Should your organization go "hybrid"?
Hosted by Patrick O'Heffernan (October 2006)
See all Hybrid Model discussions and advice on Social Edge HERE. (updated August 2008)
The advantages of hybrids go far beyond additional revenue streams; they can extend your mission, enhance your brand and provide those you serve with additional opportunities for success.
But they can cost time and money. So how do you decide if the work and legal expense (up to $15,000 in the US) are worth it?
John Cesario and Chris Wiltsee of Youth Movement Records (YMR) are now making that decision. (YMR trains at-risk kids to work in the music industry - and keep their integrity). They share their criteria with fundraising expert Patrick O’Heffernan.
1. The for-profit unit should extend the NPO's mission
It must add value to the services offered. In YMR's case, it provides their kids from poor neighborhoods with opportunities for success and the skill and will to go to college.
2. It should reduce the pressure to raise money
3. It shouldn't require an expensive infrastructure
As much as possible, the FP unit should share "backend" resources, space, and equipment with the NPO.
4. Failure shouldn’t undermine the NPO
If the criteria work for you, what are the next steps? Start with due diligence (a US term for careful research).
1. Talk to business executives who understand your social mission and find out if they will become customers or suppliers, or possibly venture partners. You will need to build the same kind of network in the for-profit world that you have built in the NPO world. Bringing them on will help in conversations with skeptical donors and board members.
2. Talk to your donors. Do they understand the benefits for you, do they have reservations, or will they pay the setup costs for you? Do they have expertise that can help start and run the for-profit unit?
3. Work out the operational details. How will the FP transfer resources to the NPO – through licenses, cash payments or fees? How will your staff divide their time, or should you plan to hire separate staffs? Will they be housed together? Will you have overlapping boards?
4. Research your country's laws. Some countries have restrictions on blending for-profit and non-profit organizations. Tax authorities in most countries have precise rules governing resource transfers.
5. Find a lawyer or a barrister who understands both NPO law and the licensing and tax laws of for-profit enterprises. YMR needed both a non-profit tax attorney and an entertainment attorney.
When all that is done, make your decision. As of this writing John and Chris are still doing their “due diligence.” They have built an organization whose kids have a 90% high school graduation rate in the middle of a 48% community and they don't want to jeopardize that success. But their kids are going into a profit-driven world, either before or after college, and they need the connections, internships, part time jobs and experience a for-profit unit will give them...
What's your experience? Jump in the conversation!
It is great to see the focus back on hybrids. We have spent the past three years structuring our organisation. It was a challenging time to say the least.
As the founder my vision was to create a self-supporting structure that would provide the funding required for social and environmental initiatives being generated within the group.
You say that For-profits can fail, it isns't a different situation for NPO's. Any initiative can fail. ... when you are running only an NPO ... our research has indicated that often the NPO compromises its vision because of "hidden or not so hidden" agendas of donors and sponsors.
In the FP case you will face the normal market barriers to entry ... but it is up to you to design strategies to overcome it.
... in our case, our integrated and blended model is working for us ...
The only factor that is critical is that you have to remain focused on your vision, and your goals ... research your external and internal environment ... take cognisense of political and socio factors that may affect your inititiative ... and most important ... remain independent as far as possible ...
When you forge alliances and partnerships be careful of who you are aligning or partnering with ... design exit strategies that you can implement ... if you see that it is moving your organisation away from its goals and vision ...
Look forward to all your comments.
Laurinda
(South Africa)
SIMA Community Based Org
We are willing to join our organization go "Hybrid. Please can you provide us more details and how we can involving or participate.
Please send information via this address Johnstone Sikulu Wanjala, Program Coordinator Sima Community Based Organization PO BOX 1691, Kitale 30200 Kenya or via email sikuluj@yahoo.com
SEKEM Initiative, promoting development
Could not agree more, it is good to think about hybrids, and even better to implement them. CSR goes only so far, but non-hybrid commercial entities have a mission (and share holders) that is essentially "not social" (i.e. it is not the primary focus).
