. I am sure she really recognized a think tank. A tank of ever floating wisdom. For his age that I can gauge by his jpg image this man would be under 40s. But he has seen a lot of suffering. Others- suffering and his own. Built around this reality is his struggle with attachment. He is attempting to come out slowly but steadily.
I have gone back into the posts to read some of his views on greed as opposed to need. How so few accumulate all knowledge and let several others walk in ignorance- yet while that walk could have been together, sharing, rearing and nurturing.
Dear Fellow thinkers and most beautiful people in the world. I have met this Dr Surya Prakash. We met when I was last in the city of Hyderabad to talk about strength based strategies to build individuals, groups, communities, organizations and the whole of society. You can find more on this at
http://strengthbasedstrategies2006.cfsites.org/
From then on a sort of mutual respect was built around the work we do in different parts of the world. - I admire what Dr Prakash does.
It is nice to ponder over the Indian names -at least the ones which have some great meaning. The word 'Surya' or 'Soorya' means the Sun and 'Prakash' means the light.
Surya Prakash is sunlight.
Sunlight is always there. Some clouds travel closer to sun and like all planets earth moves too. This is what science taught us. I suppose that is why sun rise is warm, glowing, invigorating, graceful, life giving and assisting in our growth. Seeds sprout. Buds blossom. Leaves start their starch preparation. Ants move in a single file. Birds chirp and cuckoos and crows fly away. The day begins and Life begins.
But as the clock ticks hour after hour in another part of this very planet sunlight reveals itself as scorching heat of the desert sun. Businesses come to halt. People hide their skin. Life looks as if it has come to a halt. Sunlight reflects well on the gold bars sold in the markets of Dubai at that point of time. All on the road. No one to steal. I suppose there is a metaphorical competition between the rays and light reflected by gold bars by the kilos and straight on them the sun light. This wasn’t healthy sunlight for the human hides. But life continues on.
The clock ticks away and when dusk settles down, birds, ants and all life reutrns home. Life appears as if sun light is not there. A certain amount of calmness engulfs.
Sunlight was always there. Some clouds traveled much closer to sun. The sun set looks kinder than warm, , calmer and slowly disappearing than glowing, settling us all down after a days invigorating work; gracefully letting us rest along with the birds, ants and all other life forms Those sprouts that have grown an inch further- Amazing- though you don’t really venture into gardens in the night. But if you did, you will see that a small leaf has appeared only to become placid and pick up some rest before commencing its own starch preparation tomorrow.
As it is dusk, even blossomed buds turn inwards. Leaves too become docile. Ants rest too I am unsure if they rest in a single file in the opposite direction ready for tomorrow.
Birds including cuckoos and crows chirping loudly before they return home. The dusk has settled in. The day has ended a night has begun. But the sunlight was always there. We humans, plants and bird and all life only saw darkness.
The clock ticks hour after hour unmindful of sunlight. And fair enough we comfort and cajole nurse and look after ourselves. So does the rest of life. But sunlight is always there.
Dawns and dusks are both life. Both healthy. They are created here and they do end here only to start yet another cycle. We remorse due to attachment.
Put things in Helder Camara’s words:
‘Join together all
Stone brick and the tile
Compose the house.
Unbuilt the pile
of single elements
are the hope of a house.
But more important is to plan and put it up.
The building done
Is greater than
The unassembled material’
What is sunlight teaching us overtime?
To recognize change- as each day begins and ends. Each day, day after day enveloping 24 hours we see change- 24-7 and 365 days we see change- what wisdom do we get through this? That there is no once for all transformation?
There is not a pill here to stop ageing or a process to vanish decay. They cloned a sheep which was aged be fore it was born. And they wall clone or mummy us and have us in the drawing room for ever so that our children don’t miss us?
Sunlight brings the freshness of the beginning. Imagine the most beautiful aroma of the first rain touching a piece of parched earth.
You couldn’t contain that in a bottle if you wished to. It is there for a fleeting moment. The earth gets soaked and that lovely smell that your nostrils consumed remains only a thought transformed and enters your brain. You can now visualize the smell but you could not return to the smell as the earth starts soaking and if the forecast is great and you have incessant rain for some period even foul smell comes from the same parched earth? Has life stopped? No. Life is there even in evaporation. The freshness of sunlight brings fundamental structural changes. These can go sour or crook for a number of reasons. But we must accept that we do not live in a world of absolutes. We do not have total sickness nor a perfect prescription. Every beautiful blonde ages. Earthworms decay and decompose. Nevertheless we should not give up. We should never give up because some people are too greedy if we do we are then not recognizing our power to interact with light. If we give up we only take the darkness.
