Document Actions
Government Interference
Hosted by Charles Cameron (May 2008)
Government interference can undoubtedly subvert what we’re doing on occasion, inadvertently or deliberately. It may be that a government simply wants to divert resources to its own ends, as in Myanmar recently. It may view its interests as directly opposed to those the social enterprise is intended to assist – indeed, as in the case of human rights organizations, government may be their target, too. It may wish to isolate and silence those who would like to network and organize – as in the case of the Chinese blogger who was beaten to death not so long ago.
Or it may simply be that bureaucracy lies like an immense wet blanket across any attempt to address problems with the flexibility of response that makes social entrepreneurship entrepreneurial.
My own mentor, Father Trevor Huddleston, was an outspoken white opponent of apartheid and a friend and colleague of Luthuli and Mandela at the time of the “treason trials.” His monastic order withdrew him from South Africa because they were worried that he would be arrested and sentenced to death – that he would literally become a martyr.
So the problems can fall anywhere on the spectrum from taxes to death. Or strangulating indifference.
- How does government make your task more difficult?
- Is it the enemy? Is it an ally?
- Is it the cause of the problems you address?
- Is the problem more one of malice, or indifference?
- Are there governmental means of addressing your problems?
- Is the law itself the issue? And are you working to change the law?
Cutting red tape is like taking a short cut – sometimes it gets you to your destination far faster than would otherwise be the case, sometimes it doesn’t work like that.
- What red tape needs cutting?
- Is bribery a concern?
- Do your people receive death threats?
- Do you live or work in a war zone?
Charles "Hipbone" Cameron invites you to tell us your story. Tell us the problems you face. Tell us the workarounds you’ve devised. What help do you need?


Well there's government and there's government
Hello again Charles. Well you can probably guess that where my colleague works in Eastern Europe, our mission location, there are risks and threats. Graft is something he's confronted and said no to and then gone on to condemn the government on Radio Free Europe for their corruption. A risky step where a journalist has recently been beheaded for researching corruption.
http://eng.maidanua.org/node/331
Yes, we are at risk and as you know from our previous dialogue, there's a very strong possibility that funds as well as information resources have been deployed against us.
Of more concern to me right now is our UK government who recently embraced the concept of business helping meet the MDGs. So now, there's an HIV epidemic at the doorstep of Europe and in 4 years of trying to get support from them for the same concept, $250 million has been deployed unsuccessfully.
I find no other strategy, nobody in government or the cross-party special interest groups will communicate. So it comes to this, petitioning our Prime Minister to support the kind of business for which the MDGs are primary objectives.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/marshall-plan/ e