One thing that is proved right in Sekem over and over again, is that the commercial entity has to think and behave in a commercial manner (looking after the bottom line), with social considerations comming (a very close) second, whereas it is the reverse for NGOs. Using this approach, Sekem has now established a number of commercial ventures (organic food, organic textiles, phytopharmaceuticals, IT solutions for farm management, plant breeding, farm supply provision)... and a number of social ventures (kindergarten, school, vocational training centre, handicapped and street children project, literacy, hygiene and adult education, research academy, medical centre)...
Regarding the issue of sharing staff; initially this is probably necessary, but as the business and the NGO grow, one has to ascertain that there is no conflict of interest...
...a strong vision and clearly defined roles of the NGO and the commercial entity are here essential.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 1, 2006 9:27 am (# Total: 28) VEry interesting comment from Laurinda..the impact on NPOs due to hidden agendas of supporters, donors, etc. In my experience, the agendas have not been so hidden, but vry good point. Having a hybrid could complicate the situation because the number of agendas double. Could you give us some more history of the organization and perhaps a url? Thanks
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 1, 2006 9:29 am (# Total: 28) How did you make the separation between the staffs? That is a tricky process in both financial and personal terms. Can you give us some more insight into your experience. And what is your url, so we can learn mor about the organization?
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 1, 2006 9:33 am (# Total: 28) I will pass your email address along to John Cesario who inspired this blog and perhaps he can send you some specific advice. I also read a great book lately, called The Elements of Influence" by Alan Kelly that explains how both NPOs and FPs play similar strategic games and that understanding these games can help NPOs reap someof the advantages of FPs.
Hi Patrick
Regarding agendas not "being so hidden" ... I couldn't agree with you more, although our research has indicated that some are cloated and not always obvious ... and by the time the NGO people becomes aware of them, they are so deep in dependency that they can't break the ties.
You make a very valid point in that hybrids have the potential to create other scenarios regarding above subject ... again it boils down to planning and a comprehensive knowledge of your market environment, including identifying "networks" of influence (both negative and positive).
We classify ourselves as an IVO (Integrated values organisation). We are a consulting group, started by engineers that had enough of "The business as usual crap" ... and wants to see a real change ... narrowing of the gap between the 1st and 2nd economy (read below poverty line) ...
Our URK is www.empowerment-gateway.com (although we have removed most of the on-line content as we are focusing on human capital capacity building phase)
Regards
Laurinda
balar - Nov 1, 2006 6:18 pm (# Total: 28) Tamilnadu Primary School Improvment Campaign, India
The idea of becoming a hybrid organisation is the ideal move for non-profits in the present globalisation, but how to do that. Most of the business ventures started by us become failure, it is not generating any income. The donors are not willing to support Non-profits running for profit business, they ask us to help people start their own business and leave them there. Achieving quality and scale is a big problem, we do not get qualified staffs for profits because our salaries are low, nonprofit work culture is not conducive for business. May be instead of hybrid we have to evolve a new organisation which generates its own income. I am not sure but we would welcome suggestions, please also send details about successful hybrid organisations.
V.Balakrishnan
jimfruchterman - Nov 2, 2006 9:04 am (# Total: 28) Benetech
We created a wholly-owned for-profit subsidiary in 2000. The main goal was to move unrelated business income into the sub (and pay taxes), and protect the nonprofit parent's status. In 2001 we had more than $1 million in consulting revenues, and it might have been a big problem for us if that revenue stayed in our charity.
Mozilla Foundation, the nonprofit developer of the FireFox browser, did the same thing about a year ago: they were bringing in so much advertising revenue that they wanted to protect their status as well.
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 2, 2006 1:15 pm (# Total: 28) I checked out your website. everyone on this blog should take a look
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 2, 2006 1:16 pm (# Total: 28) How did you decide what income to pay taxes on at Benetech?