This Very dawn to some, brings suffering. Is there a facilitator somewhere to make these people see an opportunity to work in that suffering and work through that suffering? Every dawn brings desperate problems. Why do we fail to see that it also brings along a learning based on how we attempted at previous problems?
If there are people who always want to take there are also people who have nothing really much but are always giving? Which side of the light we want to stand to end the darkness?
Things are not just the way they are. Never will be. It is possible to change. It is possible to do things better and differently and that’s what we all need to re-learn and en-courage each other. That is the beginning of surya prakash- the sunlight.
Why worry about next birth? Why waste time? Let us give our best here. Now.
Was it Paulo Coelho who said?
‘We will only understand the miracle of life when we allow the unexpected to happen”
I have a full quote of his.
But for the present I want to say this much I have enjoyed reading the wisdom, genuine feeling, empathy and camaraderie of this group and if you think I have said some insane things. I beg your indulgence. I will return again.
Thank you. It was beautiful to read every one’s posting
Dr Venkat Pulla
5 Mandell Close Coopers Plains, Qld 4108
Australia
Dr.venkat.pulla@gmail.com
|
Attachments: |
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 17, 2006 11:16 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
At the outset I like to say thank you all for the kind words bestowed on me.
I also have to say this - I felt uneasy to have so much of extensive expressions.
I said in open what I went through only to have few friends who would understand the tough phase I was in.
When compared to unexpected earthquakes in indonesia where more than 6000 died or when war planes cloud around unprepared citizens or BT Cotton pushed in the fields by the dealers for want of profit or young girls to the tune of 1.5 lakhs are trafficked .................................................... in front of these some situations my pain is nothing.
Unfortunately I had to express somewhere what I was going through and fortunately - Charles workshops in social edge - 1) How to prepare for unexpected & 2) Small is beautiful were in the run during difficult periods of mine.
So, I expressed -
This I see a limitation of me -I share what I am going through, I am not a well read person, 'Yes' I saw life and I see life and I am learning from wealth of knowledge shared in social edge.
Friends - I see any floor created for promotion of common good sustains.
I see any expressions of promotion of individual thought might hamper the process.
No individual is individual he carries so much - his life, others, by way of reading, situations and imaginations.
It's difficult to judge whether it is indeginous or borrowed as even indegenous do have genetic predisposition.
So, we are carriers of good word just like Typhoid carriers, we might have the bacteria but we may not be effected, so so we might be saying and we may not be following.
So, let this holy execrcise on social edge remain holy.
With love,
your,
surya prakash.
Charles Cameron aka hipbone - Jun 20, 2006 5:40 pm (# Total: 132) HipBone Games / Rheingold Associates
Hi, Surya Prakash:
You write:
- When compared to unexpected earthquakes in indonesia where more than 6000 died or when war planes cloud around unprepared citizens or BT Cotton pushed in the fields by the dealers for want of profit or young girls to the tune of 1.5 lakhs are trafficked ....... in front of these some situations my pain is nothing.
Even in your generous willingness to point us to the pains of others, your pain, too, is heard and felt.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 20, 2006 9:09 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I just enjoy dew.
The same way I enjoy your response, your moderation is beautiful.
I see one has to work to survive & serve.
We should not get lost in serving ourselves.
Thus we can avoid becoming indebted.
Freedom is lost when we accumulate.
To free ourselves we have to shed sweat.
Thus all negative energies will get mopped out of our system.
Frankly I saw death and I know it's beautiful.
So lets work towards spending each minute, so that when the sweet moment comes, we will smile.
When we smile at tough situations - we conquer.
With love,
Surya Prakash.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 23, 2006 8:58 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
I was just reflecting one of the ways we could induce discipline is by communicating how insecure environment we are living. As I feel when you are absolutely sure you tend to relax more than what you should and you are opening avenues for few who like to catch up with your peace & destroy.
This era is of communication & with it we are gifted with uncertainities - a very difficult situation,where in to monitor becomes difficult unless & until everybody is alert.
Just a thought.
Is it true we can promote discipline by this.
But need to be disciplined or say self regulator, that is, we should be able to draw a line and say this, this I will & this I will not.
Being strong enough to say no is as important as saying yes.
We are filled with so many sensory stimuli we fail to undersatand purpose of life.
Unless & until we have regular prompters who are responsible we are dragged towards uncertainities.
Firefighting approaches should take back seat.
Thus we could be filled with ideal picture of sorrounded by greenery, noise of only humming birds, running fresh water, smiles everywhere................................
Just waiting for a day where we are freed from this running around in crowded streets, honking horns, live action of street fights, accidents, hanging wires of - eletricity, telephones & cable tv's, hoardings of movies showing mindless voilence, bar & liqour shops right under & infront of schools, open drains ..................