I am starting a social entreprise (hybrid) as we speak. I have been consulting with accountants, professors of nonprofit management and development, attorneys, and others. Can someone experienced in developing a hybrid tell me how you began the organization/business? Can a for-profit business become a social enterprise (i.e., a corporation using surplus income to fund its social aim instead of going to stakeholders)?
Christi
Christi
You ask can a FP became a social entreprise? Can't see why not ... start by getting your support for the change within yr organisation before you deal with other stakeholders. You can integrate values top down or down up ....
Integrate values into your control systems, policies and procedures ...
You are working with a breed of individuals that are anchored on "facts" ... manipulation of facts et ..al. ... so the first thing you need to do is ensure that they have taken a "heart-set" ownership of yr vision before they let their heads control the processes. Without a "heart-set" change ... you will not succeed.
Regards
Laurinda
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 6, 2006 9:09 am (# Total: 28) A social enterprise has a bottom line that includes positive social impact. Just because there is a second bottom line of profit does not mean that it is not a social enterprise. The micro-enterprises funded by the Grameen Bank, the Nameste-Direct Foundation, the micro loan window of the WB, etc. are FP's. What is important is how the business/organization conducts itself, not whether or not it is organized to make a profit. As Laurinda says, "integrate values into your control systems, polcies, and proceedures.
Can a FP become a hybrid? Sure, and some do, usually by creating a NPO unit or foundation that works on the basis of a soical bottom line. But a more intersting question is how does a NPO become a hybrid? Larinda's point about "heart-set" change is important. Many NPO's dream of developing a revenue stream that frees them from fund raising. They either transform themselvs into a LLC or a C-Corp ( in the US, other forms in other countries), or they create a FP arm. What is important is that they understand that an FP has a different set of obligations, constituents, laws, and expectations than a NPO. Thinking through these beforehand and planning on how to keep the heart-set when the mind-set changes is the most important step.
SandraDickinson - Nov 6, 2006 9:36 am (# Total: 28) Recently launched: http://selearninggames.wikispaces.com
Selearninggames is a wikispace for social entrepreneurs to make a learning game together that will solve the mystery of nonprofit earned income venture profitability.
Venture entity structure may turn out to be one of the clues to the mystery.
What’s the game? It’s making the game!
The meta-patterns that solve the mystery of profitability are hidden in our collective experience. Discovering patterns is what makes learning fun! During the collaborative process of making the game, we will explore our common problems, and common solutions will emerge. Our tacit knowledge (stuff we don’t know that we know) becomes explicit.
As we apply, test and refine together, the most effective set of solutions become the meta-patterns accelerating profitability for our own ventures. These meta-patterns become the design principles of the game we make.
Please join us for fun and profitability! It’s free. You can easily edit pages, upload files, join in our discussion.
Feel free to share this invitation with like-minded folks you know :).
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 8, 2006 4:06 pm (# Total: 28) What a great idea! I notice to that the site itself is a hybrid with Google Ads. I will join and "play around with it"
institute for china africa relations - Nov 9, 2006 2:58 am (# Total: 28) Our Institute for China Africa Relations will soon be online with its own website www.inchinaafrica.org. What are the essential differences between the site of an NGO with that of a hybrid?That is speaking techinically and structurally.
We conceived the idea of a wholly Not for Profit organisation, but the reality on the ground made us think otherwise. Funds are scarce and the needs are numerous.So we opted to intergrate FP and NFP from the word go. We do not intend to create a seperate entity but run both from the same office. Will it work? I agree with Patrick that some FP are impacting positively and do the services of not for profits well.
Eustace Emeka Amuka CEO/ INSTITUTE FOR CHINA AFRICA RELATIONS
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 9, 2006 10:14 am (# Total: 28) First, there will be some website differences. The programming and design elements are the same, although you may use them differently. If you are going to sell items on your site, you will need "shopping cart" technology and a way to receive money, either through credit cards or Pay Pal. I suggest you check with the credit card companies and your bank because there are some steps you will have to take to move credits from a credit card firm to your bank account, especially if there is currency exchange involved. This varies from country to country and bank to bank, so I can't give you details for your situation.
Secondly, you will want to do some marketing and customer contacat and relations on your site. Depending on the beusinesses you go into, think about how your site can be used to generate customers and how you will track customers and potential customers. There should be a way to capture emal addreses of people who visit, perhaps by asking them to register. Once you have email, what kind of messages do you want to send them regarding the goods or services you ofer, and how often do you want to send them. There is Customer Relationship Management software for this, although you may wnat to start with just a spreasheet and see if you will need CRM software. Perhaps someone on the site can suggest free CRM software NPOs can use.
One business dea you might consider is, if you work with local artisans, arrange to sell items on your site and keep a perscentage. If you do this, you will also have to put in place what is called "fullfillment" - that is, a way to "ullfill" orders. This means recording the order, responding to the customer to let him/her know the order has been recieved and providing a way to track the order, maintaining an inventory so you have the items on hand to ship, packing for international shipping (a artform in itself!) , shipping through customs in the countries you will deal with, and paying for shipping.
A hint on charging for shipping - this is actually a profit center for most mail order firms - they charge more for handling and shipping than it costs them so they make a little profit on it also (when you ar a hybrid, you have to think in terms of profit).
Can you share offices? Yes, but local laws vary. If your non-profit status exempts your organizationf rom taxes, make certain that housing a FPO in the same office does not cancel your tax exemption. You may have to confine the NPO to a certain section of the office (at least on pater, if not for real), and charge them for that space. As a non-profit, local laws may prohibit you from giving away resources to a FPO.
Staffing and salaries may also be tricky. Does your country treat FPO workers differently from NPO workers? If so, your staff may have to keep their jobs separate -- one person may not be able to work both FPO and NPO. If the tax laws are the same for both, this will not be a tax question, but it will be an accounting question. You will have to keep separate books for hte FPO and the nNPO and staff will have to charge their time to the two entities.
If the two entities share resources like a fax machine, internet connecton, accosuntant, etc., the NPO will have to bill the FPO for its use (which is an easy way to transfer income from the FPO to the NPO without taxquestions.)
My advice is to draft a plan with as many specifics as possible and then take it to your lawyer or to a business advisor for corrections, changes, suggestions and references. And good luck.
Anyone else on the page have any suggestions for Eustace?
abromber - Nov 10, 2006 5:22 pm (# Total: 28) Warning: this is a long post!
This talk about hybrids is of great interest to me, since I do a fair amount of work in this area. Most of the people who talk about hybrids refer to an enterprise that combines a business purpose and a social purpose within a single entity or a "family" of entities. Usually, these hybrids take a few basic forms:
First, a nonprofit can carry on a business within itself, without a separate entity to carry out the business. The biggest advantage of doing it this way is simplicity. But the nonprofit may be subject to liabilities from the business, and if the business becomes too big, it can jeopardize the charity's tax exempt status. Also, because nonprofits can't issue shares, it can be hard to raise capital.
Secondly, a for-profit corporation can operate in a socially responsible manner and can dedicate profits to charity, without the need for a separate entity. Again, the advantage is simplicity. But the managers of a for-profit business owe a duty to maximize return to shareholders, and so their ability to run the company in a "charitable" manner creates real tensions, and it just isn't feasible beyond a certain point.
More common is a situation like Jim Fructerman describes, where a nonprofit creates a subsidiary to own and operate a business. If the subsidiary is wholly-owned by the charity, this works quite well. However, if the business needs outside investment, you have problems, not only because of the duty to shareholders, but also because IRS rules limit a charity's ability to participate in a business with non-charity shareholders, especially if the charity does not hold a controlling interest in the business. In practical terms, this means that the charity may have to reduce or eliminate its involvement in the business if it wants outside investors or if its need for capital grows because the business grows. These rules also hold true for joint ventures between charities and for-profit entities.