The above situation is what I am living in - I am sure it's the same everywhere, wherever "development" is happening.
Real development is possible only if realize life & be alert & be available.
Your,
Surya Prakash.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jun 25, 2006 8:29 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Did you see the match between Netherlands & Portugal aired on 25th June.
Voilence personified.
Game is so beautiful, but voilence on the field & out the field, demonstrates how much time & money we are wasting.
Referee he did his JOB by throwing record # of Red cards.
If rule permits I would have disqualified both the teams.
They have set a trend for the future matches.
So cross your fingers and wait for more voilence.
How beautiful it would have been if we had only radio, we could have avoided witnessing the live drama.
Keep posting against this wherever possible, so that we protect the game and enjoy its beauty.
-surya prakash.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jul 2, 2006 10:59 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Hello!
Once an young enterprenuer who was good at fixing door bells, was hired by an electrical shop owner.
In response to one such request he was instructed to respond to an complaint, that to fix the problem of non - functional door bell.
He returned to the shop after attending to the problem.
The complaintant came next day in furious mood and blasted the owner " why his problem was not attended to?
The shop owner was shocked and called the enterprenuer and asked why he didnt do his JOB.
Enterprenuer cooly answered he did visit the house but " what to do none attended when he pressed the door bell?
your,
Surya Prakash.
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Jul 11, 2006 11:03 pm (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
How are you?
Paused for a while and eagerly waited to hear a word from you.
Couldn't control but mail again.
To say I am waiting.
Sitting in a corner
I think of you
Never know
When
You would respond
Passed through the phases
of
UP & DOWNS,
Miseries & Celebrations
What matters now
is
the WORK
AND
Your words encourage me
To move forward
-surya prakash vinjamuri
Srijith Sridharan - Sep 6, 2006 1:15 pm (# Total: 132) Social Service Foundation
Hi friends @ social Edge,
I am relatively new to this and have been actively browsing various topics for quite some time. Feels that time has come for me to act.
It is a reality that we are a part of this big universe, but the very fact is that the universe itself is a quantum of enrgy, informed both by modern science and ancients Indian vedas.
So this small quata of energy may be full and huge within itself and it could be this fullness that helps us in maintaing the balance intact. May be this could be the reason of Shanthi Manthra, which says
That is Whole, This is whole
if Whole is taken from whole, the rest too is whole
Ohm santhi santhi santhi
I would also like to quote from Zorba the greek of Kazantzakis, where Zorba the nomadic friend of the author prepares and send a letter from his deathbed.
".......And tell him that whatever I have done, i have no regrets, tell him I hope he is well and that it's time he showed a bit of sense.
"Listen, just another minutr. If some priest or other comes to take my confession and give me a sacrement, tell him to clear out quick, and leave me his curse instead! I've done heaps and heaps of things in my life, but still I did not do enough. Men like me ought to live a thousand years. Good Night!"
So we are like this as we feels that we need to do lots, and let us act as we feel for we really dont have an explanation for that feeling, even then we work for that.
srijith Sridharan
surya prakash.Vinjamuri - Sep 18, 2006 4:49 am (# Total: 132) Life-Health Reinforcement Group
Marguerite ,Pam, & Charles,
It's been real long time that you came to this dialogue, a dialogue which is very close to my heart.
How are you?
When we travel and deviate and come back to tracks, we always wish we meet.
How sweet to be with known people and especially when so much to share.
Two months back I started a new initiative called "Open House".
A place where these things are of primary focus:
- Sharing of Knowledge on food & health.
- Dialogue on Life
- Sharing of food at night between 11 PM - 1 AM.
Of all the three the one which is close to my heart is sharing of food and the idea to intervention is what thrills me.
I believe the saying " Treat every Idea as King".
And I follow it.
Deffinetly conviction is the driving force and I am now working almost 22 hrs.
Deffinetly maddening but I like to comeover the tragedy I faced and I thought best way would be giving my full energy to the society.
Please make efforts to drop few lines,
With warm regards,
your,
Surya Prakash.
ks
Hello! You are all brilliant, I love reading your messages. I am new to this site and fairly new to the field. I am a grad student studying NPO Mgt and have been designing a business to connect entreprenuers in developing nations via text messaging and the internet. It seems like all of the communication tools and marketing materials are to the NGOs and Govt leaders that strengthen these small businesses, not really to the individual entreprenuers themselves and for that reason many businesses, even if successful, are limited in their influence.
What do you think of this idea? THANK YOU!
A conversation between our most intriguing leaders in social invention explores the vital challenge of growth:

jimfruchterman - Apr 18, 2006 7:06 am (# Total: 132)
Cynthia Gair - Apr 19, 2006 1:56 pm (# Total: 132) 