I favor LLC's for these kinds of ventures, because they allow for very flexible management structures and the members of an LLC can agree to almost any distribution of authority and profit they want. As "pass-through" entities for tax purposes, LLC's allow each investor to pay tax (or not) based on its own tax status. A charity can use its tax-deductible contributions to buy a share in such an enterprise. Social values can be built into the "DNA" of the company, profits can be allocated in proportions different from capital contributions, a charity can be given control over certain aspects of the business that are related to its exempt purpose, while investors can be given authority over pure business decision, outside entities can be issued special classes of shares that give them veto power over certain types of decisions,like mergers or changes in structure, etc. LLC's can also issue a full range of debt and equity instruments, which gives them flexibility to develop creative capital structures. And, if they are structured correctly, LLC's can be perfect vehicles for PRI investment. The big downside is that LLC's are not suited to public companies, nor are they very well suited to ventures where investors will come in and out on a frequent basis.
Another great option is to use various agreements -- rather than ownership -- to structure collaboration between a charity and a business. These agreements, including management service agreements, loans, rents, royalties, etc. provide a simple way to make sure that the charity is compensated for the use of its assets, so there is no undue enrichment to the owners of the business. property drafted, they can also keep the relationship between the two nice and neat and avoidd any nasty problems with IRS.
None of these options is perfect, and none are really designed as vehicles for social enterprise as we are coming to understand it. But they are the best we've got under current law.
In my view, what is really needed is an entirely new form of business entity that would allow a social purpose and a business purpose to co-exist peacefully. It wouldn't be a 501(c)(3), and it wouldn't be a regular tax-paying business. It would be tax-advantaged so long as the structure, compensation and profit participation operated within certain limits. It might have to issue some kind of social impact statement each year, along with its financial statements. Some have suggested that the price of ownership units should be set by the company itself, rather than by the market, to avoid the corrupting influence of Wall Street. Most agree that some kind of special tax designation would almost certainly be needed.
There is a growing movement to develop such an entity, and conversations have begun with several state legislatures and with the IRS. But these efforts are very young, and there is a lot of work to be done to determine what the key characteristics of such an entity should be, and how it could acheive legal recognition. After all, it took ten years after Wyoming passed the first LLC law in the country (in 1977) before any other state adopted one, and that only happenned after the IRS agreed to treat LLC's as partnerships for tax reasons. That was the last time a truly new form of business was created in the US.
Methinks we have a long road ahead.
Carrying on from previous message.
I couldn't agree with your post more. It took us nearly three years of trials and runs ... not to mention a tremendous amount of research.
We have a NFP fundation at the top which owns via a share structure 40% of all operational companies which are for profit. This has two benefits:
* maximising shareholder value the NGO benefits and because they are the major shareholder they have control.
* we have also introduced a policy of 10% of turnover as a CSI contribution monthly which is channeled via the NGO for endorsed social, environmetal and economic projects such as SMME development.
We then created under the FP a channel of operations which has three legs of ops ... i.e. commercial (which deals primeraly with the 1st world business, NGO and gov ... and charge market related)
a social franchise that manages all the NGO projects
and an environmental franchise
It is a simple structure within a very complex framework.
... and it is working.
We run a series of 9 workhops testing the idea prior to start of implementation. The response from all sectors was terrific ... we got a 95% buy-in of the model.
Regards
Laurinda
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 12, 2006 10:33 pm (# Total: 28) We are considering shifting ThePeopleChoose to an LLC partially or completely owned by the non profit that incubated it. But we have to consider the liability implications. Because TPC was incubated by a television network, there is an FCC license at stake...the license is worth millions of dollars, and so cannot be put a risk. Risks that can flow from a website that posts politically oriented user generated media - even a C3 that is non partisan, can include libel, slander, and copywrite violation, plus political interference at the FCC.
This is why we are exploring the LLC model. I wonder what abromber and laurinda think about this. Also, I want to complement Laurinda on the thorough tesitng....this is the way it should be done.
World Tourism Foundation
The World Tourism Foundation calls a Hybrid a "Marketplace-Driven Public-Private Partnership" (MD PPP). Structurally there are two interdependent organizations to connect the very different motivators each world holds.
The FP World Tourism Network could not exist without the branding and political access provided by the non-profit World Tourism Foundation. Likewise, the World Tourism Foundation could not exist without the business mentality of the FP World Tourism Network driving revenues. All revenues (the Top-Line) the FP generates are shared 50-50 with the NPO.
Hybrids/MD PPPs are win-win! Today's consumer WANTS to purchase products and services that have a "do-good" aspect. Governments and wealthy donors can no longer carry the load of social issues. The marketplace provides the only hope. NPO should actively seek alignments with FPs, and FPs with NPOs. It is definetly the "shape of things to come."
Our Chairman has projected "by 2025 any corporation that does not provide returns EQUALLY to shareholders and social issues,.... will fade from the marketplace!" She adds that "this includes some of today's largest and well known corporations."
Ed
Author, consultant, public speaker
Let's not lose sight of the unavoidable facts:
Patrick O'Heffernan - Nov 14, 2006 11:49 am (# Total: 28) Mal's book, (reviewed earlier on this site and in a podcast) lays out great information on this topic for both NPOs and FP's. Mal's firm is a good example of how a FP can incorporate social ends. The Greenfest, which was just held in San Francisco, had hundreds of such businesses and tens of thousands of people at their booths
shawtreatment - Dec 22, 2006 6:17 am (# Total: 28) Brad Arsenault, Cofounder
I'm the cofounder of http://www.shawtreatment.com , and thus far and after 2 years of research, we've decided to follow the Newman's Own 'recipe' of business. Which is to say, run it as a for-profit and give it all away. But I plan to look into the hybrid system in Canada. Does anyone have experience with hybrids in Canada?
Our organization, Executive Service Corps of the Charlotte Region (NC, USA), will be hosting a spring community forum on nonprofit advancement that will include a session on social entrepreneurism. We are looking for a speaker and would appreciate any recommendations.
Rosalyn Allison-Jacobs
Deputy Executive Director
Hello Everyone!
I am seeking some insight and advice. I am with a start up organization that will be a womens association/membership. Our organization consists of seven core programs that have the opportunity to involve earned income strategies. In addition, we would like to have a foundation which reaches a certain target market in addition to expanding our mission as well as a mix of social enterprises. Because we are a start up, does anyone have any advice on things I should look out for, do etc?
Thanks!
Mae
Hello Everyone!
Can you please provide me with some pros and cons of just sticking with the traditional 501c3 route but creating an earned-income enterprise? I am doing just that at the moment- and the income is related to our social purpose (healthcare) so I won't need to worry about unrelated income tax. I feel that going the nonprofit route makes us much less "threatening" to our target market, which is typically wary of for-profit business. Also, while we will run this venture as a self-sustaining and scalable enterprise, 501c3 status does allow for the possibility of government/private grants, should we decide to go after traditional donations. I would like to hear some thoughts from the group!
Advice for a Young "Hybrid" Non-Profit
Hello Everyone!
First, I would like to say that all comments and advice thus far have been insightful and useful to me. I began a non-profit organization called Indego Africa Project in November 2006 and we are in the process of applying for 501(c)(3) status.
For-Profit Component: Indego Africa plans to sell handicrafts designed and made by artisans who work with its partner organizations in Africa. Indego Africa partners will be existing community groups in African nations dedicated to teaching employable skills to their communities. Indego Africa handicrafts will be sold in their country of origin and in retail stores in the US (and eventually Europe). Initially Indego Africa will be acting as an importer and wholesaler, eventually moving into e-commerce retailing. A large portion of total revenue will be generated by sales. Artisans actually making the handicraft will be paid fairly and in accordance with fair trade principles.
Non-Profit Component: Indego Africa will be supporting economically disadvantaged artisans and encouraging them to start their own businesses (through payments for their handicrafts), donating all profits from fundraisings and sales of specific products back to the community organization that sponsors the artisan (which funds will be directed to specific charitable programmatic elements), and educating the public outside of Africa about African products and culture.
My question is whether this will present any major problems with the IRS. I expect that the flow of funds back to the partner organizations will be "substantially related" to the sale of products made by artisans in those same organizations. Will this be characterized as UBI? If this would present a problem, how can structure ourselves to take advantage of charitable deductions and the generally more positive image of non-profits? Although we are currently funded by donations from our founders, we would like to explore debt funding, at a minimum, and possibly equity financing in the future.
Thanks for any comments.
-Matt
Please visit us at www.indegoafrica.org
Start Up Hybrids
I am interested in knowing if a start up organization wants to have a hybrid structure at what point and what tools are needed to develop a hybrid from the start up phase?
Meaning do you make one business plan outlining the structure/models and smaller business plans for each entity/venture?
Any insight would be helpful!!
Thanks,
Mae
Hybrid Model
Greetings. My suggestion is go for a totally different model based on volitional trait. If your organization is built on the this trait, the kind of model you will design will be based on voluntary efforts combined with passion and environmental orientation.
Hybrid Model
Greetings. My suggestion is go for a totally different model based on volitional trait. If your organization is built on the this trait, the kind of model you will design will be based on voluntary efforts combined with passion and environmental orientation.
"Hybrid" is about FORM, not about results.
We must really abandon the form based language of for profits, non-profits, and hybrids. We should instead define ourselves in terms of the result we want to accomplish. As we all want the result of a better world, we are world betterers or simply betterers.
Form follows function, function follows intended result. It doesn't makes sense to define ourselves at a higher causal level. This only confines the options available to accomplish our intended result.
If we thought of ourselves as "World Betterers", then the specific intended results would dictate the functions necessary, which in turn would dictate the forms that would best support the functions.
Find a lawyer who understands both
After reviewing the criteria for a hybrid organization I have concluded that this structure will extend the mission, enhance the brand and provide those we serve with additional opportunities for success. We are convinced that this will extend Polder's mission to assist in the development of communities by enhancing education. Polder addresses urgent educational challenges facing communities today, by focusing upon learning in the classroom and using audiovisual technology in transitional environments. http://www.ompt.org/ The hybrid model can help reduce the pressure to raise money. We can generate profits selling consumer electronics gear. We don't want an expensive infrastructure and we don't want this model to undermine Polder.
We are working out the operational details. The FP will transfer resources to the Polder through cash payments. Initially our staff will divide their time in one office. We will have overlapping boards. We have not completed the by laws or the articles of incorporation.
We are in the midst of our due diligence. We are looking for a law firm in Northern California that understands both NPO law and the licensing and tax laws of for-profit enterprises.
Does anyone have a lead for us to follow on securing the right law firm?
Find a lawyer who understands both
After reviewing the criteria for a hybrid organization I have concluded that this structure will extend the mission, enhance the brand and provide those we serve with additional opportunities for success. We are convinced that this will extend Polder's mission to assist in the development of communities by enhancing education. Polder addresses urgent educational challenges facing communities today, by focusing upon learning in the classroom and using audiovisual technology in transitional environments. http://www.ompt.org/ The hybrid model can help reduce the pressure to raise money. We can generate profits selling consumer electronics gear. We don't want an expensive infrastructure and we don't want this model to undermine Polder.
We are working out the operational details. The FP will transfer resources to the Polder through cash payments. Initially our staff will divide their time in one office. We will have overlapping boards. We have not completed the by laws or the articles of incorporation.
We are in the midst of our due diligence. We are looking for a law firm in Northern California that understands both NPO law and the licensing and tax laws of for-profit enterprises.
Does anyone have a lead for us to follow on securing the right law firm?
New Hybrid social venture model
Last year I founded a rather unique "hybrd" social venture (Impact Makers) based in Richmond, Virginia. I think our model is fairly unique in that it is nonprofit structure based on the corporation's mission to maximize profits in order to maximize "community stakeholder value" rather than the traditional "shareholder value" - but the corporation competes in the free market.
Specifically, Impact Makers is a “competitive social venture” operating in the management consulting space, and I believe is truly unique in that it:
- Provides professional services (currently focused in healthcare) at market prices - Competes with other firms to win business - Pays market salaries to its professionals - Is a nonprofit structure with books open to the public - Contributes all profits to community organizations (and consulting time)
For a brief overview of our organization, you can visit our website at: http://www.impactmakers.org
Aside from local print press, we are also being covered on CNN Headline News in the local Richmond market – you can see the 5-minute video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dWEckHnxW4
The model is unique in that we are based on the following premise: 1) we partner with a separate, 501c3 charitable organization chosen by our volunteer board (secular, apolitical, and "helping people help themselves"). Our first partner organization is a domestic violence program and shelter called Safe Harbor.
2) We provide our partner(s) with strategic / process improvement support and also up to 30% of their budget as unrestricted funds that we closely monitor - so that they can focus their management / board attention on their "core competency" and on higher quality & lower cost service delivery, and less on fundraising.
3) At the same time, we raise funds not through traditional fundraising, but through free-market competition in the for-profit IT / management consulting space.
In our first full year of operations as of Oct 1, we were able to generate over $500k of revenue and provide our partner with $40k of donations and over 200 hours of consulting servcies and support, making us their largest corporate donor and one of the largest in the Richmond area to any single nonprofit.
Has anyone out there seen a similar model, and any thoughts / advice on such a "hybrid" structure?
I look forward to any and all feedback. - Michael


What MBAs Without Borders is doing with the 'hybrid' model
We are currently experimenting with a hybrid model, well not officially...
Within our organization, all partners we send volunteers to, no matter how big or small, they are required to pay a portion of our costs of bringing our MBA volunteers to their work. If it's a large partner, it's usually not a problem and even if it's a small MFI in Kenya, by asking them to contribute even 10% of our 4 months costs ($15,000), it gets them asking...'wait a minute...if I'm paying, what's the value of this person to me.' That's the exact question we want our partners asking. We then raise remaining funds to make the project happen.
While this limits some of the partners we can work with, the demand has grown tremendously since our start and we couldn't be happier that we've stayed firm on this model.
By asking for some of our partners to pay our full costs, it's a similar set up to a consulting firm, but much cheaper. We leverage the income received from our bigger partners to help us pay for our partners that cannot afford the full cost of our volunteers. This also helps when we are short on raising funds for a particular project.
Some other initiatives we have taken which might work for some and might be too commercial for others are the following:
We're also now working on an online consulting tool where MBAs can connect with entrepreneurs in developing countries. The platform will be ready in a few months if all goes well and the key here will be to provide a repository of information. Down the road we will look to license out the platform (for a small fee) to other orgs and will either do cost per click ads or static advertising.
To wrap up..in the end though we are not set up as a for profit in anyway legally, we do have many aspects that resemble it. We've decided to keep all our work under our NPO. I agree, that should we start bringing ooddles and oodles of income, we will have to look at other options because as mentioned earlier by another person, you can use your FP earned money whenever you want and aren't restricted like a NPO.
All this initiaves have helped us support our mission further of sending more MBA volunteers to business and not for profits in developing countries.
I hope some of this has been helpful and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask.